| Literature DB >> 35538719 |
Myung-Chul Lee1, Jungmin Ahn1, Ik Joon Choi1, Byeong-Cheol Lee1, Junsun Ryu2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to present our experiences with various approaches for endoscopic thyroidectomy (ET) and to offer lessons for choosing an approach.Entities:
Keywords: Carcinoma; Endoscopy; Thyroid Neoplasm; Thyroidectomy
Year: 2022 PMID: 35538719 PMCID: PMC9441504 DOI: 10.21053/ceo.2021.02285
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol ISSN: 1976-8710 Impact factor: 3.340
Fig. 1.Schematic drawings of various endoscopic thyroidectomy approaches. (A) Bilateral axillo-breast approach. (B) Gasless unilateral axillobreast approach. (C) Unilateral axillo-breast approach with CO2 insufflation. (D) Retroauricular approach. (E) Transoral vestibular approach with CO2 insufflation.
Patient characteristics
| Variable | TA (n=86) | BABA (n=48) | UABA (n=492) | RA (n=31) | TO (n=44) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (yr) | 39.39±0.34 | 40.90±1.18 | 38.17±12.42 | 39.11±9.87 | 37.23±10.37 | 0.54 |
| Sex | 0.64 | |||||
| Female | 83 | 47 | 485 | 31 | 43 | |
| Male | 3 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 1 | |
| Body mass index (kg/m2) | 21.04±3.18 | 22.13±1.98 | 22.32±2.42 | 23.54±2.48 | 21.42±3.21 | 0.61 |
| Pathology | 0.24 | |||||
| Malignancy | 75 | 45 | 459 | 30 | 42 | |
| Benign | 11 | 3 | 33 | 1 | 2 | |
| Tumor size (mm) | 11.45±8.64 | 8.14±5.17 | 10.23±6.23 | 8.90±6.50 | 9.11±4.90 | 0.86 |
Values are presented as mean±standard deviation.
TA, transaxillary approach; BABA, bilateral axillo-breast approach; UABA, unilateral axillo-breast approach with carbon dioxide insufflation; RA, retroauricular approach; TO, transoral vestibular approach.
Surgical outcomes
| Variable | TA (n=86) | BABA (n=48) | UABA (n=492) | RA (n=31) | TO (n=44) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Operative time (min) | 194.65±51.13 | 189.11±61.53 | 118.62±30.23 | 168.22±45.63 | 196.10±40.19 | 0.02 |
| Pain core (VAS) | ||||||
| Day 1 | 3.09±0.96 | 3.59±0.92 | 2.39±0.54 | 3.49±0.93 | 2.01±0.37 | 0.04 |
| Day 3 | 2.10±0.77 | 2.59±0.88 | 1.84±0.37 | 3.01±0.67 | 1.49±0.45 | 0.04 |
| Drainage amount (3 days, mL) | 166.34±59.02 | 175.21±54.86 | 117.21±39.19 | 143.56±60.32 | No drain | NA |
| Drainage duration (day) | 4.47±1.23 | 4.73±0.79 | 3.43±0.63 | 4.17±0.89 | No drain | NA |
| Hospital stay (day) | 6.35±1.78 | 6.78±1.45 | 6.27±1.03 | 6.45±1.33 | 6.39±0.95 | 0.89 |
Values are presented as mean±standard deviation.
TA, transaxillary approach; BABA, bilateral axillo-breast approach; UABA, unilateral axillo-breast approach with carbon dioxide insufflation; RA, retroauricular approach; TO, transoral vestibular approach; VAS, visual analog scale; NA, not available.
Complications
| Variable | TA (n=86) | BABA (n=48) | UABA (n=492) | RA (n=31) | TO (n=44) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Temporary vocal cord palsy | 5 (5.8) | 4 (8.3) | 20 (4.0) | 1 (3.2) | 2 (4.5) | 0.68 |
| Permanent vocal cord palsy | 2 (2.3) | 1 (2.1) | 4 (0.8) | 0 | 0 | 0.55 |
| Infection | 0 | 1 (2.1) | 2 (0.4) | 0 | 3 (6.8) | <0.01 |
| Bleeding | 1 (1.1) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.13 |
| Seroma | 5 (5.8) | 3 (6.3) | 2 (0.4) | 3 (9.7) | 3 (6.8) | <0.01 |
| Sensory deficit at 3 weeks | 15 (17.4) | 14 (29.2) | 25 (5.1) | 11 (35.3) | 15 (34.1) | <0.01 |
| Lip asymmetry | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (3.2) | 3 (6.8) | <0.01 |
| Tracheal injury | 0 | 1 (2.1) | 1 (0.2) | 0 | 0 | 0.20 |
| CO2-related complications | 0 | 1 (2.1) | 2 (0.4) | 0 | 2 (4.5) | 0.02 |
Values are presented as number (%).
TA, transaxillary approach; BABA, bilateral axillo-breast approach; UABA, unilateral axillo-breast approach with carbon dioxide insufflation; RA, retroauricular approach; TO, transoral vestibular approach.
Cosmetic satisfaction scores
| Variable | TA (n=86) | BABA (n=48) | UABA (n=492) | RA (n=31) | TO (n=44) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cosmetic satisfaction | ||||||
| 1 mo | 4.10±0.59 | 4.49±0.48 | 4.51±0.82 | 4.42±0.85 | 4.88±0.63 | 0.04 |
| 3 mo | 3.91±1.21 | 4.52±1.13 | 4.49±0.74 | 4.28±0.74 | 4.81±0.48 | 0.04 |
Values are presented as mean±standard deviation.
TA, transaxillary approach; BABA, bilateral axillo-breast approach; UABA, unilateral axillo-breast approach with carbon dioxide insufflation; RA, retroauricular approach; TO, transoral vestibular approach.
Fig. 2.Lip asymmetry shown after the transoral endoscopic thyroidectomy vestibular approach at postoperative 1 month in each affected patient (A, B).