| Literature DB >> 35534856 |
Tobias Bensel1, Imke Erhart1, Simon Megiroo2, Werner Kronenberg3, Wolfgang Bömicke4, Sebastian Hinz5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Owing to the reduced dental treatment infrastructure in the Tanzanian highlands, maintaining good oral health is a challenge for not only the general population but also individual professional groups. In this study, the caries prevalence and, subsequently, the prosthetic treatment needs of the nurses of the Ilembula Lutheran Hospital (ILH) and Ilembula Institute of Health and Allied Sciences (IIHAS), Tanzania, were investigated.Entities:
Keywords: Caries incidence; Epidemiology; General oral health; Nursing staff; Tanzania
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35534856 PMCID: PMC9081662 DOI: 10.1186/s12903-022-02064-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Oral Health ISSN: 1472-6831 Impact factor: 3.747
Distribution of nursing staff’s responses regarding their general medical history and dental medical history
| Gender | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Women | Age in years | Men | Age in years | Total | |||
| n (%) | mean SD | min–max | n (%) | mean SD | min–max | n (%) | |
| Total | 87 (51.8%) | 23.6 ± 7.9 | 18–58 | 81 (48.2%) | 26.6 ± 3.2 | 18–38 | 168 (100%) |
| General medical history | |||||||
| General diseases | 5 (3.0%) | 33.6 ± 18.5 | 19–58 | 0 (0.0%) | 0 | 0 | 5 (3.0%) |
| Impairment of wound healing | 2 (1.2%) | 22.0 ± 1.4 | 21–23 | 0 (0.0%) | 0 | 0 | 2 (1.2%) |
| Infectious diseases | 0 (0.0%) | – | – | 0 (0.0%) | – | – | 0 (0.0%) |
| Regular medication usage | 7 (4.2%) | 29.6 ± 16.6 | 19–58 | 2 (1.2%) | 23.5 ± 2.1 | 22–25 | 9 (5.4%) |
| Oral homecare | |||||||
| Daily tooth brushing | |||||||
| 1 | 21 (12.5%) | 22.3 ± 4.1 | 18–34 | 25 (14.8%) | 22.4 ± 2.6 | 18–27 | 46 (27.3%) |
| 2 | 53 (31.5%) | 23.8 ± 9.0 | 18–57 | 42 (25.0%) | 22.4 ± 3.3 | 18–38 | 95 (56.5%) |
| ≥ 3 | 13 (7.7%) | 24.5 ± 8.2 | 18–49 | 14 (8.4%) | 23.8 ± 3.8 | 20–32 | 27 (16.1%) |
| Private toothbrush | 87 (51.8%) | 23.6 ± 7.9 | 18–58 | 80 (47.6%) | 22.6 ± 3.2 | 18–38 | 167 (99.4%) |
| Use of toothpaste | 79 (47.0%) | 23.8 ± 8.3 | 18–58 | 74 (44.0%) | 22.5 ± 3.2 | 18–38 | 153 (91.0%) |
| Dental floss | 2 (1.2%) | 21 ± 0.0 | 21–21 | 4 (2.4%) | 22.0 ± 0.8 | 21–23 | 6 (3.6%) |
| Toothpicks | 1 (0.6%) | 23 ± 0.0 | 23 | 5 (3.0%) | 22.0 ± 1.7 | 21–25 | 6 (3.6%) |
| Toothache during daily tooth brushing | 16 (9.5%) | 26.7 ± 10.2 | 18–57 | 11 (6.6%) | 21.1 ± 1.4 | 18–23 | 27 (16.1%) |
| Gingival bleeding while brushing | 21 (12.5%) | 23.5 ± 8.8 | 18–58 | 27 (16.1%) | 22.7 ± 2.7 | 18–30 | 48 (28.6%) |
| Acute toothache | 15 (8.9%) | 25.7 ± 9.5 | 19–57 | 11 (6.6%) | 22.2 ± 3.4 | 18–30 | 26 (15.5%) |
| Dental treatment | |||||||
| Dental treatment within the two years | 29 (17.3%) | 24.5 ± 9.2 | 18–57 | 20 (11.9%) | 23.5 ± 3.6 | 18–32 | 49 (29.2%) |
| Kind of treatment | |||||||
| Fillings | 4 (2.4%) | 22.3 ± 2.2 | 20–25 | 1 (0.6%) | 31.0 ± 0.0 | 31 | 5 (3.0%) |
| Extraction | 23 (13.7%) | 25.0 ± 9.9 | 18–57 | 14 (8.3%) | 23.8 ± 3.9 | 18–32 | 37 (22.0%) |
| Dental check up | 11 (6.6%) | 25.9 ± 11.3 | 18–57 | 6 (3.6%) | 23.3 ± 2.7 | 19–27 | 17 (10.2%) |
Distribution of the responses of the nursing staff regarding their consumption of food and beverages
| Gender | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Women | Age in years | Men | Age in years | Total | |||
| n (%) | Mean SD | Min–max | n (%) | Mean SD | Min–max | n (%) | |
| Total | 87 (51.8%) | 23.6 ± 7.9 | 18–58 | 81 (48.2%) | 26.6 ± 3.2 | 18–38 | 168 (100%) |
| Dietary history | |||||||
| Meals per day | |||||||
| 1 | 1 (0.6%) | 23.0 ± 0.0 | 23 | 2 (1.2%) | 24.0 ± 4.2 | 21–27 | 3 (1.8%) |
| 2 | 15 (8.9%) | 26.1 ± 10.9 | 19–57 | 10 (6.0%) | 25.7 ± 5.6 | 18–38 | 25 (14.9%) |
| 3 | 71 (42.2%) | 23.0 ± 7.2 | 18–58 | 69 (41.1%) | 22.1 ± 2.5 | 18–31 | 140 (83.3%) |
| Sweets per day | |||||||
| 0 | 43 (25.6%) | 25.6 ± 10.4 | 18–58 | 44 (26.2%) | 22.8 ± 3.5 | 18–38 | 87 (51.8%) |
| 1 | 34 (20.2%) | 21.6 ± 3.7 | 18–40 | 27 (16.1%) | 22.8 ± 3.1 | 18–31 | 61 (36.3%) |
| 2 | 10 (5.9%) | 21.4 ± 1.3 | 19–23 | 5 (3.0%) | 22.2 ± 0.84 | 21–23 | 15 (8.9%) |
| ≥ 3 | 0 (0.0%) | – | – | 5 (3.0%) | 20.4 ± 1.5 | 18–22 | 5 (3.0%) |
| Softdrinks per day | |||||||
| 0 | 40 (23.8%) | 23.7 ± 7.6 | 18–58 | 35 (20.8%) | 22.4 ± 2.7 | 18–32 | 75 (44.6%) |
| 1 | 46 (27.4%) | 23.5 ± 7.9 | 18–57 | 40 (23.8%) | 23.1 ± 3.7 | 18–38 | 86 (51.2%) |
| 2 | 1 (0.6%) | 19.0 ± 0.0 | 19 | 5 (3.0%) | 21.0 ± 1.7 | 18–22 | 6 (3.6%) |
| > 2 | 0 (0.0%) | – | – | 1 (0.6%) | 20.0 ± 0.0 | 20 | 1 (0.6%) |
| Sugar-sweetened tea per day | |||||||
| 0 | 6 (3.6%) | 28.8 ± 12.6 | 18–49 | 9 (5.3%) | 22.2 ± 3.3 | 18–30 | 15 (8.9%) |
| 1 | 69 (41.1%) | 22.9 ± 6.7 | 18–58 | 65 (38.7%) | 22.5 ± 3.2 | 18–38 | 134 (79.8%) |
| 2 | 12 (7.1%) | 24.3 ± 11.2 | 18–57 | 6 (3.6%) | 24.7 ± 3.3 | 22–31 | 18 (10.7%) |
| > 2 | 0 (0.0%) | – | – | 1 (0.6%) | 21.0 ± 0.0 | 21 | 1 (0.6%) |
| Consumption of tobacco/alcohol | |||||||
| Alcohol | 2 (1.2%) | 22.0 ± 1.4 | 21–23 | 3 (1.8%) | 27.7 ± 9.3 | 20–38 | 5 (3.0%) |
| Tobacco | 0 (0.0%) | – | – | 2 (1.2%) | 31.5 ± 9.2 | 25–38 | 2 (1.2%) |
Caries experience of the participants: Decayed, Missing, and Filled Teeth Index
| Gender | Total (n = 168) | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Men (n = 81) | Women (n = 87) | |||||||||||
| Decayed teeth | missing teeth | filled teeth | DMF/T | Decayed teeth | missing teeth | filled teeth | DMF/T | Decayed teeth | missing teeth | filled teeth | DMF/T | |
| Mean (SD) | 4.31 (3.80) | 1.04 (1.44) | 0.04 (0.25) | 5.38 (4,01) | 4.53 (3.41) | 2.51 (3.11) | 0.13 (0.40) | 7.15 (4.82) | 4.42 (3.60) | 1.80 (2.55) | 0.08 (0.34) | 6.30 (4.53) |
| Min–max | 0–24 | 0–6 | 0–2 | 0–24 | 0–14 | 0–19 | 0–2 | 0–25 | 0–24 | 0–19 | 0–2 | 0–25 |
| n | 349 | 84 | 3 | 436 | 394 | 218 | 11 | 622 | 743 | 302 | 14 | 1058 |
| Percentile values | ||||||||||||
| 25 | 1.50 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 4.00 | 2.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.00 |
| 50 median | 4.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 5.00 | 4.00 | 2.00 | 0.00 | 7.00 | 4.00 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 6.00 |
| 75 | 6.00 | 2.00 | 0.00 | 8.00 | 6.00 | 4.00 | 0.00 | 9.00 | 6.00 | 3.00 | 0.00 | 8.00 |
DMF/T, Decayed, Missing, and Filled Teeth
Number of decayed teeth, missing teeth, and filled teeth distributed by gender
| Gender | Total (n) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Women (n) | Men (n) | ||
| Decayed (D) | |||
| 0 | 10 | 9 | 19 |
| 1 | 8 | 11 | 19 |
| 2 | 8 | 7 | 15 |
| 3 | 12 | 8 | 20 |
| 4 | 11 | 19 | 30 |
| 5 | 9 | 6 | 15 |
| 6 | 10 | 3 | 13 |
| 7 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| 8 | 6 | 7 | 13 |
| 9 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| 10 | 4 | 1 | 5 |
| 11 | 4 | 2 | 6 |
| 12 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| 13 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| 14 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Missing (M) | |||
| 0 | 22 | 44 | 66 |
| 1 | 11 | 13 | 24 |
| 2 | 23 | 12 | 35 |
| 3 | 9 | 4 | 13 |
| 4 | 12 | 6 | 20 |
| 5 | 4 | 1 | 5 |
| 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| 8 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 9 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Filled (F) | |||
| 0 | 78 | 79 | 157 |
| 1 | 7 | 1 | 8 |
| 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| Total | 87 | 81 | 168 |
Factors associated with DMFT of the participants based on a linear regression analysis
| R2 = 0.298 | Regression coefficient B | 95% confidence interval (CI) for B | SD | Beta | T | sig | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Min | Max | ||||||
| (constant) | 0.475 | − 4.721 | 5.671 | 2.631 | 0.181 | 0.857 | |
| Gender | − 1.809 | − 3.011 | − 0.607 | 0.609 | − 0.200 | − 2.972 | 0.003 |
| Age | 0.250 | 0.150 | 0.350 | 0.051 | 0.339 | 4.928 | 0.000 |
| Angle class | − 2.144 | − 3.225 | − 1.064 | 0.547 | − 0.269 | − 3.922 | 0.000 |
| Dental care per day | 0.938 | 0.043 | 1.832 | 0.453 | 0.141 | 2.071 | 0.040 |
| Meals a day | 0.100 | − 1.334 | 1.533 | 0.726 | 0.010 | 0.137 | 0.891 |
| Sweets per day | 0.776 | 0.163 | 1.390 | 0.311 | 0.205 | 2.500 | 0.013 |
| Sugar-sweetened tea per day | 0.982 | − 0.288 | 2.253 | 0.643 | 0.109 | 1.527 | 0.129 |
| Soft drinks per day | 0.310 | − 0.898 | 1.519 | 0.612 | 0.040 | 0.508 | 0.612 |
Factors associated with OHI-S of the participants based on a linear regression analysis
| R2 = 0.153 | Regression coefficient B | 95% CI for B | SD | Beta | T | Sig | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Min | Max | ||||||
| (Constant) | − 0.448 | − 1.399 | 0.504 | 0.482 | − 0.930 | 0.354 | |
| Gender | 0.189 | − 0.031 | 0.410 | 0.111 | 0.126 | 1.698 | 0.091 |
| Age | 0.025 | 0.006 | 0.043 | 0.009 | 0.202 | 2.672 | 0.008 |
| Angle class | − 0.258 | − 0.456 | − 0.061 | 0.100 | − 0.195 | − 2.579 | 0.011 |
| Dental care per day | 0.197 | 0.033 | 0.361 | 0.083 | 0.178 | 2.379 | 0.019 |
| Meals a day | 0.260 | − 0.003 | 0.522 | 0.133 | 0.149 | 1.953 | 0.053 |
| Sweets per day | 0.026 | − 0.086 | 0.139 | 0.057 | 0.041 | 0.460 | 0.646 |
| Sugar-sweetened tea per day | 0.169 | − 0.063 | 0.402 | 0.118 | 0.113 | 1.438 | 0.153 |
| Soft drinks per day | 0.040 | − 0.182 | 0.261 | 0.112 | 0.031 | 0.354 | 0.724 |
Factors associated with attritions, recessions and the occurrence of a diastema based on a binary logistic regression
| Regression coefficient B | SD | Wald | df | Sig | Exp(B) | 95% CI for EXP(B) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Min | Max | |||||||
| Binary logistic regression for attritions | ||||||||
| Gender | 1.096 | 0.625 | 3.073 | 1 | 0.080 | 2.992 | 0.879 | 10.185 |
| Age | 0.074 | 0.033 | 4.953 | 1 | 0.026 | 1.077 | 1.009 | 1.150 |
| Constant | − 4.753 | 1.099 | 18.710 | 1 | 0.000 | 0.009 | ||
| Binary logistic regression for recessions | ||||||||
| Gender | 0.703 | 0.393 | 3.206 | 1 | 0.073 | 2.019 | 0.936 | 4.358 |
| Age | 0.062 | 0.028 | 5.057 | 1 | 0.025 | 1.064 | 1.008 | 1.123 |
| Constant | − 3.096 | 0.759 | 16.632 | 1 | 0.000 | 0.045 | ||
| Binary logistic regression for the occurrence of a diastema | ||||||||
| Gender | 0.150 | 0.356 | 0.178 | 1 | 0.673 | 1.162 | 0.578 | 2.335 |
| Age | 0.040 | 0.026 | 2.234 | 1 | 0.135 | 1.040 | 0.988 | 1.096 |
| Constant | − 2.034 | 0.691 | 8.660 | 1 | 0.003 | 0.131 | ||
Incidence of Kennedy Class condition in absolute frequencies distributed in upper and lower jaw
| III | III/1 | III/2 | III/3 | Total | DMF/T | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kennedy Class III | ||||||
| Upper jaw | 15 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 20 | |
| Lower jaw | 31 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 40 | |
| Total | 46 | 12 | 1 | 1 | 60 | 8.6 |
Fig. 1Absolute frequencies of angle classification of the participants subdivided into neutral, distal, and mesial occlusion
Fig. 2Absolute frequencies of intraoral characteristics of the participants subdivided into diastema, attrition, and recession