| Literature DB >> 35539129 |
Truong Thi Vu Nu1,2, Nhu Hoa Thi Tran1,2, Eunjoo Nam3, Tan Tai Nguyen4, Won Jung Yoon5, Sungbo Cho6,7,8, Jungsuk Kim6,7,8, Keun-A Chang3, Heongkyu Ju1,2,8.
Abstract
We present the immunoassay of tau proteins (total tau and phosphorylated tau) in human sera using surface plasmon resonance (SPR) fiber sensors. This assay aimed at harvesting the advantages of using both SPR fiber sensors and a blood-based assay to demonstrate label-free point-of-care-testing (POCT) patient-friendly assay in a compact format for the early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD). For conducting the assay, we used human sera of 40 subjects divided into halves, which were grouped into AD patients and control groups according to a number of neuropsychological tests. We found that on an average, the concentrations of both total tau and phosphorylated tau proteins (all known to be higher in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and the brain) turned out to be higher in human sera of AD patients than in controls. The limits of detection of total tau and phosphorylated tau proteins were 2.4 pg mL-1 and 1.6 pg mL-1, respectively. In particular, it was found that the AD group exhibited average concentration of total tau proteins 6-fold higher than the control group, while concentration of phosphorylated tau proteins was 3-fold higher than that of the control. We can attribute this inhomogeneity between both types of tau proteins (in terms of increase of control-to-AD in average concentration) to un-phosphorylated tau proteins being more likely to be produced in blood than phosphorylated tau proteins, which possibly is one of the potential key elements playing an important role in AD progress. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 35539129 PMCID: PMC9078509 DOI: 10.1039/c7ra11637c
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 4.036
Demographic data of subjectsa
| Age | Gender | MMSE | CDR | CDR-SOB | GDS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male/female | ||||||
| Controls ( | 71.55 ± 1.21 | 16/4 | 27.80 ± 0.20 | 0.48 ± 0.03 | 0.73 ± 0.08 | 1.70 ± 0.12 |
| AD ( | 74.65 ± 1.27 | 4/16 | 20.60 ± 0.84 | 0.63 ± 0.05 | 3.15 ± 0.26 | 3.25 ± 0.12 |
Data are presented as mean ± SE.
Fig. 1(a) Cr/Au coating on a fiber core; (b) asymmetric cross-section of metal layers coated on the fiber core.
Fig. 2Schematic diagram of optical setup with the SPR fiber sensor for tau protein detection. λ/4 denotes a quarter-wave plate.
Fig. 3Schematic illustration for the immunoassay of tau proteins on the surface of the SPR fiber sensor.
Fig. 4Examples of real-time measurement of the SPR fiber sensor signal (normalized output power) upon injection of a series of biochemical substance. (a) Immuno-detection of pure phosphorylated tau proteins for signal calibration, using its concentrations of 10, 50, 100, 500, 700, 1000 and 2000 pg mL−1; (b) immuno-detection of phosphorylated tau proteins present in a human serum of the AD group, after its dilution by 100, 500, and 1000 times.
Fig. 5Nonlinear fitting for calibration of the normalized signal change (ΔP) versus tau concentration (C). (a) Normalised ΔP versus concentration of total tau (with TAU5 antibody) ranging from 0 to 2360 pg mL−1; (b) normalized ΔP versus concentration of phosphorylated tau (with AT8 antibody) ranging from 0 to 4360 pg mL−1.
Fig. 6Average tau concentrations of AD and control group sera, measured by ELISA kits (a) total tau protein levels (mean ± SE) were 344.59 ± 46.52 pg mL−1 for AD group (n = 20) and 289.09 ± 47.53 pg mL−1 for control group (n = 20); (b) phosphorylated tau protein levels (mean ± SE) were 147.50 ± 25.32 pg mL−1 for AD group (n = 20) and 134.90 ± 29.48 pg mL−1 for control group (n = 20).
Fig. 7Average of tau concentrations of AD and control group sera, measured by SPR fiber sensors (a) total tau protein levels (mean ± SE) were 61.91 ± 42.19 ng mL−1 for AD group (n = 20) and 9.99 ± 6.61 ng mL−1 for control group (n = 20); (b) phosphorylated tau protein levels (mean ± SE) were 50.25 ± 18.17 ng mL−1 for AD group (n = 20) and 17.74 ± 7.86 ng mL−1 for control group (n = 20).