Literature DB >> 35543772

Comparison of BMI on operative time and complications of robotic inguinal hernia repair at a VA medical center.

Justine Chinn, Rene Tellez1, Bunchhin Huy, Cyrus Farzaneh1, Ashton Christian1, Jay Ramsay, Hubert Kim2, Brian Smith1,2, Marcelo W Hinojosa3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: BMI is a risk factor for recurrence and post-operative complications in both open and laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal approach (TEP) repair. Robotic surgery using the transabdominal preperitoneal approach (TAPP) is a safe and viable option for inguinal hernia repair (IHR). The objective of this study is to determine how difference in BMI influences rate of operative time, complications, and rate of recurrence in a robotic TAPP IHR.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent robotic inguinal hernia repair between 2012 and 2019 at a Veterans Health Administration facility (N = 304). The operating time, outcomes, and overall morbidity and mortality for robotic IHR were compared between three different BMI Groups. These groups were divided into: "Underweight/Normal Weight" (BMI < 25) n = 102, "Pre-Obese" (BMI 25-29.9) n = 120, and "Obese" (BMI 30 +) n = 82.
RESULTS: The average operating time of a bilateral IHR by BMI group was 83.5, 98.4, and 97.8 min for BMIs < 25, 25-29.9, and 30 +, respectively. Operating time was lower in the Underweight/Normal BMI group compared to the Pre-Obese group (p = 0.006) as well as the Obese group (p = 0.001). For unilateral repair, the average operation length by group was 65.2, 70.9, and 85.6 min for BMIs < 25, 25-29.9, and 30 +, respectively, demonstrating an increased time for Obese compared to Underweight/Normal BMI (p = 0.001) and for Obese compared to Pre-Obese (p = 0.01). Demographic/comorbidity variables were not significantly different, except for a higher percentage of white patients in the Underweight/Normal BMI group compared to the Pre-Obese and Obese groups (p = 0.02 and p = 0.0003). There was no significant difference in complications or recurrence.
CONCLUSION: BMI has a significant impact on the operating time of both unilateral and bilateral robotic hernia repair. Despite this increased operative time, BMI group did not differ significantly in postoperative outcomes or in recurrence rates.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BMI; Inguinal hernia; Laparoscopic; Robotic

Year:  2022        PMID: 35543772     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09259-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  11 in total

1.  The effect of tobacco consumption and body mass index on complications and hospital stay after inguinal hernia surgery.

Authors:  D Lindström; O Sadr Azodi; R Bellocco; A Wladis; S Linder; J Adami
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2006-12-06       Impact factor: 4.739

2.  The effect of tobacco use on outcomes of laparoscopic and open inguinal hernia repairs: a review of the NSQIP dataset.

Authors:  MacKenzie Landin; John C Kubasiak; Scott Schimpke; Jennifer Poirier; Jonathan A Myers; Keith W Millikan; Minh B Luu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Open versus robotic-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal (R-TAPP) inguinal hernia repair: a multicenter matched analysis of clinical outcomes.

Authors:  R Gamagami; E Dickens; A Gonzalez; L D'Amico; C Richardson; J Rabaza; R Kolachalam
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 4.739

4.  Factors associated with hernia recurrence after laparoscopic total extraperitoneal repair for inguinal hernia: a 2-year prospective cohort study.

Authors:  L Schjøth-Iversen; A Refsum; K W Brudvik
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 4.739

5.  Feasibility of robotic inguinal hernia repair, a single-institution experience.

Authors:  Jose E Escobar Dominguez; Michael Gonzalez Ramos; Rupa Seetharamaiah; Charan Donkor; Jorge Rabaza; Anthony Gonzalez
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Robotic inguinal hernia repair: is technology taking over? Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  A Aiolfi; M Cavalli; G Micheletto; P G Bruni; F Lombardo; C Perali; G Bonitta; D Bona
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 4.739

7.  Early outcomes of robotic-assisted inguinal hernia repair in obese patients: a multi-institutional, retrospective study.

Authors:  Ramachandra Kolachalam; Eugene Dickens; Lawrence D'Amico; Christopher Richardson; Jorge Rabaza; Reza Gamagami; Anthony Gonzalez
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  First 100 consecutive robotic inguinal hernia repairs at a Veterans Affairs hospital.

Authors:  Alyssa K Kosturakis; Kathryn E LaRusso; Nels D Carroll; Michael B Nicholl
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2018-05-03

9.  Open versus laparoscopic unilateral inguinal hernia repairs: defining the ideal BMI to reduce complications.

Authors:  Ashley D Willoughby; Robert B Lim; Michael B Lustik
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Outcomes of surgery on patients with a clinically inapparent inguinal hernia as diagnosed by ultrasonography.

Authors:  L van Hout; W J V Bökkerink; M S Ibelings; J Heisterkamp; P W H E Vriens
Journal:  Hernia       Date:  2018-01-27       Impact factor: 4.739

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.