Literature DB >> 35548104

Synthesis, surface activities, and aggregation behavior of phenyl-containing carboxybetaine surfactants.

Shifeng Gao1, Zhaozheng Song1, Di Zhu1, Fang Lan1, Qingzhe Jiang1,2.   

Abstract

A series of carboxybetaine surfactants, 2-((4-(alkoxy)-3,5-dimethylbenzyl)dimethyl-ammonio)acetate (C n OBCb, where n represents the hydrocarbon chain length of 12, 14, 16 and 18), were synthesized by an efficient and high-yield route for the first time. The surface activities and aggregation behavior of C n OBCb in aqueous solution were investigated by equilibrium surface tension, interfacial tension, steady-state fluorescence, dynamic light scattering (DLS), cryogenic transmission electron microscopy (cryo-TEM) and negative-staining transmission electron microscopy (TEM) measurements. In comparison with conventional N-alkylbetaine surfactants (C n Cb), the C n OBCb species, with a phenyl group introduced in the hydrophobic tail, exhibited excellent surface activities, including lower critical micelle concentration (cmc), lower surface tension and stronger adsorption tendency at an air/water interface. C n OBCb also displayed high efficiency in reducing the toluene/water interfacial tension, with C12OBCb achieving an ultralow interfacial tension (10-3 mN m-1) at concentrations from 0.2 to 1 mmol dm-3. The fluorescence intensity ratio and the scattering intensity in DLS measurements changed remarkably at concentrations around the cmc. Furthermore, the C n OBCb species spontaneously formed vesicles above the cmc in aqueous solution, and the size of the aggregates increased with increasing surfactant concentrations. Flooding experiments showed that C n OBCb could effectively improve oil recovery by 7.85-10.55%. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 35548104      PMCID: PMC9086481          DOI: 10.1039/c8ra06217j

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  RSC Adv        ISSN: 2046-2069            Impact factor:   3.361


Introduction

Zwitterionic surfactants incorporating both positively and negatively charged hydrophilic headgroups in the same molecule are attracting increasing attention.[1,2] As an important type of zwitterionic surfactant, betaines have a hydrophilic headgroup comprised of a quaternary ammonium group and an anionic group such as carboxylate, sulfonate, sulfate, or phosphate.[3] Betaine-type surfactants possess distinctive physicochemical properties such as high foam stability, skin and eye compatibility, high efficiency in lowering surface tension, and low toxicity,[4] leading to a wide range of applications in enhanced oil recovery,[5-7] detergents,[8,9] cosmetics[2,10] and textile production.[11] As the geometry of betaine-type surfactants has a significant effect on their physicochemical properties, considerable efforts have been devoted to their structural optimization. Most reported modifications have been focused on varying the hydrophobic tail,[12-15] hydrophilic headgroup,[16-18] and spacer group.[19] Meanwhile, the introduction of a phenyl group into a hydrocarbon chain significantly influences physicochemical properties such as the critical micelle concentration (cmc), surface tension (γ), standard free energy of micellization (ΔG0mic), and aggregation structures.[20-26] The location of the phenyl group can also affect the size and structure of the micellar aggregates.[27] Thus, incorporating a phenyl group into betaines may results in phenyl-containing betaine-type surfactants with unique properties. For example, Hu et al.[28] studied the adsorption behavior of two pairs of novel betaines and found that the benzyl-substituted alkyl betaines exhibited lower cmc values and enhanced efficiency in lowering the surface tension at air/water interface than the corresponding linear surfactants. Further investigation of the interfacial properties of the same set of surfactants via molecular dynamics simulations confirmed that benzene ring incorporation could change and fix the order of the alkyl chain to some extent.[29] However, there are few studies on phenyl-containing betaine-type surfactants.[28-31] The syntheses of phenyl-containing betaine-type surfactants reported in literature are time consuming and inefficient. Thus, the development of an efficient method for synthesizing this type surfactant is still desirable. Further, a systematic study of the effects of the phenyl group on the surface activities and aggregation behavior of these surfactants would help provide a full understand of betaine-type surfactants and experimental guidelines for their application. In this work, we report a novel series of phenyl-containing carboxybetaine surfactants, 2-((4-(alkyoxy)-3,5-dimethylbenzyl)dimethylammonio)acetate (COBCb, where n represents hydrocarbon chain length of 12, 14, 16 and 18), synthesized in high yield using a three-step reaction. The surface activities and aggregation behavior of these surfactants in aqueous solution were systematically investigated by equilibrium surface tension, interfacial tension, steady-state fluorescence, dynamic light scattering, cryogenic transmission electron microscopy (cryo-TEM) and negative-staining transmission electron microscopy (TEM) measurements. In addition, the effect of phenyl group incorporation, hydrocarbon chain length, and the surfactant concentration on the adsorption and aggregation behavior was clarified by comparison with N-alkylbetaine surfactants (CCb).

Experimental methods

Materials

n-Dodecyl bromide (98%), n-tetradecyl bromide (98%), n-hexadecyl bromide (97%), n-octadecyl bromide (97%), 2,6-dimethylphenol (99%) were purchased from Aladdin Co. (China) and used without further purification. N,N-Dimethylglycine (98%) was supplied by Alfa Aesar (USA). Sodium hydroxide (99%), paraformaldehyde (99%), tetrabutylammonium bromide (TBAB) (99%), calcein (99%), sodium bicarbonate (99%) and zinc chloride (98%) were obtained from Tianjin Huchen chemical plant (China). Lauryl betaine (C12Cb) (90%) was supplied by BEIJING OUHE TECHNOLOGY CO., LED. Crude oil was obtained from Xinjiang Oilfield (China). The viscosity of oil was 15.8 mPa s at 40 °C, and its density was 0.86 g cm−3. All organic solvents were purchased from Beijing Chemical Co. (China) and were of analytical grade. Deionized water was used in all experiments.

Synthesis

All the surfactants were synthesized according to Scheme 1. 1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded at 25 °C on a 500 MHz Bruker III AVANCE spectrometer. Chemical shifts were reported in ppm relative to TMS (for 1H, δ 0.00), CD3OD (for 1H, δ 3.31; for 13C, δ 48.80), and CDCl3 (for 1H, δ 7.26; for 13C, δ 77.00). High-resolution mass spectra analysis was performed on a Bruker APEX_ULTRA_ 9.4 FT-ICR-MS spectrometer. 1H and 13C NMR spectra were provided in the ESI.†
Scheme 1

Synthesis route of COBCb (n = 12, 14, 16, 18).

Synthesis of 2-(alkoxy)-1,3-dimethylbenzene (COB)

Sodium hydroxide (0.1 mol, 4 g) was slowly added to a solution of 2,6-dimethylphenol (0.1 mol, 12.2 g) in ethanol (20 mL), and the mixture was stirred at 25 °C for 2 h. After heating to 60 °C, n-dodecyl, n-tetradecyl, n-hexadecyl, or n-octadecyl bromide (0.1 mol, 25.4–34.3 g) in N,N-dimethylformamide (30 mL) was added dropwise to the residue, and the resulting mixture was stirred for 6 h. Then the hot mixture was cooled to room temperature and filtered to remove the insoluble inorganic salt. The filtrate was washed with deionized water and dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate. After filtration, the solution was concentrated in vacuo and COB was obtained by reduced pressure distillation (188–226 °C, −0.1 MPa) as a colorless liquid.

2-(Dodecyloxy)-1,3-dimethylbenzene (C12OB)

Colorless liquid, yield (76%), 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 0.87–0.91 (t, 3H, ), 1.28–1.38 (m, 16H, –O–CH2–CH2–CH2–()–CH3), 1.46–1.54 (m, 2H, –O–CH2–CH2––(CH2)8–CH3), 1.77–1.84 (m, 2H, –O–CH2––CH2–(CH2)8–CH3), 2.28 (s, 6H, Ar–()), 3.74–3.77 (t, 2H, –O––CH2–CH2–(CH2)8–CH3), 6.89–6.92 (t, 1H, -Ar), 6.99–7.01 (d, 2H, -Ar). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 14.1, 16.2, 22.7, 26.1, 29.3, 29.5, 29.6, 29.6, 29.6, 30.4, 31.9, 72.2, 122.5, 128.6, 130.8, 156.0. 156.2. HRMS (ESI+) m/z: calcd for C20H35O+ (M + H), 291.2684; found, 291.2682.

2-(Tetradecyloxy)-1,3-dimethylbenzene (C14OB)

Colorless liquid, yield (79%), 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 0.88–0.91 (t, 3H, –), 1.28–1.37 (m, 20H, –O–CH2–CH2–CH2 –()–CH3), 1.47–1.53 (m, 2H, –O–CH2–CH2––(CH2)10–CH3), 1.78–1.84 (m, 2H, –O–CH2––CH2–(CH2)10–CH3), 2.28 (s, 6H, Ar–()), 3.75–3.77 (t, 2H, –O––CH2–CH2–(CH2)10–CH3), 6.89–6.92 (t, 1H, -Ar), 7.00–7.01 (d, 2H, -Ar). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 14.1, 16.2, 22.7, 26.1, 29.3, 29.5, 29.6, 29.6, 29.6, 29.7, 30.4, 31.9, 72.2, 123.5, 128.7, 130.9, 156.0. 156.2. HRMS (ESI+) m/z: calcd for C22H39O+ (M + H), 319.2295; found, 319.2296.

2-(Hexadecyloxy)-1,3-dimethylbenzene (C16OB)

White solid, yield (74%), 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 0.88–0.91 (t, 3H, –), 1.28–1.38 (m, 24H, –O–CH2–CH2–CH2–()–CH3), 1.48–1.54 (m, 2H, –O–CH2–CH2––(CH2)12–CH3), 1.78–1.84 (m, 2H, –O–CH2––CH2–(CH2)12–CH3), 2.29 (s, 6H, Ar–()), 3.75–3.78 (t, 2H, –O––CH2–CH2–(CH2)10–CH3), 6.90–6.93 (t, 1H, -Ar), 7.00–7.02 (d, 2H, -Ar). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 14.1, 16.2, 22.7, 26.1, 29.3, 29.5, 29.6, 29.6, 29.6, 29.7, 30.4, 31.9, 72.2, 123.5, 128.7, 130.9, 156.0. 156.2. HRMS (ESI+) m/z: calcd for C24H43O+ (M + H), 347.3308; found, 347.3310.

2-(Octadecyloxy)-1,3-dimethylbenzene (C18OB)

White solid, yield (73%), 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 0.87–0.90 (t, 3H, –), 1.27–1.38 (m, 28H, –O–CH2–CH2–CH2–()–CH3), 1.47–1.53 (m, 2H, –O–CH2–CH2 ––(CH2)14–CH3), 1.78–1.83 (m, 2H, –O–CH2––CH2–(CH2)14–CH3), 2.28 (s, 6H, Ar–()), 3.74–3.77 (t, 2H, –O––CH2–CH2–(CH2)10–CH3), 6.89–6.92 (t, 1H, -Ar), 7.00–7.01 (d, 2H, -Ar). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 14.1, 16.2, 22.6, 26.1, 29.3, 29.5, 29.6, 29.6, 29.6, 29.7, 30.4, 31.9, 72.2, 123.5, 128.7, 130.9, 156.0. 156.2. HRMS (ESI+) m/z: calcd for C26H47O+ (M + H), 375.3620; found, 375.3621.

Synthesis of 5-(chloromethy)-2-(alkoxy)-1,3-dimethylbenzene (COBMCl)

Acetic acid (20 mL) and TBAB (0.005 mol, 1.6 g) were added to a stirred solution of COB (0.1 mol, 29.1–37.3 g) dissolved in approximately 30 mL of n-hexane. Then, dry hydrogen chloride gas was continuously bubbled through the solution at room temperature. After increasing the temperature to 70 °C, zinc chloride (0.1 mol, 13.6 g) and paraformaldehyde (0.1 mol, 3 g) were slowly added, and the resulting mixture was refluxed for 8 h. The upper organic phase was separated, washed with deionized water, and then dried over anhydrous sodium sulfate. After filtration, the filtrate was concentrated under reduced pressure and COBMCl was purified by flash column chromatography using petroleum ether and ethyl acetate = 20 : 1 as the eluent.

5-(Chloromethy)-2-(dodecyloxy)-1,3-dimethylbenzene (C12OBMCl)

White solid, yield (82%), 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 0.87–0.90 (t, 3H, –), 1.27–1.36 (m, 16H, –O–CH2–CH2–CH2–()–CH3), 1.46–1.52 (m, 2H, –O–CH2–CH2–– (CH2)8–CH3), 1.76–1.82 (m, 2H, –O–CH2––CH2–(CH2)8–CH3), 2.27 (s, 6H, Ar–()), 3.73–3.75 (t, 2H, –O––CH2–CH2–(CH2)8–CH3), 4.50 (s, 2H, -Ar–Cl), 7.03 (s, 2H, -Ar). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 14.1, 16.2, 22.6, 26.1, 29.5, 29.6, 29.6, 29.6, 30.3, 31.9, 46.3, 72.3, 129.1, 131.4, 132.4, 156.2. HRMS (ESI+) m/z: calcd for C21H35O+ (M − Cl), 303.2682; found, 303.2685.

5-(Chloromethy)-2-(tetradecyloxy)-1,3-dimethylbenzene (C14OBMCl)

White solid, yield (77%), 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 0.87–0.90 (t, 3H, –), 1.27–1.36 (m, 16H, –O–CH2–CH2–CH2–()–CH3), 1.46–1.52 (m, 2H, –O–CH2–CH2––(CH2)10–CH3), 1.76–1.82 (m, 2H, –O–CH2––CH2–(CH2)10–CH3), 2.27 (s, 6H, Ar–()), 3.73–3.75 (t, 2H, –O––CH2–CH2–(CH2)10–CH3), 4.50 (s, 2H, -Ar–Cl), 7.03 (s, 2H, -Ar). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 14.1, 16.2, 22.6, 26.1, 29.3, 29.5, 29.6, 29.6, 29.6, 29.6, 30.3, 31.9, 46.3, 72.3, 129.1, 131.3, 132.4, 156.2. HRMS (ESI+) m/z: calcd for C23H39O+ (M − Cl), 331.2995; found, 331.2997.

5-(Chloromethy)-2-(hexadecyloxy)-1,3-dimethylbenzene (C16OBMCl)

White solid, yield (81%), 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 0.87–0.90 (t, 3H, –), 1.27–1.36 (m, 16H, –O–CH2–CH2–CH2–()–CH3), 1.46–1.52 (m, 2H, –O–CH2–CH2––(CH2)12–CH3), 1.76–1.82 (m, 2H, –O–CH2––CH2–(CH2)12–CH3), 2.27 (s, 6H, Ar–()), 3.73–3.75 (t, 2H, –O––CH2–CH2–(CH2)12–CH3), 4.50 (s, 2H, -Ar–Cl), 7.03 (s, 2H, -Ar). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 14.1, 16.2, 22.6, 26.1, 29.3, 29.5, 29.6, 29.6, 29.6, 29.6, 29.6, 30.3, 31.9, 46.3, 72.3, 129.1, 131.4, 132.4, 156.2. HRMS (ESI+) m/z: calcd for C25H43O+ (M − Cl), 359.3308; found, 359.3308.

5-(Chloromethy)-2-(octadecyloxy)-1,3-dimethylbenzene (C18OBMCl)

White solid, yield (75%), 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 0.87–0.90 (t, 3H, –), 1.27–1.36 (m, 16H, –O–CH2–CH2–CH2–()–CH3), 1.46–1.52 (m, 2H, –O–CH2–CH2–– (CH2)14–CH3), 1.76–1.82 (m, 2H, –O–CH2––CH2–(CH2)14–CH3), 2.27 (s, 6H, Ar–()), 3.73–3.75 (t, 2H, –O––CH2–CH2–(CH2)14–CH3), 4.50 (s, 2H, -Ar–Cl), 7.03 (s, 2H, -Ar). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 14.1, 16.2, 22.6, 26.1, 29.3, 29.5, 29.5, 29.6, 29.6, 29.6, 29.6, 30.3, 31.9, 46.2, 72.3, 129.1, 131.4, 132.4, 156.2. HRMS (ESI+) m/z: calcd for C27H47O+ (M − Cl), 387.3621; found, 387.3620.

Synthesis of COBCb

Sodium bicarbonate (0.02 mol, 1.68 g) was slowly added to a solution of N,N-dimethylglycine (0.02 mol, 2.06 g) in 40 mL of ethanol at 80 °C and stirred for approximately 1 h. COBMCl (0.02 mol, 6.76–8.44 g) dissolved in 15 mL of n-hexane was added dropwise into this solution, and the mixture was refluxed for 6 h. After all solvent was evaporated, the resulting waxy crude betaine surfactant was extracted with 20 mL of ethanol. The extract was evaporated to dryness and repeatedly recrystallized from a mixture of methanol and acetone. The product was then dried at 60 °C under vacuum.

2-((4-(Dodecyloxy)-3,5-dimethylbenzyl)dimethylammonio)acetate (C12OBCb)

White solid, yield (85%), 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 0.89–0.91 (t, 3H, –), 1.30–1.40 (m, 16H, –O–CH2–CH2–CH2–()–CH3), 1.51–1.57 (m, 2H, –O–CH2–CH2––(CH2)8–CH3), 1.78–1.84 (m, 2H, –O–CH2––CH2–(CH2)8–CH3), 2.30 (s, 6H, Ar–), 3.19 (s, 6H, –CH2–N–()–CH2–COO−), 3.64 (s, 3H, –CH2–N–(CH3)2––COO−), 3.79–3.82 (t, 2H, –O––CH2–CH2–(CH2)8–CH3), 4.67 (s, 2H, Ar––N+(CH3)2–CH2–), 7.19 (s, 2H, -Ar). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 14.2, 16.2, 22.6, 27.0, 30.2, 30.4, 30.5, 30.5, 30.5, 31.2, 32.8, 51.0, 63.7, 67.3, 73.2, 124.2, 133.0, 134.3, 159.1, 168.8. HRMS (ESI+) m/z: calcd for C25H43NO3+ (M + H), 406.3315; found, 406.3309.

2-((4-(Tetradecyloxy)-3,5-dimethylbenzyl)dimethylammonio)acetate (C14OB Cb)

White solid, yield (91%), 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 0.88–0.91 (t, 3H, –), 1.30–1.40 (m, 20H, –O–CH2–CH2–CH2–()–CH3), 1.51–1.57 (m, 2H, –O–CH2–CH2––(CH2)10–CH3), 1.78–1.84 (m, 2H, –O–CH2––CH2–(CH2)10–CH3), 2.30 (s, 6H, Ar–), 3.19 (s, 6H, –CH2–N–()–CH2–COO−), 3.64 (s, 3H, –CH2–N–(CH3)2––COO−), 3.79–3.81 (t, 2H, –O––CH2–CH2–(CH2)10–CH3), 4.67 (s, 2H, Ar––N+ (CH3)2–CH2–), 7.19 (s, 2H, -Ar). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 14.2, 16.2, 23.5, 27.0, 30.2, 30.4, 30.5, 30.5, 30.5, 30.6, 31.2, 32.8, 51.0, 63.7, 67.3, 73.2, 124.2, 133.0, 134.3, 159.1, 168.8. HRMS (ESI+) m/z: calcd for C27H47NO3+ (M + H), 434.3628; found, 434.3630.

2-((4-(Hexadecyloxy)-3,5-dimethylbenzyl)dimethylammonio)acetate (C16OB Cb)

White solid, yield (88%), 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 0.88–0.91 (t, 3H, –), 1.29–1.41 (m, 24H, –O–CH2–CH2–CH2–()–CH3), 1.51–1.57 (m, 2H, –O–CH2–CH2––(CH2)12–CH3), 1.78–1.84 (m, 2H, –O–CH2––CH2–(CH2)12–CH3), 2.29 (s, 6H, Ar–), 3.18 (s, 6H, –CH2–N–()–CH2–COO−), 3.64 (s, 3H, –CH2–N–(CH3)2––COO−), 3.79–3.81 (t, 2H, –O––CH2–CH2–(CH2)12–CH3), 4.67 (s, 2H, Ar––N+ (CH3)2–CH2–), 7.18 (s, 2H, -Ar). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 14.2, 16.2, 23.5, 27.0, 30.2, 30.4, 30.5, 30.5, 30.5, 30.6, 31.2, 32.8, 51.0, 63.7, 67.3, 73.2, 124.2, 133.0, 134.3, 159.1, 168.8. HRMS (ESI+) m/z: calcd for C29H51NO3+ (M + H), 462.3941; found, 462.3942.

2-((4-(Octadecyloxy)-3,5-dimethylbenzyl)dimethylammonio)acetate (C18OB Cb)

White solid, yield (83%), 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 0.88–0.91 (t, 3H, –), 1.29–1.40 (m, 28H, –O–CH2–CH2–CH2–()–CH3), 1.51–1.57 (m, 2H, –O–CH2–CH2––(CH2)14–CH3), 1.78–1.84 (m, 2H, –O–CH2––CH2–(CH2)14–CH3), 2.30 (s, 6H, Ar–), 3.18 (s, 6H, –CH2–N–()–CH2–COO−), 3.64 (s, 3H, –CH2–N–(CH3)2––COO−), 3.79–3.81 (t, 2H, –O––CH2–CH2–(CH2)14–CH3), 4.67 (s, 2H, Ar––N+ (CH3)2–CH2–), 7.18 (s, 2H, -Ar). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 14.2, 16.3, 23.5, 27.0, 30.3, 30.4, 30.5, 30.5, 30.5, 30.6, 31.2, 32.8, 51.0, 63.7, 67.3, 73.2, 124.2, 133.0, 134.3, 159.1, 168.7. HRMS (ESI+) m/z: calcd for C31H55NO3+ (M + H), 490.4254; found, 490.4258.

Measurements

Thermal stability measurements

The thermostability of COBCb (n = 12, 14, 16, or 18) was investigated using a HTG–3 thermogravimetric analyzer (Beijing Henven Scientific Instrument Factory, China). The sample was heated from 10 to 600 °C with a heating rate of 10 °C min−1 in a nitrogen atmosphere at a flow rate of 50 mL min−1.

Surface tension measurements

The surface tensions of aqueous surfactant solutions were measured with a BZY–2 automatic tensiometer by using the Wilhelmy plate technique at 25.0 ± 0.1 °C. To obtain equilibrium surface tension, sets of measurements were taken until the change in surface tension was less than 0.01 mN m−1 every 3 min. The cmc and surface tension at the cmc (γcmc) were determined from the break point of the surface tension and the logarithm of the concentration curve (γ − log C), respectively. The adsorption amount of surfactant Γ was calculated according to the Gibbs adsorption isotherm equation:[32]where γ is the surface tension in mN m−1, Γ is the adsorbed amount in mol m−2, R is the gas constant (8.314 J mol−1 K−1), T is the absolute temperature in K, C is the surfactant concentration, and (dγ/d log C) is the slope below the cmc in the surface tension plot. The value of n, which dependents theoretically on the surfactant type and structure, is taken as 1 for a zwitterionic surfactant in aqueous solution.[33] The occupied area per surfactant molecule at the cmc, Acmc (nm2), is obtained from the saturation adsorption (Γcmc) using the following equation:where N is Avogadro's number (6.022 × 1023 mol−1) and, Γcmc is the surface excess concentration at the cmc.

Interfacial tension measurements

The interfacial tension between toluene (or n-heptane) and aqueous surfactant solution was measured using a TX–500C spinning drop interfacial tension meter (Shanghai Zhongchen, China) at 25.0 ± 0.1 °C. The rotation speed was set at 12 rps in all measurements. Interfacial tension values were recorded until equilibrium was reached.

Steady-state fluorescence measurements

The fluorescence measurements were performed using a RF5301 fluorescence spectrophotometer (Shimadzu Corporation, Japan). The spectra were recorded between 350 and 500 nm with an excitation wavelength of 335 nm, and the excitation and emission slit widths were fixed at 3.0 nm. The concentration of pyrene in each solution was 1 × 10−6 mol dm−3. The fluorescence intensity ratio of the first to the third vibronic peaks, I1/I3, were used to estimate the micropolarity in its solubilization site.[34]

Dynamic light scattering (DLS)

DLS measurements were performed with a Nano ZS Zetasizer (Malvern Instruments Laboratory, UK) equipped with a Helium–Neon laser source operating at λo = 632.8 nm. The scattering intensity was measured at an angle of 173° to the incident beam. The autocorrelation function was analyzed using the CONTIN method. The apparent hydrodynamic diameter (Dh) was obtained according to the Stokes–Einstein equation,[25,27]Dh = kT/(3πηD), where D is the diffusion coefficient, k is the Boltzmann constant, T is the absolute temperature, and η is the viscosity of the solution. All sample solutions were filtered through a 0.45 μm membrane filter and measured three times at 25 °C.

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM)

TEM measurements were performed on a JEM–2100 transmission electron microscope (JEOL Ltd., Japan) at an accelerating voltage of 200 kV. The TEM samples were prepared using the negative-staining method with phosphotungstic acid aqueous solution (2%). A droplet of the sample solution was spread on a 300-mesh copper grid coated with a Formvar film, and excess sample solution was wicked away with a piece of filter paper. When the grid was partially dried, a drop of staining solution was added onto the grid over 10 min. After drying, the morphologies of the samples were examined by TEM.

Core flooding experiment

Surfactant flooding experiments were performed in the artificial sandstone core at the oil reservoir temperature of 40 °C. To begin with, the porosity and permeability of the sandstone core were determined using an Automated Permeameter–Porosimeter (Coretest systems, Inc., U.S.A), and the basic parameters of sandstone core were given in Table 3. The core plug was loaded into the core holder and vacuumed for 2 h. After the core was saturated with formation brine (the composition of brine was listed in Table S2†), the crude oil was injected into core plug until the water cut reached less than 1%. After that, the core was aged in the core holder for 24 h and water flooding was conducted at a flow rate of 0.4 mL min−1 until the water cut reached 98%. Finally, 0.3 PV surfactant slug was injected into the core after water flooding and then subsequent water flooding was conducted until water cut reached 98%. The produced fluid was collected using a measuring cylinder to record the oil and water production.

Core parameters and EOR of C12Cb and COBCb (n = 12, 14, 16, 18)

Core no.Length (cm)Diameter (cm)Porosity (%)Permeability (mD)Sample (0.5 mmol dm−3) E 1 (%) E 2 (%)EOR (%)
1#7.1622.52026.45132.65C12Cb48.5455.276.73
2#7.2282.52425.82126.46C12OBCb48.8959.4410.55
3#7.2182.51826.15134.60C14OBCb47.0356.119.08
4#7.2242.51625.87137.22C16OBCb48.4957.739.24
5#7.2162.52025.80134.81C18OBCb48.4156.267.85

Results and discussion

Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA)

The thermostability of COBCb (n = 12, 14, 16, or 18) was determined through TGA to evaluate the temperature range in which these surfactants can be applied. The TGA curves of COBCb are shown in Fig. 1. The results show that the weight of COBCb remains essentially unchanged below 200 °C. As the temperature increases, the compounds gradually decompose and then totally break down at approximately 500 °C. These findings indicate that COBCb (n = 12, 14, 16, or 18) exhibit excellent thermostability and can be utilized at temperatures up to 200 °C. Additionally, changing the hydrocarbon chain length did not significantly affect the onset temperature of thermal decomposition. It is also worth mentioning that the thermal decomposition temperatures of COBCb are higher than that of N-dodecyl-N,N-dimethyl-2-ammonio-1-ethanecarbonate (C12Cb, C12H25N+(CH3)2CH2COO−; 160 °C).[35] Thus, C12OBCb shows better thermal stability than the corresponding linear betaine-type surfactants and the introduction of a phenyl group in the surfactant molecule can significantly increase the thermal stability of betaine-type surfactants.
Fig. 1

TGA curves of COBCb.

Equilibrium surface tension

The surface tension is plotted as a function of concentration of COBCb (n = 12, 14, 16, or 18) in Fig. 2. The surface tension of COBCb initially decreases as the surfactant concentration increases, and then reaches an equilibrium value. The break points of the curves were taken as cmc values. The cmc, γcmc, Γcmc, and Acmc values of COBCb are listed in Table 1, along with the data for CCb (CH2N+(CH3)2–CH2COO−) for comparison.[36] The variation of the cmc with the hydrocarbon chain length for homologous straight-chain ionic surfactants can be described by the empirical Klevens equation[37] as follows:where n is the number of carbon atoms in the hydrocarbon chain. The A value is a constant for a particular ionic head at a given temperature, whereas the B value is close to 0.3 for anionic and cationic surfactants and 0.5 for zwitterionic and nonionic surfactants. The relationships between the cmc and the hydrocarbon chain length of COBCb and CCb are plotted in Fig. 3. For the CCb series, the logarithm of the cmc decreases linearly as the hydrocarbon chain length increases. However, for COBCb, a similar trend is observed for hydrocarbon chain lengths of 12–16 and a deviation from linearity occurs when the hydrocarbon chain length reaches 18. This phenomenon has also been observed in some gemini zwitterionic surfactants.[38,39] A reasonable explanation, as reported by Mukerjee,[40] is that the cmc only changes slightly as the hydrocarbon chain length increases up to 18 because the long hydrocarbon chains coil in aqueous solution. The B value of COBCb with hydrocarbon chain lengths from 12 to 16 is determined as 0.47, which is close to those for zwitterionic betaine surfactants such as sulfobetaine-type surfactants (CSb; B = 0.48)[41] and CCb (B = 0.49).[36] It is also noteworthy that the cmc values of COBCb (n = 12, 14, or 16) are approximately one order of magnitude lower than those of CCb with the same hydrocarbon chain lengths. Thus, the phenyl-containing COBCb surfactants have a better micellization ability at relatively low concentrations. This behavior is attributed to an enhancement of hydrophobic interactions caused by the introduction of a phenyl group near the headgroup.[25,42]
Fig. 2

Variation of the surface tension with the surfactant concentration for COBCb at 25 °C.

Surface activity parameters of carboxyl betaine surfactants COBCb

Surfactantcmc (mmol dm−3) γ cmc (mN m−1)106Γcmc (mol m−2) A cmc (nm2)
C12OBCb0.188127.32.630.63
C14OBCb0.022926.72.660.62
C16OBCb0.002325.62.760.60
C18OBCb0.003532.62.330.71
C12H25N+(CH3)2CH2COO1.836.53.570.47
C14H29N+(CH3)2CH2COO0.1837.53.550.47
C16H33N+(CH3)2CH2COO0.0239.74.130.40
Fig. 3

Relationship between the cmc and hydrocarbon chain length for COBCb and N-alkylbetaine surfactants CCb.

For n = 12, 14, and 16, the γcmc values of COBCb are much smaller than those of CCb (36.5–39.7 mN m−1 at 23 °C), indicating that COBCb has a greater efficiency in lowering the surface tension of water than CCb. Meanwhile, the γcmc values of COBCb decrease on increasing the hydrocarbon chain length from 12 to 16. However, for n = 18, the γcmc value is 32.63 mN m−1, which is slightly larger than those of other homogeneous surfactants. This aberrant behavior has also been observed for ultra-long unsaturated amidobetaine surfactants,[43] cationic gemini surfactants,[39,44] and zwitterionic heterogemini surfactants.[22] This phenomenon can be attributed to the fact that a long hydrophobic chain (n = 18) increase the steric hindrance between surfactant molecules, which makes surfactant molecules prone to forming premicellar aggregates in aqueous solution rather than adsorbing at the air/water interface.[43]

Interfacial tension measurements

The interfacial tension as a function of COBCb concentration in the range of 0.05–1 mmol dm−3 against toluene and n-heptane are illustrated in Fig. 4(a) and (b), respectively. The COBCb surfactants exhibit similar trends against both toluene and n-heptane, that is, the interfacial tensions decrease almost linearly with increasing surfactant concentrations in the investigated range. For the toluene/water interface, C12OBCb exhibits the lowest interfacial tension among the COBCb species, reaching an ultralow value of 10−3 mN m−1 in the concentration range of 0.2–1 mmol dm−3, which indicates excellent interfacial activity. For the n-heptane/water interface, C16OBCb exhibits the lowest interfacial tension, reaching a value of 0.24 mN m−1 at 1 mmol dm−3 (Fig. 4(b)). For both the toluene/water and n-heptane/water interfaces, C18OBCb shows the lowest capability for reducing the interfacial tension. This behavior is probably due to the longer hydrophobic chains in C18OBCb being prone to curl, leading to a loose arrangement of molecules at the interface. Thus, the concentration of effective surfactant molecules decreases in comparison with those of other homogenous COBCb species. Interestingly, it is noted that the interfacial tension values in toluene/water for COBCb (n = 12, 14, 16, or 18) are lower than those in n-heptane/water at the same concentrations. It can be deduced that the COBCb surfactants exhibit much higher efficiency in reducing interfacial tension against arenes than n-alkanes with the same number of carbon atoms in the molecular structure.
Fig. 4

Variation of the interfacial tension with COBCb concentration against toluene (a) and n-heptane (b) at 25 °C.

Adsorption properties

The Acmc, which is closely correlated with the Γcmc, can provide information about the orientation and packing degree of surfactant molecules at the air/water interface. The Acmc values of COBCb, listed in Table 1, range from 0.60 to 0.71 nm2, which are slightly larger than those of CCb.[36] This difference may be caused by the bulky phenyl group within the hydrophobic tail. Meanwhile, the Acmc values decrease marginally on increasing the hydrocarbon chain length from 12 to 16, and then increase abruptly for n = 18. The initial decrease of Acmc reflects that tight packing of COBCb molecules at the air/water interface owing to the enhancement of hydrophobic interactions between the hydrocarbon chains. It seems that the presence of a rigid phenyl group in the hydrophobic tail favors an extended orientation of the hydrophobic chain, resulting in close packing of the surfactant molecules at the air/water interface.[25] Further, π–π interactions between adjacent phenyl groups may drive more compact packing attract COBCb molecules to in the surface monolayer.[24] Notably, the Acmc value of C18OBCb is slightly larger than those of other homogeneous surfactants, which indicates that the hydrophobic tails are not vertical to the surface, likely resulting from coiling of the longer hydrophobic chains.[45,46] The efficiency and effectiveness of surfactant adsorption at the air/water interface can be characterized by the logarithm of the surfactant concentration C20 at which the surface tension of water is reduced by 20 mN m−1 (pC20) and by the cmc/C20 ratio,[47] respectively. The pC20 and cmc/C20 ratio values of COBCb are shown in Table 2 together with the data of CCb for comparison. The pC20 values of COBCb increase as the hydrocarbon chain length increases from 12 to 16 and are larger than those of CCb with the same hydrocarbon chain lengths (pC20 = 3.91–5.54 (ref. 48)), suggesting that the COBCb surfactants have a greater tendency to adsorb at air/water interface. However, for C18OBCb, the pC20 value becomes smaller, possibly because of premicellar aggregation in solution. Further, the variation of the cmc/C20 ratio values of COBCb with the hydrocarbon chain length follows the same trend as the pC20 values, and the cmc/C20 ratio values of COBCb are approximately four times larger than those of CCb (cmc/C20 = 6.5–7.5 (ref. 48)). This finding suggests that it is more beneficial for COBCb molecules to absorb at the air/water interface than to form micelles in the surfactant solution.

Parameters on micellization and adsorption of carboxyl betaine surfactants COBCb

Surfactant pC 20 cmc/C20ΔG0mic (kJ mol−1)ΔG0ads (kJ mol−1)
C12OBCb5.1325.4−31.20−46.82
C14OBCb6.0626.3−36.42−52.03
C16OBCb7.0727.1−42.12−57.60
C18OBCb6.6315.1−41.08−56.40
C12H25N+(CH3)2CH2COO3.916.5
C14H29N+(CH3)2CH2COO4.627.5
C16H33N+(CH3)2CH2COO5.546.9
According to the single-stage equilibrium model, the standard free energy of micellization (ΔG0mic) and adsorption (ΔG0ads) for zwitterionic surfactants in aqueous solution can be calculated using the following equations:[49,50]where R is the gas constant (8.314 J mol−1 K−1), T is the absolute temperature, Xcmc is the cmc as a molar fraction (Xcmc = cmc/55.4), γ0 and γcmc are the surface tensions of water and surfactant solution at the cmc, respectively. Because the micellization of COBCb is a spontaneous process, the calculated ΔG0mic values should be negative. The ΔG0mic and ΔG0ads values of COBCb (n = 12, 14, 16, or 18) are tabulated in Table 2. Based on these results, the ΔG0ads value of COBCb is more negative than its ΔG0mic value, signifying that the adsorption process is more favorable than micellization. This finding is also supported by the pC20 and cmc/C20 ratio values of COBCb being larger than those of CCb. In addition, the negative values of ΔG0mic and ΔG0ads become larger on increasing the hydrocarbon chain length from 12 to 16, but are slightly smaller when the hydrocarbon chain length reaches 18. This phenomenon suggests that a driving force for micellization or adsorption is derived from the hydrophobic effect among hydrocarbon chains[51] and the deviation may be due to the stereo inhibition of the longer hydrocarbon chain.[36]

Micropolarity and micellization

The micropolarity and micellization of COBCb (n = 12, 14, 16, or 18) were investigated using pyrene fluorescence and DLS measurements. In general, the scattering intensity obtained from DLS measurements increases as increasing the size and number of micelles increase. In fluorescence measurement, the I1/I3 ratio decreases from approximately 1.8 to 1.2 when micelles are formed, owing to the transfer of pyrene molecules from the water environment into the interior hydrophobic region of micelles.[15] The variations of I1/I3 ratio (the fluorescence spectra of COBCb are shown in the Fig. S13–S16†) and the scatting intensity as a function of COBCb (n = 12, 14, 16, or 18) concentration are shown in Fig. 5. The I1/I3 ratio starts to decrease and the scattering intensity increases at a concentration close to the corresponding cmc. These results indicate that aggregates are formed at these concentrations in aqueous solution. Additionally, the I1/I3 ratios of COBCb with n = 12, 14, 16 and 18 gradually decrease with increasing surfactant concentration. This trend is similar to the fluorescence results for heterogemini surfactants reported by Yoshimura et al.[36] who suggested that this phenomenon is probably due to a broad micelle size distribution. It is also worth noting that the minimum values of the I1/I3 ratio at high concentrations above the cmc are similar for the four COBCb surfactants, suggesting that the hydrophobic length of the surfactant molecules has little effect on the I1/I3 ratio values. This result is also in good agreement with the behavior of conventional surfactants.[52,53]
Fig. 5

Variation of the pyrene fluorescence intensity ratio I1/I3 and scattering intensity by DLS with the surfactant concentration for COBCb: n = (a) 12, (b) 14, (c) 16, (d) 18.

Size and morphology of aggregates

To investigate the effect of the COBCb concentration on the size and morphology of aggregates in aqueous solution, DLS and TEM measurements were performed. The apparent hydrodynamic diameters (Dh) for COBCb (n = 12, 14, 16, or 18) were determined by DLS over a wide concentration range from 5 × cmc to 20 × cmc. As shown in Fig. 6, COBCb show a bimodal distribution containing two peaks with a wide range of Dh values from 10 to 200 nm. As the light scattering intensity is proportional to the sixth power of the diameter of the particles, the major populations of aggregates are relatively small ones in the surfactant solution. The Dh values of aggregates of COBCb (n = 12, 14, 16, or 18) slightly increase with increasing surfactant concentrations, which implies that the small aggregates existing at low surfactant concentrations can gradually transform into large aggregates as the surfactant concentration increases. This trend is similar to the results obtained for sulfatebetaine zwitterionic gemini surfactants.[54]
Fig. 6

Variation of size distribution with the surfactant concentration by DLS for COBCb: n = (a) 12, (b) 14, (c) 16, (d) 18.

To directly visualize of the morphologies of the COBCb aggregates, TEM measurements were conducted at the concentrations used for DLS measurements. TEM images of COBCb at different concentrations (Fig. 7) clearly exhibit the presence of closed vesicles in aqueous solution. The vesicles size determined from TEM measurements are consistent with the DLS results. For C12OBCb and C14OBCb, predominant small spherical micelles and several large vesicles with average diameter about 15 and 80 nm, respectively, were observed at low concentrations (5 × cmc) (Fig. 7(a) and (d)). On further increasing the surfactant concentration to 10 × cmc, the small micelles grow into partially elongated vesicles and larger spherical vesicles (Fig. 7(b) and (e)), consistent with the higher polydisperse index (PDI) value obtained by DLS. The elongated vesicles are 50–80 nm long with diameters of 5 nm. The growth of spherical micelles into partially elongated micelles has been reported for ionic liquids containing an imidazolium ring,[54] this may be caused by the stronger hydrophobicity imparted by the presence of a phenyl group within the long hydrocarbon chain. When the concentration increases to 20 × cmc, the sizes of the small and large vesicles are centered at 35 and 110 nm, respectively. Surprisingly, the formation of elongated vesicles was not observed in for C16OBCb and C18OBCb (Fig. 7(h) and (k)), and only spherical micelles or elliptical vesicles were formed within the investigated concentration ranges. The Cryo-TEM experiments for COBCb (n = 12, 14, 16, 18) at the concentrations of 20 × cmc were carried out and the Cryo-TEM images were shown in Fig. 8. The formation of spherical particles was also observed for all of these four surfactants from cryo-TEM images whose dimension matches closely with DLS and TEM data.
Fig. 7

TEM images of COBCb (n = 12, 14, 16 and 18) aggregates: C12OBCb at (a) 0.94 mmol dm−3 (5 × cmc), (b) 1.88 mmol dm−3 (10 × cmc), (c) 3.76 mmol dm−3 (20 × cmc); C14OBCb at (d) 0.114 mmol dm−3 (5 × cmc), (e) 0.229 mmol dm−3 (10 × cmc), (f) 0.458 mmol dm−3 (20 × cmc); C16OBCb at (g) 0.0115 mmol dm−3 (5 × cmc), (h) 0.023 mmol dm−3 (10 × cmc), (i) 0.046 mmol dm−3 (20 × cmc); C18OBCb at (j) 0.0175 mmol dm−3 (5 × cmc), (k) 0.035 mmol dm−3 (10 × cmc), (l) 0.07 mmol dm−3 (20 × cmc).

Fig. 8

Cryo-TEM images of vesicles formed at 20 × cmc for (a) C12OBCb (3.76 mmol dm−3), (b) C14OBCb (0.458 mmol dm−3), (c) C16OBCb (0.046 mmol dm−3), and (d) C18OBCb (0.07 mmol dm−3).

Moreover, optical microscope by OLYMPUS BX51 Fluorescence Microscopy was performed to investigate encapsulation ability of this new class of surfactants. The fluorescent image for C12OBCb solution (3.76 mmol dm−3) dyed with calcein is shown in Fig. S17.† It can be seen that calcein was well encapsulated into the vesicles. The diameter of small vesicles is a few tens of nanometers, which is also consistent with the DLS and TEM results.

Core flooding experiment

The capability of enhancing oil recovery for the C12Cb and COBCb (n = 12, 14, 16, 18) solution was evaluated in sandstone core, and the results of the surfactant flood ing were summarized in Table 3. The displacement efficiency of COBCb (n = 12, 14, 16, 18) is slightly higher than that of C12Cb (6.73%) at the same surfactant concentration (Fig. 9). C12OBCb enhanced an additional oil recovery of 10.55%, which was the highest among the COBCb species. The relatively higher oil recovery for COBCb surfactants could be attributed to the excellent interfacial tension properties.
Fig. 9

Oil recovery as a function of pore volume injected (PV) for C12Cb and COBCb (n = 12, 14, 16, 18).

Conclusions

A novel series of phenyl-containing carboxybetaine surfactants were successfully prepared by an efficient and high-yield synthesis route and characterized by 1H NMR, 13C NMR, and ESI-HRMS. The TGA results showed that COBCb was stable and difficult to decompose below 200 °C. COBCb exhibited superior surface activities, including lower cmc (0.1881–0.0023 mmol dm−3), higher efficiency in lowering the surface tension of water (25.6–32.6 mN m−1) and stronger adsorption tendency at the air/water interface, in comparison with CCb with the same hydrocarbon chain length. COBCb also showed excellent interfacial tension activity against toluene, with C12OBCb reaching ultralow interfacial tension (10−3 mN m−1) in the range of 0.2–1 mmol dm−3. The DLS and TEM results showed that the COBCb could spontaneous aggregate into vesicles, and the sizes of the aggregates increase with increasing surfactant concentrations. In particular, COBCb with n = 12 and 14 aggregated to form elongated micelles at 10 × cmc. From these results, it could be concluded that the presence of a phenyl group in the hydrophobic chain has a dramatic effect on the surface–active properties and aggregation behavior of betaine-type surfactants. Moreover, core flooding experiments directly demonstrate that COBCb could remarkably enhance oil recovery by 7.85–10.55%.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts to declare.
  22 in total

1.  Phenyl-ring-bearing cationic surfactants: effect of ring location on the micellar structure.

Authors:  Swati De; Vinod K Aswal; S Ramakrishnan
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 3.882

2.  Adsorption and micellization behavior of novel gluconamide-type gemini surfactants.

Authors:  Kenichi Sakai; Shin Umezawa; Mamoru Tamura; Yuichiro Takamatsu; Koji Tsuchiya; Kanjiro Torigoe; Takahiro Ohkubo; Tomokazu Yoshimura; Kunio Esumi; Hideki Sakai; Masahiko Abe
Journal:  J Colloid Interface Sci       Date:  2007-11-06       Impact factor: 8.128

3.  Zwitterionic heterogemini surfactants containing ammonium and carboxylate headgroups. 1. Adsorption and micellization.

Authors:  Tomokazu Yoshimura; Kanae Nyuta; Kunio Esumi
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2005-03-29       Impact factor: 3.882

4.  Synergistic sphere-to-rod micelle transition in mixed solutions of sodium dodecyl sulfate and cocoamidopropyl betaine.

Authors:  N C Christov; N D Denkov; P A Kralchevsky; K P Ananthapadmanabhan; A Lips
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2004-02-03       Impact factor: 3.882

5.  Synthesis, aggregation behavior and interfacial activity of branched alkylbenzenesulfonate gemini surfactants.

Authors:  Qun Zhang; Maozhang Tian; Yuchun Han; Chunxian Wu; Zhibo Li; Yilin Wang
Journal:  J Colloid Interface Sci       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 8.128

6.  Microcalorimetric study on micellization of nonionic surfactants with a benzene ring or adamantane in their hydrophobic chains.

Authors:  Yajuan Li; James Reeve; Yilin Wang; Robert K Thomas; Jinben Wang; Haike Yan
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2005-08-25       Impact factor: 2.991

7.  High temperature ultralow water content carbon dioxide-in-water foam stabilized with viscoelastic zwitterionic surfactants.

Authors:  Shehab Alzobaidi; Chang Da; Vu Tran; Maša Prodanović; Keith P Johnston
Journal:  J Colloid Interface Sci       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 8.128

8.  Cleavable cationic antibacterial amphiphiles: synthesis, mechanism of action, and cytotoxicities.

Authors:  Jiaul Hoque; Padma Akkapeddi; Venkateswarlu Yarlagadda; Divakara S S M Uppu; Pratik Kumar; Jayanta Haldar
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2012-08-08       Impact factor: 3.882

9.  Synthesis and surface properties of anionic gemini surfactants with amide groups.

Authors:  Tomokazu Yoshimura; Kunio Esumi
Journal:  J Colloid Interface Sci       Date:  2004-08-01       Impact factor: 8.128

10.  Synthesis, Surface and Antimicrobial Activity of Piperidine-Based Sulfobetaines.

Authors:  Daria Wieczorek; Adam Dobrowolski; Katarzyna Staszak; Dobrawa Kwaśniewska; Patrycja Dubyk
Journal:  J Surfactants Deterg       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 1.902

View more
  1 in total

1.  Micellization, surface activities and thermodynamics study of pyridinium-based ionic liquid surfactants in aqueous solution.

Authors:  Dong Fu; Xiaoru Gao; Bo Huang; Jue Wang; Yao Sun; Weijun Zhang; Kan Kan; Xiaochen Zhang; Yang Xie; Xin Sui
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 4.036

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.