Literature DB >> 35549977

Characterizing the relationship between peak assistance torque and metabolic cost reduction during running with ankle exoskeletons.

Delaney E Miller1, Guan Rong Tan2, Emily M Farina3, Alison L Sheets-Singer3, Steven H Collins2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reducing the energy cost of running with exoskeletons could improve enjoyment, reduce fatigue, and encourage participation among novice and ageing runners. Previously, tethered ankle exoskeleton emulators with offboard motors were used to greatly reduce the energy cost of running with powered ankle plantarflexion assistance. Through a process known as "human-in-the-loop optimization", the timing and magnitude of assistance torque was optimized to maximally reduce metabolic cost. However, to achieve the maximum net benefit in energy cost outside of the laboratory environment, it is also necessary to consider the tradeoff between the magnitude of device assistance and the metabolic penalty of carrying a heavier, more powerful exoskeleton.
METHODS: In this study, tethered ankle exoskeleton emulators were used to characterize the effect of peak assistance torque on metabolic cost during running. Three recreational runners participated in human-in-the-loop optimization at four fixed peak assistance torque levels to obtain their energetically optimal assistance timing parameters at each level.
RESULTS: We found that the relationship between metabolic rate and peak assistance torque was nearly linear but with diminishing returns at higher torque magnitudes, which is well-approximated by an asymptotic exponential function. At the highest assistance torque magnitude of 0.8 Nm/kg, participants' net metabolic rate was 24.8 ± 2.3% (p = 4e-6) lower than running in the unpowered devices. Optimized timing of peak assistance torque was as late as allowed during stance (80% of stance) and optimized timing of torque removal was at toe-off (100% of stance); similar assistance timing was preferred across participants and torque magnitudes.
CONCLUSIONS: These results allow exoskeleton designers to predict the energy cost savings for candidate devices with different assistance torque capabilities, thus informing the design of portable ankle exoskeletons that maximize net metabolic benefit.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Augmentation; Exoskeleton; Human-in-the-loop optimization; Metabolic cost; Running

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35549977      PMCID: PMC9096774          DOI: 10.1186/s12984-022-01023-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil        ISSN: 1743-0003            Impact factor:   5.208


  24 in total

1.  Perceived benefits and barriers to physical activity in a nationally representative sample in the European Union.

Authors:  H J Zunft; D Friebe; B Seppelt; K Widhalm; A M Remaut de Winter; M D Vaz de Almeida; J M Kearney; M Gibney
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.022

2.  Metabolic cost, mechanical work, and efficiency during walking in young and older men.

Authors:  O S Mian; J M Thom; L P Ardigò; M V Narici; A E Minetti
Journal:  Acta Physiol (Oxf)       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 6.311

3.  The biomechanics of running and running styles: a synthesis.

Authors:  Ben T van Oeveren; Cornelis J de Ruiter; Peter J Beek; Jaap H van Dieën
Journal:  Sports Biomech       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 2.832

4.  Muscle-tendon mechanics explain unexpected effects of exoskeleton assistance on metabolic rate during walking.

Authors:  Rachel W Jackson; Christopher L Dembia; Scott L Delp; Steven H Collins
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 3.312

5.  Estimating instantaneous energetic cost during non-steady-state gait.

Authors:  Jessica C Selinger; J Maxwell Donelan
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2014-09-25

Review 6.  Physical activity and mental health: current concepts.

Authors:  S A Paluska; T L Schwenk
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 11.136

7.  Running versus weight lifting in the treatment of depression.

Authors:  E J Doyne; D J Ossip-Klein; E D Bowman; K M Osborn; I B McDougall-Wilson; R A Neimeyer
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1987-10

8.  Assistance magnitude versus metabolic cost reductions for a tethered multiarticular soft exosuit.

Authors:  B T Quinlivan; S Lee; P Malcolm; D M Rossi; M Grimmer; C Siviy; N Karavas; D Wagner; A Asbeck; I Galiana; C J Walsh
Journal:  Sci Robot       Date:  2017-01-18

9.  Human-in-the-loop optimization of exoskeleton assistance during walking.

Authors:  Juanjuan Zhang; Pieter Fiers; Kirby A Witte; Rachel W Jackson; Katherine L Poggensee; Christopher G Atkeson; Steven H Collins
Journal:  Science       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Individualization of exosuit assistance based on measured muscle dynamics during versatile walking.

Authors:  R W Nuckols; S Lee; K Swaminathan; D Orzel; R D Howe; C J Walsh
Journal:  Sci Robot       Date:  2021-11-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.