Literature DB >> 35551657

Engaging Pattern Recognition Receptors in Solid Tumors to Generate Systemic Antitumor Immunity.

Michael Brown1.   

Abstract

Malignant tumors frequently exploit innate immunity to evade immune surveillance. The priming, function, and polarization of antitumor immunity fundamentally depends upon context provided by the innate immune system, particularly antigen presenting cells. Such context is determined in large part by sensing of pathogen specific and damage associated features by pathogen recognition receptors (PRRs). PRR activation induces the delivery of T cell priming cues (e.g. chemokines, co-stimulatory ligands, and cytokines) from antigen presenting cells, playing a decisive role in the cancer immunity cycle. Indeed, endogenous PRR activation within the tumor microenvironment (TME) has been shown to generate spontaneous antitumor T cell immunity, e.g., cGAS-STING mediated activation of antigen presenting cells after release of DNA from dying tumor cells. Thus, instigating intratumor PRR activation, particularly with the goal of generating Th1-promoting inflammation that stokes endogenous priming of antitumor CD8+ T cells, is a growing area of clinical investigation. This approach is analogous to in situ vaccination, ultimately providing a personalized antitumor response against relevant tumor associated antigens. Here I discuss clinical stage intratumor modalities that function via activation of PRRs. These approaches are being tested in various solid tumor contexts including melanoma, colorectal cancer, glioblastoma, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, bladder cancer, and pancreatic cancer. Their mechanism (s) of action relative to other immunotherapy approaches (e.g., antigen-defined cancer vaccines, CAR T cells, dendritic cell vaccines, and immune checkpoint blockade), as well as their potential to complement these approaches are also discussed. Examples to be reviewed include TLR agonists, STING agonists, RIG-I agonists, and attenuated or engineered viruses and bacterium. I also review common key requirements for effective in situ immune activation, discuss differences between various strategies inclusive of mechanisms that may ultimately limit or preclude antitumor efficacy, and provide a summary of relevant clinical data.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.

Entities:  

Keywords:  In situ vaccination; Innate immunotherapy; Intratumoral therapy; Oncolytic virus; Pattern recognition receptor; TLR agonist; Type-I IFN

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35551657     DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-96376-7_3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Treat Res        ISSN: 0927-3042


  240 in total

1.  Migratory dendritic cells transfer antigen to a lymph node-resident dendritic cell population for efficient CTL priming.

Authors:  Rhys S Allan; Jason Waithman; Sammy Bedoui; Claerwen M Jones; Jose A Villadangos; Yifan Zhan; Andrew M Lew; Ken Shortman; William R Heath; Francis R Carbone
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 31.745

2.  Spatiotemporal dynamics of innate immune signaling via RIG-I-like receptors.

Authors:  Katharina Esser-Nobis; Lauren D Hatfield; Michael Gale
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  CD8+ T cell priming by dendritic cell vaccines requires antigen transfer to endogenous antigen presenting cells.

Authors:  Alice W Yewdall; Scott B Drutman; Felecia Jinwala; Keith S Bahjat; Nina Bhardwaj
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Tumour heterogeneity and resistance to cancer therapies.

Authors:  Ibiayi Dagogo-Jack; Alice T Shaw
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 5.  Signaling to NF-kappaB by Toll-like receptors.

Authors:  Taro Kawai; Shizuo Akira
Journal:  Trends Mol Med       Date:  2007-10-29       Impact factor: 11.951

6.  IKKepsilon and TBK1 are essential components of the IRF3 signaling pathway.

Authors:  Katherine A Fitzgerald; Sarah M McWhirter; Kerrie L Faia; Daniel C Rowe; Eicke Latz; Douglas T Golenbock; Anthony J Coyle; Sha-Mei Liao; Tom Maniatis
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 25.606

Review 7.  Oncology meets immunology: the cancer-immunity cycle.

Authors:  Daniel S Chen; Ira Mellman
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 31.745

Review 8.  The three Es of cancer immunoediting.

Authors:  Gavin P Dunn; Lloyd J Old; Robert D Schreiber
Journal:  Annu Rev Immunol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 28.527

Review 9.  CD169+ Macrophages Capture and Dendritic Cells Instruct: The Interplay of the Gatekeeper and the General of the Immune System.

Authors:  Joanna Grabowska; Miguel A Lopez-Venegas; Alsya J Affandi; Joke M M den Haan
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2018-10-26       Impact factor: 7.561

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.