Literature DB >> 35549394

Reasons Office-Based Physicians in the United States Recommend Common Complementary Health Approaches to Patients: An Exploratory Study Using a National Survey.

Barbara J Stussman1, Richard L Nahin1, Patricia M Barnes2, Remle Scott3, Termeh Feinberg4, Brian W Ward2.   

Abstract

Objective: To examine the reasons why office-based physicians do or do not recommend four selected complementary health approaches to their patients in the context of the Andersen Behavioral Model. Design: Descriptive estimates of physician-level data from the 2012 National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) Physician Induction Interview, a nationally representative survey of office-based physicians (N = 5622, weighted response rate = 59.7%). Setting/Location: The United States. Outcome measures: Reasons for the recommendation or lack thereof to patients for: herbs and other non-vitamin supplements, chiropractic/osteopathic manipulation, acupuncture, and mind-body therapies (including meditation, guided imagery, and progressive relaxation). Differences by physician sex and medical specialty were described.
Results: For each of the four complementary health approaches, more than half of the physicians who made recommendations indicated that they were influenced by scientific evidence in peer-reviewed journals (ranging from 52.0% for chiropractic/osteopathic manipulation [95% confidence interval, CI = 47.6-56.3] to 71.3% for herbs and other non-vitamin supplements [95% CI = 66.9-75.4]). More than 60% of all physicians recommended each of the four complementary health approaches because of patient requests. A higher percentage of female physicians reported evidence in peer-reviewed journals as a rationale for recommending herbs and non-vitamin supplements or chiropractic/osteopathic manipulation when compared with male physicians (herbs and non-vitamin supplements: 78.8% [95% CI = 72.4-84.3] vs. 66.6% [95% CI = 60.8-72.2]; chiropractic/osteopathic manipulation: 62.3% [95% CI = 54.7-69.4] vs. 47.5% [95% CI = 42.3-52.7]). For each of the four complementary health approaches, a lack of perceived benefit was the most frequently reported reason by both sexes for not recommending. Lack of information sources was reported more often by female versus male physicians as a reason to not recommend herbs and non-vitamin supplements (31.4% [95% CI = 26.8-36.3] vs. 23.4% [95% CI = 21.0-25.9]). Conclusions: There are limited nationally representative data on the reasons as to why office-based physicians decide to recommend complementary health approaches to patients. Developing a more nuanced understanding of influencing factors in physicians' decision making regarding complementary health approaches may better inform researchers and educators, and aid physicians in making evidence-based recommendations for patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey; U.S. physicians; acupuncture; chiropractic; dietary supplements; mind and body

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35549394      PMCID: PMC9467636          DOI: 10.1089/jicm.2022.0493

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Integr Complement Med        ISSN: 2768-3605


  60 in total

1.  Towards a sociology of CAM and nursing.

Authors:  Philip Tovey; Jon Adams
Journal:  Complement Ther Nurs Midwifery       Date:  2002-02

2.  Insurance Coverage for Complementary Health Approaches Among Adult Users: United States, 2002 and 2012.

Authors:  Richard L Nahin; Patricia M Barnes; Barbara J Stussman
Journal:  NCHS Data Brief       Date:  2016-01

Review 3.  Rheumatologists' opinions towards complementary and alternative medicine: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rebecca Grainger; Jennifer Walker
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 2.980

4.  Use of Complementary and Alternative Medicine among Older Adults: Differences between Baby Boomers and Pre-Boomers.

Authors:  Sheryl R Groden; Amanda Toler Woodward; Linda M Chatters; Robert Joseph Taylor
Journal:  Am J Geriatr Psychiatry       Date:  2017-08-12       Impact factor: 4.105

5.  High use of complementary and alternative medicine among a large cohort of women with a family history of breast cancer: the Sister Study.

Authors:  Heather Greenlee; Christine L Sardo Molmenti; Laura Falci; Ross Ulmer; Sandra Deming-Halverson; Lisa A DeRoo; Dale P Sandler
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2016-03-26       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Complementary and integrative medicine: An observational study on pediatric clinicians' knowledge, beliefs and practices.

Authors:  Nicole Casbarro; Olohirere Ezomo; Katherine Woolley; Ryan Smith; Claire Hardin; Richard Feinn; Karen Myrick
Journal:  Complement Ther Med       Date:  2021-02-27       Impact factor: 2.446

7.  Trends in the use of complementary health approaches among adults: United States, 2002-2012.

Authors:  Tainya C Clarke; Lindsey I Black; Barbara J Stussman; Patricia M Barnes; Richard L Nahin
Journal:  Natl Health Stat Report       Date:  2015-02-10

8.  Complementary and alternative medicine use among adults and children: United States, 2007.

Authors:  Patricia M Barnes; Barbara Bloom; Richard L Nahin
Journal:  Natl Health Stat Report       Date:  2008-12-10

9.  Differences between Male and Female Consumers of Complementary and Alternative Medicine in a National US Population: A Secondary Analysis of 2012 NIHS Data.

Authors:  Yan Zhang; Matthew J Leach; Helen Hall; Tobias Sundberg; Lesley Ward; David Sibbritt; Jon Adams
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 2.629

10.  Factors Related to Disclosure and Nondisclosure of Dietary Supplements in Primary Care, Integrative Medicine, and Naturopathic Medicine.

Authors:  Jennifer R Guzman; Debora A Paterniti; Yihang Liu; Derjung M Tarn
Journal:  J Fam Med Dis Prev       Date:  2019-08-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.