| Literature DB >> 35552495 |
Adib Tavakoli1, Jeremie Maire1, Boris Brisuda1, Thierry Crozes1, Jean-François Motte1, Laurent Saminadayar1, Eddy Collin1, Olivier Bourgeois2.
Abstract
Practical applications of heat transport control with artificial metamaterials will heavily depend on the realization of thermal diodes/rectifiers, in which thermal conductivity depends on the heat flux direction. Whereas various macroscale implementations have been made experimentally, nanoscales realizations remain challenging and efficient rectification still requires a better fundamental understanding of heat carriers' transport and nonlinear mechanisms. Here, we propose an experimental realization of a thermal rectifier based on two leads with asymmetric mass gradients separated by a ballistic spacer, as proposed in a recent numerical investigation, and measure its thermal properties electrically with the microbridge technique. We use a Si[Formula: see text]N[Formula: see text] nanobeam on which an asymmetric mass gradient has been engineered and demonstrate that in its current form, this structure does not allow for thermal rectification. We explain this by a combination of too weak asymmetry and non-linearities. Our experimental observations provide important information towards fabricating rigorous thermal rectifiers in the ballistic phonon transport regime, which are expected to open new possibilities for applications in thermal management and quantum thermal devices.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35552495 PMCID: PMC9098508 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-11878-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Principle of the asymmetric mass gradient thermal rectifier. (Color online) Schematic principle of the thermal rectifier as suggested by Chen et al. [41]. It can be modeled by a chain comprising of different masses, linked to two diffusive reservoirs R and R. Higher heat flux is expected from the heavy (high mass M) to the light side (low mass M) compared to the reverse direction. The relative masses as a function of position are schematically shown for both the numerical proposal (blue) and our experimental implementation (red). The two curves are offset for clarity.
Dimensions and masses of deposited material (Pt/C) on each side of the ballistic channel.
| Surface (nm | 270 | 350 | 400 | 385 | 550 | 680 |
| Mass (pg) | 0.07 | 0.10 | 0.15 | 0.14 | 0.27 | 0.40 |
The deposited thickness is estimated to be t = 70 ± 30 nm.
Figure 2Asymmetric mass gradient nanobeam. (a) Schematic plot of the numerical model, in which the two diffusive reservoirs (R1 and R2 ) are linked by the ballistic spacer. (b) SEM image of the nanobeam loaded with asymmetric masses. (c) False color SEM micrograph of the two suspended membrane-based nanocalorimeters, with the loaded nanobeam from (b) between them. The NbN thermometers are represented in green. (d) Schematic of the measurement system: the thermometers are shown in green whereas the heaters are shown in red. Heat flow is depicted by black arrows.
Figure 3Thermal conductance of the non-loaded nanobeam. Measured thermal conductance of a non-loaded nanobeam linking the membrane-based calorimeters. The measurements are performed alternatively when the left (right) membrane is used as a heater and the other as a sensor. (Upper inset) SEM micrograph of the nanobeams. The dot and arrow of a given color correspond to the heated side and heat flux direction, respectively.
Figure 4Thermal conductance of nanobeam with asymmetric mass gradient. (a) Thermal conductance of the loaded nanobeam with heat flowing in either direction. (upper inset) SEM micrograph of the nanobeam loaded with asymmetric mass gradients on each side. The dot and arrow of a given color correspond to the heated side and heat flux direction, respectively. (b) Reported thermal conductance for both heat flux directions in the non-loaded and loaded cases. (inset) SEM micrographs showing the heated side and heat flux direction.