Literature DB >> 35541906

The role of Insulin-like growth factor 2 mRNA-binding proteins (IGF2BPs) as m6A readers in cancer.

Chao-Yue Sun1, Di Cao2, Bin-Bin Du1, Cun-Wu Chen1, Dong Liu1.   

Abstract

RNA can be modified by over 170 types of distinct chemical modifications, and the most abundant internal modification of mRNA in eukaryotes is N6-methyladenosine (m6A). The m6A modification accelerates mRNA process, including mRNA splicing, translation, transcript stability, export and decay. m6A RNA modification is installed by methyltransferase-like proteins (writers), and potentially removed by demethylases (erasers), and this process is recognized by m6A-binding proteins (readers). Notably, alterations of m6A-modified proteins (writers, erasers and readers) are involved in the tumorigenesis, progression and metastasis. Importantly, the fate of m6A-methylated mRNA is mediated mostly through m6A readers, and among these readers, insulin-like growth factor 2 mRNA-binding proteins (IGF2BPs) are unique RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) that stabilize their targets mRNA via m6A modification. In this review, we update the writers, erasers and readers, and their cross-talks in m6A modification, and briefly discuss the oncogenic role of IGF2BPs in cancer. Most importantly, we mainly review the up-to-date knowledges of IGF2BPs (IGF2BP1/2/3) as m6A readers in an m6A-modified manner in cancer progression. © The author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer; IGF2BPs; N6-methyladenosine (m6A); Reader; Stabilization

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35541906      PMCID: PMC9066119          DOI: 10.7150/ijbs.70458

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Biol Sci        ISSN: 1449-2288            Impact factor:   10.750


Introduction

The insulin-like growth factor 2 mRNA-binding proteins (IGF2BPs, IMPs), including IGF2BP1/2/3, are first identified in 1999 for their ability to bind to the name-giving 5'UTR of insulin-like growth factor Ⅱ (IGF-Ⅱ) leader 3 mRNA 1. The first IGF2BPs family member described is IGF2BP1 that is identified as a 75kd polysome-associated protein to stabilize c-MYC mRNA by binding to its coding region determinant (CRD) 2. IGF2BP2 is first described in 1999, and discovered as an intracellular antigen detected in 30-40% hepatocellular carcinoma patients 3, 4. IGF2BP3, initially called KOC protein, is first demonstrated as a highly expressed gene in pancreatic cancer that encodes four K-homologous (KH) domains 5. IGF2BPs are highly conserved RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) that are crucial players in regulating RNA processing, including mRNA splicing, translation, decay and stability 6. IGF2BPs are expressed in most tissues during embryogenesis, and only IGF2BP2 is ubiquitously expressed in adult tissues 3, 7. Importantly, IGF2BPs are characterized as oncofetal proteins, by which IGF2BPs are involved in carcinogenesis 8, 9. Accumulating data have been demonstrated that IGF2BPs are highly expressed in a broad range of tumors and also associated with poor prognosis 8. IGF2BPs uniquely contain two RNA recognition motifs (RRMs) and four KH domains. KH domains-containing proteins are first reported by Kiledjian to regulate mRNA stability in 1995 10. The underlying mechanism of mRNA stabilization by KH domains is revealed by Huang laboratory, by which IGF2BPs stabilize c-MYC by its KH domains (KH3-4) in m6A modification manner 11. Since then, the function of IGF2BPs in m6A modification has been continuously reported, where the IGF2BPs participate in posttranscriptional process, including alternative splicing, metabolism, and stabilization 12. In a manner similar with DNA and protein, RNAs can be modified by more than 170 chemically modifications 13. Among them, N6-methyladenosine (m6A) is most abundant modification of messenger RNA (mRNAs) and non-coding RNA (ncRNAs) in mammals 14, 15. Although first discovered in the 1970s, the m6A modification began to revive in 2012, when a next-generation sequencing method, MeRIP-Seq was described and used 16. In mammalian cells, m6A modification can be catalyzed by a methyltransferase complex (“writers”) and removed by demethylases (“erasers”), thus m6A mRNA modification is a reversible and dynamic process 17. Notably, the fate of m6A-modified RNA is mediated mostly through RNA-binding proteins (“readers”), including YTHDF, FMRP, CNBP, PRRC2A, HNRNPA2B1 and IGF2BPs 18-20. The m6A modification by m6A readers affects mRNA fate by regulating RNA splicing, translation, stability, structure, export and decay of the modified RNA 21. Recently, emerging evidence demonstrates that m6A modification also affects the mRNA fate by promoting the phase separation of m6A readers 22. For example, m6A regulates the fate of cytosolic mRNA through scaffolding for binding YTHDF proteins, resulting in the formation of phase separation complex (YTHDF-m6A-mRNA) that partitions into phase-separated compartments, such as P-bodies and stress granules 23. This effect is efficient for the polymethylated mRNAs that scaffold multiple YTHDF proteins. In addition, m6A modification is required for the liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) of YTHDC1 to form nuclear condensates that protect mRNAs from degradation, and regulate myeloid leukemic differentiation 24. In addition to m6A readers, the roles of LLPS in m6A writers have been explored, and for instance, LLPS is an important player in regulating dynamic assembly of the mRNA m6A methyltransferase complex (METTL3/METTL14/WTAP) 25. m6A modification governs mRNA fate and function in multiple biological processes, and m6A readers-mediated m6A modification is implicated in various human diseases, especially cancer 26. Among m6A readers, IGF2BPs are very uniquely RNA-binding proteins that play critical roles in cancer progression through affecting mRNA fate in an m6A-dependent manner. In this review, we will briefly introduce the understanding of m6A modification by the writers, erasers and readers, and crosstalk between theses regulators. In addition, we also summarize the function of oncogenes, IGF2BPs in the tumorigenesis and cancer progression. Of note, we focus on how IGF2BPs promote tumorigenesis and progression via the m6A-dependent manner. Moreover, we further describe perspectives toward future questions and challenges in IGF2BPs-mediated m6A modification.

m6A writers, erasers, and readers

m6A, one of the most abundant chemical modifications in eukaryotic mRNA, has gained increasing attention as a mode of post-transcriptional gene regulation 27-29. Genetic loss-of-function studies on m6A writers, erasers and readers highlight m6A modification as a dynamically and reversibly regulatory process in various biological processes 30, 31. m6A methylation plays critical roles in regulating gene expression through mediating the mRNA stability, degradation and translation, and its disruption results in a series of diseases, including cancer 32-34. The cross-talks among m6A writer, eraser, and reader are reported to determine the m6A levels of their targets and, consequently, the stability of these targets plays important roles in tumorigenesis, drug resistance, and metastasis 35-37.

m6A writers

m6A is established by m6A methyltransferases complex (also called “writers”) that transfers a methyl group from s-adenosylmethionine (SAM) to the substrate adenosine in RNA 38, 39. Methyltransferase-like protein 3 (METTL3) and METTL14 play as a catalytic core complex known as the m6A-METTL complex (MAC) that recognizes the DRACH motifs and promotes the m6A modification in the transcriptome 40-42. Notably, METTL3 has catalytic activity, while METTL14 forms a heterodimer with METTL3 and then strengthens its catalytic action 39, 43, 44. Interestingly, MAC interacts with m6A-METTL associated complex (MACOM) that composes of the wilms tumor 1 associated protein (WTAP), vir-like m6A methyltransferase-associated (VIRMA), RNA-binding motif 15 (RBM15), zinc-finger CCCH-type-containing 13 (ZC3H13), Cbl proto oncogene-like protein 1 (CBLL1) 45. Although the MACOM itself lacks catalytic activity, its coordinated interaction with the MAC promotes it localization to nuclear speckles and modulates their recruitment to specific targets for m6A modification. METTL16 (a homologue of METTL3), a novel independent RNA methyltransferase, is a conserved U6 snRNA methyltransferase and regulates cellular SAM levels 46, 47. CAPAM (also known as PCIF1) has been recently identified as an evolutionarily conserved methyltransferase, responsible for the m6A on the mRNA cap-adjacent Am-modified nucleotide 48-50. The METTL5: TRMT112 complex has been recognized as a m6A rRNA methyltransferase that catalyzes the N6-methylation of A1832 (m6A1832) in human 18S rRNA 51. In addition, ZCCHC4, another m6A rRNA MTase, facilitates the m6A4220 modification in all human 28S rRNA 52.

m6A erasers

The possible reversibility and dynamic of the m6A modification are identified by the m6A demethylases (erasers): fat mass and obesity-associated protein (FTO) and α-ketoglutarate-dependent dioxygenase alk B homolog 5 (ALKBH5) protein, which can selectively remove m6A-methylated groups from their targets RNA 53, 54. The demethylase activity of ALKBH5 has been demonstrated to be preferential for m6A methylation in DRACH motif-dependent manner in RNA, whereas FTO demethylate a wide array of substrates including m6A 54. Several recent studies suggest that FTO, however, preferentially demethylates the N6,2′-O-dimethyladenosine (m6Am), which suggests that ALKBH5 is more participated in global m6A demethylation than FTO 55.

m6A readers

m6A recognition proteins, known as “readers”, can decode m6A marks and perform diverse biological functions 56, and these m6A readers include YT521-B homology domain family proteins (YTHDF1/2/3), YT521-B homology domain containing 1 and 2 (YTHDC1/2) 57, eukaryotic translation initiation factor 3 (eIF3) 58, insulin like growth factor 2 mRNA-binding proteins (IGF2BP1/2/3) 11, heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins (HNRNPA2/B1, HNRNPC/G) 59, Proline rich coiled-coil 2 A (Prrc2a) 60, HuR (known as ELAVL1) 41, cellular nucleic acid binding protein (CNBP) 61, and SND1 62. YTHDF2 is first identified m6A reader that impairs the stability of targeted transcripts and promotes mRNAs degradation via recruiting the CCR4-NOT deadenylation complex 57, 63. Conversely, YTHDF1 promotes mRNA translation by interacting with the translation initiation factor eIF3 64. YTHDF3 not only can interact cooperatively with YTHDF2 to promote mRNA decay, but also cooperates with YTHDF1 to promote the translation of the methylated RNAs 65, 66. Interestingly, YTHDF3 loss decreases the binding of YTHDF1 and YTHDF2 to their transcripts, displaying the important role of YTHDF3 in the RNA binding specificity 65. YTHDC1 mediates alternative splicing by recruiting the splicing factor serine and arginine-rich splicing factor 3 (SRSF3) and restricting the bind of exon-skipping factor SRSF10 67. YTHDC2 preferentially binds to m6A-containing RNA, and then promotes translation efficacy of its targets and reduce their mRNA abundance 68, 69. eIF3 can directly bind to mRNAs-containing m6A in their 5'UTR, which is sufficient to stimulate the mRNA translation in the loss of the cap-binding factor eIF4E 58. The HNRNPs family binds to m6A-containing mRNA through the mechanism of “m6A-switch”, in which m6A modification alters the mRNAs structures to expose the single stranded hnRNP binding motif 59, 70. HNRNPA2B1 binds to pre-microRNA and accelerates its maturation 19, 71. In addition, HNRNPA2B1 also functions as modulating the alternative splicing of transcripts 19. HNRNPC participates in the processing of pre-mRNAs and intronless mRNAs 72. HNRNPG selectively binds to RNAs and regulates alternative splicing by interacting with m6A-methylated mRNAs 73. Recently, IGF2BPs are verified as a distinct and conserved family of m6A-readers, consisting of two RNA recognition motif (RRM) domains and four K homology (KH) domains 7. Nevertheless, the third and fourth KH domains (KH3-4) are responsible for recognizing the m6A sites of targets mRNAs. IGF2BPs can promote the stability and facilitate the translation efficiency in an m6A-dependent fashion 11. And the IGF2BPs-mediated mRNA stabilization can be enhanced by recruiting the co-factors of IGF2BPs, HuR and matrin 3 (MATR3), to prevent their targets from degradation 11. In addition, IGF2BPs are also demonstrated to be involved in mRNA translation by modulating alternative splicing 74. Prrc2a encodes a large proline-rich protein and is located at the MHC class III region 75. A recent study has proved that Prrc2a functions as a novel m6A reader stabilizing the mRNA of Olig2 60. HuR, one of the members of the Hu family of RNA-binding proteins, is associated with the m6A bait and stabilizes m6A-containing mRNAs 41, 76. In addition, the “Royal family” protein, SND1 also can read the m6A-modified mRNAs and promotes mRNA stabilization 62. CNBP is recently identified a novel m6A reader that consists of seven highly conserved zinc finger domains involved in mRNA transcription, stabilization, and translation 20, 61, 77. Interestingly, only CNBP protein is localized in the nucleoplasm while other readers are localized to the cytosol. However, all m6A writers are localized in the nucleus and most readers are localized to the cytosol, how writers-readers systems work remains poorly understood. The m6A writers, erasers, and readers have been characterized in Figure .

Crosstalk between m6A writers, erasers, and readers

First, the links between m6A writers and readers have been extensively studied. m6A readers are often required for m6A methyltransferases-catalyzed m6A methylation. For example, METTL3-dependent m6A hypermethylation up-regulates NLRP1 transcript, and knockdown of YTHDF1 reduces the NLRP1 mRNA 78. In turn, m6A writers are also necessary for m6A readers-mediated m6A modification. For example, METTL14 depletion reduces Socs1 m6A methylation, and blunts YTHDF1 binds to the m6A sites 79. Loss of METTL3 impairs YTHDF1-mediated translation of its target, SPRED2 in an m6A modification manner 80. In addition, m6A writers and readers bind to the same target transcripts 81, and thus, m6A writers and readers combine together to regulate m6A methylation process. One reasonable possibility is that m6A writers and readers can form polymeric methyltransferase complex. Second, the relationships between the m6A erasers and readers are similar to the above links. m6A readers are also required for m6A demethylases-modified m6A methylation. For example, ALKBH5 suppresses pancreatic cancer progression through activation of PER1 in an YTHDF2-dependent m6A way 82. Third, m6A writers and erasers regulate m6A modification in opposite direction. METTL3 and ALKBH5, for example, oppositely regulate the TFEB mRNA level in an m6A-modified manner 83. In addition, m6A writers and erasers constitute positive feedback loops to control the stability of target transcripts 35. Fourth, m6A writers and erasers can determine the m6A status of targets by controlling each other's expression and regulating m6A readers 35. Thus, interplay among m6A writer, eraser and reader determines the m6A status and level.

The oncogenic role of IGF2BPs in cancer

All human IGF2BPs have been identified as oncofetal proteins, and among them, IGF2BP1 and IGF2BP3 are bona fide oncofetal proteins that are synthesized in many cancers 3. In agreement, IGF2BP1 and IGF2BP3 display a high degree of amino acid identity (73%) with each other and show similar activity 84. The oncogenic role of IGF2BP3 was first described due to its overexpression in pancreatic cancer in 1997 5, and then IGF2BP3 modulates tumor cell fate, such as proliferation, migration, and chemo-resistance by controlling the translation and turnover of target transcripts, and regulating DNA methylation, and acetylation processes 3, 85. IGF2BP1 is the most conserved oncogene of all three IGF2BPs that is required for the transport, stability, and localization of mRNAs in carcinogenesis, and chemo-resistance 84, 86. Of note, IGF2BP1 is post-transcriptional driver of E2F1-driven hallmark in solid cancers 87. IGF2BP2 is a unique member of IGF2BPs that is ubiquitously expressed in the adult organism, and IGF2BP2 is an important post-transcriptional regulator of RNAs via the ribonucleoprotein complex 7, 8. Interestingly, IGF2BP2 can preferentially regulate glucose and lipid metabolism, and thus IGF2BP2 is considered as diabetes associated gene that impairs insulin secretion 88. Notably, accumulating data demonstrates that IGF2BP2 promotes carcinogenesis by regulating cancer metabolism 8. Nonetheless, all three IGF2BPs are highly expressed and function as independent prognostic factors in a variety of cancers, including lung cancer 89, 90, liver cancer 91-93, breast cancer 94, 95, colorectal cancer 96-98, pancreatic cancer 99-101, prostate cancer 102, bladder cancer 103-105, thyroid cancer 106-108, gastric cancer 109, 110, renal cell carcinoma 111, ovarian cancer 112, 113, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma 114, 115, acute myeloid leukemia 116. In addition to the high expression of the IGF2BPs itself, intercellular communication factors, such as tumor-secreted extracellular vesicles (EVs), can maintain the stability of IGF2BPs in cells to promote the development of cancer. EVs are emerging as crucial messengers maintaining homeostasis in tumor progression, and metastasis 117. Interestingly, the RBPs and their substrate RNAs are detected in EVs, and EVs can harbour sequence motifs to mirror the activity of RBPs 118. circNEIL3 is packaged into exosomes and then transmitted to tumor associated macrophages (TAMs) that enable them to acquire immunosuppressive effect by stabilizing IGF2BP3, and promoting glioma progression 119. EVs secreted by melanoma cells regulate the effect of IGF2BP1 on metastasis, and in turn, IGF2BP1 affects the cargo of the EVs 120. Nevertheless, the connection of IGF2BPs' stability with EVs biology requires comparative and systematic studies. In addition, IGF2BPs also play important roles in regulating other cancer phenotypes, such as glycolysis, stemness and chemo-resistance 121-123. In mechanism, the oncogenic roles of IGF2BPs are largely attributed to their m6A dependent mRNA stabilization of oncogenic targets 87. Thus, in most cases, inhibition of IGF2BPs or their targets can suppress the proliferation and migration of cancer cells.

The role of IGF2BPs as m6A reader in cancer

The m6A modification is a dynamic process, and the biological function of m6A relies on m6A readers. These readers recognize m6A-containing RNAs either by directly binding to YT521-B homology (YTH) domain, or by binding to single-stranded RNA motifs 124. Although YTH domains bind to RNA with low affinity between 100 and 300 nM, YTH domain-containing proteins recognize m6A to regulate mRNA splicing, metabolism, folding, and translation 17, 125. Besides YTH domain, m6A-containing RNAs can be selectively recognized by K homology (KH) domain. In 2018, IGF2BPs are first recognized as a novel family of m6A readers that stabilize their targets in an m6A-dependent manner 11. IGF2BPs have six characteristic RNA-binding domains, including four distinct KH domains at C-terminal region, and two RNA recognition motifs (RRMs) at N-terminal region 126. IGF2BPs-recognized m6A by KH domains has been demonstrated by Huang's laboratory, by which mutations in the KH domains (KH3-4) completely abolish the function of IGF2BPs as m6A reader 11. Importantly, the critical role of KH3-4 domains in cancer has been demonstrated before IGF2BPs are identified as new m6A reader 127. Unlike the canonical YTH domain-containing proteins, IGF2BPs-recognized targets, such as c-MYC, display higher transcript level and longer half-life period 124. As RNA stabilizers, IGF2BPs promote the stability of multiple mRNAs through m6A modification and IGF2BPs-modified m6A plays a crucial role in many pathological conditions, especially cancer.

IGF2BP1

Currently, m6A modification regulates the translation 128, splicing 129, maturation 130, stabilization 131, and decay 132 of noncoding RNAs, including miRNAs, lncRNAs and circRNAs in cancer. In turn, interestingly, noncoding RNAs regulate IGF2BPs mRNA stabilization or IGF2BPs-modificated m6A in cancer progression 133, 134. LncRNA THAP7-AS1 is correlated with poor prognosis in gastric cancer patients, and mechanistically, METTL3 stabilizes THAP7-AS1 in IGF2BP1-mediated m6A modification manner 135. The oncogene MYC (also known as c-MYC) is one of the most frequently activated in human cancers, and c-MYC overexpression causes tumorigenesis and maintains tumor growth 136. Importantly, c-MYC is considered as a critical target of IGF2BPs, and lncRNAs recruits or binds to IGF2BP1 to stabilize or increase the mRNA of c-MYC, depending m6A modification in tumor progression. For example, a hypoxia-induced lncRNA KB-1980E6.3 maintains stemness of breast cancer stem cells (BCSC) under hypoxic microenvironment by recruiting IFG2BP1 to stabilize c-MYC mRNA in m6A-modified manner 137. Before identified as the m6A reader, IGF2BPs are regulated by lncRNAs to mediate translation and mRNA stability of c-MYC 138. Interestingly, lncRNAs regulate m6A modification on their targets' mRNA by IGF2BP1. LINC002661 encodes a 71-amino acid oncopeptide that binds to IGF2BP1 and then strengthens the m6A recognition of IGF2BP1 to increase mRNA stability of m6A-methylated c-MYC, which promotes tumorigenesis 139. In addition to lncRNAs, a study reported that circPTPRA plays as a tumor suppressor in bladder cancer by interacting the KH domains of IGF2BP1 to block its m6A recognition of its targets, c-MYC and FSCN1 mRNA 105. In addition to noncoding RNAs, m6A modification by IGF2BP1 also regulates the function and generation of mRNAs. High expression of IGF2BP1 is associated with poor prognosis in endometrial cancer patients, and mechanistically, IGF2BP1 recruits polyadenylate-binding protein 1 (PABPC1) to stabilize paternally expressed gene 10 (PEG10) mRNA in an m6A-dependent manner 140. In endometrial cancer, IGF2BP1 is a direct downstream target of peptidylarginine deiminase II (PADI2) that is required for endometrial cancer progression, and IGF2BP1 binds to the m6A sites of oncogenic SOX2 and prevents its mRNA degradation 141. In hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), ALKBH5, an m6A demethylase, inhibits LY6/PLAUR Domain Containing 1 (LYPD1) that is recognized and then stabilized by IGF2BP1 142. In HCC, RNA-binding motif protein 15 (RBM15) facilitates cancer progression via promoting post-transcriptional activation of YES1 in IGF2BP1-mediated m6A manner 143. In addition, ALKBH5 also blocks pancreatic cancer progression through activation of PER1 by another m6A reader, YTHDF2 82. In liver cancer stem cells (LCSC), IGF2BP1 facilitates LCSC phenotypes via promoting the stability of MGAT5 mRNA in an m6A modification manner 144. In another study, IGF2BP1 is demonstrated as a post-transcriptional enhancer of serum response factor (SRF) in cancer with a 3' UTR and m6A-dependent manner 145. A later study also shows that IGF2BP1 promotes tumorigenesis and metastasis of oral squamous cell carcinoma via enhancing Bmi1 mRNA translation in METTL3-mediated m6A modification manner 146. A subsequent study shows that METTL3 promotes the mRNA stability of kinesin-like protein, KIP3C in IGF2BP1- modified m6A manner, accelerating prostate cancer progression 147. Moreover, METTL3 methylates KRT7-AS to enhance the mRNA stability of keratin 7 (KRT7) depending on IGF2BP1-modified m6A, promoting breast cancer lung metastasis 148. In addition to m6A methyltransferases, m6A demethylase FTO reduce the stability of DACT1 mRNA by IGF2BP1-modified m6A demethylation, facilitating osteosarcoma progression 149. Recently, IGF2BP1 is reported to promote E2F1-3-driven G1/S transition in an m6A-dependent manner in cancer cells 87. Thus, IGF2BP1, as an m6A-reader, plays as an important oncogene in cancer by stabilizing or enhancing mRNA of its oncogenic factors, and thus IFG2BP1 is druggable for cancer treatment. Interestingly, m6A readers (IGF2BPs) cooperatively interact with m6A writers or erasers to regulate cancer progression.

IGF2BP2

In similar with IGF2BP1, noncoding RNAs also interact with IGF2BP2 to stabilize or increase their targets mRNA, and IGF2BP2 can directly regulate noncoding RNAs in an m6A-dependent way. In colorectal cancer patients, high expressed LINC00460 is correlated with poor overall survival, and mechanistically, LINC00460 interacts with IGF2BP2 to bind to the 3'UTR of high-mobility group AT-hook 1 (HMGA1), and enhances the stability of HMGA1 mRNA 150. In colorectal liver metastasis model, circNSUN2 binds to the KH3-4 domains of IGF2BP2 and stabilizes the high mobility group AT-hook 2 (HMGA2) 151. In esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), LncRNA CCAT2 increases IGF2BP2 expression, and then IGF2BP2 improves mRNA stability of thymidine kinase 1 (TK1) in m6A modification manner, which promotes tumor progression 152. In prostate cancer, lncRNA PCAT6 interacts with IGF2BP2 to promote bone metastasis by stabilizing insulin-like growth factor1 receptor (IGF1R) mRNA 153. In glioblastoma, IGF2BP2 recognizes the m6A site of lncRNA CASC9 and increases its stability, and CASC9 cooperates with IGF2BP2 to form a complex that stabilizes hexokinase 2 (HK2), promoting aerobic glycolysis 154. In pancreatic cancer patients, IGF2BP2 is associated with poorer prognosis, and mechanistically, IGF2BP2 plays as m6A reader for modification of lncRNA DANCR and stabilizes its mRNA 155. In thyroid cancer, lncRNA HAGLR increases IGF2BP2 expression, and IGF2BP2 recognizes the m6A modification of c-MYC and leads to increased c-MYC expression, which promotes cancer progression 156. In addition, lncRNA LINRIS stabilizes IGF2BP2 by blocking its ubiquitination to promote the c-MYC-driven glycolysis in colorectal cancer 157. In colorectal cancer, IGF2BP2 directly binds to the m6A sites of lncRNA ZFAS1 and increases its stability to activate the Warburg effect 158. Moreover, LINC01021 promotes tumorigenesis and progression through enhancing the mRNA stability of target transcripts, MSX1 and JARID2 in IGF2BP2- mediated m6A modification 159. Besides lncRNAs, circCD44 also directly interacts with IGF2BP2 to enhance the stability of c-MYC mRNA in m6A-modifed manner, promoting cancer progression in triple-negative breast cancer 160. In addition, in cervical cancer, circARHGAP12 interacts with IGF2BP2 through m6A site in the exon-3 to increase the stability of forkhead box M1 (FOXM1) mRNA 161. In turn, IGF2BP2 also directly stabilizes noncoding RNAs to promote cancer progression. For example, IGF2BP2 binds to lncRNA DUXAP9 and increases its stability in m6A manner, which facilitates proliferation and motility of renal cancer cells 162. In addition to noncoding RNAs, the mechanism of IGF2BP2 activity also relies on the direct interaction with its protein partners. For example, higher expression of IGF2BP2 is associated with a poorer prognosis in HCC patients, and mechanistically, IGF2BP2 directly recognizes and binds to the m6A site of flap endonuclease-1 (FEN1), and maintains its mRNA expression 92. Analogously, in colorectal cancer, IGF2BP2 recognizes and binds to m6A-modified YAP and enhances the stability of YAP mRNA, thereby facilitating tumorigenesis 163. Similarly, IGF2BP2 recognizes the coding sequence (CDS) regions of transcription factor SOX2 and protects it from degradation in m6A- mediated manner, which facilitates tumorigenesis and metastasis in colorectal cancer 164. In similar with c-MYC, oncogene SOX2 is highly susceptible to m6A modification 165, 166. In thyroid cancer, m6A demethylase FTO inhibits cell growth and glycolysis by reducing the mRNA stability of target, APOE in IGF2BP2-mediated m6A-dependent manner 167. IGF2BP2 also promotes lymphatic metastasis and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) of head and neck squamous carcinoma cells by stabilizing slug mRNA in an m6A-dependent manner 168. In addition, human papillomavirus E6/E7 promotes aerobic glycolysis of cervical cancer by stabilizing MYC expression in IGF2BP2-mediated m6A-dependent way 169. In breast cancer stem-like cells (BCSC), aurora kinase A (AURKA) binds to IGF2BP2 and strengthens IGF2BP2 to stabilize DROSHA mRNA in an m6A-modified way, thereby increasing BCSC stemness maintenance 170. In addition to cancer, IGF2BP2-mediated m6A modification also plays crucial roles in other physiological and pathological contexts. Most recently, IGF2BP2 maintains mitochondrial homeostasis of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) through maintaining the mRNA stability of its downstream target Bmi1, indicating that IGF2BP2-mediated m6A modification is critical for HSCs maintenance and hematopoiesis 171. In the immune process, IGF2BP2 regulates macrophage phenotypic activation by stabilizing TSC1 and PPARγ mRNA in an m6A-dependent manner 172. Moreover, IGF2P2 also binds to CCAAT/enhancer binding proteins (C/EBPs) to enhance the mRNA half-life and expression of C/EBPs in an m6A-modified manner in autoimmune inflammation 173. In addition, IGF2BP2-modified m6A also plays important roles in regulating cardiac hypertrophy and aging-associated disorders 174, 175.

IGF2BP3

A major function of IGF2BP3 is interaction with the mRNA machinery, and plays as a stabilizer of oncogene in cancer 3. In colon cancer, high expression of IGF2BP3 is associated with poorer overall survival, and IGF2BP3 recognizes and binds to the CDS region of Cyclin D1 to regulate cycle, and IGF2BP3 also regulates angiogenesis through m6A modification of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) 176. In gastric cancer, IGF2BP3 directly binds to hypoxia inducible factor-1a (HIF1A) at a specific m6A site in the CDS region, and knockout of IGF2BP3 inhibits cell migration and angiogenesis induced by hypoxia 177. In addition, IGF2BP3 can bind to the m6A-modified region of the ATP-binding cassette transporters subfamily B member 1 (ABCB1) and promotes its mRNA stabilization, thereby triggering chemoresistance of colorectal cancer cells 178. m6A demethylase ALKBH5 inhibits metastasis of gastric cancer through modulating expression of downstream target, PKMYT, and IGF2BP3 stabilize the mRNA stability of PKMYT1 by recognizing its m6A modification sites 179. m6A methyltransferase METTL3 post-transcriptionally mediates PD-L1 mRNA activation in breast cancer with m6A-IGF2BP3-dependent manner 180. Thus, m6A readers play important roles in m6A writers or erasers-mediated the stability of targets mRNA. Moreover, MYC-activated IGF2BP3 increase m6A-modified level of KPNA2, thereby promoting cell proliferation and metastasis nasopharyngeal carcinoma 181. Alternatively, IGF2BPs also can stabilize mRNAs in an m6A-independent manner. For example, IGF2BP3 specifically binds to pregenomic RNA (pgRNA) and increases its stability without m6A modification, and promotes the stemness and tumorigenicity of HCC cells 182. Thus, in addition to m6A modification, IGF2BPs can stabilize their targets mRNA through other mechanisms, and in general, preferentially through the m6A-modified manner. In line with IGF2BP1 and IGF2BP2, noncoding RNAs play as guide or scaffold to recruit or interact with IGF2BP3 to regulate the function of their targets. For instance, lncRNA DMDRMR binds and cooperates with IGF2BP3 to stabilize multiple targets, including CDK4, in an m6A-dependent manner, and thereby drives cancer progression of clear cell renal cell carcinoma 111. In addition, circular RNA, circ-TNPO3 serves as a protein decoy to competitively interact with IGF2BP3, and the stabilization role of IGF2BP3 on c-MYC mRNA is weakened, leading to inhibition of metastasis in gastric cancer 183. The m6A modification is established by m6A methyltransferases (also known as m6A writer) 56. METTL3 and METTL14 are core subunits of the methyltransferase complex that efficiently catalyses m6A modification 184. Accumulating evidences in recent years demonstrate that METTL3, in most cases, plays as an oncogene in cancer 185. Importantly, in some instances, the function of METTL3 in cancer depends on m6A readers, such as YTHDF2 186. In gastric cancer, higher expression of METTL3 is associated with poor prognosis, and mechanistically, METTL3 mediates the m6A modification of HDGF mRNA in a manner with IGF2BP3-dependent HDGF mRNA stability 187. In addition to METTL3, another m6A writer, RBM15 regulates the m6A modification of its downstream target, TMBIM6, and enhances TMBIM6 mRNA stability through IGF2BP3-dependent way, and thereby facilitating progression of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma 188. Interestingly, cross-talk among m6A writers, erasers, readers maintains the m6A level that regulates tumor growth and progression. For example, METTL14 and ALKBH5 (eraser) determine the m6A level of targets via controlling each other expression and by inhibiting YTHDF3 (reader) 189. In some cases, the m6A modification requires different readers to regulate their targets mRNA. For example, m6A-modified pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase 4 (PDK4) participates in glycolysis of cancer cells, and specifically, m6A-modified PDK4 regulates translation and mRNA stability via binding to YTHDF1 and IGF2BP3, respectively 121.

IGF2BPs

In 2018, IGF2BPs family was first identified as new m6A reader that has unique KH domains different from classical YTH domains 11. IGF2BPs promote the stability and storage of c-MYC, and the oncogenic role of IGF2BPs depends on their function as m6A readers 11. In renal cell cancer, transcription factor early growth response 2 (EGR2) increases the expressions of IGF2BPs, and IGF2BPs enhance the stability of sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 3 (S1PR3) mRNA in m6A-dependent manner, and S1PR3 drives tumorigenesis and metastasis 190. In acute myeloid leukemia (AML), RNA-binding protein YBX1 is required for survival of AML, and mechanistically, YBX1 can cooperate with IGF2BP1 and IGF2BP3 to increase the stability of c-MYC and BCL2 mRNA in an m6A dependent manner 191. In hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the cancer-testis lncRNA-CTHCC promotes HCC growth and metastasis, and mechanistically, lncRNA-CTHCC is modified by m6A methylation with METTL3 and IGF2BP1/IGF2BP3 to maintain its stability and increase its expression 192. In colorectal cancer, METTL3 promotes glycolysis metabolism to drive tumorigenesis, mechanistically, METTL3 mediates m6A modification to enhance the expressions of HK2 and SLC2A1 through IGF2BP2/3-dependent mRNA stability function 193. In lung cancer, IGF2BPs, in particular, the IGF2BP2/3 increase the mRNA stability of VANGL1, and VANGL1 is associated with radio-resistance 194. Since IGF2BPs are oncofetal, interestingly, degradation of IGF2BPs can be used for cancer treatment. For example, tumor suppressor gene, circNDUFB2 interacts with the KH domains of IGF2BP1/2/3 in an m6A-dependent manner, and facilitates ubiquitination and degradation of IGF2BPs, thus leading to inhibition of tumor growth of lung cancer 195. The detail functions of IGF2BPs- modified m6A in cancer is shown in Table .

Conclusion and perspectives

IGF2BPs-mediated m6A modification that controls mRNA fate is emerging as a rising star in cancer through more mechanistic analyses since 2018. However, the oncogenic role of IGF2BPs in stabilizing theirs targets, such as c-MYC, has garnered interest in developing small-molecule inhibitors targeting IGF2BPs before 2018. As a result, a novel IGF2BP1 inhibitor, BTYNB, was identified to inhibit IGF2BP1 and destabilize c-MYC, providing a therapeutic option for cancer treatment 199. Besides IGF2BPs, several small-molecule inhibitors targeting other m6A modification proteins (writers, erasers) are discovered using high-throughput screening 200. Nevertheless, it is possible that inhibition of IGF2BPs may lead to feedback activation of other readers (such as YTHDF1), inevitably developing drug resistance. IGF2BPs participate in posttranscriptional RNA processing, such as RNA splicing, translation, stability and decay, and in most cases, IGF2BPs stabilize their targets in m6A-dependent manner. Nevertheless, many questions remain to be resolved. (i) If IGF2BPs stabilize their downstream targets in an m6A-independent way, the detail mechanisms are what? (ii) Whether IGF2BPs increase the stability of targets mRNA through m6A modification before IGF2BPs are identified as new m6A readers? (iii) Do IGF2BPs and other m6A readers compete for the same targets mRNA, such as c-MYC? (ⅳ) How m6A writers (such as METTL3) and readers (IGF2BPs) cooperate through the “writers-readers system”? Thus, future structural studies are strongly warranted to understand how IGF2BPs binds to their targets, such as c-MYC, and investigate other KH domains-containing proteins as potential m6A readers.
Table 1

The functions of IGF2BPs as m6A readers in cancer

Upstream targetm6A readerFunctionCancer typeReference
IGF2BPsEnhances c-MYC mRNA stability and translationPan-cancer 11
IGF2BPsStabilizes VANGL1Lung cancer 194
IGF2BPsStabilizes HK2 and SLC2A1Colorectal cancer 193
circNDUFB2IGF2BPsEnhances IGF2BPs degradationLung cancer 195
EGR2IGF2BPsStabilizes S1PR3 mRNARenal cell carcinoma 190
YBX1IGF2BPsStabilizes BCL2, c-MYC mRNAMyeloid leukemia 191
IGF2BPsStabilizes lncRNA-CTHCCHepatocellular carcinoma 192
lncRNA KB-1980E6.3IGF2BP1Stabilizes c-MYCBreast cancer 137
LINC00266-1IGF2BP1Stabilizes c-MYCColorectal cancer 139
CircPTPRAIGF2BP1Stabilizes c-MYC and FSCN1Bladder cancer 105
IGF2BP1Stabilizes PEG10Endometrial cancer 140
IGF2BP1Promotes SRF expressionPan-cancer 145
IGF2BP1Stabilizes MGAT5Liver cancer 144
IGF2BP1Stabilizes AURKA, HDLBP and YWHAZPan-cancer 196
PADI2IGF2BP1Stabilizes SOX2Endometrial cancer 141
IGF2BP1Controls E2F1 turnoverPan-cancer 87
RBM15IGF2BP1Promotes post-transcriptional activation of YES1HCC 143
METTL3IGF2BP1Stabilizes KIF3CProstate cancer 147
METTL3IGF2BP1Stabilizes lncRNA THAP7-AS1Gastric cancer 135
ALKBH5IGF2BP1Stabilizes LYPD1HCC 142
METTL3IGF2BP1Promotes BMI1 translationSquamous Cell Carcinoma 146
FTOIGF2BP1Reduce mRNA stability of DACT1Osteosarcoma 149
IGF2BP2Reduces LncRNA HAGLRThyroid cancer 197
IGF2BP2Stabilizes FEN1 mRNAHCC 92
IGF2BP2Promote YAP translation, and activates ErbB2Colorectal cancer 163
IGF2BP2Stabilizes lncRNA DANCRPancreatic cancer 155
CircARHGAP12IGF2BP2Stabilizes FOXM1 mRNACervical cancer 161
HCG11IGF2BP2Stabilizes LATS1 mRNALung cancer 198
lncRNA CCAT2IGF2BP2Stabilizes TK1 mRNAEsophageal squamous cell carcinoma 152
LINC01021IGF2BP2Enhances mRNA stability of MSX1 and JARID2Colorectal cancer 159
IGF2BP2Stabilizes lncRNA CASC9/HK2 mRNAGlioblastoma 154
IGF2BP2Stabilizes the ZFAS1/OLA1 axisColorectal cancer 158
METTL3IGF2BP2Prevents SOX2 mRNA degradationColorectal cancer 164
IGF2BP2Promotes Slug mRNA stabilityHead and neck squamous carcinoma 168
FTOIGF2BP2Reduces APOE mRNA stabilityThyroid cancer 167
HPV E6/E7IGF2BP2Stabilize MYC expressionCervical cancer 169
miR-204IGF2BP2Enhances c-MYC expressionThyroid Cancer 156
LINC00460IGF2BP2Stabilizes HMGA1 mRNAColorectal cancer 150
IGF2BP3Stabilizes ABCB1 mRNAChemoresistance 178
lncRNA (DMDRMR)IGF2BP3Stabilizes CDK4 COL6A1, LAMA5, FN1Renal cell carcinoma 111
IGF2BP3Stabilizes HIF1AGastric cancer 177
ALKBH5IGF2BP3Stabilize mRNA stability of PKMYT1Gastric cancer 179
METTL3IGF2BP3Promotes PD-L1 mRNA activationBreast cancer 180
MYCIGF2BP3Increases mRNA stability of KPNA2Nasopharyngeal carcinoma 181
RBM15IGF2BP3Stabilizes TMBIM6Laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma 188
IGF2BP3Reduces Cyclin D1 mRNA stabilityColon cancer 176
IGF2BP3Stabilizes HDGFGastric cancer 187
IGF2BP3Promotes translation and stability of PDK4Pan-cancer 121
  198 in total

1.  The methylated constituents of L cell messenger RNA: evidence for an unusual cluster at the 5' terminus.

Authors:  R P Perry; D E Kelley; K Friderici; F Rottman
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 2.  The role of the oncofetal IGF2 mRNA-binding protein 3 (IGF2BP3) in cancer.

Authors:  Marcell Lederer; Nadine Bley; Christian Schleifer; Stefan Hüttelmaier
Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 15.707

3.  Ythdc2 is an N6-methyladenosine binding protein that regulates mammalian spermatogenesis.

Authors:  Phillip J Hsu; Yunfei Zhu; Honghui Ma; Yueshuai Guo; Xiaodan Shi; Yuanyuan Liu; Meijie Qi; Zhike Lu; Hailing Shi; Jianying Wang; Yiwei Cheng; Guanzheng Luo; Qing Dai; Mingxi Liu; Xuejiang Guo; Jiahao Sha; Bin Shen; Chuan He
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2017-08-15       Impact factor: 25.617

4.  DMDRMR-Mediated Regulation of m6A-Modified CDK4 by m6A Reader IGF2BP3 Drives ccRCC Progression.

Authors:  Yinmin Gu; Shaoxi Niu; Yang Wang; Liqiang Duan; Yongbo Pan; Zhou Tong; Xu Zhang; Zhenyu Yang; Bo Peng; Xiaodong Wang; Xiaoqi Han; Yuxin Li; Tianyou Cheng; Yajuan Liu; Lina Shang; Tongfeng Liu; Xiwang Yang; Minxuan Sun; Siyuan Jiang; Chang Zhang; Ning Zhang; Qinong Ye; Shan Gao
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2020-12-08       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  IGF2BP2/IMP2-Deficient mice resist obesity through enhanced translation of Ucp1 mRNA and Other mRNAs encoding mitochondrial proteins.

Authors:  Ning Dai; Liping Zhao; Diedra Wrighting; Dana Krämer; Amit Majithia; Yanqun Wang; Valentin Cracan; Diego Borges-Rivera; Vamsi K Mootha; Matthias Nahrendorf; David R Thorburn; Liliana Minichiello; David Altshuler; Joseph Avruch
Journal:  Cell Metab       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 27.287

6.  An additional class of m6A readers.

Authors:  Katherine I Zhou; Tao Pan
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 28.824

Review 7.  The MYC oncogene - the grand orchestrator of cancer growth and immune evasion.

Authors:  Renumathy Dhanasekaran; Anja Deutzmann; Wadie D Mahauad-Fernandez; Aida S Hansen; Arvin M Gouw; Dean W Felsher
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 66.675

8.  METTL3-mediated N6-methyladenosine modification is critical for epithelial-mesenchymal transition and metastasis of gastric cancer.

Authors:  Ben Yue; Chenlong Song; Linxi Yang; Ran Cui; Xingwang Cheng; Zizhen Zhang; Gang Zhao
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2019-10-13       Impact factor: 27.401

9.  Identification and validation of m6A RNA methylation regulators with clinical prognostic value in Papillary thyroid cancer.

Authors:  Xinyi Wang; Xiaorui Fu; Junjia Zhang; Chengfeng Xiong; Shuyong Zhang; Yunxia Lv
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 5.722

10.  IGF2BP1 is a targetable SRC/MAPK-dependent driver of invasive growth in ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Nadine Bley; Annekatrin Schott; Simon Müller; Danny Misiak; Marcell Lederer; Tommy Fuchs; Chris Aßmann; Markus Glaß; Christian Ihling; Andrea Sinz; Nikolaos Pazaitis; Claudia Wickenhauser; Martina Vetter; Olga Ungurs; Hans-Georg Strauss; Christoph Thomssen; Stefan Hüttelmaier
Journal:  RNA Biol       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 4.652

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  RNA modifications: importance in immune cell biology and related diseases.

Authors:  Lian Cui; Rui Ma; Jiangluyi Cai; Chunyuan Guo; Zeyu Chen; Lingling Yao; Yuanyuan Wang; Rui Fan; Xin Wang; Yuling Shi
Journal:  Signal Transduct Target Ther       Date:  2022-09-22
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.