Erin Gallagher1, Elizabeth Alvarez2, Lin Jin3, Dale Guenter4, Lydia Hatcher5, Andrea Furlan6. 1. Assistant Professor in the Department of Family Medicine at McMaster University in Hamilton, Ont. erin.gallagher@medportal.ca. 2. Assistant Professor in the Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact at McMaster University. 3. Master of public health candidate at McMaster University. 4. Associate Professor in the Department of Family Medicine and the Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact at McMaster University. 5. Associate Clinical Professor in the Department of Family Medicine at McMaster University. 6. Associate Professor in the Department of Medicine at the University of Toronto in Ontario.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To describe how and why patient contracts are used for the management of chronic medical conditions. DATA SOURCES: A scoping review was conducted in the following databases: MEDLINE, Embase, AMED, PsycInfo, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and Nursing & Allied Health. Literature from 1997 to 2017 was included. STUDY SELECTION: Articles were included if they were written in English and described the implementation of a patient contract by a health care provider for the management of a chronic condition. Articles had to present an outcome as a result of using the contract or an intervention that included the contract. SYNTHESIS: Of the 7528 articles found in the original search, 76 met the inclusion criteria for the final review. Multiple study types were included. Extensive variety in contract elements, target populations, clinical settings, and cointerventions was found. Purposes for initiating contracts included behaviour change and skill development, including goal development and problem solving; altering beliefs and knowledge, including motivation and perceived self-efficacy; improving interpersonal relationships and role clarification; improving quality and process of chronic care; and altering objective and subjective health indices. How contracts were developed, implemented, and assessed was inconsistently described. CONCLUSION: More research is required to determine whether the use of contracts is accomplishing their intended purposes. Questions remain regarding their rationale, development, and implementation.
OBJECTIVE: To describe how and why patient contracts are used for the management of chronic medical conditions. DATA SOURCES: A scoping review was conducted in the following databases: MEDLINE, Embase, AMED, PsycInfo, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and Nursing & Allied Health. Literature from 1997 to 2017 was included. STUDY SELECTION: Articles were included if they were written in English and described the implementation of a patient contract by a health care provider for the management of a chronic condition. Articles had to present an outcome as a result of using the contract or an intervention that included the contract. SYNTHESIS: Of the 7528 articles found in the original search, 76 met the inclusion criteria for the final review. Multiple study types were included. Extensive variety in contract elements, target populations, clinical settings, and cointerventions was found. Purposes for initiating contracts included behaviour change and skill development, including goal development and problem solving; altering beliefs and knowledge, including motivation and perceived self-efficacy; improving interpersonal relationships and role clarification; improving quality and process of chronic care; and altering objective and subjective health indices. How contracts were developed, implemented, and assessed was inconsistently described. CONCLUSION: More research is required to determine whether the use of contracts is accomplishing their intended purposes. Questions remain regarding their rationale, development, and implementation.
Authors: N A Piotrowski; D J Tusel; K L Sees; P M Reilly; P Banys; P Meek; S M Hall Journal: Exp Clin Psychopharmacol Date: 1999-11 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Craig J Bryan; Jim Mintz; Tracy A Clemans; Bruce Leeson; T Scott Burch; Sean R Williams; Emily Maney; M David Rudd Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2017-01-23 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Niklaus D Labhardt; Jean-Richard Balo; Mama Ndam; Engelbert Manga; Beat Stoll Journal: Trop Med Int Health Date: 2011-07-06 Impact factor: 2.622
Authors: Janey C Peterson; Mary E Charlson; Zachary Hoffman; Martin T Wells; Shing-Chiu Wong; James P Hollenberg; Jared B Jobe; Kathryn A Boschert; Alice M Isen; John P Allegrante Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2012-01-23