| Literature DB >> 35538279 |
E S Obukhova1,2, A M Rozhina3, V P Voronin4, P Yu Dgebuadze5, S A Murzina6.
Abstract
The obtained results on the study of the antimicrobial activity of lipid extracts of tissues of starfishes Linckia laevigata and Culcita novaeguineae and sea urchin Diadema setosum collected in the Nhatrang Bay (South China Sea) against nosocomial strains of Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterococcus faecium, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Candida sp., Streptococcus pyogenes, and Staphylococcus aureus are presented. The effect of the investigated extracts on Gram-positive, Gram-negative microorganisms, as well as yeast of the genus Candida, was determined. It was found that lipid extracts of echinoderms of the Nhatrang Bay exhibit the highest antimicrobial activity against the Gram-positive microorganisms, namely Streptococcus pyogenes.Entities:
Keywords: antimicrobial activity; fatty acids; lipids; nosocomial strains; tropical ecosystems
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35538279 PMCID: PMC9090694 DOI: 10.1134/S1607672922020119
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Dokl Biochem Biophys ISSN: 1607-6729 Impact factor: 0.834
Antibiotic sensitivity of microorganisms
| Microorganism | Antibiotic susceptibility profile | Antibiotic resistance profile |
|---|---|---|
|
| FOX, C, SAM, CZA | CRO, CTX, CPM, CIP, CFX, CXM, AP, PRL, CAZ, ATM, TS, AC |
|
| MEM, IMI, CZA | GM, AK, CRO, CTX, CPM, CIP, FOX, CFX, CXM, AP, PRL, C, CAZ, ATM, TS, AC, SAM |
| FCN, AMB, KCA, MCL | ||
|
| CPM, CAZ, CZA, IMI, MEM, ATM, CIP, AK | |
|
| OX, LZD, FOX, CIP, AK, TS | PG, C |
|
| PG, VA, TS, LZD | C, E |
|
| AP, VA, IMI | LZD |
AMB—Amphotericin B, KCA—Ketoconazole, MCL—Miconazole, GM—Gentamicin, MEM—Meropenem, IMI—Imipenem, AK—Amikacin, CRO—Ceftriaxone, CTX—Cefotaxime, CPM—Cefepime, CIP—Ciprofloxacin, FOX—Cefoxitin, CFX—Cefalexin, CXM—Cefuroxime, AP—Ampicillin, PRL—Piperacillin, C—Chloramphenicol, CAZ—Ceftazidime, ATM—Aztreonam, TS—Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, AC—Amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, SAM—Ampicillin-sulbactam, CZA—Ceftazidime-avibactam, LZD—Linezolid, OX—Oxacillin, PG—Benzylpenicillin, FCN—Fluconazole, VA—Vancomycin, E—Erythromycin.
Fig. 1. Effect of some lipid extracts of Culcita novaeguineae on S. pyogenes.
Fig. 3. Antimicrobial activity of lipid extracts of Culcita novaeguineae.
Fig. 4. Antimicrobial activity of lipid extracts of Diadema setosum.
Fig. 5. Antimicrobial activity of lipid extracts of Linckia laevigata.
Content of total lipids and lipid classes (phospholipids, triacylglycerols, diacylglycerols, cholesterol esters, cholesterol, free fatty acids) (% dry weight) in the studied tissues of some echinoderm species (Linckia laevigata, Diadema setosum, Culcita novaeguineae)
| Species |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| n | 15 | 15 | 15 |
| TLs | 14.20 ± 0.90 | 24.98 ± 1.02 | 13.80 ± 0.53 |
| PLs | 3.26 ± 0.26 | 3.38 ± 0.21 | 3.10 ± 0.12 |
| MAGs | 1.35 ± 0.11 | 1.42 ± 0.14 | 1.36 ± 0.04 |
| DAGs | 0.40 ± 0.03 | 3.18 ± 0.26 | 0.51 ± 0.06 |
| Chol | 3.37 ± 0.24 | 4.21 ± 0.23 | 3.53 ± 0.10 |
| FFAs | 3.80 ± 0.31 | 5.53 ± 0.46 | 3.26 ± 0.23 |
| TAGs | 0.31 ± 0.09 | 5.87 ± 1.12 | 0.75 ± 0.15 |
| Chol esters | 1.70 ± 0.14 | 1.38 ± 0.19 | 1.29 ± 0.05 |
TL—total lipids, PL—phospholipids, MAGs—monoacylglycerols, DAGs—diacylglycerols, Chol—cholesterol, FFA—free fatty acids, TAGs—triacylgrlycerols, Chol esters—cholesterol esters.
Fatty acid composition (% of the total fatty acids) in the studied tissues of some echinoderm species (Linckia laevigata, Diadema setosum, Culcita novaeguineae)
| Species |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| n | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| 14:0 | 0.65 ± 0.09 | 8.43 ± 1.10 | 0.46 ± 0.04 |
| 16:0 | 3.82 ± 0.16 | 24.33 ± 0.69 | 4.30 ± 0.64 |
| 17:0 | 1.05 ± 0.07 | 0.95 ± 0.14 | 0.87 ± 0.07 |
| 18:0 | 8.27 ± 0.13 | 5.02 ± 0.13 | 10.10 ± 1.04 |
| 20:0 | 2.67 ± 0.27 | 1.93 ± 0.10 | 3.37 ± 0.29 |
| ∑ SFA | 18.01 ± 0.30 | 42.12 ± 1.03 | 21.25 ± 2.15 |
| 18:1 (n-9) | 8.72 ± 0.47 | 3.56 ± 0.78 | 5.23 ± 0.72 |
| 18:1 (n-7) | 3.46 ± 0.07 | 3.61 ± 0.16 | 4.49 ± 0.47 |
| 20:1 (n-11) | 10.49 ± 0.39 | 3.08 ± 0.21 | 10.73 ± 0.43 |
| 20:1 (n-9) | 0.62 ± 0.06 | 3.62 ± 0.22 | 1.19 ± 0.16 |
| ∑ MUFA | 29.98 ± 0.72 | 26.35 ± 0.72 | 33.67 ± 3.20 |
| 14:2 (n-9) | 0.65 ± 0.09 | 0.47 ± 0.05 | 0.30 ± 0.04 |
| 16:2 (n-9) | 0.73 ± 0.05 | 0.36 ± 0.02 | 0.40 ± 0.07 |
| 18:2 (n-9) | 0 | 0 | 1.27 ± 0.31 |
| 20:3 (n-9) | 6.16 ± 0.51 | 0.14 ± 0.03 | 0.23 ± 0.04 |
| ∑ (n-9) PUFA | 8.03 ± 0.42 | 1.32 ± 0.07 | 2.61 ± 0.50 |
| 18:2 (n-7) | 4.15 ± 0.22 | 0.06 ± 0.01 | 0.39 ± 0.14 |
| ∑ (n-7) PUFA | 4.95 ± 0.22 | 0.36 ± 0.01 | 0.97 ± 0.20 |
| 18:2 (n-6) | 1.10 ± 0.10 | 1.79 ± 0.12 | 0.67 ± 0.08 |
| 20:4 (n-6) | 12.93 ± 0.88 | 12.28 ± 0.29 | 17.90 ± 1.46 |
| ∑ (n-6) PUFA | 15.91 ± 0.90 | 18.10 ± 0.63 | 19.98 ± 1.37 |
| 18:2 (n-4) | 6.68 ± 0.39 | 0.11 ± 0.02 | 0.70 ± 0.21 |
| 18:3 (n-4) | 1.52 ± 0.69 | 0.04 ± 0.02 | 2.21 ± 0.30 |
| ∑ (n-4) PUFA | 10.45 ± 0.89 | 0.86 ± 0.13 | 6.24 ± 0.51 |
| 18:3 (n-3) | 0 | 0.89 ± 0.08 | 0.73 ± 0.27 |
| 18:4 (n-3) | 2.48 ± 0.20 | 1.73 ± 0.17 | 0 |
| 20:5 (n-3) | 6.24 ± 0.15 | 5.01 ± 0.30 | 8.76 ± 0.70 |
| 22:5 (n-3) | 0.45 ± 0.21 | 0.27 ± 0.02 | 0.88 ± 0.54 |
| 22:6 (n-3) | 0.83 ± 0.04 | 1.25 ± 0.05 | 1.35 ± 0.51 |
| ∑ (n-3) PUFA | 12.67 ± 0.19 | 10.85 ± 0.51 | 14.78 ± 0.97 |
| ∑ PUFA | 52.01 ± 0.53 | 31.5 ± 0.73 | 45.08 ± 1.23 |
The table shows individual fatty acids that dominate the FA family or account for more than 1%. SFAs are saturated fatty acids, MUFAs are monounsaturated fatty acids, and PUFAs are polyunsaturated fatty acids.