| Literature DB >> 35539162 |
Shoujiang Li1, Bo Xu1, Peng Chen1, Yunliang Zhao1,2, Guihua Nie1, Shaoxian Song2.
Abstract
In order to improve the separation of sylvite and halite in SDIC Xinjiang Lop Nur potash Co. Ltd. (SLNP), in this work, the flotation kinetics of sylvite and halite under different collector dosages were investigated. It was observed that the increased speed of halite was much faster than sylvite in terms of flotation rate with an increase in octadecylamine hydrochloride (ODA) dosage. The reason for the upward floating of halite explored by SEM-EDS was that sylvite was locked with halite, thus it can float up along with sylvite. According to the analysis results, a strategy of starvation feeding the collector was employed to increase the flotation rate difference between sylvite and halite, and consequently improve the separation of sylvite and halite. It has been demonstrated that starvation feeding the collector is an efficient method for obtaining high grade sylvite, because it can not only improve the separation of sylvite and halite but also decrease the consumption of ODA in the flotation process. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 35539162 PMCID: PMC9082182 DOI: 10.1039/c8ra04166k
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 3.361
Fig. 1XRD results of carnallite after cold decomposition.
The Na+ and K+ distributions in different size fractions
| Size Fraction (mm) | Yield (%) | Cumulative yield (%) | Grade (%) | Distribution (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Na+ | K+ | Na+ | K+ | |||
| >0.42 | 29.61 | 29.61 | 5.50 | 8.18 | 18.18 | 14.88 |
| 0.42–0.25 | 20.32 | 49.93 | 9.16 | 14.92 | 20.78 | 18.64 |
| 0.25–0.15 | 15.54 | 65.47 | 11.18 | 16.58 | 19.39 | 15.84 |
| 0.15–0.104 | 9.85 | 75.32 | 15.24 | 20.77 | 16.75 | 12.57 |
| 0.104–0.074 | 8.93 | 84.25 | 14.13 | 24.94 | 14.09 | 13.69 |
| <0.074 | 15.75 | 100.00 | 6.15 | 25.19 | 10.81 | 24.39 |
| Total | 100.00 | — | 8.96 | 16.27 | 100.00 | 100.00 |
Fig. 2The flotation flowsheet of sylvite: (a) current flotation flowsheet in SLNP; (b) flotation flowsheet of starvation feeding the collector.
Fig. 3The recovery of sylvite (a) and halite (b) as a function of flotation time with different ODA dosages.
Fitting parameters of the flotation kinetics model for the recovery of sylvite with different ODA dosages
| ODA dosage (g t−1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25 | 85.81 | 9.243 | 1.633 | 76.567 | 0.314 | 0.999 |
| 55 | 91.072 | 58.783 | 2.314 | 32.289 | 0.440 | 0.999 |
| 85 | 91.024 | 66.360 | 2.416 | 24.664 | 0.554 | 0.999 |
Fitting parameters of the flotation kinetics model for the recovery of halite with different ODA dosages
| ODA dosage (g t−1) |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| 25 | 65.372 | 0.236 | 0.986 |
| 55 | 69.546 | 1.005 | 0.991 |
| 85 | 72.045 | 1.461 | 0.994 |
Fig. 4The flotation rate constant of sylvite and halite as a function of ODA dosage.
Fig. 5The mineral composition and micro-morphology of the concentrate.
Fig. 6The flotation behavior of sylvite and halite particles at different ODA dosages: (a) low ODA dosage; (b) medium ODA dosage; (c) high ODA dosage.
Fig. 7The flotation results of sylvite with different flowsheets.