| Literature DB >> 35536502 |
Tahereh Zadeh Mehrizi1, Mehdi Shafiee Ardestani2.
Abstract
Despite the importance of the proper quality of blood products for safe transfusion, conventional methods for preparation and their preservation, they lack significant stability. Non-metal nanoparticles with particular features may overcome these challenges. This review study for the first time provided a comprehensive vision of the interaction of non-metal nanoparticles with each blood product (red blood cells, platelets and plasma proteins). The findings of this review on the most effective nanoparticle for improving the stability of RBCs indicate that graphene quantum dots and nanodiamonds show compatibility with RBCs. For increasing the stability of platelet products, silica nanoparticles exhibited a suppressive impact on platelet aggregation. Pristine graphene also shows compatibility with platelets. For better stability of plasma products, graphene oxide was indicated to preserve free human serum albumin from thermal shocks at low ionic strength. For increased stability of Factor VIII, mesoporous silica nanoparticles with large pores exhibit the superb quality of recovered proteins. Furthermore, 3.2 nm quantum dots exhibited anticoagulant effects. As the best promising nanoparticles for immunoglobulin stability, graphene quantum dots showed compatibility with γ-globulins. Overall, this review recommends further research on the mentioned nanoparticles as the most potential candidates for enhancing the stability and storage of blood components.Entities:
Keywords: Blood products; Mesoporous silica nanoparticles; Nanodiamonds; Non-metal nanoparticles; Stability
Year: 2022 PMID: 35536502 PMCID: PMC9085557 DOI: 10.1007/s40204-022-00188-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Prog Biomater ISSN: 2194-0517
Fig. 1The interaction of bare mesoporous silica nanoparticles with red blood cells. Bare MSNs lead to the hemolysis of RBCs
Biocompatibility studies of nanoparticles with RBC
| Row | Nanoparticle type | Surface modification | Nanoparticle size (nm) | Effects | Study type | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Silica | ||||||
| 1 | Silica | Unmodified, amine and carboxyl groups | Unmodified: 39.2 ± 10.3 amine-modified: 38.0 ± 9.1 carboxyl-altered: 38.0 ± 12.6 | Unmodified silica nanoparticles: less damage, reduction in membrane binding in membrane asymmetry loss, cell deformation, disruption of vesicles mimicking the erythrocyte outer leaflet lipid composition. no significant hemolysis by amino- and carboxyl-modified particles | In vitro | Bigdelou et al. ( |
| 2 | Silica | – | Nanoparticles: | Fasterhemolysis by nanoparticles than nanowires reduced RBC aggregation in the short silica nanowires compared with others | In vitro | Kimet al. ( |
| 3 | Amorphous silica | – | 50 nm | Dose-dependent hemolysis, oxidative activity, apoptosis and increased cytosolic Ca2+ in RBCs | In vitro | Nemmar et al. ( |
| 4 | Ion-doped silica | Calcium, magnesium and copper ions | 100% SiO2: 2.05 ± 0.39 60–40% SiO2–CaO: 2.05 ± 0.33 60–30– 10% SiO2–CaO–MgO,: 1.52 ± 0.27 60–30-7.5–2.5% SiO2–CaO–MgO–CuO: 5.7 ± 1.06 | Improved hemocompatibility by Mg and Cu added to silica in comparison with pure silica nanoparticles | In vitro | Tsamesidis et al. ( |
| 5 | Amorphous silica nanoparticles | – | 7–14 (hydrophilic vs. hydrophobic), 5–15, 20 and 50 | Hindered hemolytic activity as a result of corona formation | In vitro | Shi et al. ( |
| 6 | Meso/macroporous silica particles | Pore diameters of 40 and 170 | ||||
| 7 | Sphere- and rod-shaped Mesoporous Silica | – | Large pore size sphere-shaped: 68 ± 4 Small pore size sphere-shaped: 67 ± 3 Rod-shaped: (107 ± 8) × (343 ± 16) | Hemocompatibility, pore size and morphology of the MSNs influence the conformation of absorbed HSA and HSF | In vitro | Ma et al. ( |
| 8 | Spherical mesoporous silica (MSN-SiOH) | Silanol groups | 115 ± 5 | Spherical protein corona formation during hemolysis, reduced hemolytic effect in a dose-dependent manner by human blood proteins | In vitro | Martinez et al. ( |
| 9 | Au@silica | Au, cRGD-Zein | 0%methanol: 150 thickness 16.2%methanol: 215.0 ± 35.0 | Anti-hemolysis effect of cRGD-Zein | In vitro | Huang et al. ( |
| 10 | Asymmetric mesoporous silica | Adjustable head–tail structure | 200 | Superb hemocompatibility, low reactive oxygen species, flat contact to the RBC membrane, and reduced distortion of RBC | In vitro | Abbaraju et al. ( |
| Graphene | ||||||
| 11 | GN | – | GN: 400 nm–1.5 μm | Dose-dependent hemolysis according to methods of production and surface modification | In vivo | Jaworski et al. ( |
| GO | GO: 100 nm–2.3 μm | |||||
| rGO | rGO: 100 nm–1.5 μm, aggregates > 5 μm | |||||
| 12 | Graphene | Carboxyl, epoxy, and hydroxyl groups | Average thickness: ≈ 0.4 | Hemocompatibility of both p-G and f-G | In vitro | Sasidharan et al. ( |
| 13 | GQDs | Hydroxyl and carboxyl groups | Non-functionalized GQDs: 122 hydroxylated/carboxylated GQDs: 190 | Concentration dependent hemolytic activity and RBC deformability and aggregation | In vitro | Kimet al. ( |
| 14 | GO | – | 156 ± 213 | Severe damage to RBCs, diverse hemolytic properties under several incubation conditions | In vitro | Wang et al. ( |
| 15 | GO | Lipid bilayers | – | Hemolysis of bare GO, suppressed hemolysis by coated GO with lipid membranes | In vitro | Monasterio et al. ( |
| 16 | GO nanosheets | BSA | – | Hemocompatibility | In vitro | Cai et al. ( |
| 17 | GNP-Dex | Dextran | 81.3 nm | Hemocompatibility | In vitro and In vivo | Chowdhury et al. ( |
| 18 | GO | – | Hemocompatibility | In vitro | de Sousa et al. ( | |
| 19 | GO-MSN nanocomposite | MSN | 51 ± 8 | Decrease of hemolysis and minimization of the interaction with human plasma proteins | In vitro | Fonseca et al. ( |
| Nanodiamonds | ||||||
| 20 | Nanodiamonds | Oxygen and hydrogen-terminated surface-modified NDs | H2 ND: 5–6 O2 ND: 10–15 Unmodified ND: 10 | Hemocompatibility | In vitro | Wąsowicz et al. ( |
| 21 | Nanodiamonds | – | 5 and 100 | Localization 100-nm cNDs around RBCs, penetration of 5-nm cNDs into the RBCs, no hemolysis and no alteration in cell viability or oxygenation/deoxygenation, RBC deformability and aggregation in a concentration-dependent way | In vitro | Lin et al. ( |
| 22 | Nanodiamonds | Carboxyl group | 100 | Echinocyte formation, plasma membrane alteration, higher aggregation strength of RBCs, formation of larger cell aggregates | In vitro | Avsievich et al. ( |
| 23 | HPHT-NDs | 35–500 | Not cytotoxic, no significant hemolytic and thrombogenic effects | In vitro | Li et al. ( | |
| Fullerene | ||||||
| 24 | Fullerene | PEG, PEI, carboxyl and hydroxyl group | – | No hemolysis | In vitro | Canapè et al. ( |
| Carbon nanotube | ||||||
| 25 | TPU-g-PEG/CNT | TPU grafting PEG | – | Hemocompatibility, reduction in blood cell adhesion and lower hemolysis rates | In vitro | Shi et al. ( |
| 26 | SWNTs | - | Diameter of 0.8–1.2 length of 100–1000 | Diminished RBC aggregation by increased concentration of SWNTs or incubation time, more toxic effect of bundled SWNTs than individual SWNTs | In vitro | Heo et al. ( |
| 27 | N+-bombarded MWCNTs | N+ | 40 to 60 | Enhanced hemocompatibility by higher N atomic percentage | In vitro | Zhao et al. ( |
| Others | ||||||
| 28 | OQCNs | Oxidized | 10 | Increased recovery times of sheep RBCs cryopreservation compared to using a commercial cryoprotectant | In vitro | Bai et al. ( |
| 29 | Colloidal apatite nanoparticles | AEP/HMP | Monomodal distribution centered on d50 ~ 40, with d10 ~ 22 and d90 ~ 80 | Increased RBC cryosurvival | In vitro | Stefanic et al. ( |
| 30 | HAP particles | Heparin | HAP nanoparticles: 18–30 × 45–120 heparin-modified HAP nanoparticles: 10–20 × 40–100 HAP microparticles: 0.15–0.3 μm | Aggregation of the RBCs by HAP nanoparticles despite HAP microparticles, suppression of RBCs aggregation by highly negatively charged HAP nanoparticles after heparin modification | In vitro | Han et al. ( |
Biocompatibility studies of nanoparticles with platelets
| Row | Nanoparticle | Surface modification | Nanoparticle size | Effects | Study type | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Silica | ||||||
| 1 | Silica | – | 10–40 | Concentration and size-dependent ADP-induced platelet-rich plasma aggregation suppression and partly activation of platelets | In vitro | Gryshchuk and Galagan ( |
| Graphene | ||||||
| 2 | Graphene | Carboxyl, epoxy, and hydroxyl groups | Average thickness: ≈ 0.4 | Compatibility with platelets | In vitro | Sasidharan et al. ( |
| 3 | GNP-Dex | Dextran | 81.3 | No activation of platelet | In vitro and in vivo | Chowdhury et al. ( |
| 4 | Albumin-GO | Albumin | – | Enhanced anticoagulant activity | In vitro | Loh and Lim ( |
| 5 | GO | Docetaxel | – | Antiproliferation and antithrombosis | In vitro and in vivo | Ge et al. ( |
| 6 | Graphene nanosheets | PEI, | 4–5 | Suppression of the activation, adhesion, and aggregation of platelets | In vitro | Du et al. ( |
| Fullerene( | ||||||
| 7 | C60 Fullerene | Hydrated | Single C60HyFn: 1.6–1.8 13 hydrated C60: 3.4 | Clot lysis effect | In vitro | Andrievsky et al. ( |
| Nanotubes | ||||||
| 8 | HNTs | - | Length: 0.2–1 µm Diameter: 20–50 Inner diameter: 10–20 nm | Nonhemolysis effect and procoagulant activity in a dose-dependent manner | In vitro | Liu et al. ( |
| 9 | SWNTs | – | – | Activation of platelets and prothrombotic effects in vivo, enhanced expression of platelet P-selectin, the number of platelets–granulocyte complexes, and platelet aggregability in vitro | In vitro and in vivo | Bihari et al. ( |
| 10 | MWCNTs | – | – | Platelet activation by depletion of platelet intracellular stores of Ca2+ | In vitro | De Paoli Lacerda et al. ( |
| 11 | MWCNTs bombarded with N+ | N+ | – | Better cytocompatibility and less platelet adhesion by higher nitrogen content | In vitro | Zhao et al. ( |
| 12 | MWCNTs | Carboxyl group | Outer diameters: 60–100 nm lengths: 1–2 µ m | Significant impact of the properties of the protein corona on the outcome of the interaction with PLT, Activation of PLT aggregation and the release of PMPs by Bare CNTCOOH, reduced PLT aggregating activity by HSA corona, attenuation of the effect of CNTCOOH on PLT by agglomeration of CNTCOOH by FBG, enhanced release of PMP by IgG and the H1 corona, respectively, by inducing PLT fragmentation, and aggregation of PLT | In vitro | De Paoli et al. ( |
| Carbon dot | ||||||
| 13 | Carbon dot | – | 3 | Suppression of platelet aggregation via reduction of the phospholipase C/PKC cascade and the inactivation of MAPK | In vitro and in vivo | Lee et al. ( |
Fig. 2The results of graphene oxide binding to bovine serum albumin
Fig. 3The interaction of charged carbon nanodots with human serum albumin. PEG C-dots interact with the site I of HSA via electrostatic forces whereas PEI C-dots interacted with the site II via hydrophobic and van der Waals forces
Biocompatibility studies of nanoparticles with serum albumin
| Row | Nanoparticle | Surface modification | Nanoparticle size | Results | Study type | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Carbon nanoparticles | – | 4.0 | Strong interaction of carbon nanoparticles with BSA and HSA | In vitro | Mandal et al. ( |
| Silica | ||||||
| 2 | Sphere- and rod-shaped Mesoporous Silica | – | Large pore size sphere–shaped: 68 ± 4 Small pore size sphere–shaped: 67 ± 3 Rod–shaped: (107 ± 8) × (343 ± 16) | Conformational change of HSA dependent to the pore size and morphology of the MSNs | In vitro | Ma et al. ( |
| Graphene | ||||||
| 3 | GO | – | – | Interaction between BSA and GO and alterations in BSA structure | In vitro | Nan et al. ( |
| 4 | GO | – | Height: 1.2 Average thickness: 4 | Significant interaction of BSA on the GO surface and conformational changes of BSA after the addition of GO | In vitro | Kuchlyan et al. ( |
| 5 | GO | – | – | The conformational change, diminished thermal stability, increased Esterase-like activity and the Non-enzymatic glycosylation, decreased drug binding of BSA | In vitro and in silico | Zhang et al. ( |
| 6 | GO | – | 1.0 ± 0.3 μm | Ionic strength-dependent interaction between GO and free HSA, hindered interaction in blood plasma | In vitro | Taneva et al. ( |
| 7 | GO | PEI, COOH | – | Minimal conformational change and HSA’s binding capacity to bilirubin by the binding of GO-COOH, strong toxicity by binding of p-GO and GO-PEI | In vitro | Ding et al. ( |
| 8 | GQDs | – | 2.14 ± 0.05 | Strong hydrogen bonds with HSA, insignificant conformational change | In vitro | Ba et al. ( |
| 9 | GQDs | – | 1.2 | Conformational changes and possibility of toxicity of GQDs | In vitro | Huang et al. ( |
| 10 | ZnO–rGO | ZnO | 20 | Interaction of ZnO–rGO with BSA | In vitro | Naskar et al. ( |
| 11 | MnO2@RGO | MnO2 | – | Insignificantly Changes in secondary structure of BSA, the NC GO percentage dependent interplays of NC and BSA, slight BSA esterase-like activity changes, aggregate forming from the protein-NC complexes | In vitro | Baral et al. ( |
| Fullerene | ||||||
| 12 | C60 | – | 20–60 | Using BSA as a solubilizer, sustained cytotoxic effect of Solubilized C60 | In vitro | Wu et al. ( |
| 13 | C60 | – | 120–260 | Slight damage to the secondary structure of HSA/BSA | In vitro | Liu et al. ( |
| 14 | nC60 | – | – | Conformational changes of the HSA resulting in compacter structure, Alteration of drug binding sites | In vitro | Song et al. ( |
| 15 | C60-fullerene and carboxy fullerenes | Carboxyl group | – | Similar binding sites of HIV protease and serum albumin | In silico | Benyamini et al. ( |
| 16 | C60 Fullerene | – | – | Antibody Fab fragment and serum albumin as target Candidates | In silico | Calvaresi and Zerbetto ( |
| SWCNTs | ||||||
| 17 | SWCNTs | – | SWCNT I: SWCNT II: 3.2 ± 4 nm, l = 5 mm | Nanotube diameter dependent hydrophobic forces and covalent bonds of BSA and SWCNTs in solid nanocomposites, alteration of the conformation of albumin, decrease in intensity in the high-frequency region of the absorption bands, distortion in SWCNTs by the covalent attachments to the graphene surface | In vitro | Gerasimenko et al. ( |
| Quantum dot | ||||||
| 18 | GSH–CdTe QDs | GSH–CdTe | 1.7, 2.5, 2.8, 3.0 | Ground-state complex with HSA, no significant changes in the conformation of HSA | In vitro | Yang et al. ( |
| 19 | Ag2Te QDs and CdTe QDs | Ag2Te and CdTe | 2.9 | Weaker quenching and binding ability of Ag2Te QDs than CdTe QDs, less conformational change in HSA by Ag2Te QDs demonstrating the lower toxicity risk | In vitro | Xiao et al. ( |
| 20 | CdSe/ZnS core–shell quantum dots | CdSe/ZnS | 3.3 | Formation of QDs@BSA bioconjugates | In vitro | Dzagli et al. ( |
| 21 | CdTe quantum dots | CdTe | 4 | Formation of protein corona by negative QDs and HSA, adsorption of HSA onto the surface of positive QDs and the aggregation of QDs | In vitro | Lai et al. ( |
| 22 | CdSe/ZnS quantum dots | CdSe/ZnS | Negative QDs: 2.8 Positive QDs:2.6 | Formation of QDs–BSA complex, structural AND biological activity changes of BSA | In vitro | Xiao et al. ( |
| Carbon dots | ||||||
| 23 | Ru:CNDEDAs | Amine–coated Ru (III) | – | Perturbation of albumin in circular dichroism study, the formation of a ground-state complex with BSA/HSA in the absorption study, the higher stability of Ru:CNDEDA-BSA than Ru:CNDEDA-HSA | In vitro and in silico | Maity et al. ( |
| 24 | C-dots | – | 2.4 ± 0.6 | No significant effect on HSA or γ -globulin structure, impact on the transport function of proteins by varying the affinity of drugs with HSA and γ –globulins | In vitro | Xu et al. ( |
| 25 | N,S-CDs | Nitrogen and sulfur | 2.0, 7.6, 13.9 | Conformational changes in HSA | In vitro and in silico | Liang et al. ( |
| 26 | negative PEG Cdots and positive PEI Cdots | PEG, PEI | 2.5 ± 0.9 | Similar binding affinity of PEG and PEI Cdots to HSA, interaction of PEG Cdots with site I, interaction of PEI Cdots with site II, minimal effect of PEG Cdots on HSA structure, notable distortion of HSA conformation by the high content of PEI Cdots | In vitro | Li et al. ( |
Biocompatibility studies of nanoparticles with plasma factor VIII
| Row | Nanoparticle type | Surface modification | Nanoparticle size | Effects | Study type | References |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Silica | – | 10–40 | Procoagulant effects, increased the factor X activation | In vitro | Gryshchuk and Galagan ( |
| 2 | Porous silica | – | 74 ± 11, 83 ± 9 and 94 ± 9 | Controlled diffusion mechanism of the release of the small pore silica particles, a non-Fickien release profile and mono-exponential dependence by the nanaoparticles with largest pore sizes (approximately 25 nm),superb quality of the recovered proteins | in vitro | Zampini et al. ( |
| 3 | Fullerenol and carboxy fullerene | Carboxyl and hydroxyl groups | – | Anticoagulant by impeding the activity of FXa, more stably binding of carboxy fullerene to the active site of FXa than fullerenol | In silico | Liu et al. ( |
| 4 | Carbon nanotube | Nitrogen | – | Albumin recovery with an efficiency of 80%, biocompability of CNTs | In vitro | Yeh et al. ( |
| 5 | Quantum dots | – | 3.2, 3.6 | The anticoagulant effect of 3.2 nm QDs calcium ions concentration dependent, increased coagulation time, reduced Factor VIII activity | In vitro | Maguire et al. ( |