Literature DB >> 35544556

HgCdTe/black phosphorus van der Waals heterojunction for high-performance polarization-sensitive midwave infrared photodetector.

Hanxue Jiao1, Xudong Wang1, Yan Chen1, Shuaifei Guo2, Shuaiqin Wu1, Chaoyu Song2, Shenyang Huang2, Xinning Huang1, Xiaochi Tai1, Tie Lin1, Hong Shen1, Hugen Yan2, Weida Hu1, Xiangjian Meng1, Junhao Chu1, Yuanbo Zhang2, Jianlu Wang1.   

Abstract

New-generation infrared detectors call for higher operation temperature and polarization sensitivity. For traditional HgCdTe infrared detectors, the additional polarization optics and cryogenic cooling are necessary to achieve high-performance infrared polarization detection, while they can complicate this system and limit the integration. Here, a mixed-dimensional HgCdTe/black phosphorous van der Waals heterojunction photodiode is proposed for polarization-sensitive midwave infrared photodetection. Benefiting from van der Waals integration, type III broken-gap band alignment heterojunctions are achieved. Anisotropy optical properties of black phosphorous bring polarization sensitivity from visible light to midwave infrared without external optics. Our devices show an outstanding performance at room temperature without applied bias, with peak blackbody detectivity as high as 7.93 × 1010 cm Hz1/2 W-1 and average blackbody detectivity over 2.1 × 1010 cm Hz1/2 W-1 in midwave infrared region. This strategy offers a possible practical solution for next-generation infrared detector with high operation temperature, high performance, and multi-information acquisition.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35544556      PMCID: PMC9094662          DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abn1811

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Adv        ISSN: 2375-2548            Impact factor:   14.957


INTRODUCTION

Infrared detectors, which use infrared radiation intensity and spectrum to distinguish objects from complex backgrounds, have vitally important applications in many fields, such as environmental monitoring, thermal imaging, and free-space optical communication (–). New-generation infrared detectors are supposed to have features including high resolution, multicolor functionality, high operation temperature (HOT), and polarization sensitivity (–). In 1985, the conception of realizing HOT infrared detector was proposed by Ashley and Elliott (). Up to now, many heterogeneous structures have been proposed to implement HOT detectors (, –), such as p+/p−/n+ (), p+/n−/n+ (), and nBn (–) structures. However, high-performance room temperature operation is still a severe challenge for infrared detectors, especially in midwave and long-wave infrared region. Besides, traditional infrared polarization detector is normally achieved by adding polarization optics components, which undoubtedly increases structure complexity of the detector. Therefore, it is necessary to find advanced materials and device architectures to achieve previously unknown room temperature infrared polarization detectors. Van der Waals heterogeneous integration may be an attractive way to solve this problem. In van der Waals heterojunction, materials are combined through intermolecular interaction, and there is no chemical bonding on the interface and surface; thus, they provide a near-perfect heterogeneous interface and high flexibility of heterostructure construction, such as two-dimensional (2D)/0D heterojunctions, 2D/2D heterojunctions, and 2D/3D heterojunctions (–), showing great potential for high-performance photodetectors. 2D materials that relied on van der Waals forces between layers have received extensive attention in development of previously undefined and high-performance infrared detectors (, –). Among 2D materials, black phosphorus (bP) is extremely noteworthy for its high carrier mobility (, ), layer-dependent narrow bandgap (, ) (from ~0.3 eV of bulk to ~1.5 eV of monolayer), and anisotropy crystal structure (, ), which makes bP a promising candidate for high-performance infrared polarization detection. Polarization-resolved midwave infrared (MWIR) photodetectors based on bP has been realized, such as bP vertical p-n junction (), bP/MoS2 heterojunction, and bP/MoS2/graphene unipolar barrier heterojunction (–), showing great potential in infrared accurate identification. However, 2D materials with only atomic-scale thickness have weak absorption, which limits the performance in infrared detection. 2D/3D mixed-dimension integration seems especially attractive for infrared detectors since it gives chances to combine advantages of classic infrared materials and emerging 2D materials. Here, a HgCdTe/bP van der Waals heterojunction is designed to achieve room temperature polarization-sensitive MWIR detection. Thanks to the broken-gap band alignment of HgCdTe/bP heterojunction, photoinduced direct tunneling (DT) in HgCdTe/bP heterojunction brings low noise and large photocurrent at zero bias, leading to high light-to-dark current ratio over 104. Our photodetector exhibits high sensitivity for MWIR at room temperature and show obvious blackbody response with responsivity of 193 mA/W and detectivity of 7.93 × 1010 cm Hz1/2 W−1. Besides, polarization sensitivity from visible light to 4.0 μm is confirmed, which is attributed to the anisotropy crystal structure of bP, bringing an additional dimension into photodetection. Therefore, this device shows tremendous potential in MWIR detection under circumstances of room temperature, low power consumption, and multidimensional imaging.

RESULTS

Device structure and interface characterization

To ensure high infrared absorption of our photodetector, we designed the device as a heterojunction consisting of a multilayer bP flake and an 8-μm-thick HgCdTe film, as shown in Fig. 1A. Before transferring bP to the surface of HgCdTe, an area of around 1 mm2 of the HgCdTe film is removed to fill the 100- to 150-nm-thick Al2O3 for electric isolation. The area of Al2O3 is much larger than that of the bP flake and electrodes to ensure reliable isolation so that the signal from HgCdTe/bP heterojunction can be collected sufficiently via electrodes. More details of the device fabrication can be found in Materials and Methods. An optical microscope image of a HgCdTe/bP heterojunction photodetector is shown in Fig. 1B, where multilayer bP is marked with white dashed box, the left half of the image is HgCdTe, and the dark blue area of the image (right half) is Al2O3.
Fig. 1.

Structure and interface characteristics of HgCdTe/bP heterojunction.

(A) Schematic diagram of HgCdTe/bP heterojunction and its electrode contacts. (B) Optical microscope image of a typical device. The left part of bP is on HgCdTe, and the right part is on Al2O3. Scale bar, 10 μm. (C) High-resolution cross-sectional TEM image of the HgCdTe/bP interface. Scale bar, 5 nm. (D) Cross-sectional TEM image of the HgCdTe/bP interface. Scale bar, 10 nm. (E) The EDS mapping corresponding to (D), where the elements Hg, Cd, Te, P, and O are marked with different colors, showing no obvious interdiffusion layer between bP and HgCdTe. (F) Cross-sectional TEM image of the metal/bP/Al2O3 interfaces. Scale bar, 10 nm.

Structure and interface characteristics of HgCdTe/bP heterojunction.

(A) Schematic diagram of HgCdTe/bP heterojunction and its electrode contacts. (B) Optical microscope image of a typical device. The left part of bP is on HgCdTe, and the right part is on Al2O3. Scale bar, 10 μm. (C) High-resolution cross-sectional TEM image of the HgCdTe/bP interface. Scale bar, 5 nm. (D) Cross-sectional TEM image of the HgCdTe/bP interface. Scale bar, 10 nm. (E) The EDS mapping corresponding to (D), where the elements Hg, Cd, Te, P, and O are marked with different colors, showing no obvious interdiffusion layer between bP and HgCdTe. (F) Cross-sectional TEM image of the metal/bP/Al2O3 interfaces. Scale bar, 10 nm. The cross-sectional transmission electron microscope (TEM) images in Fig. 1 (C and D) show the interface between bP and HgCdTe. The layered structure of multilayer bP is observed clearly in Fig. 1C, with a corresponding monolayer thickness of 5.5 Å. At the interface, a 2-nm-thick noncrystal layer between bP and HgCdTe was observed, which is attributed to PO from oxidation of bP during device fabrication. Existence of the PO layer introduces unpremeditated defects at the interface, which has a negative impact on photoresponse time and transmission of photogenerated carriers. However, this unintentionally oxide layer also has a positive effect as a natural tunneling barrier in our photodetector, which could be replaced by other suitable materials with well-designed barrier height and width. Moreover, energy-dispersive x-ray spectrometry (EDS) mapping of HgCdTe/bP interface was measured and shown in Fig. 1E, where components of Hg, Cd, Te, P, and O are clearly identified and marked with different colors, demonstrating sharp and clean van der Waals interface between bP and HgCdTe with no interdiffusion. The cross-sectional TEM image of metal/bP/Al2O3 interfaces was also shown in Fig. 1F, showing a similar layered structure of bP and clean van der Waals bP/Al2O3 interface without impurity. Besides, other interfaces of the device, including metal/HgCdTe and Al2O3/HgCdTe, were also measured and analyzed via cross-sectional TEM and EDS mapping (figs. S1 and S2), which all indicate clear and flat interfaces without gap or impurity.

Optical properties and broken-gap band alignment

In semiconductor heterojunction, band alignment is necessary for investigating carrier transport process and correlated optoelectronic characteristics. To determine band alignment of HgCdTe/bP heterojunction in this work, infrared spectroscopy and Kelvin probe force microscope (KPFM) were measured. Noticing that HgCdTe is a pseudo-binary semiconductor, which has tunable bandgap correlated to component and temperature (), we measured infrared absorption spectra to estimate the cutoff wavelength (λc) and bandgap (Eg) of HgCdTe, as shown in Fig. 2A (top). Here, λc is defined as the wavelength where absorption decreases to 50% of the maximum value. From Fig. 2A, it can be derived that the λc of HgCdTe is approximately 4.4 μm; thus, the optical Eg of HgCdTe is 0.28 eV, estimated by . The component of Hg1-CdTe could also be estimated as x = 0.3 via Chu’s formula (see details in note S1) (). Similarly, infrared absorption spectra of HgCdTe/bP heterojunction are shown in Fig. 2A (bottom). The cutoff wavelength λc of HgCdTe/bP heterojunction is almost the same as that of HgCdTe. However, an unsmoothed segment appeared at λ = 4.2 μm, which is attributed by absorption edge of bP. Our results also agree well with previously reported theoretical and experimental value (, ).
Fig. 2.

Infrared spectra and band alignment of HgCdTe/bP heterojunction.

(A) Infrared absorption spectra of HgCdTe and HgCdTe/bP heterojunction. The cutoff wavelengths λc of HgCdTe and HgCdTe/bP heterojunction are both ~4.4 μm. (B) Schematic of energy band alignment of HgCdTe and bP before contact. Positions of Ec, EF, and Ev relative to vacuum level are labeled respectively. (C) Classic I-V characteristics of HgCdTe/bP heterojunction in dark environment and at room temperature. Inset: Energy band diagram of HgCdTe/bP heterojunction after contact under equilibrium. (D) Energy band diagram of HgCdTe/bP heterojunction (i) at reverse bias, (ii) at small forward bias, and (iii) at large forward bias. Directions of electrons transferring are shown as blue arrows.

Infrared spectra and band alignment of HgCdTe/bP heterojunction.

(A) Infrared absorption spectra of HgCdTe and HgCdTe/bP heterojunction. The cutoff wavelengths λc of HgCdTe and HgCdTe/bP heterojunction are both ~4.4 μm. (B) Schematic of energy band alignment of HgCdTe and bP before contact. Positions of Ec, EF, and Ev relative to vacuum level are labeled respectively. (C) Classic I-V characteristics of HgCdTe/bP heterojunction in dark environment and at room temperature. Inset: Energy band diagram of HgCdTe/bP heterojunction after contact under equilibrium. (D) Energy band diagram of HgCdTe/bP heterojunction (i) at reverse bias, (ii) at small forward bias, and (iii) at large forward bias. Directions of electrons transferring are shown as blue arrows. Work function of bP (ΦbP = 4.92 eV) and of HgCdTe (ΦHgCdTe = 5.18 eV) are derived from KPFM results (see details in note S2 and fig. S3). On the basis of the above-measured data, schematic of energy band alignment of bP and HgCdTe before contact is given in Fig. 2B, showing a broken-gap (type III) heterojunction alignment with the difference in Fermi levels Δ, defined by Δ = ΦbP − ΦHgCdTe, as 0.26 eV. Valence band maximum (VBM) Ev of multilayer bP (>5 layers) is reported as 4.6 eV () so that the conduction band minimum (CBM) Ec of bP is estimated as 4.3 eV by Ec = Ev − Eg. CBM of HgCdTe is ~5.155 eV, estimated by empirical formula based on CdTe bandgap diagram (see details in note S1) (, ), which is lower than VBM of bP. VBM of HgCdTe is estimated as 5.435 eV. X-ray diffraction results of HgCdTe film show a peak at ~72° that is attributed to the (422) facet spacing of as HgCdTe, indicating that our HgCdTe film is single crystal without impurity phases (fig. S4A). Besides, the Hall effect measurement results, which are consistent with the Fermi level position of HgCdTe and bP measured via KPFM, indicate that HgCdTe is an n-type semiconductor (fig. S4B). In addition, carrier concentration and Hall mobility of the HgCdTe are 2.5 × 1016 cm−3 and 390.2 cm2 V−1 s−1, respectively. Note that the Fermi level of a thick bP flake is below its VBM, indicating that the bP is a degenerate p-type semiconductor, which correspond with previous investigations (–) and transfer characteristics in fig. S4C. Therefore, a vertical p-i-n junction is formed between bP and HgCdTe, where i is the insulated PO layer. The current-voltage relation (I-V) characteristics of the HgCdTe/bP p-i-n junction are given in Fig. 2C, which show backward-rectifying diode characteristics. It can be observed that the backward current is larger than forward current, which is caused by the band-to-band tunneling (BTBT) effect (). However, no negative differential resistance was observed in small forward bias, which is attributed to large excess current caused by tunneling via defect states in PO tunneling barrier. To exclude influence of electrode contacts, I-V characteristics between electrodes and bP (HgCdTe) are given in fig. S4D (fig. S4A, inset), showing a good ohmic contact. After bP and HgCdTe contact, the broken-gap band alignment of HgCdTe/bP heterojunction leads to a built-in potential barrier ∆ = 0.26 eV. Hence, electrons in bP will move into HgCdTe and accumulate. Similarly, accumulation layer of holes will appear at the bP side. The bilateral accumulation layer leads to a huge band bending (Fig. 2C, inset), thereby generating a built-in field from bP to HgCdTe, which is opposite to type II p-n junction (, ). Under different bias conditions, as shown in Fig. 2D, at reverse bias, tunneling window of HgCdTe/bP heterojunction opens wider with appearance of BTBT effect, leading to high backward current. When the heterojunction is at small forward bias, barrier of heterojunction is depleted and tunneling window is relatively narrow, causing small forward tunneling current. At large forward bias, carrier transport in heterojunction will be dominated by drift-diffusion mechanism, which is similar to that in type II p-n junction. To further indicate the broken-gap band alignment of HgCdTe/bP heterojunction, we measure the temperature-dependent I-V characteristics in dark condition at room temperature and show the results in fig. S5. The thermionic emission model is used in fig. S5B, and the plot (extracted from fig. S5A at small forward bias) does not show a linear dependency, demonstrating that the thermionic emission model is not suitable for the device. This can indicate that the band structure of HgCdTe/bP heterojunction is not type II band alignment. To investigate the tunneling mechanism of the device, ln(Id/V2) versus −1/V curves extracted at small bias are shown in fig. S5C. The slopes of the curves at various temperatures are all positive, indicating that DT dominates in HgCdTe/bP heterojunction, which is consistent with band alignment analysis. The DT current transport model is described as , where IDT is the DT current, V is the applied bias voltage, m* is the effective mass of the carrier, h is Planck’s constant, and d and φ are tunneling thickness and tunneling barrier height, respectively. The equation could be reduced as . Meanwhile, the barrier height is estimated via DT fitting curves of . Considering the existence of the PO layer, the barrier width of the device could be estimated as ~2 nm. Therefore, the tunneling barrier height of ~1.47 eV is derived, which is attributed to the PO layer.

Room temperature MWIR detection of HgCdTe/bP heterojunction

With the high absorption of light by the HgCdTe/bP heterojunction, the device exhibits a sensitive response to incident light wavelength from visible to MWIR. The classic I-V characteristics of the device with illumination of 637 nm are shown in Fig. 3A. The device exhibits obvious negative open-circuit voltage Voc and positive short circuit current Isc under different incident light powers. It is completely different from the photoresponse characteristics of traditional p-n junctions, which has positive Voc and negative Isc. This photoresponse near zero bias owes to the accumulation of opposite carriers in the heterojunction as a result of band bending, which is also experimental evidence of broken bandgap. For a comprehensive display of this photoresponse characteristic, the I-V characteristics in logarithmic coordinates are given in fig. S4E. It clearly shows that at zero bias, the light-to-dark current ratio, defined by the ratio of current under light Ilight and dark Idark, reaches a high value of 1.31 × 104 (with incident power density of 7.14 W/mm2), which is due to the low dark current and high photocurrent at zero bias. Compared with reported traditional infrared detectors listed in table S1, the dark current density of our device is much lower even at higher operation temperature. The low dark current is attributed to the potential barrier at zero bias, which suppresses the movement of thermal emission carriers, while the high photocurrent is due to DT.
Fig. 3.

Visible to MWIR Photoresponse characteristics of the HgCdTe/bP heterojunction.

(A) I-V characteristics near zero bias under 637-nm laser illumination. Laser power density changes from zero to 7.14 W/mm2. (B) DT fitting of HgCdTe/bP heterojunction at small forward bias under 637-nm laser illumination with various laser powers derived from (A). (C) Schematic of HgCdTe/bP heterojunction band diagram under illumination of light. (D to F) Photocurrent mapping images correspondingly measured at zero bias with 637-, 1060-, and 1310-nm laser illumination. The HgCdTe/bP heterojunction overlap area is marked with white dashed boxes. Scale bar, 10 μm. Inset: Optical image of the measured device. (G) Ten to 90% rise and fall times measured with 637-nm laser illumination. (H) Time-dependent photoresponse characteristics of HgCdTe/bP heterojunction with 4.3-μm laser at zero bias. Frequency of incident light is 1 Hz. (I) Photoresponse spectrum of HgCdTe/bP heterojunction, measured from 520 nm to 4.3 μm at incident power of 3.5 μW.

Visible to MWIR Photoresponse characteristics of the HgCdTe/bP heterojunction.

(A) I-V characteristics near zero bias under 637-nm laser illumination. Laser power density changes from zero to 7.14 W/mm2. (B) DT fitting of HgCdTe/bP heterojunction at small forward bias under 637-nm laser illumination with various laser powers derived from (A). (C) Schematic of HgCdTe/bP heterojunction band diagram under illumination of light. (D to F) Photocurrent mapping images correspondingly measured at zero bias with 637-, 1060-, and 1310-nm laser illumination. The HgCdTe/bP heterojunction overlap area is marked with white dashed boxes. Scale bar, 10 μm. Inset: Optical image of the measured device. (G) Ten to 90% rise and fall times measured with 637-nm laser illumination. (H) Time-dependent photoresponse characteristics of HgCdTe/bP heterojunction with 4.3-μm laser at zero bias. Frequency of incident light is 1 Hz. (I) Photoresponse spectrum of HgCdTe/bP heterojunction, measured from 520 nm to 4.3 μm at incident power of 3.5 μW. As shown in Fig. 3B, under 637-nm laser illumination, the fitting curves of versus exhibit good linear relationship with positive slope at various powers, indicating the existence of DT in the heterojunction with light illumination. As band schematic shown in Fig. 3C, on account of the huge band bending and the bilateral accumulation layers at zero bias, a built-in field from bP to HgCdTe emerges in the heterojunction. With the excitation of light, electrons will jump into the conduction band, and photogenerated carriers will be separated by the built-in electric field. Consequently, photogenerated electrons are transferred from HgCdTe to bP via DT, thereby generating large forward photocurrent flows from bP to HgCdTe. To further investigate the photoresponse mechanism of the photodetector at zero bias, the photocurrent mapping is measured with the micro-area laser scanning. Figure 3 (D to F) shows photocurrent mappings with 637-, 1060-, and 1310-nm laser illumination, respectively, where the heterojunction area and an electrode are marked with white dashed boxes, and the corresponding optical microscope image is shown in Fig. 3D (inset). Photocurrent mapping indicates that the photodetector exhibits a strong photoresponse mainly in the overlapping region between bP and HgCdTe. Taking I-V characteristics and photocurrent mapping into consideration, photoresponse of the HgCdTe/bP photodetector is mainly contributed to photoinduced DT mechanism at HgCdTe/bP heterojunction area. It also further indicates that the HgCdTe/bP photodetector embraces the capability to detect visible to near-infrared light. The photoresponse time of the photodetector with incident light wavelength of 637 nm is shown in Fig. 3G, with a rise time τr ~ 150 μs and a decay time τf ~ 110 μs. The photoresponse characteristics of the detector to MWIR radiation have also been validated. Figure 3H shows a typical time-dependent photoresponse of HgCdTe/bP heterojunction at λ = 4.3 μm. With illumination of laser at frequency f = 1 Hz, the photodetector shows sensitive and quick response. To estimate performance of photodetectors, responsivity and detectivity are two primary parameters. Responsivity is defined as , where Iph = Ilight − Idark and P is effective incident light power. For our photodetector, R is 168 mA/W at λ = 4.3 μm, with P = 0.23 μW, derived from Fig. 3H. Specific detectivity D* is defined as , where AD is the active area of detector; in our sample, AD is the area of overlap between bP and HgCdTe, In is the noise current, and Δf is the measurement bandwidth with a value of 1 Hz. The D* of our photodetector at 4.3 μm is calculated as 1.81 × 1010 cm Hz1/2 W−1, which has a comparable value with commercial cooled HgCdTe photovoltaic (PV) photodetectors (). It indicates that our HgCdTe/bP heterojunction photodetector has the capability of high-performance MWIR detection at room temperature without external bias and cooler. Overall, the photoresponse spectrum from visible light to 4.3 μm is shown in Fig. 3I, and the photoresponse peak wavelength λp of our photodetector is approximately 3.2 μm.

Polarization-resolved photodetection for visible MWIR

On the basis of the anisotropic optical properties of bP, the HgCdTe/bP heterojunction is able to achieve polarization-resolved photodetection, which adds a additional information dimension to infrared detection. Figure 4A is a schematic of detecting the polarization-sensitive characteristics of the detector. Linearly polarized light is attained via a polarizer, and the polarization angle θ could be adjusted via a half-wave plate. To investigate optical characteristics of bP, polarization-solved infrared relative extinction spectra of bP with different polarizing angles are shown in Fig. 4B, where T represents the transmission of bP on sapphire substrate and T0 represents the transmission of only sapphire substrate. The top inset shows optical photograph of the measured sample, and directions of different polarizing angles are marked with dashed lines. It can be clearly found that bP exhibits different transmission characteristics with polarizing angle changing. When polarizing angle θ = 90° (blue line), bP shows minimum absorption, which indicates the zigzag direction of the bP flake. With θ decreasing, absorption of bP increases (red line) and reaches maximum value when θ = 0° (black line). The relative extinction shows a sharp increase at around 2400 cm−2, indicating 0.3-eV bandgap of bP. The polarization-sensitive absorption of bP originates from its anisotropic crystal structure (, ). Figure S3F shows schematics of bP crystal structure from top view (top) and lateral view (bottom), with bP’s zigzag and armchair directions marked. Incident polarized light parallel to the armchair direction sees an obvious absorption, while transmittance of light along the zigzag direction is relatively high ().
Fig. 4.

Polarization-resolved HgCdTe/bP heterojunction photodetector.

(A) Schematic diagram of polarization photoresponse measurement. (B) Polarization-solved infrared relative extinction spectra of bP with various polarization angles. Insets are optical image (top) and schematic diagram (bottom) of the measured sample. Scale bar, 20 μm. (C) Photocurrent experiment data and fitting curve with 637-nm laser illumination as a function of polarization angle. Incident light power is 372 μW. (D) Optical microscope image of a device and corresponding polarization photocurrent mappings with 637-nm laser illumination and polarization angle from 0° to 180°. One of the electrodes and the junction area are marked with white dashed boxes. Scale bars, 20 μm.

Polarization-resolved HgCdTe/bP heterojunction photodetector.

(A) Schematic diagram of polarization photoresponse measurement. (B) Polarization-solved infrared relative extinction spectra of bP with various polarization angles. Insets are optical image (top) and schematic diagram (bottom) of the measured sample. Scale bar, 20 μm. (C) Photocurrent experiment data and fitting curve with 637-nm laser illumination as a function of polarization angle. Incident light power is 372 μW. (D) Optical microscope image of a device and corresponding polarization photocurrent mappings with 637-nm laser illumination and polarization angle from 0° to 180°. One of the electrodes and the junction area are marked with white dashed boxes. Scale bars, 20 μm. A classic polarization-resolved performance of HgCdTe/bP heterojunction photodetector is shown in Fig. 4C, which was measured with illumination of linearly polarized laser at λ = 637 nm. Here, the dots are experimental data, and the line is the fitting curve, which is fitted by the sinusoidal function as Iph = Icos2(θ + ϕ) + Isin2(θ + ϕ), where Iph is the photocurrent of the photodetector; θ is the polarized angle; and I, I, and ϕ are the fitting parameters. The extinction ratio defined by Iph max/Iph min is ~1.45 with 637-nm laser illumination. To comprehensively confirm the polarization sensitivity of our photodetector, we applied illumination of linearly polarized laser, which is at λ = 940 nm, 1310 nm, 3.4 μm, and 4.0 μm. Last, the devices showed obvious polarization-resolved characteristics under all conditions above (see details in fig. S6). The results indicate that the HgCdTe/bP heterojunction photodetector has the potential for polarized light detection, and its detection wavelength range covers visible to MWIR, without additional optical modules. Polarized photocurrent mapping can further confirm the origin of the detector’s polarization detection. Figure 4D shows the polarization-resolved photocurrent mapping images with different polarization angles at λ = 637 nm. It can be clearly seen that with θ changes from 0° to 180°, the photocurrent of overlapping region between bP and HgCdTe obviously decreases to a minimum value at θ = 90° and then increase to maximum value at θ = 180°. By contrast, there is no notable change in the photocurrent around the HgCdTe electrode. This phenomenon strongly proves that the polarization sensitivity of HgCdTe/bP heterojunction is attributable to the anisotropic crystal structure of bP.

Blackbody response and noise characteristics

To further estimate application potential of this photodetector, we used a blackbody as a radiation source to simulate the infrared detection circumstances. The schematic of blackbody response measurement system is shown in fig. S7A. Note that for no shield mask in this system, ambient light and radiation could attribute to both dark current and noise so that the noise and dark current of blackbody response seems to be much larger compared with photoresponse characteristics under laser illumination. Typical response characteristics of our device are shown in fig. S7 (B to F), with different temperature blackbody radiation at f = 1 Hz. It is natural that as the blackbody temperature reduces, the response amplitude of the photodetector decreases simultaneously, which is due to the decrease of the blackbody radiant exitance and the red shift of the peak wavelength. In the case of the incident light offered by blackbody, blackbody responsivity Rbb is given by , where Pbb is the effective incident blackbody radiation power. Pbb can be estimated by , where η = 0.7 is the transmittance of Dewar window, σ = 2π5k4/(15c2h3) is the Stefan-Boltzmann constant and has an approximate value of 5.67 × 10−12 W cm−2 K−4, Tb is the blackbody temperature, T0 is the background temperature, Ab is the area of blackbody radiation aperture, AD is the active area of detector (in our sample, AD is the overlap area between bP and HgCdTe), and L is the distance from blackbody to detector. It can be derived from fig. S7F that the peak blackbody responsivity of the device is 193 mA/W, which appears at blackbody temperature Tb = 605 K. Figure 5A shows the measured current noise spectrum of the device from 1 to 104 Hz at room temperature. When the frequency exceeds 102 Hz, the noise behavior is 1/f noise. The low-frequency noise current In was estimated as 1 × 10−14 A Hz−1/2; thus, noise equivalent power (NEP) at Tb = 605 K is calculated as 5.95 × 10−14 W Hz−1/2, which is one to two orders of magnitude lower than reported low-dimensional MWIR detectors (see in table S1). Consequently, the blackbody detectivity of our HgCdTe/bP photodetector could be estimated by . As shown in Fig. 5B, peak detectivity is evaluated as high as 7.93 × 1010 cm Hz1/2 W−1, which is comparable to commercial MWIR detectors. Besides, average detectivity in MWIR region is above 2.1 × 1010 cm Hz1/2 W−1, indicating that our HgCdTe/bP photodetector has great potential in MWIR detection applications.
Fig. 5.

Blackbody response and noise characteristics.

(A) Noise spectrum measured at background temperature of 300 K and zero bias. (B) Detectivity as functions of wavelength at various blackbody temperature measured at background temperature of 300 K. (C) Comparison of dark current density and detectivity with reported MWIR detectors, where traditional bulk detectors are marked with triangular dots and low-dimensional detectors are marked with square dots. References can be found in table S1. (D) Comparison of detectivity with other classic infrared photodetectors at room temperature. The background-limited infrared performance (BLIP) of PV infrared photodetectors calculated for field of view = 2π and background temperature of 300 K is shown by dash-dot lines. PC, photoconductive; SL, superlattice.

Blackbody response and noise characteristics.

(A) Noise spectrum measured at background temperature of 300 K and zero bias. (B) Detectivity as functions of wavelength at various blackbody temperature measured at background temperature of 300 K. (C) Comparison of dark current density and detectivity with reported MWIR detectors, where traditional bulk detectors are marked with triangular dots and low-dimensional detectors are marked with square dots. References can be found in table S1. (D) Comparison of detectivity with other classic infrared photodetectors at room temperature. The background-limited infrared performance (BLIP) of PV infrared photodetectors calculated for field of view = 2π and background temperature of 300 K is shown by dash-dot lines. PC, photoconductive; SL, superlattice. To exhibit advantages of our HgCdTe/bP photodetector, we show the performance comparison of our device and other reported MWIR detectors in Fig. 5 (C and D). Figure 5C shows a comparison of dark current density and detectivity with traditional bulk infrared detectors, such as InSb, HgCdTe, and InAsSb/InSb superlattices, and emerging low-dimensional detectors, such as bP/MoS2 heterojunctions. Combining advantages of both traditional bulk infrared materials and 2D materials, our photodetector exhibits low dark current density and high room temperature detectivity. Figure 5D gives classic room temperature detectivity of MWIR detectors with different structures, indicating that our HgCdTe/bP photodetector has comparable detectivity with commercial HgCdTe detectors and much higher detectivity than many other detectors in the MWIR region. The HgCdTe/bP photodetectors with broken-gap band alignment could have promising prospects in uncooled infrared polarization detection.

DISCUSSION

In conclusion, we have designed and fabricated a high-performance room temperature polarization-resolved MWIR photodetector using HgCdTe/bP van der Waals heterojunction. By means of van der Waals integration, both advantages of bP and HgCdTe are fully integrated. As a photodetector, the broken-gap band alignment between bP and HgCdTe can efficiently suppress dark current, and photoinduced DT brings a large photocurrent. This enables the photodetector to achieve outstanding MWIR detection ability at room temperature, which greatly reduces power consumption compared to traditional cooling infrared detectors. Besides, we demonstrate the polarization sensitivity of HgCdTe/bP photodetector from visible light to MWIR without other optical structures, which is achieved by bP for its anisotropy crystal structure. Furthermore, our photodetector has sensitive blackbody response, with the peak blackbody detectivity as high as 7.93 × 1010 cm Hz1/2 W−1, indicating that it embraces great potential for practical application. Our investigation shows that the van der Waals mixed-dimensional integration provides a feasible method for manufacturing high-performance HgCdTe photodetectors, which has superior interface characteristics and high flexibility. By delicate design of band alignment and device structure, more advanced functions and excellent performances can be realized in HgCdTe-based detectors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Device fabrication

HgCdTe film with a thickness of 8 μm was deposited on the 900-μm-thick germanium substrate by molecular beam epitaxy. For electrical isolation, HgCdTe film was patterned by ultraviolet lithography, and about 150-nm-thick HgCdTe was etched by argon ion bombardment. Then, a 150-nm-thick Al2O3 was deposited by electron beam evaporation (EBE) to fill the removed HgCdTe area. bP flakes with thickness of 50 to 150 nm were mechanically exfoliated from bulk materials onto the silicon substrates. HgCdTe was handled with Br2/ethanol solution for 5 to 10 s to remove damaged layer and clear contamination on surface, and then, bP was transferred to the surface of HgCdTe in a nitrogen environment immediately. Electrodes were patterned by electron beam lithography, and 15/30-nm Ti/Au was deposited by EBE.

Electrical and optoelectrical measurements

All electrical and optoelectrical measurements were performed at room temperature in a room with blackout curtain to avoid interference of ambient light. Sample devices were placed in a vacuum Dewar with pressure of 10−4 Pa to avoid degradation and oxidation of bP and HgCdTe. The device electrical and optoelectrical properties were measured with an Agilent B1500A semiconductor parameter analyzer when the incident light wavelength was below 2 μm. In the case of MWIR (2.77 to 4.32 μm), an Agilent B2912 source meter was used to measure its electrical and optoelectrical properties. In the photocurrent mapping measurement, lasers were focused on the device with a ×20 objective lens, and current signals are processed with a low-noise SRS-SR570 preamplifier and a Signal Recovery Model 7270 DSP lock-in amplifier.

Blackbody response measurements

All blackbody response measurements were performed at room temperature, and the measured sample was placed in a vacuum Dewar. Blackbody radiation was obtained from a Newport Oriel 67000 blackbody source. The distance between the blackbody and the sample is about 10 cm. A mechanical chopper is placed in front of the blackbody to generate blackbody radiation signal at a certain frequency. Response characteristics of our device were measured with an Agilent B2912 source meter.
  24 in total

1.  Ultrabroadband and High-Detectivity Photodetector Based on WS2/Ge Heterojunction through Defect Engineering and Interface Passivation.

Authors:  Di Wu; Jiawen Guo; Chaoqiang Wang; Xiaoyan Ren; Yongsheng Chen; Pei Lin; Longhui Zeng; Zhifeng Shi; Xin Jian Li; Chong-Xin Shan; Jiansheng Jie
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2021-05-23       Impact factor: 15.881

2.  Polarization-sensitive broadband photodetector using a black phosphorus vertical p-n junction.

Authors:  Hongtao Yuan; Xiaoge Liu; Farzaneh Afshinmanesh; Wei Li; Gang Xu; Jie Sun; Biao Lian; Alberto G Curto; Guojun Ye; Yasuyuki Hikita; Zhixun Shen; Shou-Cheng Zhang; Xianhui Chen; Mark Brongersma; Harold Y Hwang; Yi Cui
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 39.213

3.  Anisotropic photocurrent response at black phosphorus-MoS2 p-n heterojunctions.

Authors:  Tu Hong; Bhim Chamlagain; Tianjiao Wang; Hsun-Jen Chuang; Zhixian Zhou; Ya-Qiong Xu
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 7.790

4.  Gate-Tunable Semiconductor Heterojunctions from 2D/3D van der Waals Interfaces.

Authors:  Jinshui Miao; Xiwen Liu; Kiyoung Jo; Kang He; Ravindra Saxena; Baokun Song; Huiqin Zhang; Jiale He; Myung-Geun Han; Weida Hu; Deep Jariwala
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 11.189

5.  Room-temperature nine-µm-wavelength photodetectors and GHz-frequency heterodyne receivers.

Authors:  Daniele Palaferri; Yanko Todorov; Azzurra Bigioli; Alireza Mottaghizadeh; Djamal Gacemi; Allegra Calabrese; Angela Vasanelli; Lianhe Li; A Giles Davies; Edmund H Linfield; Filippos Kapsalidis; Mattias Beck; Jérôme Faist; Carlo Sirtori
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Rediscovering black phosphorus as an anisotropic layered material for optoelectronics and electronics.

Authors:  Fengnian Xia; Han Wang; Yichen Jia
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-07-21       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Van der Waals Broken-Gap p-n Heterojunction Tunnel Diode Based on Black Phosphorus and Rhenium Disulfide.

Authors:  Pawan Kumar Srivastava; Yasir Hassan; Yisehak Gebredingle; Jaehyuck Jung; Byunggil Kang; Won Jong Yoo; Budhi Singh; Changgu Lee
Journal:  ACS Appl Mater Interfaces       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 9.229

8.  Solution-Synthesized High-Mobility Tellurium Nanoflakes for Short-Wave Infrared Photodetectors.

Authors:  Matin Amani; Chaoliang Tan; George Zhang; Chunsong Zhao; James Bullock; Xiaohui Song; Hyungjin Kim; Vivek Raj Shrestha; Yang Gao; Kenneth B Crozier; Mary Scott; Ali Javey
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 15.881

9.  Reconfigurable 2D/0D p-n Graphene/HgTe Nanocrystal Heterostructure for Infrared Detection.

Authors:  Ulrich Nguétchuissi Noumbé; Charlie Gréboval; Clément Livache; Audrey Chu; Hicham Majjad; Luis E Parra López; Louis Donald Notemgnou Mouafo; Bernard Doudin; Stéphane Berciaud; Julien Chaste; Abdelkarim Ouerghi; Emmanuel Lhuillier; Jean-Francois Dayen
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 15.881

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.