| Literature DB >> 35552543 |
Yumna Sadef1, Tayyaba Javed1, Rimsha Javed2, Adeel Mahmood2, Mona S Alwahibi3, Mohamed S Elshikh3, Mohamed Ragab AbdelGawwa4, Jawaher Haji Alhaji5, Rabab Ahmed Rasheed6.
Abstract
The present study assessed nutritional status, antioxidant activity, and total phenolic content in fruits, i.e., mango (Mangifera indica), apple (Malus domestica), and vegetable, i.e., bottle gourd (Lagenaria siceraria), and ridge gourd (Luffa acutangula) peels. The antioxidant activity and total phenolic content (TPC) were evaluated by using methanol extracts along with 2, 2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), Folin-Ciocalteu (FC) assay, respectively having Butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT) and Gallic acid (GA) as standard. The TPC and antioxidant activity in the peels ranged from 20 mg GAE/g to 525 mg GAE/g and 15.02% to 75.95%, respectively, which revealed that investigated fruit and vegetable peels are rich source of phytochemical constituents. Bottle gourd peels exhibited the highest value of DPPH compared to the rest of the peels included in the study. Likewise, mango peels had the highest TPC as compared to the rest of the fruit peels. This research showed that the utilization of agricultural wastes should be promoted at commercial level to achieve the nutritional benefit at zero cost and minimize the generation of biological waste.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35552543 PMCID: PMC9098067 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265566
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Nutritional composition (± standard deviation) of fruit and vegetable peels.
| Sample | Moisture | Ash | Lipids | Fiber | Protein | Carbohydrates | Energy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| of total (%) | of dry matter (%) | kcal/100g | |||||
| Mango | 8.8 ± 0.51 | 3.5 ± 0.22 | 0.34 ± 0.05 | 4.5 ± 0.22 | 4.30 ± 0.05 | 78.5 ± 0.24 | 335 ± 1.2 |
| Apple | 11.9 ± 0.92 | 2.6 ± 0.52 | 0.18 ± 0.04 | 7.6 ± 0.06 | 1.24 ± 0.05 | 76.5 ± 1.4 | 313 |
| Bottle gourd | 9.9 ± 0.24 | 8.5 ± 0.27 | 0.15 ± 0.03 | 15.6 ± 0.20 | 12.2 ± 0.12 | 53.7 ± 0.85 | 264 ± 2.5 |
| Ridge gourd | 11.2 ± 0.31 | 7.3 ± 0.13 | 0.19 ± 0.02 | 17.6 ± 0.25 | 16.5 ± 0.18 | 47.3 ± 0.77 | 256 ± 2.1 |
Values are means ± standard deviations of three replicate measurements.
Fig 1Percent inhibition of different fruit and vegetable peels.
Fig 2Total phenolic content in fruit and vegetable peel extracts.