| Literature DB >> 35548340 |
Fei Jing1, Xi Chen2, Jingbo Xue1, Kai Huang2, Feng Xing1, Xudong Hu3, Yuan Peng1, Chenghai Liu1,2,4.
Abstract
Background and aim: Pro-inflammatory macrophages aggravated progress of pulmonary fibrosis (PF) both in patients and animal models. Fuzheng Huayu (FZHY) formula, a Chinese herbal product, is effective in treating pulmonary fibrosis in our previous study. But its action mechanism against PF relating to macrophage activation was unclear. This study was designed to evaluate the anti-fibrotic and anti-inflammatory roles of FZHY in pulmonary fibrosis and to elucidate the potential mechanisms.Entities:
Keywords: NF-κB; TNF-α signal pathway; fuzheng huayu formula; lipopolysaccharide; macrophages; methylprednisolone; network pharmacology; pulmonary fibrosis
Year: 2022 PMID: 35548340 PMCID: PMC9081434 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.805432
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pharmacol ISSN: 1663-9812 Impact factor: 5.988
Components of Fuzheng Huayu formula.
| Chinese name | Plant sources | Medicinal parts | Preparation amount (g) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Danshen | Salvia Miltiorrhizae Bge (Labiatae) | radix | 8 |
| Chongcao | artificial fermentation cordyceps | mycelia | 4 |
| Taoren | Prunus persica (L.) Batsch (Rosaceae) | fruit | 2 |
| Jiaogulan | Gynostemma pentaphyllum (Thunb) | whole herb | 6 |
| Songhuafen | Pinus massoniana Lamb (Pinaceae) | pollen | 2 |
| Wuweizi | Schisandrae Chinensis (Turcz.)Baill | fruit | 2 |
FIGURE 1Flow chart.
The chemical components of FZHY for FZHY quality control.
| Compounds (marker) | Quality criterion |
|---|---|
| Salvianolic acid B (from Danshen) | Should be no less than 15.6 mg in 24 g of FZHY raw materials (daily dose) |
| Sodium Danshensu (from Danshen) | Should be no less than 13.2 mg in 24 g of FZHY raw materials (daily dose) |
| Adenosine (from Chongcao) | Should be no less than 4.8 mg in 24 g of FZHY raw materials (daily dose) |
| Schisandrin B (from Wuweizi) | Should be no less than 2.28 mg in 24 g of FZHY raw materials (daily dose) |
Real-time quantitative PCR primers used in this study.
| Gene | Forward (5’→3′) | Reverse (5’→3′) |
|---|---|---|
| TNF-α | TAG CCA GGA GGG AGA ACA GA | CCA GTG AGT GAA AGG GAC AGA |
| β-actin | TGA CGA GGC CCA GAG CAA GA | ATG GGC ACA GTG TGG GTG AC |
FIGURE 2Analyses of the different potential therapeutic targets between PF and healthy lung tissues. (A) The heatmap comparing the different gene expressions between PF and healthy lung tissues was shown. (B) The volcano plot of p values as a function of weighted fold change for mRNAs in PF and healthy lung tissues. The vertical dotted line delimits up- and down-regulation. Red and green plots represent significant up-regulated and down-regulated mRNAs with>1.2-fold change and corrected p < 0.05, respectively. (C) Venn diagram of FZHY- and PF-related proteins. The overlapped genes were considered as the potential hub genes of FZHY against PF. (D) The Component-Target protein network. The violet triangles represent the candidate active compounds in FZHY. The green circles represent the gene names of target proteins of PF. (E) Cluster analysis of the PPI network. 12 FZHY-PF crossover proteins were filtered into the PPI network complex. (F–H) Bioinformatic analyses of drug-disease intersection proteins. Gene ontology annotations, including BP (F), CC (G) and MF (H) analysis. (I) KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of 12 putative targets. (I) PF-related KEGG pathway enrichment was presented.
The potential hub genes of FZHY against PF.
| Gene | Full name |
|---|---|
| ICAM1 | Intercellular Adhesion Molecule 1 |
| IL6 | Interleukin 6 |
| FOS | Fos Proto-Oncogene |
| NFKBIA | Nuclear factor Kappa B inhibitor alpha |
| SELE | Selectin E |
| MCL1 | Myeloid cell leukemia 1 protein |
| PCNA | Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen |
| CCNB1 | cyclin B1 |
| COL3A1 | Collagen Type III Alpha 1 Chain |
| MYC |
|
| COL1A2 | Collagen Type I Alpha 2 Chain |
| IRF1 | Interferon Regulatory Factor 1 |
FIGURE 3FZHY treatment attenuates bleomycin-induced lung fibrosis in vivo. (A) Lung fibrosis was induced by bleomycin at day 0. Then mice were administered with FZHY or methylprednisolone once a day for 20 consecutive days. 24 h after FZHY administration, all mice were sacrificed. (B) Ratio of lung weight to body weight in each group. (C) α-SMA protein expression in each group. (D) Pathological analysis including H&E, Masson, Sirius red stains at ×100 magnification in each tissue specimen. (E) Semi-quantitative analysis for collagen deposition. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.
FIGURE 4FZHY reduced expression of TNF-α in macrophages in mice Pulmonary Fibrosis in vivo (A–B) Immunohistochemistry for expression of TNF-α in the lung tissue (A; magnification, ×400) and semi-quantitative analysis for the positive-stain of TNF-α (B). (C) mRNA expression of TNF-α in the lung tissue. (D–E) Western blot for TNF-α of the lung tissue (D) and histograms for Western blot results (E). (F) Immunohistochemistry for expression of F4/80 in the lung tissue. (G) Representative immunofluorescence confocal microscopy images of F4/80 and TNF-α; red transfected into F4/80; green transfected into TNF-α. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.
FIGURE 5FZHY reduced the expression of TNF-α in LPS-inducedmacrophages in vitro. (A) Viability ofBMDMsat 24 h incubatedwith different concentrations of FZHY assessed byCCK8assay.BMDMswere treated withLPS (100 or 200 ng/ml) with or without FZHY(25 μg/ml, 50 μg/ml, 100 μg/ml) for 24 h (B–C) Levels of TNF-α and IL-6 in supernatant after 24 h incubated with different concentrations of FZHY observed by Elisa kits. (D) Western blot analysis for TNF-α, (E) Arg1 and iNos of the LPS-stimulated BMDMs. Representative immunofluorescence microscopy images of iNos (F) and Arg1 (G). (H) Western blot analysis for p65 and p-p65 production in the LPS-stimulated BMDMs.(I) Representative images of immunofluorescence staining of p-p65 NF-κB (white) nuclear translocation. Cell nuclei are detected by 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) (blue). Scale bars, 50 μm. Semi-quantitative evaluation of p-p65NF-κB nuclear translocation, as evidenced by the colocalization experiments.Results are expressed asmeans ± SDof the relative percentage of p-p65 nuclei-positively stained cells to the total number of cells. Ten fields per condition were analyzed. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001; #p < 0.05, ##p < 0.01, ###p < 0.001.