Literature DB >> 3555029

Oral ciprofloxacin in the treatment of serious soft tissue and bone infections. Efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics.

D E Nix, T J Cumbo, P Kuritzky, J M DeVito, J J Schentag.   

Abstract

Forty-eight patients were enrolled in a clinical study of oral ciprofloxacin for the treatment of soft tissue or bone infections. Patients received 500 to 750 mg of ciprofloxacin every 12 hours. In the predominantly older population studied, there were 13 patients with osteomyelitis, 24 diabetic patients with soft tissue infection and probable osteomyelitis, and 11 patients with other soft tissue infections. Infecting pathogens included Pseudomonas aeruginosa in 25 patients, Serratia species in nine patients, Staphylococcus aureus in 13 patients, and other aerobic gram-negative rods in 21 patients. Clinical response (defined as resolution or improvement) was noted in 84 percent of patients with non-diabetic osteomyelitis, in 79 percent of patients with diabetic infections, and in 91 percent of patients with soft tissue infections. Microbiologic outcome was very favorable in 75 percent of cases, and Pseudomonas responded as well as any other pathogen. Pharmacokinetic properties of ciprofloxacin were evaluated in 12 patients, and the data were analyzed using both compartmental and non-compartmental analyses. Mean values for compartmental rate constants (hours-1) were as follows: absorption rate constant = 1.15; intercompartmental rate constants, k12 = 0.48, and k21 = 0.58; elimination rate constant = 0.46; distribution rate constant = 1.31; and terminal elimination rate constant = 0.19. The apparent volume of distribution at steady state/bioavailability was 196 liters and total body clearance/bioavailability was 45.9 liters/hour. The mean time to peak concentration was 1.3 hours. The mean peak concentration as determined by compartmental fitting (2.4 micrograms/ml) underestimated the observed peak (3.2 micrograms/ml) by 24.8 percent. Clearance of ciprofloxacin was similar regardless of the method used to fit the data, whereas the volume of distribution was significantly different when the two analysis techniques were compared. Ciprofloxacin was well tolerated, with the most frequent adverse reactions being rash, gastrointestinal intolerance, and increased levels of liver enzymes, each of which occurred in five patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3555029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med        ISSN: 0002-9343            Impact factor:   4.965


  12 in total

1.  Prognostic value of the clinical examination of the diabetic foot ulcer.

Authors:  D Edelman; D M Hough; K N Glazebrook; E Z Oddone
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Physiologically Based Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling Approach for Ciprofloxacin in Bone of Patients Undergoing Orthopedic Surgery.

Authors:  Cornelia B Landersdorfer; Martina Kinzig; Rainer Höhl; Peter Kempf; Roger L Nation; Fritz Sörgel
Journal:  ACS Pharmacol Transl Sci       Date:  2020-05-25

Review 3.  Use of quinolones in osteomyelitis and infected orthopaedic prosthesis.

Authors:  D P Lew; F A Waldvogel
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 4.  Systemic antibiotic therapy for chronic osteomyelitis in adults.

Authors:  Brad Spellberg; Benjamin A Lipsky
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 5.  Ciprofloxacin. A review of its pharmacological profile and therapeutic use in the elderly.

Authors:  L R Wiseman; J A Balfour
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 3.923

6.  Primarily non-surgical management of osteomyelitis of the foot in diabetes.

Authors:  F L Game; W J Jeffcoate
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2008-04-03       Impact factor: 10.122

7.  Treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa-infected orthopedic prostheses with ceftazidime-ciprofloxacin antibiotic combination.

Authors:  P Brouqui; M C Rousseau; A Stein; M Drancourt; D Raoult
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 8.  Bacterial resistance to fluoroquinolones: lessons to be learned.

Authors:  P Ball
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.553

Review 9.  Quinolones and osteomyelitis: state-of-the-art.

Authors:  D P Lew; F A Waldvogel
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 9.546

10.  Penetration of moxifloxacin into bone evaluated by Monte Carlo simulation.

Authors:  Cornelia B Landersdorfer; Martina Kinzig; Friedrich F Hennig; Jürgen B Bulitta; Ulrike Holzgrabe; George L Drusano; Fritz Sörgel; Johannes Gusinde
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.