Literature DB >> 3554578

Nonoperative management of the ultrasonically evaluated appendiceal mass.

P Bagi, S Dueholm.   

Abstract

Forty patients with an ultrasonically evaluated appendiceal mass were studied. Abscesses were diagnosed in 31 patients (78%). Seventeen patients had an ultrasonically guided percutaneous drainage performed, and all but one patient had resolution of symptoms without further treatment or complications. Fourteen patients were treated conservatively without drainage, and 12 had resolution of symptoms without interference. Ultrasonograms in the remaining nine patients (22%) revealed phlegmonous inflammation only, and all recovered without treatment. The three patients considered failures had surgery because of intestinal obstruction or suspected but unverified perforation. Three patients (8.5%) had recurrent appendicitis within 5 months after the initial attack. Diagnostic errors delayed proper therapy for 1 month in a patient with a cecal carcinoma and for 5 months in a patient with Crohn's disease. Late sequelae were observed in four patients, three of whom had surgery. Nonoperative treatment and if possible ultrasonically guided percutaneous drainage of verified abscesses are safe procedures with few complications and late sequelae. However, diligent in-hospital observation and close follow-up are mandatory.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3554578

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surgery        ISSN: 0039-6060            Impact factor:   3.982


  21 in total

1.  Can perforated appendicitis Be diagnosed preoperatively based on admission factors?

Authors:  D Oliak; D Yamini; V M Udani; R J Lewis; H Vargas; T Arnell; M J Stamos
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Appendiceal involvement in cecal carcinoma: demonstration by ultrasound.

Authors:  W B Becking; J B Puylaert; M A Feldberg; M S van Leeuwen
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1989

Review 3.  Management of appendiceal mass: controversial issues revisited.

Authors:  Abdul-Wahed N Meshikhes
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-11-13       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Is interval appendectomy indicated after non-operative management of acute appendicitis in patients with cancer? A retrospective review from a single institution.

Authors:  Tushar Samdani; Tiffany T Fancher; Frederic M Pieracci; Soumitra Eachempati; Laila Rashidi; Garrett M Nash
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 0.688

5.  [Modern treatment of an appendiceal mass].

Authors:  L I Partecke; A Müller; W Kessler; S Diedrich; C-D Heidecke; M Patrzyk; B Mensel
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 6.  Interval appendicectomy after appendiceal mass or abscess in adults: what is "best practice"?

Authors:  Lorraine Corfield
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2007-01-01       Impact factor: 2.549

7.  Conservative management of acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Ajaz A Malik; Shams-ul Bari
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  C-Reactive protein is an independent surgical indication marker for appendicitis: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Shozo Yokoyama; Katsunari Takifuji; Tsukasa Hotta; Kenji Matsuda; Toru Nasu; Mikihito Nakamori; Naoki Hirabayashi; Hiroyuki Kinoshita; Hiroki Yamaue
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2009-10-31       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  When is pneumonia not pneumonia?

Authors:  Ayodele Sasegbon
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2015-06-08

10.  Retained appendicolith in an inflamed appendix.

Authors:  Naoko Iwahashi Kondo; Hiroshi Kohno
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2008-10-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.