| Literature DB >> 35540549 |
Muhammad Latif1, Zaman Ashraf2, Sulman Basit1, Abdul Ghaffar3, Muhammad Sohail Zafar4,5, Aamer Saeed6, Sultan Ayoub Meo7.
Abstract
The course of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-rearranged non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) therapy has improved impressively. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved crizotinib (Xalkori, Pfizer) as a first-in-class tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that demonstrated a substantial objective response rate (ORR) and remarkable progression-free survival (PFS). However, acquired resistance to crizotinib is still a major concern especially as the central nervous system (CNS) remains the most common sites of relapse. To combat disease resistance, limited PFS and poor CNS exposure exhibited by crizotinib (Xalkori, Pfizer) led to the discovery of numerous next generation ALK-TKIs and surprisingly most of them are 2,4-Diarylaminopyrimidine Analogues (DAAPalogues). To date, DAAPalogues have been investigated extensively to display their superior potency against numerous kinase targets especially ALK/ROS1. This review describes hit-to-drug evolution strategies, activity spectra, milestones related to medicinal chemistry discovery efforts and scalable synthetic pathways of clinically emerging DAAPalouges which are either progressing as investigational or preclinical candidates. In addition, the significance of DAAPalogues to treat the patients with ALK+-NSCLC in clinical settings has been detailed. This review is beneficial for medicinal chemists and researchers contributing to discovering ALK-TKIs to overcome existing issues related to DAAPalouges in the drug discovery process. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 35540549 PMCID: PMC9080316 DOI: 10.1039/c8ra01934g
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 4.036
Fig. 1An overview of ALK in cancer and schematic summary of ALK overexpression, point mutations, and fusions in ALK positive cancer.
Fig. 2The anaplastic lymphoma kinase receptor tyrosine kinase. (A) Schematic representation of pleotrophin (PTN) bound ligand activated anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) receptor signalling. (B) Constitutively active ALK receptor signalling due to EML4 fusion. The fusion arises due to paracentric inversion between EML4 and ALK genes located in the short arm of chromosome 2. EML4-ALK translocation is thought to lead to the constitutive activation of oncogenic signaling through multiple pathways such as PI3K/Akt, JAK/STAT, and RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK. Aberrant activation of PI3K-Akt initiate mTOR, FOXO and GSK3β signalling which lead to survival and proliferation of tumour cells. PI3K/Akt activation also lead to MEKK2/3/MEK5/ERK5 pathway which subsequently promote the expression of the oncogene MYCN. The STAT3 signaling pathway has shown a key role in NPM-ALK mediated alteration however the significance of STAT3 activation in EML4-ALK+-NSCLC is unclear. ALK has also been shown to phosphorylate PLCγ to mediate its mitogenicity. (mTOR; mechanistic target of rapamycin, S6K; ribosomal S6 kinase, TD; trimerisation domain, TAPE; tandem atypical propeller domain, MAM; meprin, A5 protein, and protein tyrosine phosphatase Mu domain).
Fig. 3FDA approved ALK inhibitors with substantial impact in the field of medical oncology with reported point mutations to drug resistance. (Only most critical mutations are shown. The mutations written in blue are most frequent and critical.)
Fig. 4Novel, potent and selective DAAPalogues as ALK inhibitors.
Key features of DAAPalogues as ALK inhibitor advancing to clinical study
| Crizotinib | Ceritinib | Alectinib | Lorlatinib | Brigatinib | CEP-28122 | CEP-37440 | NVP-TAE684 | CEP-1 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mol. wt | 450 | 558 | 483 | 406 | 584 | 539 | 580 | 614 | 596 |
| c log | 4.2 | 6.5 | 5.2 | 2.7 | 5.9 | 4.7 | 4.7 | 3.9 | 5.2 |
| TPSA | 77 | 105 | 72 | 110 | 82 | — | — | — | — |
| HBD | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | |
| Phase | I, II, III | I, II, III | I/II | I/II | I, II, III | Pre-clinical (discontinued) | I | Pre-clinical (discontinued) | (Disc) |
| FDA approval status |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Targets other than ALK, [(IC50 nM)] | ROS1, c-Met | IGF-R1, InsR, ROS1 | RET, LTK, GAK | ROS1 | ROS (1.9 nM) IGF1R (24.9 nM), FLT3 (2.1 nM) | FLT4 (IC50 = 46 nM) | RSK2, SK3, RSK4, FAK | ALK, c-Fes, LRRK2 | |
| ALK(Enzymatic) (nM) | 24 | — | — | — | 0.37 | 2.0 | 3.1 | NA | 4 |
| IC50 (nM) | |||||||||
| ALK(cellular), (nM) | 3 | 0.15 | 1.9 | 2 | 0.62 | 40 | 22 | 3 | 30 |
| EML4-ALKwt | 56 | 41 | 2 | 1.3 | 5 | — | — | 16 | |
| IC50 (nM) | 44 | ||||||||
| EML4-ALKL1196M | 549 (R) | 64 (S) | 90 (S) | 21 (S) | 3 (S) | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| EML4-ALKG1202R | 328 | 444 | 207 | 77 | 56 | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| EML4-ALKC1156Y | 144 | 164 | 2 | 1.6 | 3 | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| EML4-ALKF1174L | 81 | 101 | 3 | 0.2 | 12 | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| EML4-ALKL1152R | 645 | 2747 | 169 | 9.0 | 2300 | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| EML4-ALK1151Tins | 857 | 668 | 72 | 38 | 142 | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| EML4-ALKG1269A | 512 | 57 | 9 | 15 | 2 | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| EML4-ALKS1206Y | 65 | 33 | 2 | 4.2 | 12 | ND | ND | ND | ND |
| Ref |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In 2011, FDA granted accelerated approval to crizotinib to treat patients with ALK-positive cancer but traditional approval was given in 2013. However on March 11, 2016, crizotinib got FDA approval as ROS1 inhibitor as well.
In April 2014, ceritinib obtained accelerated FDA approval for patients with ALK-positive metastatic NSCLC but on May 26, 2017, FDA granted regular approval to ceritinib.
In June 2013, FDA granted alectinib BTD based on preliminary evidence of clinical activity but got FDA approval in 2014. On Dec 11, 2015, he U.S. FDA granted accelerated approval to alecensa (alectinib) capsules for the treatment of patients with advanced (metastatic) ALK-positive NSCLC.
In 2015, lorlatinib (Pfizer) received FDA orphan drug status for therapy NSCLC patients. But in April, 2017, BTD was granted by FDA to lorlatinib for therapy of patients with ALK+-NSCLC who previously received one or more ALK inhibitors.
In 2016, FDA granted BTD to brigatinib. In April, 2017, the U.S FDA granted accelerated approval to brigatinib (ALUNBRIG) for the treatment of patients confirmed with metastatic ALK+-NSCLC who progressed on or were intolerant to crizotinib.
Further optimized to CEP-28122.
Further optimized to discover CEP-37440.
Further optimized to CEP-28122.
Further optimized to give other CEP analogs (Scheme 5).
The shown potency was against the two EML4-ALK+-NSCLC cancer cell lines such as NCI-H2228 and NCI-H3122.
The shown potency was against the two EML4-ALK+-NSCLC cancer cell lines such as NCI-H2228 and NCI-H3122.
Scheme 5The strategic development of CEP-37440 from (12).
Scheme 1The strategic development of brigatinib (Alunbrig™, AP26113) (5) from a SRC inhibitor (AP23464).
Scheme 2Medicinal chemistry discovery pathway of brigatinib.
Scheme 3Summarized layout of NVP-TAE684 DAAPlouge and evolution of ceritinib.
Scheme 4Pilot plant and scalable synthesis of CEP-28122 (17).
Comparision of PK and key features of intermediate DAAPalouges in discovery of CEP-37440 (19)
| Comp. | ALK enzyme IC50 (nM) | ALK cell IC50 (nM) | INSR enzyme IC50 (nM) | INSR cell IC50 (nM) | IR/ALK IC50 | FAK enzyme IC50 (nM) | FAK cell IC50 (nM) | Karpas-299 cell IC50 (nM) | hERG IC50 (μM) | CYP IC50 (μM) | Liver microsome LM ( | F (%) rat | Oral AUC0−∞ (ng h mL−1) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| M | R | Mo | H | |||||||||||||
| 12 | 15 | 23 | 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||
| 13 | 14 | — | — | — | 43 | — | — | 45 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 14 | 34 | 175 | >10 000 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 4 | — | 1860 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 4 | 30 | 1380 | — | 345 | — | — | 190 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 30 | 1019 |
| 17 | 1.9 | 42 | 662 | >10 000 | 662 | 30 | 944 | 20 | >10 | >10 | 8 | 16 | 17 | 11 | 25 | 1203 |
| 18 | 9 | 200 | 508 | — | — | 6.5 | — | — | 7.9 | >10 | 40 | 39 | 7 | 11 | — | 5526 |
| 19 | 3.1 | 22 | 65 | 2000 | — | 2.0 | 80 | — | >10 | >5.6 | 40 | 40 | 21 | 40 | 42 | 8360 |
Scheme 6Pilot plant synthesis of CEP-37440 DAApalouge to provide clinical supplies.[171]
Pharmacokinetic parameters of novel analogs (13–19) in CD-1 mouse, Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats, and cynomolgus monkeys
| PK parameters | Compound | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (13) | (15) | CEP-28122 (17) | CEP-37440 (19) | |||||||||
| SCID mouse | Rat | Dog | S-D rat | CD-1 mouse | CD-1 mouse | Rat | Dog | Mo | CD-1 mouse | SD rat | Mo | |
|
| ||||||||||||
| Dose (mg kg−1) | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
|
| 0.3 | 0.8 | 1.1 | 0.80 ± 0.05 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.9 ± 0.2 | 2.4 ± 0.2 | 1.2 ± 0.05 | 3.0 | 2 ± 0.4 | 5.4 ± 0.6 |
| Cl (mL min−1 kg−1) | 37 | 13 | 22 | 16 ± 1.5 | 20 | 29 | 17 ± 2 | 40 ± 1 | 28 ± 4 | 10 | 4 ± 0.2 | 30.±0.5 |
| % Cl/hepatic blood flow | 41 | 20 | 58 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
|
| 0.9 | 0.9 | 2.1 | 1.1 ± 0.1 | 1.2 | 1.8 | 1.3 ± 0.2 | 8.2 ± 0.5 | 2.9 ± 0.3 | 2.7 | 0.8 ± 0.2 | 13.2 ± 1.9 |
| AUC0−∞ (ng h mL−1) | 446 | 1276 | 773 | 1019 ± 91 | 830 | 584 | 989 ± 127 | 409 ± 16 | 615 ± 89 | 1612 | 4005 ± 237 | 554 ± 11 |
|
| ||||||||||||
| Dose (mg kg−1) | 10.0 | 5.0 | 10.0 | 5.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 5.0 | 10.0 |
|
| 306 ± 53 | 1192 | 880 | 599 ± 3 | 427 | 170 ± 51 | 1533 | 1340 ± 107 | 239 ± 6 | |||
|
| 0.25 | 0.8 | 1.1 | 3.3 ± 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.25 | 1.3 ± 0.3 | 0.8 | 4.7 ± 1.3 | 2 | 3.3 ± 0.7 | 6 |
|
| 2.4 | 2.2 | 1.6 | n.d | 3.1 | 2.3 | 6.6 ± 1.6 | 3.3 | 1.2 ± 0.05 | — | — | — |
| AUC0−∞ (ng h mL−1) | 1406 | 4088 | 2482 | 1395 ± 281 | 3895 | 2993 | 4833 ± 797 | 2126 | 954 ± 209 | 16 429 | 8360 ± 540 | 2757 ± 114 |
|
| 32 | 64 | 31 | 30 ± 6 | 64 | 51 | 50 ± 8 | 52 | 16 ± 3 | 102 | 42 ± 3 | 50 ± 3 |