| Literature DB >> 35536489 |
Viktor Bielik1, Ivan Hric2, Simona Ugrayová2, Libuša Kubáňová2,3, Matúš Putala4, Ľuboš Grznár4, Adela Penesová3, Andrea Havranová3, Sára Šardzíková5, Marián Grendar6, Eva Baranovičová6, Katarína Šoltys5,7, Martin Kolisek6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Physical exercise has favorable effects on the structure of gut microbiota and metabolite production in sedentary subjects. However, little is known whether adjustments in an athletic program impact overall changes of gut microbiome in high-level athletes. We therefore characterized fecal microbiota and serum metabolites in response to a 7-week, high-intensity training program and consumption of probiotic Bryndza cheese.Entities:
Keywords: Athletes; Butyrate; Gut microbiome; Physical exercise; Probiotics
Year: 2022 PMID: 35536489 PMCID: PMC9091066 DOI: 10.1186/s40798-022-00453-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sports Med Open ISSN: 2198-9761
Training variables before (Phase 1) and during (Phase 2A and 2B) intervention. Total swimming distance (TS), high-intensity swimming distance (HIS), and training hours out of the water (OUT) are presented as mean and standard deviation
| TS | HIS | HIS to TS (%) | OUT | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phase 1 | 45.9 ± 14.4 | 4.8 ± 2.8 | 10.4 ± 10.0 | 2.5 ± 0.7 |
| Phase 2A | 31.3 ± 5.5 | 7.2 ± 3.9 | 20.7 ± 6.9 | 2.6 ± 0.9 |
| Phase 2B | 22.1 ± 3.9 | 3.2 ± 1.3 | 14.3 ± 13.2 | 1.8 ± 0.4 |
Phase 1 (from March 18 to May 3, 2019), experimental Phase 2A (from May 6 to June 7, 2019), and experimental Phase 2B (from June 8 to June 15, 2019) which towards to Slovak Swimming National Championship in Long course (15–16th June 2019, Žilina, Slovakia). All measurements were taken before Phase 2A and repeated after Phase 2B (in the week following the championship)
Bacterial taxa (phyla, order, family, genus) before and after 7 weeks of the high-intensity training phase with probiotics
| Taxa (%) | HITB-pre ( | HITB-post ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11.1495 (± 5.9885) | 15.7330 (± 5.2891) | 0.026 | |
| 10.7238 (± 5.9885) | 15.5264 (± 5.2891) | 0.026 | |
| 10.7238 (± 5.9862) | 15.5264 (± 5.2913) | 0.026 | |
| 0.5273 (± 0.4799) | 0.3936 (± 0.4001) | 0.041 | |
| 0.0706 (± 0.0758) | 0.1578 (± 0.1747) | 0.015 | |
| 7.095 (± 4.4728) | 9.7773 (± 4.7393) | 0.053 | |
| 0.0395 (± 0.0737) | 0.4395 (± 1.3809) | 0.051 | |
| 0.4123 (± 0.3741) | 0.8465 (± 0.7732) | 0.050 | |
| 0.0688 (± 0.0756) | 0.1559 (± 0.1747) | 0.019 | |
| 0.5273 (± 0.4799) | 0.3936 (± 0.4001) | 0.041 | |
| 0.0089 (± 0.0168) | 0.0126 (± 0.0201) | 0.080 | |
| 7.0955 (± 4.4728) | 9.7773 (± 4.7393) | 0.053 | |
| 0.3838 (± 0.3881) | 0.6861 (± 0.5919) | 0.060 | |
| 0.0021 (± 0.0055) | 0.0268 (± 0.0542) | 0.008 | |
| 0.5273 (± 0.4809) | 0.3936 (± 0.4006) | 0.041 | |
| 2.1098 (± 1.6001) | 1.2069 (± 7212) | 0.028 |
Data are presented as means and standard deviations. HITB-pre variables before high-intensity training with probiotics, HITB-post variables after high-intensity training with probiotics
Bacterial taxa (phyla, order, family, genus) before and after 7 weeks of the high-intensity training phase without probiotics
| Taxa (%) | HIT-pre ( | HIT-post ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 13.7922 (± 6.6851) | 17.6415 (± 8.8349) | 0.050 | |
| 0.0671 (± 0.1210) | 0.1141 (± 0.1840) | 0.019 | |
| 0.2082 (± 0.1836) | 0.4174 (± 0.4210) | 0.023 | |
| 0.2057 (± 0.1859) | 0.3987 (± 0.4088) | 0.023 | |
| 0.1109 (± 0.0859) | 0.1848 (± 0.1456) | 0.041 | |
| 0.4061 (± 0.2757) | 0.8471 (± 0.7084) | 0.010 | |
| 0.0376 (± 0.0609) | 0.0632 (± 0.1039) | 0.050 | |
| 0.2057 (± 0.1859) | 0.3978 (± 0.4039) | 0.023 | |
| 0.0122 (± 0.0161) | 0.0403 (± 0.0492) | 0.008 | |
| 0.0065 (± 0.0094) | 0.0196 (± 0.0238) | 0.028 | |
| 0.3961 (± 0.2772) | 0.8025 (± 0.7105) | 0.010 | |
| 0.0061 (± 0.0174) | 0.0646 (± 0.1725) | 0.028 | |
| 0.0014 (± 0.0036) | 0.0068 (± 0.0095) | 0.046 | |
| 0.0000 (± 0.0000) | 0.0045 (± 0.0068) | 0.043 | |
| 0.0713 (± 0.0658) | 0.1776 (± 0.1693) | 0.012 | |
| 0.0634 (± 0.0663) | 0.1364 (± 0.1657) | 0.033 |
Data are presented as means and standard deviations. HIT-pre variables before high-intensity training without probiotics, HIT-post variables after high-intensity training without probiotics
Fig. 1α-diversity by Shannon index before and after intervention. a High-intensity training and use of probiotic cheese (HITB); b High-intensity training only (HIT). Floating bars are the minimum to maximum values, the line shows the mean. *p < 0.05
Fig. 2β-diversity of analyzed samples represented by significantly altered (p < 0.05) bacterial taxa, selected by Random Forest machine learning analysis, before and after 7 weeks of the high-intensity training phase (HIT and HITB) as visualized by PCA. SVD with imputation was used to calculate principal components. The X and Y axis show principal component 1 and principal component 2 that explain 21% and 17.4% of the total variance, respectively. Prediction ellipses are such that, with a probability of 0.95, a new observation from the same group will fall inside the ellipse (n = 48 data points). HIT-pre variables before high-intensity training, HIT-post variables after high-intensity training
Fig. 3ROC (receiver operating characteristic) curves with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) for the RFM-L algorithm acetate, pyruvate, Butyricimonas, butyrate, Bacteroidetes, Alistipes, and α-diversity (Shannon index) as joint predictors/discriminators between pre- and post-intervention in HIT. FPR, false-positive rate; HIT, high-intensity training group; RFM-L, Random Forest machine-learning; TPR, true positive rate
Fig. 4ROC (receiver operating characteristic) curves with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) for the RFM-L algorithm pyruvate, lactate, acetate, α-diversity (Shannon index), and butyrate, as excellent joint predictors/discriminators between pre- and post-intervention in HITB. FPR, false-positive rate; HITB, high-intensity training and use of probiotic cheese group; RFM-L, Random Forest machine-learning; TPR, true positive rate