| Literature DB >> 35545998 |
Lorena Duca1, Isabella Nava2, Daniele Vallisa3, Giovanni Battista Vadacca4, Andrea Magnacavallo5, Andrea Vercelli6, Patrizio Capelli7, Giovanna Graziadei8, Filippo Banchini9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Dysregulation of iron metabolism and hyper-inflammation are two key points in the pathogenesis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Since high hepcidin levels and low serum iron can predict COVID-19 severity and mortality, we decided to investigate iron metabolism and inflammatory response in 32 COVID-19 adult patients with a diagnosis of COVID-19 defined by a positive result of RT-PCR nasopharyngeal swab, and admitted to an Italian emergency department for acute respiratory failure at different degree.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35545998 PMCID: PMC9171873 DOI: 10.23750/abm.v93i2.12937
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Biomed ISSN: 0392-4203
Demographic, Hematological, Iron Metabolism and Inflammatory Parameters
|
| ||
|
| 32 | |
|
| 13/19 | |
|
| 63.5 (28-91) | |
|
| ||
|
|
| |
| 6.8 (3.8-9.8) | 4.0-10.0 | |
| 5.7 (3.0-8.4) | 2.0-8.0 | |
| 0.8 (0.5-1.2) | 1.5-4.0 | |
| 0 (0.-0.01) | 0.10-0.50 | |
| 4.71 (4.27-5.16) | 4.00-5.40 | |
|
| 13.9 (13.0-14.8) | 12.0-16.0 |
|
| 86 (84-88) | 82-98 |
|
| 29 (28-30) | 27-32 |
|
| 0.84 (0.70-0.99) | 0.60-1.00 |
|
| 36 (25-48) | 10-50 |
|
|
| 10-31 |
|
| 26 (13-39) | 10-31 |
|
| ||
|
| 30 (0-20) | 49-151 |
|
| 9 (6-13) | 20-45 |
|
|
| 12-120 |
|
|
| -0.60- 0.001 |
|
| ||
|
|
| <30 |
|
|
| 0-0.5 |
|
|
| 12-25 |
|
|
| 2.0-15.0 |
|
|
| 30-80 |
|
|
| 15-400 |
|
| 631 (244-1019) | <1000 |
|
| ||
|
| 0.49 (0.21-0.77) | 0.10-0.35 |
|
|
| 0-247 |
|
| ||
|
| 13 (41) | |
|
| 14 (44) | |
|
| 0 | |
|
| 5 (15) | |
M: male, F: female. RBC: red blood cells, AST: aspartate aminotransferase, ALT: alanine aminotransferase, NTBI: non-transferrin-bound iron, ESR: erythrocyte sedimentation rate, CRP: C-reactive protein, IL-6: interleukin 6, MDA: malondialdehyde, LDH: lactate dehydrogenase, are reported as median and IQR value.
Demographics, laboratory and radiological results of the 3 groups of patients stratified according to PaO2/FiO2 ratio
| Group 1 (G1) PaO2/FiO2 > 300 mmHg | Group 2 (G2) PaO2/FiO2 > 200 < 300 mmHg | Group 3 (G3) PaO2/FiO2 <100 mmHg | P<0.05 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 13 (6/7) | 14 (11/3) | 5 (2/3) | |
|
| 54 (13) | 68 (15) | *88 (5) | *p=0.001 vs G1-G2 |
|
| 8 | 7 | 4 | |
|
| 2 (15) | 9 (64) | 5 (100) | |
| 4.8 (3.9-5.7) | 7.7 (5.1-10.4) | *18.2 (16.8-19.7) | *p=0.001 vs G1-G2 | |
| 0.9 (0.5-1.3) | 0.8 (0.5-1.1) | *°0.5 (0.2-0.8) | *p=0.001 vs G1 | |
|
| 14.3 (13.5-15.1) | 14.0 (13.0-15.0) | *11.7 (10.9-12.6) | *p=0.001 vs G1-G2 |
|
| 31 (22-41) | *°31 (20-42) | 23 (12-34) | *p=0.001 vs G1 |
|
| 9 (7-12) | *9 (3-15) | 8 (1-16) | *p=0.001 vs G1 |
|
| 275 (72-479) | *417 (198-637) | 559 (455-664) | *p=0.001 vs G1-G3 |
|
| -0.34 (-0.79-0.11) | 0.11 (0.18-0.40) | -0.06 (-0.77-0.65) | |
|
| 38 (27-49) | 63 (50-76) | *120 (113-128) | *p=0.001 vs G1-G2 |
|
| 1.3 (0.7-1.9) | 5.1 (2.3-7.9) | ^*14.0 (9.2-18.9) | ^p=0.01 vs G2 |
|
| 95 (79-111) | 95 (58-133) | *110 (49-172) | *p=0.001 vs G1-G2 |
|
| 5.6 (0.85-10.4) | 12.0 (2.0-23.0) | °50.0 (2.2-97.8) | ° p=0.04 vs G1-G2 |
|
| 63 (26-100) | *117 (56-178) | 117 (62-173) | *p=0.001 vs G1 |
|
| 402 (360-444) | 536 (466-606) | *754 (629-879) | *p=0.001 vs G1-G2 |
|
| 409 °(276-543) | 763 (332-1195) | 3614 (79-7150) | °p=0.04 vs G2 |
|
| 0.40 (0.09-0.72) | 0.49 (0.24-0.75) | ^0.53 (0.20-0.87) | ^ p=0.01 vs G1-G2 |
|
| 251 (192-311) | 320 (278-362) | ^462 (277-648) | ^p=0.01 vs G1-G2 |
|
| 8+/-6 | 11+/-5 | 21+/-4 | |
|
| 15+/-5 | 24+/-9 | 56+/-19 |
M: male, F: female. HP: hypertension, DM: diabetes mellitus, CAD: cardiovascular disease, NTBI: non-transferrin-bound iron, ESR: erythrocyte sedimentation rate, CRP: C-reactive protein, IL-6: interleukin 6, MDA: malondialdehyde, LDH: lactate dehydrogenase. LUS: lung ultrasound, HRTC: high-resolution chest tomography. Laboratory tests are reported as median (IQR) value.
Figure 1.Iron metabolism and inflammation status: (A) NTBI correlations with Transferrin Saturation % and Chitrotriosidase respectively; (B) correlations between Hepcidin and CRP and between Hepcidin and Fibrinogen.
Figure 2.Correlation between imaging techniques: HRCT and LUS.