| Literature DB >> 35551612 |
Taewoong Son1,2, Youn-Joo Cho1,2, Hyunseung Lee1, Mi Young Cho1,3, Byeongwoo Goh1, Hyun Min Kim1, Phan Thi Ngoc Hoa1,2, Sun-Hee Cho1, Young-Jun Park4, Hye Sun Park5, Kwan Soo Hong6,7.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There has been growing concern regarding the impact of air pollution, especially fine dust, on human health. However, it is difficult to estimate the toxicity of fine dust on the human body because of its diverse effects depending on the composition and environmental factors.Entities:
Keywords: Air pollution; Biodistribution; In vivo image-tracking; Particulate matter; Silica particle
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35551612 PMCID: PMC9097390 DOI: 10.1186/s12951-022-01419-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Nanobiotechnology ISSN: 1477-3155 Impact factor: 9.429
Fig. 1Synthesis and characterization of CSPM. a Schematic illustration of the synthesis of CSPMs with different particle sizes and their in vivo biodistribution imaging studies. b A representative FE-SEM image (scale bar = 100 nm) and HR-TEM image (the inset, scale bar = 200 nm) of the synthesized CSPM0.1. c Size distribution analysis of the synthesized CSPM0.1. d Surface zeta potentials of silica particulate matter (SPM) without dye-doping and CSPM0.1. e Fluorescence spectra (excitation and emission scan modes) of CSPM0.1. f Fluorescence intensity profiles of CSPM0.1, Cy7-APTES, and Cy7 with time. g In vitro dye release profiles of CSPM0.1. Fluorescence intensity linearity in h in vitro and i in vivo environments for CSPM0.1. CSPM0.1 was subcutaneously injected into the mouse abdomen at different concentrations
Fig. 2In vivo fluorescence imaging and biodistribution study of CSPM0.1. a Representative real-time in vivo fluorescence images of CSPM0.1 injected intratracheally into the mice. b Ex vivo fluorescence images of the major organs from the injected mice. c SNR obtained from the fluorescence intensities of the major organs at different time-points. d Fluorescence microscopy images of the dissected lung tissues. Red and blue colors indicate CSPMs and DAPI staining, respectively. The data shown are averages of > 3 independent experiments (scale bar = 100 µm)
Fig. 3In vivo fluorescence imaging and biodistribution study of CSPM2.0. a Representative real-time in vivo fluorescence images of CSPM2.0 injected intratracheally into the mice. b Ex vivo fluorescence images of the major organs from the injected mice. c SNR obtained from the fluorescence intensities of the major organs at different time-points. d Fluorescence microscopy images of the dissected lung tissues. Red and blue colors indicate CSPMs and DAPI staining, respectively. The data shown are averages of > 3 independent experiments (scale bar = 100 µm)
Fig. 4Flow cytometric and microscopic analysis of single-cells obtained from the excised lungs. a Gating strategy to identify epithelial and endothelial cells and leukocytes. b Qualitative analysis of cellular uptake of CSPM0.1 in lung cells. Populations of CSPM0.1-labeled c stromal cells (CD45−) and leukocytes (CD45+) and d epithelial (CD45−CD326+) and endothelial cells (CD45−CD31+). e Qualitative analysis of cellular uptake of CSPM2.0 in lung cells. Populations of CSPM2.0 labeled f stromal cells (CD45−) and leukocytes (CD45+) and g epithelial (CD45−CD326+) and endothelial cells (CD45−CD31+). h Cellular microscopy images of CSPM-labeled cells. Red, green, and blue colors represent CSPMs, CD45 antibodies, and DAPI staining, respectively (scale bar = 10 µm)