| Literature DB >> 35540577 |
Qinjie Shi1, Yanxia Shi2, Kang Chang1, Jianqin Chen1, Zhenjiang Zhao3, Weiping Zhu1, Yufang Xu1, BaoJu Li2, Xuhong Qian1.
Abstract
Due to the emergence of drug resistance, pesticide residue and environmental contamination, it is important to develop novel eco-friendly strategies to protect plants. Among them, plant activators have been gaining more and more attention. Herein, based on SHAFTS method, a new scaffold for novel plant activators was predicted and the discovery and structure-activity relationships of a series of 3(2H)-pyridazinone derivatives as novel plant activators were elucidated in detail. The vast majority of compounds exhibited excellent broad-spectrum induced resistance activity against tested diseases in vivo but no direct antimicrobial activity in vitro. Among them, compound 32 showed excellent efficacy against four pathogens and great potential as new plant activators in crop protection. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 35540577 PMCID: PMC9074948 DOI: 10.1039/c9ra06892a
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 4.036
Fig. 1The discovery of the lead compound 8.
Fig. 2The optimization strategy of the lead compound 8.
Structure and in vivo induced resistance activity of compounds 13–18, 25–30a
| Compound | R1 | Efficacy (%) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MM | CC | RS | BC | FO | PI | PT | PL | ||
| 13 | H |
|
| −2.86 | −8.40 | 5.94 | 33.17 | ND | 26.95 |
| 14 | 4-F | 27.78 |
|
| −1.41 | −7.5 | 7.09 | ND |
|
| 15 | 4-Cl |
|
| −4.04 | −9.06 | 11.31 | 32.46 | ND |
|
| 16 | 4-CF3 | 17.5 |
| 6.01 | 11.78 | −2.13 |
| ND |
|
| 17 | 4-OCH3 |
| 44.26 | 46.35 | 24.19 | 2.58 | 2.08 | ND |
|
| 18 | 4-OCF3 | ND | ND |
| ND |
| 16.67 |
| ND |
| 25 | 3,5-Di-Cl |
|
| −2.86 | −10.4 | −1.46 | 23.53 | ND |
|
| 26 | 2,4-Di-Cl | 39.17 |
| 12.51 | −0.91 | 11.31 | 26.38 | ND | 48.7 |
| 27 | 3,4-Di-Cl | 43.33 |
| 3.74 | −15.1 | 1.9 | 19.95 | ND | 38.44 |
| 28 | 3,4-Di-F | ND | ND |
| ND |
| −9.72 |
| ND |
| 29 | 4-F-3-CF3 | ND | ND |
| ND | 10.26 | 2.78 |
| ND |
| 30 | 3,5-Di-OCH3 | ND | ND |
| ND |
| −5.56 | 44.62 | ND |
| BTH |
| −8.2 | 16.06 | 46.8 | 19.37 |
| ND |
| |
| 50% kresoximmethyl (WG) |
| ||||||||
| 75% chlorothalonil (WP) |
| ||||||||
| 5% validamycin A (WP) |
| ||||||||
| 50% procymidone (WP) | 41.87 | ||||||||
| 70% mildothane (WP) |
| ||||||||
| 50% dimethomorph (WP) |
| ||||||||
| 20% bismerthlazol (WP) |
|
| |||||||
ND-not detected; inducing activity > 50% are shown in bold.
Structure and in vivo induced resistance activity of compounds 19–24a
| Compound | R1 | Efficacy (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RS | FO | PI | PT | ||
| 19 | 2-F | 40.36 |
| 13.89 | 4.62 |
| 20 | 2-CF3 |
| 23.08 | 25 | 44.62 |
| 21 | 2-OCH3 | 32.34 | 38.46 | 22.22 | ND |
| 22 | 3-F | 30.17 | 35.9 | 6.94 | 4.62 |
| 23 | 3-CF3 |
| −23.08 | 11.11 | 38.46 |
| 24 | 3-OCH3 |
|
| 0 |
|
| 5% validamycin A (WP) |
| ||||
| 70% mildothane (WP) |
| ||||
| 50% dimethomorph (WP) |
| ||||
| 20% bismerthlazol (WP) |
| ||||
ND-not detected; inducing activity > 50% are shown in bold.
Structure and in vivo induced resistance activity of compounds 31–35a
| Compound | R1 | Efficacy (%) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MM | CC | RS | BC | FO | PI | PT | PL | ||
| 31 | 4-F |
|
| 32.02 | 20.2 | −2.8 | 9.23 | ND |
|
| 32 | 4-OCH3 |
|
|
| 29.18 | −5.49 | 22.1 | ND |
|
| 33 | 2-OCH3 | ND | ND |
| ND |
| 5.56 |
| ND |
| 34 | 3-F | ND | ND | 24.04 | ND | 17.95 | 29.86 | −66.2 | ND |
| 35 | 3,4-Di-Cl | 10 |
| 39.7 | −11.9 | −0.11 | 14.95 | ND |
|
| BTH |
| −8.2 | 16.06 | 46.8 | 19.37 |
| ND |
| |
| 50% kresoximmethyl (WG) |
| ||||||||
| 75% chlorothalonil (WP) |
| ||||||||
| 5% validamycin A (WP) |
| ||||||||
| 50% procymidone (WP) | 41.87 | ||||||||
| 70% mildothane (WP) |
| ||||||||
| 50% dimethomorph (WP) |
| ||||||||
| 20% bismerthlazol (WP) |
|
| |||||||
ND-not detected; inducing activity > 50% are shown in bold.
In vitro anti-microbial activity of the representative compounds
| Compound | Efficacy (%) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MM | CC | RS | PI | |
| 14 | 0.00 | 9.80 | 4.75 | 5.96 |
| 15 | 15.12 | 13.14 | 0.59 | 1.99 |
| 16 | 4.26 | 11.58 | 4.15 | 7.62 |
| 17 | 5.62 | 10.24 | 0.89 | 6.29 |
| 25 | 10.47 | 9.35 | 0.89 | 3.64 |
| 31 | 1.36 | 18.26 | 0.00 | 2.98 |
| 32 | 9.69 | 11.58 | 8.90 | 0.33 |
| 35 | 4.56 | 20.04 | −1.48 | 7.28 |
| CK | 10 | 12 | 19 | 11 |
| 50% kresoximmethyl (WG) | 71 | |||
| 75% chlorothalonil (WP) | 21 | |||
| 5% validamycin A (WP) | 50 | |||
| 50% dimethomorph (WP) | 80 | |||