| Literature DB >> 35541833 |
Yong Wang1, Tianxia Chen1, Zhengtao Zhang1, Yongnian Ni1,2.
Abstract
We reported a sensitive and selective fluorescence "turn on-off" strategy for detection of Cu2+ and hemin, respectively. The fluorescence "turn on" sensor for Cu2+ detection had a wide linear range of 0.05-2.0 μM with a limit of detection (LOD) of 0.032 μM, and the fluorescence "turn off" sensor for hemin detection possessed a wide linear range of 0.05-4.0 μM with an LOD of 0.045 μM. The sensor for Cu2+ or hemin exhibited high selectivity over other possible substances. In addition, it was demonstrated by using various analytical characterization techniques that the fluorescence "turn on" sensor for Cu2+ was constructed on the basis of the formation of water-soluble fluorescent copper nanoclusters (CuNCs), and the fabrication of the fluorescence "turn off" sensor for hemin was predominately based on the inner filter effect of hemin on the fluorescence of the CuNCs. Finally, the proposed fluorescence "turn on-off" sensor system was successfully applied for detection of Cu2+ in lake water samples and hemin in duck blood samples. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 35541833 PMCID: PMC9078579 DOI: 10.1039/c7ra11383h
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 4.036
Scheme 1Schematic illustration of fluorescence “turn on–off” strategy for detection of Cu2+ and hemin.
Fig. 1(A) Three-dimensional fluorescence spectra of the CuNCs. Inset: the related optical photographs. (B) Effect of time on the fluorescence intensity of the CuNCs. (C) TEM image of the CuNCs. (D) High resolution XPS spectra of Cu 2p for CuNCs. (E) FT-IR spectra of CuNCs.
Fig. 2(A) The emission spectra of CuNCs under 300 nm excitation with the increasing concentration of the Cu2+. Inset: the calibration plot of (F − F0) versus Cu2+ concentration, where F and F0 respectively represented the fluorescence intensity with and without Cu2+. (B) Selectivity of the “turn on” sensor for Cu2+. The concentration of each metal ion were 1.0 μM. The error bars are the standard deviation of three measurements.
Fluorescence analysis of Cu2+ and hemin: a comparison of the proposed approach with other reported methods
| Probe | Mechanism | Linear range (μM) | LOD (μM) | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
| BSA-capped AuNCs | Electrostatic & ion-exchanging | 30–500 | 0.5 |
|
| BSA-capped AuNCs | Coordination & energy transfer | 0.5–100 | 0.3 |
|
| BSA-capped AuNCs | Precipitation | 5–500 | 5.0 |
|
| BSA-capped CuNCs | Intersystem crossing | 0.02–34 | 0.001 |
|
| DNA-capped Cu/Ag NCs/MPA | Oxidation | 0.005–0.2 | 0.0027 |
|
| PEI-capped AgNCs | Coordination & energy transfer | 0.01–7.7 | 0.01 |
|
| PMAA-capped AgNCs | Coordination & energy transfer | 0.01–30 | 0.01 |
|
| Sn( | Coordination | 0.5–70 | 0.38 |
|
| DTT-capped AuNCs | Coordination | 0–60 | 0.08 |
|
| Penicillamine-capped CuNCs | Formation-induced FL | 14.8–99.2 | 4.69 |
|
| Cytidine-stabilized CuNCs | Formation-induced FL | 0.05–2.0 | 0.032 | This work |
|
| ||||
| Curcumin polymer | Electron density transfer | 20–100 | 13.5 |
|
| Hep–MPA–CdS QDs/protamine | Static interaction & surface defect | 0.167–17 | 0.0486 |
|
| DNA–rGO/AO | Competition & electron or energy transfer | 0.31–2.5 | 0.05 |
|
| Cytidine-stabilized CuNCs | Inner filter effect | 0.05–4.0 | 0.045 | This work |
DNA-capped Cu/Ag nanoclusters in the presence of 3-mercaptopropionic acid.
Polyethyleneimine-capped AgNCs.
poly(methacrylic acid)-capped AgNCs.
Dithiothreitol-capped AuNCs.
Heparin–mercaptopropionic acid dual modified CdS quantum dots in the presence of protamine.
DNA-reduced graphene oxide in the presence of acridine orange.
Fig. 3(A) The emission spectra of CuNCs under 300 nm excitation with the increasing concentration of the hemin. Inset: the calibration plot of (F0 − F) versus hemin concentration, where F and F0 respectively represented the fluorescence intensity of CuNCs with and without hemin. (B) Fluorescence excitation and emission spectra of the CuNCs, and UV-vis absorption spectrum of hemin. (C) Selectivity of the “turn off” sensor for hemin. The concentration of hemin and other substance are 1.0 μM. The error bars are the standard deviation of three measurements.
Determination of Cu2+ in lake water samples (n = 3)
| Samples | Added (μM) | Mean found (μM) | Mean recovery (%) | RSD (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | 0.06 | — | 4.6 |
| 2 | 1.00 | 1.02 | 96 | 5.7 |
| 3 | 1.50 | 1.56 | 100 | 1.3 |
| 4 | 2.00 | 1.93 | 94 | 1.7 |
Determination of hemin in duck blood samples (n = 3)
| Samples | Added (μM) | Mean found (μM) | Mean recovery (%) | RSD (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | 0.09 | — | 6.6 |
| 2 | 1.00 | 1.01 | 92 | 6.8 |
| 3 | 2.00 | 1.98 | 95 | 4.0 |
| 4 | 4.00 | 4.25 | 104 | 1.7 |