| Literature DB >> 35536186 |
Anna Wagner1, Jana Seiler1, Martin Beye1.
Abstract
Functional genetic studies in honeybees have been limited to transposon mediated transformation and site directed mutagenesis tools. However, site- and sequence-specific manipulations that insert DNA fragments or replace sequences at specific target sites are lacking. Such tools would enable the tagging of proteins, the expression of reporters and site-specific amino acid changes, which are all gold standard manipulations for physiological, organismal, and genetic studies. However, such manipulations must be very efficient in honeybees since screening and crossing procedures are laborious due to their social organization. Here, we report an accurate and remarkably efficient site-specific integration of DNA-sequences into the honeybee genome using clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat/clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeat-associated protein 9-mediated homology-directed repair. We employed early embryonic injections and selected a highly efficient sgRNA in order to insert 294 and 729 bp long DNA sequences into a specific locus at the dsx gene. These sequences were locus-specifically integrated in 57% and 59% of injected bees. Most importantly, 21% and 25% of the individuals lacked the wildtype sequence demonstrating that we generated homozygous mutants in which all cells are affected (no mosaicism). The highly efficient, locus-specific insertions of nucleotide sequences generating homozygous mutants demonstrate that systematic molecular studies for honeybees are in hand that allow somatic mutation approaches via workers or studies in the next generation using queens with their worker progeny. The employment of early embryonic injections and screenings of highly efficient sgRNAs may offer the prospect of highly successful sequence- and locus-specific mutations also in other organisms.Entities:
Keywords: zzm321990 Apis melliferazzm321990 ; CRISPR/Cas9; gene editing; homology-directed repair; knock-in; methods
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35536186 PMCID: PMC9157169 DOI: 10.1093/g3journal/jkac098
Source DB: PubMed Journal: G3 (Bethesda) ISSN: 2160-1836 Impact factor: 3.542
Fig. 1.The site-specific insertion of linear DNA fragments into the dsx gene of the honeybee. a) Schematic presentation of the DNA fragments employed. b) Scheme of the CRISPR/Cas9-mediated HDR. The blue box indicates the new DNA fragment that needs to be integrated. The black boxes indicate the homologous arms to the left and right. Gray boxes show the remaining part of the exon. Arrows above a box indicate the position of the oligonucleotide primers for amplifications. c) Amplicons from different individuals were analyzed by size in 1% agarose gel. Black and white reversed pictures of ethidium bromide stained gels are shown. d) The expected nucleotide sequence after locus-specific insertions. wt sequences of dsx gene above and the expected sequence after insertion for comparison with (e). e) The detected nucleotide sequences at the target site of our homozygous mutated individuals. wt, wildtype individual (noninjected).
The DNA fragment insertions into the dsx gene.
| Fragment | No. of bees with | No. of mutated bees | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No insert/no insert | Insert/no insert | Insert/insert | |||
|
| % | 43 | 36 | 21 | 57 |
|
| (6/14) | (5/14) | (3/14) | (8/14) | |
|
| % | 41 | 34 | 25 | 59 |
|
| (28/68) | (23/68) | (17/68) | (40/68) | |
Nucleotide sequences of the designated target site of homozygous individuals.
| Fragment | Individual | No. of clones showing correct integration | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| L1 #J3 | % | 43 |
|
| (3/7) | ||
| L1 #J6 | % | 100 | |
|
| (7/7) | ||
| L1 #A10 | % | 100 | |
|
| (3/3) | ||
|
| L5 #15 | % | 100 |
|
| (8/8) | ||
| L5 #21 | % | 100 | |
|
| (8/8) | ||
| L5 #22 | % | 100 | |
|
| (11/11) | ||
| RE #7 | % | 100 | |
|
| (5/5) | ||
| RE #11 | % | 100 | |
|
| (8/8) | ||
| RE #12 | % | 100 | |
|
| (8/8) | ||