Literature DB >> 35538254

Prevalence of keratoconus in refractive surgery practice population in North Macedonia.

Fanka Gilevska1, Biljana Kostovska2, Ilir Osmani2, Alma Biscevic3, Smiljka Popovic Suic4, Maja Bohac5, Sudi Patel5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the prevalence of keratoconus (KC) in relation to ethnicity in a group of people who consulted an ophthalmological care institution seeking for refractive surgery in N. Macedonia.
METHODS: This was a cross-sectional, interventional retrospective study. Chart reviews were performed for all new patients attending between January 2016 and January 2020 at the Sistina Ophthalmology Hospital in Skopje. All patients were screened; KC diagnosis and classification were based on the corneal topography. Ethnicity and gender classifications were according to patients' self-opinions.
RESULTS: A total of 2812 patients charts reviewed. The mean age was 31.71 years (SD  ± 9.73), and 1209 (43%) were male. A total of 2050 (72.9%) declared themselves as Macedonians, 649 (23.1%) Albanians, 76 (2.7%) Turks and 37 (1.3%) in other ethnicities. Differences in age between the ethnic groups were statistically significant (x2 = 90.225, p < 0.001). KC was diagnosed in 343 patients (12.2%), while 9 (0.7%) were KC suspects and 6(0.21%) presented pellucid marginal degeneration. KC was more frequent in males (n = 246, 71.7% of total) and skewed toward younger patients. Increasing patients' age decreased the odds of KC diagnosis by 3.7% (95% CI 1.8%-4.4%) per annum. Males were four times more likely to be diagnosed with KC (AOR = 4.01; 95% CI 3.12-5.16). In comparison with Macedonian patients, Turks were more likely to be diagnosed with KC (AOR = 4.09; 95% CI 2.47-6.78). There was no difference between Macedonians and Albanians (p = 0.08).
CONCLUSION: The prevalence of KC at a refractive surgery practice in N. Macedonia is much higher compared with general population (6.8/100,000) and similar to the prevalence in Middle East Asia. Nationwide screening programs are needed to diagnose the disease earlier.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Epidemiology; Keratoconus; Prevalence

Year:  2022        PMID: 35538254     DOI: 10.1007/s10792-022-02319-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0165-5701            Impact factor:   2.029


  10 in total

1.  A keratoscopic survey of 13,395 eyes.

Authors:  H W HOFSTETTER
Journal:  Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom       Date:  1959-01

Review 2.  Review: keratoconus in Asia.

Authors:  Yee Onn Kok; Grace Feng Ling Tan; Seng Chee Loon
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.651

Review 3.  Genetics vs chronic corneal mechanical trauma in the etiology of keratoconus.

Authors:  Yaron S Rabinowitz; Virgilio Galvis; Alejandro Tello; Daniela Rueda; Juan Daniel García
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2020-10-24       Impact factor: 3.467

4.  High prevalence and familial aggregation of keratoconus in an Iranian rural population: a population-based study.

Authors:  Hassan Hashemi; Samira Heydarian; Abbasali Yekta; Hadi Ostadimoghaddam; Mohamadreza Aghamirsalim; Akbar Derakhshan; Mehdi Khabazkhoob
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2018-03-24       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 5.  Ectatic diseases.

Authors:  Marcella Q Salomão; Ana Luisa Hofling-Lima; Louise Pellegrino Gomes Esporcatte; Fernando Faria Correa; Bernardo Lopes; Nelson Sena; Daniel G Dawson; Renato Ambrósio
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 3.467

6.  Is consanguinity a risk factor for keratoconus?

Authors:  Ariela Gordon-Shaag; Michel Millodot; Maron Essa; Jeanne Garth; Mohammed Ghara; Einat Shneor
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.973

7.  Keratoconus detected by videokeratography in candidates for photorefractive keratectomy.

Authors:  A B Nesburn; S Bahri; J Salz; Y S Rabinowitz; E Maguen; J Hofbauer; M Berlin; J I Macy
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  1995 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  [Epidemiology of keratoconus in the Urals].

Authors:  E N Gorskova; E N Sevost'ianov
Journal:  Vestn Oftalmol       Date:  1998 Jul-Aug

9.  Keratoconus: is it a Non-inflammatory Disease?

Authors:  Zisis Gatzioufas; Georgios D Panos; Samer Hamada
Journal:  Med Hypothesis Discov Innov Ophthalmol       Date:  2017

10.  Prevalence of Keratoconus in a Refractive Surgery Population.

Authors:  Abdulrahman Mohammed Al-Amri
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-09-06       Impact factor: 1.909

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.