| Literature DB >> 35540377 |
Wenqian Nong1, Anran Zhao2, Jinrui Wei3, Hui Cheng1, Xuan Luo1, Cuiwu Lin1.
Abstract
A series of benzothiazole amide derivatives were synthesized through a facile and efficient method via a nucleophilic acyl substitution reaction between 2-aminobenzothiazole and various cinnamic acid compounds. The obtained products exhibited good thermal stabilities. All compounds were evaluated for their in vitro hemostatic activities using the commercially available standard drug etamsylate as a positive control. The results showed that compound Q2 had a significant partial coagulation activity, reduced capillary permeability at 5, 10 and 50 μmol L-1, activated thrombin activity, and a more potent platelet aggregation activity than the positive control group (etamsylate, up to 1283.9 times in the nanomole range). A molecular modeling study revealed that compound Q2 was a competitive thrombin activator. Therefore, Q2 may be a potential lead for further biological screening and for the generation of drug molecules. Moreover, the structure-activity relationship of the prepared compounds is also discussed herein. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 35540377 PMCID: PMC9078235 DOI: 10.1039/c7ra13397a
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 4.036
Scheme 1Synthesis of compounds Q1–Q4. Reagents and conditions: (a) acetic anhydride/pyridine, 120 °C, 5 h, 98–100%. (b) SOCl2, DMF, 70 °C, 5 min, 100%. (c) NaHCO3, pH = 6–7, 0–5 °C to room temperature, 3 h, 70–82%.
Scheme 2Synthesis of compounds Q5–Q9. Reagents and conditions: (b) SOCl2, DMF, 70 °C, 5 min, 100%. (c) NaHCO3, pH = 6–7, 0–5 °C to room temperature, 3 h, 88–93%.
Synthesis of benzothiazole amide derivativesa and their biological evaluation on platelet aggregation
|
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compound |
|
|
|
| Yield | EC50 |
| 2-Aminobenzothiazole | 513.7 | |||||
| q1 | H | OCOCH3 | OCH3 | H | 100 | 476.3 |
| q2 | H | OCOCH3 | H | H | 99 | 98.76 |
| q3 | H | H | OCOCH3 | H | 98 | 129.4 |
| q4 | H | H | H | OCOCH3 | 98 | 108.7 |
| q5 | H | H | H | H | 322.3 | |
| q6 | H | OCH3 | H | H | 280.5 | |
| q7 | H | OCH3 | OCH3 | H | 189.4 | |
| q8 | OCH3 | OCH3 | OCH3 | H | 120.9 | |
| q9 | — | — | — | — | 227.8 | |
| Q1 | H | OCOCH3 | OCH3 | H | 82 | 93.87 |
| Q2 | H | OCOCH3 | H | H | 73 | 0.036 |
| Q3 | H | H | OCOCH3 | H | 77 | 1.246 |
| Q4 | H | H | H | OCOCH3 | 70 | 0.119 |
| Q5 | H | H | H | H | 88 | 73.71 |
| Q6 | H | OCH3 | H | H | 90 | 54.58 |
| Q7 | H | OCH3 | OCH3 | H | 92 | 18.09 |
| Q8 | OCH3 | OCH3 | OCH3 | H | 93 | 1.867 |
| Q9 | — | — | — | — | 90 | 35.47 |
| Etamsylate | 46.22 | |||||
Reaction conditions: the acid chloride of cinnamic acid compounds (1.5 mmol), 2-aminobenzothiazole (1.0 mmol) in 10.0 mL of CH2Cl2, 0–5 °C to room temperature, 3 h.
Isolated yield after flash chromatography.
The EC50 values are expressed as the concentration required to promote ADP-induced human platelet aggregation response by 50%; n = 3.
Reaction conditions: cinnamic acid compounds (ferulic acid, p-hydroxy-cinnamic acid, m-hydroxycinnamic acid, and o-hydroxy-cinnamic acid, 25.0 g), pyridine (5 mL) in 100 mL of acetic anhydride at 120 °C for 5 h.
q5: cinnamic acid; q6: 4-methoxycinnamic acid; q7: 3,4-dimethoxycinnamic acid; q8: 3,4,5-trimethoxycinnamic acid; q9: 3-phenylpropionic acid.
Fig. 1Ball-and-stick structures of compounds Q7 and Q9.
Fig. 2Thermogravimetric and heat flow curves of compounds Q1–Q9 recorded at a constant heating rate. The mass loss is expressed as the fraction M/M0 of the mass at temperature T to the initial mass of the samples equilibrated at laboratory atmosphere.
R (%) values of the synthesized benzothiazole amide derivativesa
| Compound | Concentration (μmol L−1) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | 10 | 50 | 100 | |
| Etamsylate | −7.12 ± 0.23 | −6.10 ± 0.22 | −4.52 ± 0.46 | −1.01 ± 0.25 | 4.07 ± 0.12 |
| 2-Aminobenzothiazole | −4.87 ± 0.13*** | −5.27 ± 0.35 | −6.19 ± 0.13*** | −4.74 ± 0.23*** | −4.48 ± 0.35*** |
| q1 | −1.72 ± 0.25*** | −0.54 ± 0.16*** | 0.86 ± 0.25*** | 1.58 ± 0.14*** | 1.87 ± 0.38*** |
| q2 | −3.97 ± 0.47*** | −3.56 ± 0.24*** | −1.92 ± 0*** | 0.01 ± 0.27 | 0.82 ± 0.14*** |
| q3 | −2.19 ± 0.36*** | −1.23 ± 0.27*** | 0.55 ± 0.24*** | 0.96 ± 0.24*** | 3.15 ± 0.14 |
| q4 | −3.47 ± 0.12*** | −1.20 ± 0.24*** | −0.96 ± 0.32*** | 0.12 ± 0.24* | 0.24 ± 0.43*** |
| q5 | −2.18 ± 0.39*** | −0.26 ± 0.38*** | 2.05 ± 0.44*** | 2.56 ± 0.26*** | 7.57 ± 0.34*** |
| q6 | −0.96 ± 0.32*** | 0.12 ± 0.11*** | 0.36 ± 0.35*** | 0.60 ± 0.32** | 0.72 ± 0.21*** |
| q7 | −0.73 ± 0.15*** | −0.44 ± 0.44*** | 1.91 ± 0.14*** | 2.20 ± 0.25*** | 2.79 ± 0.15* |
| q8 | −0.48 ± 0.24*** | −0.84 ± 0.60*** | −1.20 ± 0.43*** | −1.67 ± 0.12 | −2.75 ± 0.24*** |
| q9 | 1.03 ± 0.12*** | −0.77 ± 0.26*** | −1.67 ± 0.13*** | −2.31 ± 0.33* | −2.57 ± 0.22*** |
| Q1 | 0.14 ± 0.37*** | −8.58 ± 0.37*** | −10.10 ± 0.14*** | −6.50 ± 0.14*** | −5.26 ± 0.37*** |
| Q2 | −38.84 ± 0.08*** | −38.26 ± 0*** | −36.12 ± 0.22*** | −36.03 ± 0.43*** | −20.25 ± 0.30*** |
| Q3 | 0.42 ± 0.38*** | 0.21 ± 0.21*** | −1.98 ± 0.21*** | −0.73 ± 0.21 | −0.52 ± 0.10*** |
| Q4 | −35.46 ± 0.17*** | −34.96 ± 0.30*** | −34.22 ± 0.22*** | −31.90 ± 0.41*** | −4.80 ± 0.14*** |
| Q5 | −12.06 ± 0.20*** | −10.03 ± 0.34*** | −9.58 ± 0.11*** | −9.47 ± 0.29*** | −7.89 ± 0.11*** |
| Q6 | −9.47 ± 0.11*** | −8.90 ± 0.11*** | −8.46 ± 0.41*** | −7.90 ± 0.11*** | −7.33 ± 0.34*** |
| Q7 | −4.55 ± 0.28*** | −6.21 ± 0.14 | −8.83 ± 0.14*** | −7.31 ± 0.24*** | −4.41 ± 0.24*** |
| Q8 | 2.24 ± 0.11*** | −0.11 ± 0.11*** | −4.69 ± 0.18 | −3.52 ± 0.11*** | 0.85 ± 0.11*** |
| Q9 | −5.75 ± 0.30*** | −4.06 ± 0.46*** | −3.95 ± 0.20 | −1.01 ± 0.30 | 4.51 ± 0.20 |
Data represent mean ± SEM; n = 8. *P < 0.05 vs. etamsylate; **P < 0.01 vs. etamsylate; ***P < 0.001 vs. etamsylate.
R (%) values of the synthesized benzothiazole amide derivativesa
| Compound | Concentration (μmol L−1) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | 10 | 50 | 100 | |
| Etamsylate | −11.75 ± 0.34 | −1.92 ± 0.24 | 5.51 ± 0.44 | 11.51 ± 0.33 | 16.04 ± 0.17 |
| 2-Aminobenzothiazole | 12.57 ± 0.29*** | 11.40 ± 0*** | 9.36 ± 0.29*** | 3.51 ± 0.31*** | 0.58 ± 0.29*** |
| q1 | 0.26 ± 0.26*** | −0.52 ± 0.26* | −1.82 ± 0.26*** | −3.16 ± 0.45*** | −5.47 ± 0.45*** |
| q2 | −2.53 ± 0.51*** | −1.52 ± 0.25 | 1.01 ± 0.44*** | 2.03 ± 0.25*** | 4.30 ± 0.51*** |
| q3 | 0.98 ± 0.42*** | −0.98 ± 0.24 | −4.39 ± 0.24*** | −5.61 ± 0.42*** | −6.10 ± 0.24*** |
| q4 | −4.95 ± 0.26*** | −3.91 ± 0** | −2.87 ± 0.26*** | −1.82 ± 0.52*** | −1.56 ± 0.45*** |
| q5 | −6.58 ± 0.44*** | −5.32 ± 0.25*** | −0.76 ± 0.51*** | 1.77 ± 0.44*** | 3.54 ± 0.25*** |
| q6 | −2.29 ± 0.43*** | −1.02 ± 0.51 | −0.51 ± 0.25*** | 0.51 ± 0.67*** | 2.04 ± 0.25*** |
| q7 | −4.15 ± 0*** | −1.71 ± 0.24 | 2.44 ± 0.42*** | 5.12 ± 0.49*** | 8.29 ± 0*** |
| q8 | −4.30 ± 0.44** | −2.28 ± 0.25 | −1.27 ± 0.44*** | 2.03 ± 0.51*** | 3.04 ± 0.25*** |
| q9 | −4.12 ± 0.45*** | −2.06 ± 0.26 | −1.55 ± 0.26*** | 0.01 ± 0.52*** | 1.03 ± 0.25*** |
| Q1 | −7.38 ± 0.22*** | −11.50 ± 0.38*** | −12.15 ± 0.38*** | −12.80 ± 0.01*** | −14.53 ± 0.22*** |
| Q2 | −6.67 ± 0.24*** | −11.43 ± 0.41*** | −17.14 ± 0.01*** | −24.52 ± 0.24*** | −16.43 ± 0.41*** |
| Q3 | −3.11 ± 0.19*** | −4.47 ± 0*** | −16.70 ± 0.34*** | −14.18 ± 0.19*** | −9.13 ± 0.34*** |
| Q4 | −21.91 ± 0.28*** | −20.24 ± 0.24*** | −18.10 ± 0.24*** | −15.00 ± 0.41*** | −13.33 ± 0.24*** |
| Q5 | −10.56 ± 0.10* | −11.97 ± 0.41*** | −13.62 ± 0.23*** | −20.19 ± 0.23*** | −20.66 ± 0.47*** |
| Q6 | −14.46 ± 0.24*** | −10.9 ± 0.24*** | −5.21 ± 0.47*** | −4.98 ± 0.47*** | −0.95 ± 0.24*** |
| Q7 | −19.31 ± 0.38*** | −17.57 ± 0.22*** | −17.14 ± 0.22*** | −16.05 ± 0.38*** | −13.23 ± 0.22*** |
| Q8 | −29.13 ± 0.39*** | −28.35 ± 0.01*** | −27.96 ± 0.19*** | −16.31 ± 0.39*** | −13.20 ± 0.34*** |
| Q9 | −2.61 ± 0.41*** | −3.79 ± 0.24*** | −11.61 ± 0.24*** | −17.54 ± 0.41*** | −18.48 ± 0.24*** |
Data represent mean ± SEM; n = 8. *P < 0.05 vs. etamsylate; **P < 0.01 vs. etamsylate; ***P < 0.001 vs. etamsylate.
R (%) values of the synthesized benzothiazole amide derivativesa
| Compound | Concentration (μmol L−1) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | 10 | 50 | 100 | |
| Etamsylate | −13.70 ± 0.37 | −10.73 ± 0.11 | −8.03 ± 0.21 | 2.84 ± 0.13 | 4.03 ± 0.46 |
| 2-Aminobenzothiazole | −1.05 ± 0.46*** | −1.22 ± 0.30*** | −1.57 ± 0.17*** | −4.36 ± 0*** | −4.48 ± 0.35*** |
| q1 | 7.60 ± 0.17*** | 4.73 ± 0.45*** | 2.87 ± 0.59** | −1.35 ± 0.45*** | −2.20 ± 0.29*** |
| q2 | −4.78 ± 0.27*** | −3.85 ± 0.27*** | −3.70 ± 0.15*** | −3.39 ± 0.27*** | −2.93 ± 0.27*** |
| q3 | −2.23 ± 0.15*** | −1.92 ± 0.26*** | −0.89 ± 0.39* | −0.30 ± 0.15*** | 0.45 ± 0.14*** |
| q4 | −2.71 ± 0.15*** | −2.56 ± 0.30*** | 0.00 ± 0.15*** | 0.30 ± 0.52*** | 0.90 ± 0.40*** |
| q5 | −5.94 ± 0.45*** | −2.53 ± 0.39*** | −1.78 ± 0.15*** | −0.45 ± 0.39*** | 2.23 ± 0.54** |
| q6 | −4.16 ± 0.15*** | −3.23 ± 0.56*** | −2.31 ± 0.41*** | −1.23 ± 0.15*** | −0.15 ± 0.27*** |
| q7 | −0.77 ± 0.41*** | 0.77 ± 0.27*** | 1.23 ± 0.27*** | 1.69 ± 0.46 | 1.85 ± 0.31** |
| q8 | 1.52 ± 0.45*** | 3.21 ± 0.34**** | 4.39 ± 0.29*** | 5.57 ± 0.45*** | 6.76 ± 0.34*** |
| q9 | −5.42 ± 0.54*** | −1.51 ± 0.26*** | −1.05 ± 0.45*** | −0.45 ± 0.40*** | 1.51 ± 0.15*** |
| Q1 | −2.12 ± 0.28*** | −5.22 ± 0.33*** | −4.73 ± 0.16*** | −3.59 ± 0.57*** | −2.12 ± 0.28*** |
| Q2 | −6.79 ± 0.15*** | −5.91 ± 0.15*** | −4.43 ± 0.15*** | −1.62 ± 0.26*** | −0.59 ± 0.15*** |
| Q3 | −6.57 ± 0.13*** | −5.36 ± 0.13*** | −4.29 ± 0.23*** | −1.21 ± 0.13*** | −0.13 ± 0.13*** |
| Q4 | −9.90 ± 0.15*** | −7.24 ± 0.15*** | −5.47 ± 0.30*** | −4.73 ± 0*** | −2.07 ± 0.44*** |
| Q5 | −11.43 ± 0.13*** | −10.22 ± 0.13 | −9.67 ± 0*** | −4.03 ± 0.23*** | −2.28 ± 0.13*** |
| Q6 | −4.57 ± 0.48*** | −4.70 ± 0.13*** | −6.99 ± 0.13*** | −9.54 ± 0.13*** | −14.79 ± 0.13*** |
| Q7 | −3.57 ± 0.28*** | −4.40 ± 0.16*** | −5.38 ± 0.33*** | −6.85 ± 0.16*** | −7.83 ± 0.33*** |
| Q8 | −1.61 ± 0.13*** | −4.29 ± 0*** | −3.89 ± 0.23*** | −4.83 ± 0.27*** | −1.21 ± 0.13*** |
| Q9 | −9.82 ± 0.27*** | −6.72 ± 0.13*** | −5.19 ± 0.13*** | −4.03 ± 0.23*** | −3.90 ± 0.27*** |
Data represent mean ± SEM; n = 8. *P < 0.05 vs. etamsylate; **P < 0.01 vs. etamsylate; ***P < 0.001 vs. etamsylate.
Fig. 3The EC50 values for the activation of thrombin activity by compounds Q2 and Q8. aThe EC50 values are expressed as the concentration required for a thrombin activity response of 50%; n = 3.
Fig. 4The classical systems for blood coagulation including extrinsic, intrinsic, and/or the common coagulation pathways.[30]
Fig. 5Compound Q2 docking into the thrombin binding pocket.
Fig. 6Effects of compounds Q2 and etamsylate on capillary permeability. The results were expressed as the concentration of CNP (pg mL−1). Values are reported as the mean ± SEM of three independent experiments.