Ahmed Lotf Algahefi1,2, Maged S Alhammadi3,4, Bowen Zheng1, Abeer A Almashraqi5, Yang Zhao1, Yi Liu6. 1. School and Hospital of Stomatology, China Medical University, Liaoning Provincial Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, Shenyang, China. 2. Faculty of Dentistry, Ibb University, Ibb, Republic of Yemen. 3. Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Department of Preventive Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia. 4. Postgraduate Orthodontic Program, Department of Orthodontics, Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Sana'a University, Sana'a, Republic of Yemen. 5. Department of Pre-Clinical Oral Health Sciences, College of Dental Medicine, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha, Qatar. 6. School and Hospital of Stomatology, China Medical University, Liaoning Provincial Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, Shenyang, China. liuyi@cmu.edu.cn.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the morphological and dimensional variations of the frontal air sinuses in a group of adolescent Caucasians and Chinese with different skeletal malocclusions in both genders. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 290 adolescent Caucasians and Chinese patients with 145 each. Each sample included 90 females and 55 males and was categorized based on ANB angle in reference to each population norms into 65 skeletal class I, 50 skeletal class II, and 30 skeletal class III malocclusions. All linear, angular, and surface area measurements of the frontal air sinuses were evaluated using lateral cephalometric radiographs and calculated using Winceph version 8 software. The frontal air sinus parameters were compared between genders and the two ethnic groups using an independent sample t-test. ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc tests were used to compare the frontal air sinus parameters between the three skeletal malocclusions. RESULT: The frontal air sinus width and surface area were found to be significantly greater in Caucasians when compared with Chinese patients. According to gender, the frontal air sinus length, width, and surface area, as well as the glabella convexity, were greater in males than females, while the frontal air sinus index (length/width) was significantly greater in females than males in both ethnic groups. In both ethnic groups, the frontal air sinus surface area was significantly greater in skeletal class III malocclusion when compared to skeletal class I and class II malocclusions in Caucasians (P = 0.0022) and Chinese (P = 0.0097). There was a weak-to-moderate correlation between the frontal air sinus parameters and the nasio, sella, and glabella positions (R = -0.56 to 0.62). CONCLUSION: The frontal air sinus dimensions and surface area varied greatly in between ethnic groups, genders, and malocclusion types. The frontal air sinus parameters were correlated with nasion, sella, and glabella positions. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These findings could assist orthodontists, ENT specialist, and forensic medical investigators to focus on the size of frontal sinus during treatment planning, the relationship between the size of frontal air sinus and malocclusions, and age determination.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the morphological and dimensional variations of the frontal air sinuses in a group of adolescent Caucasians and Chinese with different skeletal malocclusions in both genders. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 290 adolescent Caucasians and Chinese patients with 145 each. Each sample included 90 females and 55 males and was categorized based on ANB angle in reference to each population norms into 65 skeletal class I, 50 skeletal class II, and 30 skeletal class III malocclusions. All linear, angular, and surface area measurements of the frontal air sinuses were evaluated using lateral cephalometric radiographs and calculated using Winceph version 8 software. The frontal air sinus parameters were compared between genders and the two ethnic groups using an independent sample t-test. ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc tests were used to compare the frontal air sinus parameters between the three skeletal malocclusions. RESULT: The frontal air sinus width and surface area were found to be significantly greater in Caucasians when compared with Chinese patients. According to gender, the frontal air sinus length, width, and surface area, as well as the glabella convexity, were greater in males than females, while the frontal air sinus index (length/width) was significantly greater in females than males in both ethnic groups. In both ethnic groups, the frontal air sinus surface area was significantly greater in skeletal class III malocclusion when compared to skeletal class I and class II malocclusions in Caucasians (P = 0.0022) and Chinese (P = 0.0097). There was a weak-to-moderate correlation between the frontal air sinus parameters and the nasio, sella, and glabella positions (R = -0.56 to 0.62). CONCLUSION: The frontal air sinus dimensions and surface area varied greatly in between ethnic groups, genders, and malocclusion types. The frontal air sinus parameters were correlated with nasion, sella, and glabella positions. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These findings could assist orthodontists, ENT specialist, and forensic medical investigators to focus on the size of frontal sinus during treatment planning, the relationship between the size of frontal air sinus and malocclusions, and age determination.