| Literature DB >> 35540619 |
Xing-Ru Chen1,2, Yan-Yan Liu1,2, Yong-Hui Zhou1,2, Xiao-Xu Xing1,2, Qian-Wei Qu1,2, Xue-Ying Chen1,2, Wen-Ya Ding1,2, Guang-Long Cheng1,2, Ai-Juan Wei1,2, Xi-Wen Feng1,2, Bello-Onaghise God'spower1,2, Nsabimana Eliphaz1,2, Yan-Hua Li1,2.
Abstract
Syringa oblata Lindl. (S. oblata) is a medicinal plant with effective broad-spectrum antibacterial activity, which can also inhibit Streptococcus suis biofilm formation. The processing of herbal medicine can purify medicinal materials, provide acceptable taste, reduce toxicity, enhance efficacy, influence performance and facilitate preparation. Thus, the aim of this study was to enhance the biofilm inhibition activity of S. oblata toward Staphylococcus xylosus (S. xylosus) using the best processing method. The content of rutin and flavonoids and the ability to inhibit the biofilm formation by S. oblata were examined using four processing methods. One of the best methods, the process of stir-frying S. oblata with vinegar, was optimized based on the best rutin content by response surface methodology. The histidine content and hisB gene expression of S. xylosus biofilm in vitro, resulting from stir-frying S. oblata with vinegar, were evaluated and were found to be significantly decreased and down-regulated, respectively. The results show that S. oblata stir-fried with vinegar can be used to effectively treat diseases resulting from S. xylosus infection. This is because it significantly inhibited S. xylosus biofilm formation by interfering with the biosynthesis of histidine; thus, its mechanism of action is decreasing histidine synthesis. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 35540619 PMCID: PMC9074935 DOI: 10.1039/c9ra06224f
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 4.036
Fig. 1The experimental flow chart.
Variables and experimental design levels for response surface
| Independent variable/unit | Coded symbol | Level | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| −1 | 0 | 1 | ||
| Moistening time/min |
| 20 | 40 | 60 |
| Frying time/min |
| 2 | 3 | 4 |
| The dosage of vinegar/mL |
| 6 | 10.5 | 15 |
Box–Behnken design matrix with three independent variables expressed in code with experimental and predicted responses
| Run |
|
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Predicted value (%) | Experiment value (%) | Predicted value (%) | Experiment value (%) | ||||
| 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 8.37 | 8.00 | 306.06 | 287.84 |
| 2 | 2 | 0 | −1 | 6.13 | 6.83 | 249.31 | 260.20 |
| 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8.57 | 8.55 | 311.98 | 310.02 |
| 4 | −1 | −1 | 0 | 6.56 | 6.92 | 242.52 | 260.74 |
| 5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 7.64 | 7.80 | 278.47 | 281.01 |
| 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8.76 | 8.55 | 311.98 | 310.02 |
| 7 | −1 | 0 | 1 | 8.01 | 7.32 | 288.35 | 277.46 |
| 8 | 0 | 1 | −1 | 7.90 | 7.58 | 263.97 | 271.29 |
| 9 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 7.71 | 7.91 | 257.01 | 272.69 |
| 10 | −1 | 1 | 0 | 6.13 | 6.66 | 270.16 | 278.51 |
| 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8.68 | 8.55 | 311.98 | 310.02 |
| 12 | 0 | −1 | 1 | 6.82 | 7.15 | 270.75 | 263.43 |
| 13 | 4 | −1 | 0 | 6.27 | 5.74 | 261.74 | 253.39 |
| 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8.42 | 8.55 | 311.98 | 310.02 |
| 15 | 0 | −1 | −1 | 6.39 | 6.23 | 239.18 | 236.65 |
| 16 | −1 | 0 | −1 | 7.46 | 7.26 | 269.14 | 253.46 |
| 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8.34 | 8.55 | 302.15 | 310.02 |
Fig. 2(A) The rutin content with different Syringa oblata Lindl. processing methods. (B) The total flavonoid content with different Syringa oblata Lindl. processing methods. (C) The inhibition of Staphylococcus xylosus biofilm formation by different Syringa oblata Lindl. processing methods: (a) normal, (b) stir-frying with vinegar, (c) stir-frying with salt-water, (d) stir-frying with ginger juice and (e) stir-frying with honey. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). Different letters indicate a significant difference at p < 0.05. (*p < 0.05) is significantly different as compared to the untreated control bacteria.
Fig. 3Single-factor experiments with the rice vinegar (a) and vinegar (b) (A), and moistening time (B) in the Syringa oblata Lindl. stir-fried with vinegar. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3).
ANOVA for the response surface quadratic model of the Syringa oblata Lindl. stir-fried with vinegara
| Source | Sum of squares | df | Mean square |
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Model | 12.45 | 9024.24 | 9 | 9 | 1.38 | 1002.69 | 4.28 | 4.06 | 0.034* | 0.039* |
|
| 2.01 | 1363.95 | 1 | 1 | 2.01 | 1363.95 | 6.22 | 5.52 | 0.041* | 0.051 |
|
| 0.01 | 1.96 | 1 | 1 | 0.01 | 1.96 | 0.04 | 7.92 × 10−3 | 0.851 | 0.932 |
|
| 0.66 | 665.85 | 1 | 1 | 0.66 | 665.85 | 2.03 | 2.69 | 0.197 | 0.145 |
|
| 1.59 | 69.60 | 1 | 1 | 1.59 | 69.60 | 4.94 | 0.28 | 0.062 | 0.612 |
|
| 0.12 | 72.77 | 1 | 1 | 0.12 | 72.77 | 0.37 | 0.29 | 0.561 | 0.604 |
|
| 0.26 | 33.12 | 1 | 1 | 0.26 | 33.12 | 0.82 | 0.13 | 0.396 | 0.725 |
|
| 3.64 | 1924.09 | 1 | 1 | 3.64 | 1924.09 | 11.28 | 7.79 | 0.012* | 0.027* |
|
| 2.63 | 1443.72 | 1 | 1 | 2.63 | 1443.72 | 8.13 | 5.84 | 0.025* | 0.046* |
|
| 0.79 | 2747.37 | 1 | 1 | 0.79 | 2747.37 | 2.45 | 11.12 | 0.162 | 0.013* |
| Residual | 2.26 | 1729.78 | 7 | 7 | 0.32 | 247.11 | ||||
| Lack of fit | 2.14 | 1652.42 | 3 | 3 | 0.71 | 550.81 | 23.22 | 28.48 | 0.005* | 0.004* |
| Pure error | 0.12 | 77.36 | 4 | 4 | 0.03 | 19.34 | ||||
| Cor total | 14.71 | 10 754.02 | 16 | 16 | ||||||
*Significant (p < 0.05); a indicated rutin content. b indicated total flavonoid content.
Fig. 4Response surface plots (three-dimensional) showing the effects of the moistening time (X1, min), frying time (X2, min) and the dosage of vinegar (X3, mL) on the concentration of rutin (Y1, μg g−1) and total flavonoids (Y2, mg g−1) in Syringa oblata Lindl.
Fig. 5(A) The inhibition of Staphylococcus xylosus biofilm formation by rutin: normal (a) and stir-frying with vinegar (b). (B) Determination of the histidine content and of Staphylococcus xylosus in sub-MICs in the control, normal Syringa oblata Lindl. (a) and Syringa oblata Lindl. stir-fried with vinegar (b). (C) The effect of Syringa oblata Lindl. on the expression of hisB genes in Staphylococcus xylosus. The expression was normalized to that of 16S RNA. Controls refer to the absence of Syringa oblata Lindl. *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 as compared to the control bacteria. Different letters indicate a significant difference at p < 0.05. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3).