Xi-Han Wang1, Kun Shao2, Hui-Min An2, Xiao-Hui Zhai1, Pei-Jun Zhou3, Bing Chen4. 1. Department of Pharmacy, Rui-Jin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China. 2. Center for Organ Transplantation, Rui-Jin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao-Tong University School of Medicine, 197 Ruijin Er Road, Shanghai, People's Republic of China. 3. Center for Organ Transplantation, Rui-Jin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao-Tong University School of Medicine, 197 Ruijin Er Road, Shanghai, People's Republic of China. peijunzhou@yahoo.com. 4. Department of Pharmacy, Rui-Jin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, People's Republic of China. chchenbing@hotmail.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Intracellular exposure of tacrolimus (TAC) may be a better marker of therapeutic effect than whole blood exposure. We aimed to evaluate the influence of genetic polymorphism on the pharmacokinetics of TAC in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and develop limited sampling strategy (LSS) models to estimate the area under the curve (AUC0-12h) in the PBMC of Chinese renal transplant patients. METHODS: Ten blood samples of each of the 23 renal transplant patients were collected 0-12h after 14 (10-18) days of TAC administration. PBMCs were separated and quantified. The TAC level in PBMCs was determined, and pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated by noncompartmental study. The AUC0-12h of TAC in whole blood was estimated by Bayesian approach based on a population pharmacokinetic model established in 65 renal transplant patients. The influence of CYP3A5 and ABCB1 genotypes on exposure was estimated. By applying multiple stepwise linear regression analysis, LSS equations for TAC AUC0-12h in the PMBC of renal transplant patients were established, and the bias and precision of various equations were identified and compared. RESULTS: We found a modest correlation between TAC exposure in whole blood and PBMC (r2 = 0.5260). Patients with the CYP3A5 6986GG genotype had a higher AUC0-12h in PBMCs than those with the 6986 AA or GA genotype (P = 0.026). Conversely, patients with the ABCB1 3435TT genotype had a higher AUC0-12h in PBMC than those with the 3435 CC and CT genotypes (P = 0.046). LSS models with 1-4 blood time points were established (r2 = 0.570-0.989). The best model for predicting TAC AUC0-12h was C2-C4-C6-C10 (r2 = 0.989). The model with C0.5-C6 (r2 = 0.849) can be used for outpatients who need monitoring to be performed in a short period. CONCLUSIONS: The CYP3A5 and ABCB1 genotypes impact TAC exposure in PBMCs, which may further alter the effects of TAC. The LSS model consisting of 2-4 time points is an effective approach for estimating full TAC AUC0-12h in Chinese renal transplant patients. This approach may provide convenience and the possibility for clinical monitoring of TAC intracellular exposure.
PURPOSE: Intracellular exposure of tacrolimus (TAC) may be a better marker of therapeutic effect than whole blood exposure. We aimed to evaluate the influence of genetic polymorphism on the pharmacokinetics of TAC in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and develop limited sampling strategy (LSS) models to estimate the area under the curve (AUC0-12h) in the PBMC of Chinese renal transplant patients. METHODS: Ten blood samples of each of the 23 renal transplant patients were collected 0-12h after 14 (10-18) days of TAC administration. PBMCs were separated and quantified. The TAC level in PBMCs was determined, and pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated by noncompartmental study. The AUC0-12h of TAC in whole blood was estimated by Bayesian approach based on a population pharmacokinetic model established in 65 renal transplant patients. The influence of CYP3A5 and ABCB1 genotypes on exposure was estimated. By applying multiple stepwise linear regression analysis, LSS equations for TAC AUC0-12h in the PMBC of renal transplant patients were established, and the bias and precision of various equations were identified and compared. RESULTS: We found a modest correlation between TAC exposure in whole blood and PBMC (r2 = 0.5260). Patients with the CYP3A5 6986GG genotype had a higher AUC0-12h in PBMCs than those with the 6986 AA or GA genotype (P = 0.026). Conversely, patients with the ABCB1 3435TT genotype had a higher AUC0-12h in PBMC than those with the 3435 CC and CT genotypes (P = 0.046). LSS models with 1-4 blood time points were established (r2 = 0.570-0.989). The best model for predicting TAC AUC0-12h was C2-C4-C6-C10 (r2 = 0.989). The model with C0.5-C6 (r2 = 0.849) can be used for outpatients who need monitoring to be performed in a short period. CONCLUSIONS: The CYP3A5 and ABCB1 genotypes impact TAC exposure in PBMCs, which may further alter the effects of TAC. The LSS model consisting of 2-4 time points is an effective approach for estimating full TAC AUC0-12h in Chinese renal transplant patients. This approach may provide convenience and the possibility for clinical monitoring of TAC intracellular exposure.
Authors: Pierre Wallemacq; Victor W Armstrong; Merce Brunet; Vincent Haufroid; David W Holt; Atholl Johnston; Dirk Kuypers; Yannick Le Meur; Pierre Marquet; Michael Oellerich; Eric Thervet; Burkhand Toenshoff; Nas Undre; Lutz T Weber; Ian S Westley; Michel Mourad Journal: Ther Drug Monit Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 3.681
Authors: Philip F Halloran; Jessica Chang; Konrad Famulski; Luis G Hidalgo; Israel D R Salazar; Maribel Merino Lopez; Arthur Matas; Michael Picton; Declan de Freitas; Jonathan Bromberg; Daniel Serón; Joana Sellarés; Gunilla Einecke; Jeff Reeve Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2014-11-06 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Pierre Marquet; Laetitia Albano; Jean-Baptiste Woillard; Lionel Rostaing; Nassim Kamar; Charlotte Sakarovitch; Philippe Gatault; Matthias Buchler; Bernard Charpentier; Eric Thervet; Elisabeth Cassuto Journal: Pharmacol Res Date: 2017-12-08 Impact factor: 7.658
Authors: R Venkataramanan; A Swaminathan; T Prasad; A Jain; S Zuckerman; V Warty; J McMichael; J Lever; G Burckart; T Starzl Journal: Clin Pharmacokinet Date: 1995-12 Impact factor: 6.447
Authors: Soma Bahmany; Lucia E A de Wit; Dennis A Hesselink; Teun van Gelder; Nauras M Shuker; Carla Baan; Bart C H van der Nagel; Birgit C P Koch; Brenda C M de Winter Journal: Biomed Chromatogr Date: 2018-11-14 Impact factor: 1.902