| Literature DB >> 35536006 |
Andrew Oliver1, Zhengyao Xue1,2, Yirui T Villanueva1,2, Blythe Durbin-Johnson3, Zeynep Alkan1, Diana H Taft2, Jinxin Liu4, Ian Korf3, Kevin D Laugero1,5, Charles B Stephensen1,5, David A Mills2,6, Mary E Kable1,5, Danielle G Lemay1,3,5.
Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) represents a significant source of morbidity and mortality worldwide, with expectations that AMR-associated consequences will continue to worsen throughout the coming decades. Since resistance to antibiotics is encoded in the microbiome, interventions aimed at altering the taxonomic composition of the gut might allow us to prophylactically engineer microbiomes that harbor fewer antibiotic resistant genes (ARGs). Diet is one method of intervention, and yet little is known about the association between diet and antimicrobial resistance. To address this knowledge gap, we examined diet using the food frequency questionnaire (FFQ; habitual diet) and 24-h dietary recalls (Automated Self-Administered 24-h [ASA24®] tool) coupled with an analysis of the microbiome using shotgun metagenome sequencing in 290 healthy adult participants of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Nutritional Phenotyping Study. We found that aminoglycosides were the most abundant and prevalent mechanism of AMR in these healthy adults and that aminoglycoside-O-phosphotransferases (aph3-dprime) correlated negatively with total calories and soluble fiber intake. Individuals in the lowest quartile of ARGs (low-ARG) consumed significantly more fiber in their diets than medium- and high-ARG individuals, which was concomitant with increased abundances of obligate anaerobes, especially from the family Clostridiaceae, in their gut microbiota. Finally, we applied machine learning to examine 387 dietary, physiological, and lifestyle features for associations with antimicrobial resistance, finding that increased phylogenetic diversity of diet was associated with low-ARG individuals. These data suggest diet may be a potential method for reducing the burden of AMR. IMPORTANCE Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) represents a considerable burden to health care systems, with the public health community largely in consensus that AMR will be a major cause of death worldwide in the coming decades. Humans carry antibiotic resistance in the microbes that live in and on us, collectively known as the human microbiome. Diet is a powerful method for shaping the human gut microbiome and may be a tractable method for lessening antibiotic resistance, and yet little is known about the relationship between diet and AMR. We examined this relationship in healthy individuals who contained various abundances of antibiotic resistance genes and found that individuals who consumed diverse diets that were high in fiber and low in animal protein had fewer antibiotic resistance genes. Dietary interventions may be useful for lessening the burden of antimicrobial resistance and might ultimately motivate dietary guidelines which will consider how nutrition can reduce the impact of infectious disease.Entities:
Keywords: antibiotic resistance; bioinformatics; diet; diversity; fiber; food; gut microbes; human health; machine learning; metagenomes; microbiome; nutrition
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35536006 PMCID: PMC9239165 DOI: 10.1128/mbio.00101-22
Source DB: PubMed Journal: mBio Impact factor: 7.786
General characteristics of each ARG cluster for all individuals
| Characteristic | Data by cluster | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Low-ARG | Medium-ARG | High-ARG | |
| Avg age (y [range]) | 42.7 (19–66) | 39.5 (18–65) | 41.4 (20–64) |
| BMI (kg/m2 [range]) | 27.7 (19.7–43.9) | 27.3 (18.2–43.2) | 26.5 (18.0–38.0) |
| No. of males | 33 | 72 | 35 |
| No. of females | 40 | 72 | 38 |
| Ethnicity ( | |||
| Asian | 4 | 15 | 13 |
| Black | 4 | 6 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 12 | 18 | 8 |
| White | 52 | 104 | 49 |
| Born in United States ( | |||
| Yes | 60 | 125 | 56 |
| No | 13 | 19 | 17 |
N = 290.
FIG 1Distribution of antibiotic resistance mechanisms in a healthy U.S. cohort. (A) Stacked bar chart of the top nine most abundant ARG mechanisms across 290 individuals, normalized to genome equivalents (see Materials and Methods). Horizontal quartile lines are drawn based on total ARG abundance and represent our clustering strategy. (B) A zoom-in of the low-abundant mechanisms that are found increasingly throughout the high-ARG group. (C) Total ARG abundance violin plot summary between ARG clusters. Points represent the sum of ARG abundance within individuals.
FIG 2Differences in microbiome diversity between ARG clusters. (A) Shannon diversity between ARG clusters (n = 290 individuals). Significance was determined using the Kruskal-Wallis test and a post hoc Dunn test, with P values correcting using the Benjamini-Hochberg method. (B) Nonmetric multidimensional scaling of Bray-Curtis distances between individuals’ microbiomes. Points are colored by ARG cluster. Beta diversity differences were determined using a PERMANOVA, which revealed significant differences in the community composition between the clusters.
Tests of directed hypotheses
| Dietary component | Data source | Data by cluster | Transformation, test | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low ( | Medium ( | High ( | Low vs medium | Low vs high | Medium vs high | All | |||
| Avg fiber intake_tnfs | ASA24 | 26.67 ± 10.8 (1.35) | 24.96 ± 13.53 (1.2) | 26.42 ± 12.31 (1.63) | sqrt(x), ANOVA, Tukey | 0.423 | 0.982 | 0.58 | 0.376 |
| Fiber from food and supplements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Total fiber intake | FFQ | 25.94 ± 11.34 (1.42) | 24.85 ± 12.18 (1.08) | 28.41 ± 11.96 (1.58) | yeojohnson, ANOVA, Tukey | 0.655 | 0.494 | 0.084 | 0.101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Soluble fiber intake | FFQ | 7.2 ± 3.2 (0.4) | 6.82 ± 3.73 (0.33) | 7.73 ± 3.32 (0.44) | yeojohnson, ANOVA, Tukey | 0.517 | 0.645 | 0.097 | 0.107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Habitual protein intake from animals |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Saturated fatty acid intake | FFQ | 26.45 ± 11.33 (1.42) | 29 ± 12.66 (1.12) | 30.13 ± 12.49 (1.65) | BoxCox, ANOVA, Tukey | 0.295 | 0.168 | 0.802 | 0.166 |
| Total energy intake | FFQ | 2008.95 ± 734.73 (91.84) | 2135.41 ± 820.54 (72.81) | 2288.85 ± 825.32 (109.32) | arcsinh, ANOVA, Tukey | 0.599 | 0.12 | 0.379 | 0.141 |
| Beef/pork consumption, including cured meat |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Beef/pork consumption, excluding cured meat |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| FFQ | 0.53 ± 0.32 (0.04) | 0.67 ± 0.42 (0.04) | 0.61 ± 0.37 (0.05) | yeojohnson, ANOVA, Tukey | 0.045 | 0.465 | 0.602 | 0.056 | |
| HEI total score | ASA24 | 64.33 ± 13.29 (1.66) | 61.53 ± 14.1 (1.25) | 63.57 ± 12 (1.59) | None, ANOVA, Tukey | 0.364 | 0.949 | 0.607 | 0.343 |
| Stool pH | Not applicable | 7.08 ± 0.54 (0.07) | 6.97 ± 0.61 (0.05) | 6.87 ± 0.52 (0.07) | None, ANOVA, Tukey | 0.431 | 0.121 | 0.539 | 0.143 |
| BMI | Not applicable | 27.64 ± 5.4 (0.67) | 27.2 ± 5 (0.44) | 26.1 ± 4.08 (0.54) | yeojohnson, ANOVA, Tukey | 0.837 | 0.258 | 0.422 | 0.27 |
Shows statistics regarding the hypotheses made about diet and other physiological metrics and their relationship with antimicrobial resistance. These comparisons were made across a subset of the same individuals for which we had data on every dietary/physiological feature used in this analysis (n = 246 individuals). Rows with features that were significantly different between ARG clusters are bolded. Values displayed in parenthetical are formated as Mean ± standard deviation (standard error of mean).
Units are g.
Units are g/1,000 kcal.
Units are kcal.
Units are oz eq.
Units are oz eq/1,000 kcal.
FIG 3Proportional odds logistic regression identifies relationships between dietary nutrients from directed hypotheses and ARG genes or mechanisms. The abundance of MEG 1039, an aminoglycoside-O-phosphotransferase (aph3-dprime), varied significantly with (A) total calorie intake and (B) soluble fiber intake (n = 290 individuals). Likewise, aggregated at the mechanism level, multimetal resistance significantly varied with (C) dietary fiber intake and (D) soluble fiber intake. The red regression line is based on the geom_smooth() function using the locally estimated scatterplot smoothing (LOESS) method from the R package ggplot2. The P values of the POLR regression are included in red, noting which covariates were included in the POLR analysis.
FIG 4Using machine learning to identify aspects of diet, lifestyle, and the microbiome that predict ARG abundance. (A) SHAP values depicting the predictive power of a random forest using diet and lifestyle features to distinguish individuals in the low-ARG and medium-ARG groups. High levels of diversity in diet (which was correlated with diversity in carbohydrates) was most predictive of low-ARG individuals. (B) Features, sorted by their mean absolute SHAP value, which distinguish all ARG clusters, low-ARG (gray, n = 45) and medium-ARG (gold, n = 95), and low-ARG and high-ARG (blue, n = 47). (C) A nonmetric multidimensional scaling of Bray-Curtis distances between individuals’ microbiomes, with overlaid vectors of bacterial families identified as strong predictors of ARG cluster membership. Box plots show the log-transformed abundance of the families between ARG clusters. (D) A random forest using both microbiome and diet/lifestyle data uses mainly microbiome features in distinguishing ARG clusters.