Literature DB >> 35536381

Employer-based insurance coverage increases utilization of planned oocyte cryopreservation.

Arielle S Yeshua1, Baruch Abittan2, Liron Bar-El3, Christine Mullin2, Randi H Goldman2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the utilization of planned oocyte cryopreservation (OC) in the year immediately prior to, and the year of, insurance coverage commencement for employees at our institution.
METHODS: Patient demographics and cycle outcomes were retrospectively compared between the first OC cycles occurring in 2017 vs. 2018 according to insurance coverage and type, age, and the number of oocytes retrieved and cryopreserved. Continuous demographic variables including age, BMI, day 3 FSH and E2, AMH, gravidity, and parity were compared using student T-tests. Cycle outcomes, including the number of oocytes retrieved and cryopreserved were compared using linear regression models, adjusting for potential confounders including age, BMI, and ovarian reserve parameters.
RESULTS: Between January 2017 and December 2018, 123 patients underwent planned OC at our institution. Patient age ranged from 23 to 44 years and did not significantly differ from 2017 to 2018 (mean 34.9 vs. 35.2). There was a 12% increase in planned OC utilization from 2017 (N = 58) to 2018 (N = 65). Significantly, more patients had any insurance coverage in 2018 vs. 2017 (71.9% vs. 40.4%, p = 0.001), a 78% increase. From 2017 to 2018, the number of patients with hospital-based insurance coverage undergoing planned OC increased by a factor of 8 (5 to 41.5%, p < 0.001), while the number of self-pay patients significantly decreased (p = 0.001). No differences were found regarding cycle outcomes.
CONCLUSION: A greater proportion of women at our institution had insurance coverage for planned OC in 2018 vs. 2017. Employer-based insurance coverage for planned OC was associated with a significant increase in utilization by hospital employees.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fertility preservation; Insurance coverage; Planned oocyte cryopreservation

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35536381      PMCID: PMC9174362          DOI: 10.1007/s10815-022-02506-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet        ISSN: 1058-0468            Impact factor:   3.357


  19 in total

1.  Does company-sponsored egg freezing promote or confine women's reproductive autonomy?

Authors:  Heidi Mertes
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-05-24       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Use of cryo-banked oocytes in an ovum donation programme: a prospective, randomized, controlled, clinical trial.

Authors:  Ana Cobo; Marcos Meseguer; José Remohí; Antonio Pellicer
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  Oocyte banking for anticipated gamete exhaustion (AGE) is a preventive intervention, neither social nor nonmedical.

Authors:  Dominic Stoop; Fulco van der Veen; Michel Deneyer; Julie Nekkebroeck; Herman Tournaye
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 3.828

4.  What do reproductive-age women who undergo oocyte cryopreservation think about the process as a means to preserve fertility?

Authors:  Brooke Hodes-Wertz; Sarah Druckenmiller; Meghan Smith; Nicole Noyes
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 7.329

5.  Elective oocyte cryopreservation: who should pay?

Authors:  Heidi Mertes; Guido Pennings
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2011-11-13       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  Delayed childbearing by education level in the United States, 1969-1994.

Authors:  K E Heck; K C Schoendorf; S J Ventura; J L Kiely
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  1997-06

7.  Maternal age and fetal loss: population based register linkage study.

Authors:  A M Nybo Andersen; J Wohlfahrt; P Christens; J Olsen; M Melbye
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-06-24

8.  Comparison of concomitant outcome achieved with fresh and cryopreserved donor oocytes vitrified by the Cryotop method.

Authors:  Ana Cobo; Masashigue Kuwayama; Sonia Pérez; Amparo Ruiz; Antonio Pellicer; José Remohí
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2007-09-24       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  Delayed childbearing: more women are having their first child later in life.

Authors:  T J Matthews; Brady E Hamilton
Journal:  NCHS Data Brief       Date:  2009-08

10.  Embryo development of fresh 'versus' vitrified metaphase II oocytes after ICSI: a prospective randomized sibling-oocyte study.

Authors:  Laura Rienzi; Stefania Romano; Laura Albricci; Roberta Maggiulli; Antonio Capalbo; Elena Baroni; Silvia Colamaria; Fabio Sapienza; Filippo Ubaldi
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2009-10-27       Impact factor: 6.918

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.