| Literature DB >> 35549572 |
Yulan Liu1,2, Hong Xiang3, Wenfang Xiong2, Jie Ouyang2, Hengdao Liu4, Shaoli Zhao2, Jie Xiao2, Jialing Li2, Zhihao Shu2, Xuewen Wang2, Huiqin Liu2, Jing Zhang2, Jianing Fan2, Ying Li2, Shuhua Chen5, Hongwei Lu1,3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This study aims to determine the role and mechanism of autophagy in endothelial cell dysfunction by glucolipotoxicity.Entities:
Keywords: AMPK/mTOR; Glucolipotoxicity; autophagy; diabetes; endothelial cell dysfunction
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35549572 PMCID: PMC9125420 DOI: 10.1177/14791641221102513
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Diab Vasc Dis Res ISSN: 1479-1641 Impact factor: 3.541
Figure 1.Effect of glucolipotoxicity on autophagic activation and autophagic flow of HUVECs. Cells were treated with 30 mM glucose and 100 μM palmitic acid (GL) for 24 h. A. Expression levels of autophagy proteins LC3 and P62 were detected by Western blot. B. Immunofluorescence detection of P62 expression in cells. Scale bar: 100 μm. C. Quantification of cellular lysosome numbers by Lyso-Tracker Red dye. Scale bar: 100 μm. D. Transmission electron microscopy observation of autophagosomes and autolysosomes in cells. Scale bar: 2/5 μm. E. Western blot analysis of LC3 conversion in cells pretreated with Baf A1 (50 nM) for 2 h and then treated with GL for 24 h. F. MDC staining of autophagic vacuoles. Scale bar: 100 μm. The band densities of LC3-II (A and E) and P62 (A) were quantitated and normalized to those of corresponding loading control Actin. The mean fluorescence intensity of P62 (B), the number of lysosomes (C), the number of autophagosomes (D), and the number of MDC vacuoles (F) were quantitated or counted in the whole field. Representative images are shown or data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3) *p < 0.05 vs control group and #p < 0.05 vs GL group or Baf A1 group. CON = control group; GL = glucolipotoxicity group; Baf A1= bafilomycin A1 group; GL+ Baf A1 = glucolipotoxicity + bafilomycin A1 group; MDC= monodansylcadaverine.
Figure 2.Effect of glucolipotoxicity on tubular formation and apoptosis of HUVECs. Cells were cultured for 24 h under glucolipotoxic conditions, as described in Figure 1. A. Detection of intracellular ROS production by a fluorescent probe DCFH-DA. The mean fluorescence intensity of ROS was quantitated in the whole field. B. Evaluation of the capillary structure formation of cells on Matrigel and quantification of the tubule length with the ImageJ. Scale bar: 100 μm. C. Quantification of apoptotic cells by Hoechst 33258 staining. The nuclei of apoptotic cells are concentrated, dense, and high blue. Scale bar: 100 μm. D. Flow cytometric analysis of cell apoptosis rate with Annexin V-Alexa Fluor 647/PI staining. E. Western blot analysis of the expression of apoptotic protein BAX, cleaved caspase-3 and anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-2. The band densities were quantitated. Representative images are shown or data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3). *p < 0.05 vs control group and **p < 0.01 vs control group. CON = control group; GL= glucolipotoxicity group; PI, propidium iodide; ROS, reactive oxygen species.
Figure 3.Effect of autophagic inhibition on glucolipotoxicity-induced cell dysfunction in HUVECs. Cells were treated with 3-MA (5 mM), an early-stage autophagy inhibitor, and glucolipotoxicity for 24 h. A. Western blot analysis of LC3 expression. B. Observation of autophagosomes and autolysosomes in HUVECs under TEM. Scale bar: 2/5 μm. C. Detection of intracellular ROS by DCFH-DA. D. Evaluation of tubular formation of cells on Matrigel. E. Quantification of apoptotic cells by Hoechst 33258 staining. Scale bar: 100 μm. F. Flow cytometric analysis of cell apoptosis rate with Annexin V-Alexa Fluor647/PI staining. G. Western blot detection of expression of cleaved caspase-3, BAX and Bcl-2. Representative images are shown or data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3). *p < 0.05 vs control group, **p < 0.01 vs control group, and #p < 0.05 vs GL group. CON = control group; GL = glucolipotoxicity group; GL + 3-MA = glucolipotoxicity + 3-MA group; 3-MA, 3-methyladenine; PI, propidium iodide; ROS, reactive oxygen species.
Figure 4.The involvement of AMPK/mTOR/ULK1 pathway in autophagy induction by glucolipotoxicity in HUVECs. A. Western blot analysis of AMPK, mTOR, and ULK1 phosphorylation in cells exposed to glucolipotoxicity for 24 h. B. Western blot analysis of AMPK phosphorylation and LC3 expression in cells treated with AMPK specific inhibitor Compound C (5 μM) and glucolipotoxicity for 24 h. C. Western blot analysis of mTOR phosphorylation and LC3 expression in cells pretreated with mTOR inhibitor rapamycin (100 nM) for 2 h and then treated with glucolipotoxicity for 24 h. Representative images are shown or data are expressed as mean ± SD (n = 3). *p < 0.05 vs control group, **p < 0.01 vs control group, ***p < 0.001 vs control group, and #p < 0.05 vs GL group. CON = control group; GL = glucolipotoxicity group; GL+ Compound C = glucolipotoxicity + Compound C group; GL+ Rapamycin = glucolipotoxicity+ rapamycin group.
Figure 5.A flow chart model showing that glucolipotoxicity initiates autophagy through AMPK/mTOR/ULK1 signaling pathway and inhibits autophagic flow, leading to accumulation of autophagosomes, thereby inducing apoptosis and impairing endothelial cell function.