| Literature DB >> 35539066 |
Hong Chen1, Yun Zou1, Xue Jiang1, Fangqi Cao1, Wenbin Liu1.
Abstract
Ketamine is a commonly abused drug due to its stimulant, dissociative and hallucinogenic effects. An overdose of ketamine has been found to cause a variety of side effects. Therefore, the identification and quantification of ketamine are of significant importance for clinical purposes and drug seizing. However, conventional methods for ketamine detection possess some disadvantages such as sophisticated procedures, expensive instruments and low sensitivity. Herein, we develop a novel fluorescent nanoprobe for ultrasensitive ketamine detection with signal amplification based on Adenosine Triphosphate (ATP)-fueled target recycling and FRET (fluorescence resonance energy transfer) occurring between the FAM (Fluorescein, tagged with Y-shape DNA) and AuNPs. Based on the combination of FRET and signals circle amplification, the gold nanospheres functionalized with Y-motif DNA (Y@AuNPs) nanoprobe was utilized for effective ketamine detection with the limit of detection (LOD) down to 3 pg mL-1, which was lower than previously reported. Furthermore, the high sensitivity of Y@AuNPs facilitated quantitative analysis in biological media and practical samples. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 35539066 PMCID: PMC9075121 DOI: 10.1039/c9ra06139h
Source DB: PubMed Journal: RSC Adv ISSN: 2046-2069 Impact factor: 4.036
Scheme 1Scheme illustration of fluorescence detection mechanism and signal cycle amplification process.
Fig. 1(a) Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image. (b) Ultraviolet-Vis (UV-Vis) absorption spectra of AuNPs and Y-motif immobilized AuNPs (Y@AuNPs). (c) Principle of fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET). The red and blue lines are attributed to UV-Vis absorption spectra of AuNPs and fluorescence emission spectra of Y-motif. (d) Feasibility of fluorescence detection with Y@AuNPs probe. Fluorescence spectra of Y-motif (black line), Y@AuNPs (red line) and Y@AuNPs with the addition of ATP and ketamine (blue line).
Fig. 2(a) The fluorescence spectra of different concentrations of ketamine with Y@AuNPs in the presence of 10 mM ATP. (b) The calibration curve corresponding to (a), in which the linear equation was y = 30.26x − 10.61.
Comparison of performance of different methods for detection of ketamine
| Detection methods | Sample | Detection limit | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Elector-microchip | Urine–plasma | 50 ng mL−1 |
|
| LC/MS/MS | Hair | 20 ng g−1 |
|
| UPLC | Urine | 0.1 ng mL−1 |
|
| GC-MS | Urine | 0.5–1.0 ng mL−1 |
|
| Fluorescence | Blood | 60 pg mL−1 |
|
| FRET and signal amplification | Blood | 3 pg mL−1 | This article |
Fig. 3(a) Evolution of the selectivity. The fluorescence spectra of the ketamine detection system toward the four various drugs including ketamine (100 pg mL−1), methadone, cocaine and methamphetamine (METH) with the concentration of 200 pg mL−1. (b) The corresponding fluorescence bars chart for specificity detection.
Determination of ketamine in human blood samples (n = 5)
| Sample | Detected (pg mL−1) | Added (pg mL−1) | Recovery (%) | RSD (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blood | — | Blank | — | — |
| 11.8 | 10 | 118 | 4.5 | |
| 31.8 | 30 | 106 | 3.7 | |
| 48.5 | 50 | 97 | 4.8 | |
| 93 | 100 | 93 | 3.3 | |
| 135 | 150 | 90 | 2.6 |