Timo Stausberg1, Tobias Ahnert2, Ben Thouet2, Rolf Lefering3, Andreas Böhmer4, Thomas Brockamp2, Arasch Wafaisade2, Matthias Fröhlich2,3. 1. Department of Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, Cologne-Merheim Medical Centre (CMMC), University of Witten/Herdecke, Ostmerheimerstr.200, 51109, Cologne, Germany. stausbergt@kliniken-koeln.de. 2. Department of Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, Cologne-Merheim Medical Centre (CMMC), University of Witten/Herdecke, Ostmerheimerstr.200, 51109, Cologne, Germany. 3. Institute for Research in Operative Medicine (IFOM), University of Witten/Herdecke, Cologne, Germany. 4. Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Cologne-Merheim Medical Centre (CMMC), University of Witten/Herdecke, Cologne, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The indication for pre-hospital endotracheal intubation (ETI) must be well considered as it is associated with several risks and complications. The current guidelines recommend, among other things, ETI in case of shock (systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg). This study aims to investigate whether isolated hypotension without loss of consciousness is a useful criterion for ETI. METHODS: The data of 37,369 patients taken from the TraumaRegister DGU® were evaluated in a retrospective study with regard to pre-hospital ETI and the underlying indications. Inclusion criteria were the presence of any relevant injuries (Abbreviated Injury Scale [AIS] ≥ 3) and complete pre-hospital management information. RESULTS: In our cohort, 29.6% of the patients were intubated. The rate of pre-hospital ETI increased with the number of indications. If only one criterion according to current guidelines was present, ETI was often omitted. In 582 patients with shock as the only indication for pre-hospital ETI, only 114 patients (19.6%) were intubated. Comparing these subgroups, the intervention was associated with longer time on scene (25.3 min vs. 41.6 min; p < 0.001), higher rate of coagulopathy (31.8% vs. 17.2%), an increased mortality (8.2% vs. 11.5%) and higher standard mortality ratio (1.17 vs. 1.35). If another intubation criterion was present in addition to shock, intubation was performed more frequently. CONCLUSION: Decision making for pre-hospital intubation in trauma patients is challenging in front of a variety of factors. Despite the presence of a guideline recommendation, ETI is not always executed. Patients presenting with shock as remaining indication and subsequent intubation showed a decreased outcome. Thus, isolated shock does not appear to be an appropriate indication for pre-hospital ETI, but clearly remains an important surrogate of trauma severity and the need for trauma team activation.
PURPOSE: The indication for pre-hospital endotracheal intubation (ETI) must be well considered as it is associated with several risks and complications. The current guidelines recommend, among other things, ETI in case of shock (systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg). This study aims to investigate whether isolated hypotension without loss of consciousness is a useful criterion for ETI. METHODS: The data of 37,369 patients taken from the TraumaRegister DGU® were evaluated in a retrospective study with regard to pre-hospital ETI and the underlying indications. Inclusion criteria were the presence of any relevant injuries (Abbreviated Injury Scale [AIS] ≥ 3) and complete pre-hospital management information. RESULTS: In our cohort, 29.6% of the patients were intubated. The rate of pre-hospital ETI increased with the number of indications. If only one criterion according to current guidelines was present, ETI was often omitted. In 582 patients with shock as the only indication for pre-hospital ETI, only 114 patients (19.6%) were intubated. Comparing these subgroups, the intervention was associated with longer time on scene (25.3 min vs. 41.6 min; p < 0.001), higher rate of coagulopathy (31.8% vs. 17.2%), an increased mortality (8.2% vs. 11.5%) and higher standard mortality ratio (1.17 vs. 1.35). If another intubation criterion was present in addition to shock, intubation was performed more frequently. CONCLUSION: Decision making for pre-hospital intubation in trauma patients is challenging in front of a variety of factors. Despite the presence of a guideline recommendation, ETI is not always executed. Patients presenting with shock as remaining indication and subsequent intubation showed a decreased outcome. Thus, isolated shock does not appear to be an appropriate indication for pre-hospital ETI, but clearly remains an important surrogate of trauma severity and the need for trauma team activation.
Authors: Avishai M Tsur; Roy Nadler; Ari M Lipsky; Diana Levi; Tarif Bader; Avi Benov; Elon Glassberg; Jacob Chen Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2020-08 Impact factor: 3.313
Authors: M Rehn; P K Hyldmo; V Magnusson; J Kurola; P Kongstad; L Rognås; L K Juvet; M Sandberg Journal: Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Date: 2016-10-06 Impact factor: 2.105
Authors: Julie Mayglothling; Therese M Duane; Michael Gibbs; Maureen McCunn; Eric Legome; Alexander L Eastman; James Whelan; Kaushal H Shah Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2012-11 Impact factor: 3.313
Authors: Bjoern Hussmann; Rolf Lefering; Christian Waydhas; Steffen Ruchholtz; Arasch Wafaisade; Max Daniel Kauther; Sven Lendemans Journal: Crit Care Date: 2011-09-13 Impact factor: 9.097