| Literature DB >> 35548050 |
Lulu Han1, Hui Tao1, Lingyun Kang1, Shuo Wang1,2, Qiyu Diao1, Deping Han3, Kai Cui1.
Abstract
Early feeding regime has a substantial lifelong effect on lambs and weaning ewe's milk can lead to the intestinal injury of lambs. To explore the molecular regulatory mechanism of intestinal injury of lambs under weaning stress, the jejunum was conducted transcriptome and then integrated analyzed with our previous proteome data. A total of 255 upregulated genes and 285 downregulated genes were significantly identified. These genes showed low overlapping with differentially expressed proteins identified by isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantification (iTRAQ). However, according to their functions, the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and proteins with the same expression trend were enriched for the similar Gene Ontology (GO) terms and the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways, such as intestinal lipid absorption, urea cycle, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) signaling pathway, and ferroptosis. Furthermore, the DEGs, including FABP2, ACSL3, APOA2, APOC3, and PCK1, might play essential roles in intestinal lipid absorption and immune response through the PPAR signaling pathway and ferroptosis. This study could provide new insights into early lamb breeding at the molecular level.Entities:
Keywords: intestinal injury; proteome; sheep; transcriptome; weaning stress
Year: 2022 PMID: 35548050 PMCID: PMC9082421 DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2022.809188
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Vet Sci ISSN: 2297-1769
The quality of data output.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AR1 | 22995633 | 22373634 | 5.75 | 5.59 | 0.06 | 91.96 | 85.92 | 50.48 |
| AR2 | 28353082 | 27932670 | 7.09 | 6.98 | 0.04 | 94.19 | 89.22 | 50.56 |
| AR3 | 21275181 | 21220183 | 5.32 | 5.31 | 0.06 | 92.59 | 86.52 | 50.05 |
| ER1 | 23576166 | 23185535 | 5.89 | 5.8 | 0.04 | 94.19 | 89.28 | 49.38 |
| ER2 | 18195848 | 18136753 | 4.55 | 4.53 | 0.04 | 96.15 | 92.00 | 48.24 |
| ER3 | 21778235 | 21267590 | 5.44 | 5.32 | 0.06 | 91.91 | 85.81 | 49.13 |
Raw reads: the original sequence data was counted, four behaviors per unit, statistics of the number of sequencing sequences of each file.
Clean reads: the calculation method was the same as raw reads, but the statistical files were filtered sequencing data.
Raw bases (G): the number of original sequence data was multiplied by the length of the sequencing sequence, unit: G (data).
Clean bases (G): the number of filtered sequences multiplied by the length of the sequence, unit: G (data).
Error (%): base error rate. Q20, Q30 (%): the percentage of bases with Phred values > 20 and 30 to the total bases.
GC (%): the percentage of the total number of bases G and C to the total number of bases.
Figure 1The principal component analysis (PCA) analysis of gene expressions in the intestinal samples. The black patterns represent the artificially reared (AR) group and the red patterns represent the ewe reared (ER) group.
Figure 2Gene expression between the AR and ER groups. (A) The expression of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between the two groups. The red dots indicate upregulated DEGs and the green dots indicate downregulated DEGs. The gray dots reveal that there is no difference in the expression of genes between the two groups. (B) Number of significantly DEGs.
Figure 3Enriched biological processes, cellular components, and molecular functions assigned to the DEGs between the AR and ER groups. The diamond showed the biological processes; the big circle showed the cellular components; the small circle showed the genes; the different colors represented the different functional groups, respectively, based on kappa score; all the DEGs were not enriched molecular functions.
Figure 4The Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment analysis of the DEGs between the AR and ER groups. The big circle showed the metabolic pathway; the small circle showed the genes; the different colors represented different pathways, respectively.
Figure 5The top 10 hub genes by cytoHubba in the DEGs between the AR and ER groups.
Figure 6Differential correlation of proteome-transcriptome expression. (A) The correlation between all the associated protein and messenger RNA (mRNA). (B) The distribution of correlation of consistent-changed transcriptome and proteome. (C) The distribution of correlation of different-changed transcriptome and proteome. (D) Detailed classification of expression correlation.
Figure 7Enrichment analysis of the co-expressed DEGs between transcriptome and proteome. (A) Enrichment analysis of the genes, which were upregulated in transcriptome but downregulated in proteome. (B) Enrichment analysis of the genes, which were downregulated in transcriptome and proteome. The diamond represented the metabolic pathways in the KEGG database; the triangle represented the functions in the GO database; the circle showed the genes; the different colors represented the different functional groups, respectively, based on kappa score.