| Literature DB >> 35547111 |
Rachel Wooliver1, Stephanie N Kivlin2, Sindhu Jagadamma1.
Abstract
Interactions between species above- and belowground are among the top factors that govern ecosystem functioning including soil organic carbon (SOC) storage. In agroecosystems, understanding how crop diversification affects soil biodiversity and SOC storage at the local scale remains a key challenge for addressing soil degradation and biodiversity loss that plague these systems. Yet, outcomes of crop diversification for soil microbial diversity and SOC storage, which are key indicators of soil health, are not always positive but rather they are highly idiosyncratic to agroecosystems. Using five case studies, we highlight the importance of selecting ideal crop functional types (as opposed to focusing on plant diversity) when considering diversification options for maximizing SOC accumulation. Some crop functional types and crop diversification approaches are better suited for enhancing SOC at particular sites, though SOC responses to crop diversification can vary annually and with duration of crop cover. We also highlight how SOC responses to crop diversification are more easily interpretable through changes in microbial community composition (as opposed to microbial diversity). We then develop suggestions for future crop diversification experiment standardization including (1) optimizing sampling effort and sequencing depth for soil microbial communities and (2) understanding the mechanisms guiding responses of SOC functional pools with varying stability to crop diversification. We expect that these suggestions will move knowledge forward about biodiversity and ecosystem functioning in agroecosystems, and ultimately be of use to producers for optimizing soil health in their croplands.Entities:
Keywords: above-belowground interactions; agroecosystem; biodiversity-ecosystem function; crop diversification; soil health; soil microbial diversity; soil organic carbon
Year: 2022 PMID: 35547111 PMCID: PMC9082997 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.854247
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 6.064
Case study details.
| Study focus | Response of soil bacterial communities to changes in crop sequence and biocovers | Shifts in soil fungal communities across cover cropping treatments, with a focus on AMF | Changes in soil bacterial communities across an agroforestry chronosequence | Shifts in soil microbial communities and soil fertility across cropping systems | How crop rotation shapes soil funga, chemical properties, and soybean cyst nematodes |
| Location | Tennessee, United States (MTREC: 36°1′ N, 85°7′ W; RECM: 35°32′ N, 88°26′ W) | Pennsylvania, United States (40°43′N, 77°55′W) | Shaanxi, China (34°21′N, 107°43′E) | Heilongjiang, China (49° N, 125°41′E) | Minnesota, United States (44°4′N, 93°33′W) |
| Soil order | Alfisol | Ultisol | Cambisol | Vertisol | Mollisol |
| Focal crop | Corn, Soybean, Cotton | Corn, Soybean, Wheat | Wheat | Soybean | Corn, Soybean |
| Control, | A. Cotton mono. (RECM only) | A. Fallow | A. Wheat mono. | A. Fallow soybean | A. Corn mono. |
| Annual fertilizer rates | 128.5 kg N ha–1 (corn only) |
| 160 kg N ha–1 | 196.5 kg N ha–1 as (NH4)3PO4 and urea | 224.4 kg ha–1 as urea (2015 and 2016 corn only) |
| Tillage regime | No-till | Chisel tillage (depth not specified) before cash and cover crop planting | Tillage (type not specified) to 20 cm before cash crop planting |
| Chisel tillage (depth not specified) and field cultivation before cash crop planting |
| Expt. duration | 11 and 12 years | 3 years | 5–14 years | 11 years | 33 and 34 years |
| Soil sampling depth | 0–15 cm | 0–20 cm | 0–10 cm | 0–20 cm | 0–20 cm |
| Soil sampling season | Spring | Spring, Summer | Fall | Fall | Spring, Summer, Fall |
| C measurement | SOC (%) | SOM (%) | SOC (g kg–1) | SOM (g kg–1) (by treatment) | SOC (%) |
| Replicates | 3–4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 |
| Composited subsamples | 6 | 10 |
| 7 |
|
| Plot size (m2) | 75 (MTREC), 57 (RECM) | 59 |
|
|
|
FIGURE 1Responses of soil bacterial diversity to crop diversification. Three studies are represented: Ashworth et al. (2017) (A–D), Gao et al. (2019) (E), and Song et al. (2018) (F). Responses are shown as log response ratios (LRR) with 95% confidence intervals which account for low sample sizes (Pustejovsky, 2018). Responses are calculated using Inverse Simpson diversity. Open points represent log response ratios whose 95% confidence intervals overlap zero, while solid points represent log response ratios whose 95% confidence intervals do not overlap zero.
FIGURE 2Responses of soil organic carbon to crop diversification. Five studies are represented: Ashworth et al. (2017) (A–D), Cloutier et al. (2020) (E), Gao et al. (2019) (F), Song et al. (2018) (G), and Strom et al. (2020) (H). Responses are shown as log response ratios (LRR) with 95% confidence intervals which account for low sample sizes (Pustejovsky, 2018). Open points represent log response ratios whose 95% confidence intervals overlap zero, while solid points represent log response ratios whose 95% confidence intervals do not overlap zero. Responses in (F,G) do not have 95% confidence intervals because the original studies reported only treatment mean organic carbon values rather than plot-level values; solid points represent cases in which the original study found sign.
FIGURE 3Responses of soil fungal diversity to crop diversification. Responses are shown as log response ratios (LRR) with 95% confidence intervals which account for low sample sizes (Pustejovsky, 2018). Three studies are represented: Cloutier et al. (2020) (A), Song et al. (2018) (B), and Strom et al. (2020) (C). Responses are calculated using Inverse Simpson diversity. While black responses represent the total fungal community, colored responses represent functionally distinct subsets of the fungal community: arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF; blue), saprotrophic fungi (brown), and plant pathogenic fungi (red). Open points represent log response ratios whose 95% confidence intervals overlap zero, while solid points represent log response ratios whose 95% confidence intervals do not overlap zero.
FIGURE 4Distance-based redundancy analysis of soil bacterial communities in response to soil organic carbon (SOC), with readily available SOC pools shown if data were available as dissolved organic carbon (DOC). Three studies are represented: Ashworth et al. (2017) (A,B), Gao et al. (2019) (C), and Song et al. (2018) (D). Asterisks represent significance of marginal treatment effects (***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05).
FIGURE 5Associations between soil organic carbon and either soil bacterial (A) or fungal diversity (B). Associations are shown as standardized beta values derived from linear mixed models that account for study design (i.e., include replicate as a random effect). Colors indicate the magnitude and direction of beta value, from strongly negative (red) to strongly positive (blue). No beta values were significant at α = 0.05.
FIGURE 6Distance-based redundancy analysis of soil fungal communities in response to soil organic carbon (SOC), with readily available SOC pools shown if data were available as permanganate-oxidizable carbon (POXC). Three studies are represented: Cloutier et al. (2020) (A), Song et al. (2018) (B), and Strom et al. (2020) (C). Asterisks represent significance of marginal treatment effects (***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01).