| Literature DB >> 35534778 |
Guy-Marino Hinnouho1,2, Daniela Hampel3,4, Setareh Shahab-Ferdows4, Maxwell A Barffour3,5,6, Liadhan McAnena7, Charles D Arnold3, K Ryan Wessells3, Sengchanh Kounnavong8, Lindsay H Allen3,4, Helene McNulty7, Sonja Y Hess3.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To assess the effects of intervention with a daily multiple micronutrient powder (MNP) on thiamine, riboflavin, folate, and B12 status among young Laotian children.Entities:
Keywords: Folate; Lao PDR; MNP; Micronutrient powder; Riboflavin; Thiamine; Vitamin B12; Young children
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35534778 PMCID: PMC9464137 DOI: 10.1007/s00394-022-02890-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur J Nutr ISSN: 1436-6207 Impact factor: 4.865
Fig. 1Lao Zinc Study flow diagram for B-vitamins samples collection. MNP, Micronutrient powder
Baseline characteristics of study participants by intervention group
| Variables | All | MNP | Control |
|---|---|---|---|
| 260 | 130 | 130 | |
| Age in months | 13.1 ± 4.9 | 13.4 ± 4.9 | 12.8 ± 4.8 |
| Females, | 119 (45.8) | 62 (47.7) | 57 (43.9) |
| Breastfeeding, (%) | 159 (84.1) | 77 (83.7) | 82 (84.5) |
| Minimum dietary diversitya, | 9 (4.8) | 5 (5.4) | 4 (4.1) |
| Minimum meal frequencyb, | 110 (58.2) | 50 (54.4) | 60 (61.9) |
| Consumption of iron-rich foods, | 122 (64.6) | 61 (66.3) | 61 (62.9) |
| Child anthropometric measures | |||
| Length (cm) | 71.6 ± 5.4 | 71.7 ± 5.6 | 71.4 ± 5.3 |
| Weight (kg) | 8.0 ± 1.2 | 8.0 ± 1.3 | 8.0 ± 1.2 |
| MUAC (cm) | 13.6 ± 1.0 | 13.6 ± 1.0 | 13.7 ± 0.9 |
| LAZ | − 1.7 ± 1.0 | − 1.7 ± 1.0 | − 1.6 ± 0.9 |
| WAZ | − 1.5 ± 0.9 | − 1.6 ± 0.9 | − 1.5 ± 0.8 |
| WLZ | − 0.9 ± 0.9 | − 0.9 ± 0.9 | − 0.9 ± 0.9 |
| Stunting, | 95 (36.5) | 54 (41.5) | 41 (31.5) |
| Wasting, | 32 (12.3) | 17 (13.1) | 15 (11.5) |
| Underweight, | 81 (31.2) | 48 (36.9) | 33 (25.4) |
| CRP, mg/L | 2.9 ± 6.2 | 2.6 ± 5.4 | 3.3 ± 7.0 |
| Elevated CRP (> 5 mg/L), | 40 (15.4) | 19 (14.6) | 21 (16.3) |
| AGP, g/L | 0.8 ± 0.5 | 0.8 ± 0.5 | 0.8 ± 0.5 |
| Elevated AGP (> 1 g/L), | 58 (22.4) | 32 (24.6) | 26 (20.2) |
| Hemoglobin concentrations, g/L | 105.5 ± 10.5 | 106.0 ± 11.3 | 105.0 ± 9.8 |
| Anemia, | 168 (64.6) | 79 (60.8) | 89 (68.5) |
| Thiamine concentrations, nmol/L | 78.5 ± 57.2 | 78.4 ± 57.3 | 78.6 ± 57.2 |
| Thiamine deficiency (< 70 nmol/L), | 151 (58.1) | 74 (56.9) | 77 (59.2) |
| EGRac | 1.44 ± 0.29 | 1.40 ± 0.24 | 1.48 ± 0.32 |
| Riboflavin deficiencyc (EGRac > = 1.4), | 130 (50.6) | 58 (45.0) | 72 (56.3) |
| Folate concentrations, nmol/L | 22.1 ± 10.1 | 21.2 ± 9.6 | 23.0 ± 10.5 |
| Folate deficiency (< 10 nmol/L), | 21 (8.1) | 11 (8.5) | 10 (7.7) |
| Vitamin B12 concentrations, pmol/L | 451.0 ± 180.8 | 466.0 ± 174.0 | 436.1 ± 187.0 |
| Low or marginal vitamin B12 (< 221 pmol/L), | 16 (6.2) | 5 (3.9) | 11 (8.5) |
| Maternal education (primary or lower), | 171 (66.8) | 91 (70.5) | 80 (63.0) |
| Maternal BMI, kg/m2 | 21.3 ± 2.8 | 21.9 ± 3.0 | 20.8 ± 2.6 |
| HFIAS, | |||
| Food secure | 98 (37.7) | 54 (41.5) | 44 (33.9) |
| Mildly food insecure access | 106 (40.8) | 46 (35.4) | 60 (46.2) |
| Moderately food insecure access | 34 (13.1) | 17 (13.1) | 17 (13.1) |
| Severely food insecure access | 22 (8.5) | 13 (10.0) | 9 (6.9) |
Values presented as mean ± standard deviation or n (%).
AGP α1-acid glycoprotein, BMI body mass index, CRP C-reactive protein, EGRac erythrocyte glutathione reductase activity coefficient, HFIAS household food insecurity access scale, LAZ length-for-age z score, MNP micronutrient powder, MUAC mid-upper arm circumference, WAZ weight-for-age z score, WLZ weight-for-length z score
aProportion of children 6–23 months of age who receive foods from 4 or more food groups
bProportion of breastfed and non-breastfed children 6–23 months of age who receive solid, semi-solid, or soft foods the minimum number of times or more
cn = 257 samples have been analyzed for riboflavin status
Effect of supplementation with daily micronutrient powder or daily placebo on endline thiamine, riboflavin, folate, and vitamin B12 status among young Laotian children
| MNP | Control | Effect size | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thiamine, eThDP | ||||
| Endline thiamine concentration, nmol/L | ||||
| Minimally adjusted | 109.5 ± 8.9 | 109.6 ± 8.9 | − 0.1 ± 8.9 | 0.980 |
| Fully adjusteda | 110.6 ± 8.9 | 109.4 ± 8.9 | 1.2 ± 8.9 | 0.924 |
| Prevalence of thiamine deficiency (< 70 nmol/L) | ||||
| Minimally adjusted | 19.0 | 18.7 | 1.01 | 0.950 |
| Fully adjusteda | 18.1 | 18.8 | 0.96 | 0.881 |
| Riboflavin, EGRac | ||||
| Endline EGRac | ||||
| Minimally adjusted | 1.46 ± 0.3 | 1.48 ± 0.3 | − 0.02 ± 0.3 | 0.314 |
| Fully adjustedb | 1.46 ± 0.3 | 1.49 ± 0.3 | − 0.03 ± 0.3 | 0.184 |
| Prevalence of riboflavin deficiency (EGRac > = 1.4), % | ||||
| Minimally adjusted | 56.7 | 59. 9 | 0.95 | 0.541 |
| Fully adjustedb | 56.4 | 61.0 | 0.92 | 0.364 |
| Folate | ||||
| Endline folate concentration, nmol/L | ||||
| Minimally adjusted | 28.2 ± 0.8 | 19.8 ± 0.8 | 8.4 ± 0.9 | < 0.001 |
| Fully adjustedc | 28.2 ± 0.8 | 19.9 ± 0.8 | 8.3 ± 0.9 | < 0.001 |
| Prevalence of folate deficiency (< 10 nmol/L), % | ||||
| Minimally adjusted | 2.2 | 9.5 | 0.23 | 0.026 |
| Fully adjustedc | 1.6 | 17.4 | 0.09 | 0.015 |
| Vitamin B12 | ||||
| Endline vitamin B12 concentration, pmol/L | ||||
| Minimally adjusted | 518.2 ± 24.5 | 521.0 ± 24.5 | − 2.9 ± 24.6 | 0.874 |
| Fully adjustedd | 523.3 ± 24.6 | 515.9 ± 24.8 | 7.4 ± 24.6 | 0.678 |
| Prevalence of vitamin B12 deficiency (< 221 pmol/L), % | ||||
| Minimally adjusted | 4.4 | 1.4 | 3.14 | 0.381 |
| Fully adjustedd | 3.7 | 1.6 | 2.31 | 0.491 |
Results shown as geometric mean ± geometric SD for eThDP and EGRac (eThDP and EGRac were log-transformed, and then, the estimates were back-transformed using Excel’s exponential function) and arithmetic mean ± SD for folate and vitamin B12. ANCOVA regression models were used to examine the difference in mean eThDP, EGRac, folate, and vitamin B12 at endline. A modified Poisson regression model was used to estimate the prevalence ratio of thiamine, riboflavin, folate, and B12 deficiencies).
EGRac erythrocyte glutathione reductase activity coefficient; eThDP erythrocyte thiamine diphosphate, Minimally adjusted adjusted for baseline value, age, and district, n 257 samples have been analyzed for riboflavin status
aFully adjusted = Minimally adjusted + LAZ, WAZ, maternal education, marital status, HFIAS, SES index, and health center
bFully adjusted = Minimally adjusted + sex and CRP
cFully adjusted = Minimally adjusted + WAZ, HFIAS, SES index, Hb, and CRP
dFully adjusted = Minimally adjusted + anemia and AGP
Associations between baseline thiamine, riboflavin, folate, and B12 deficiencies and potential risk factors among young Laotian children
| Thiamine (< 70 nmol/L) | EGRac (> = 1.4) | Folate (< 10 nmol/L) | B12 (< 221 pmol/L) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR [95% CI] | OR [95% CI] | OR [95% CI] | OR [95% CI] | |||||
| Child | ||||||||
| Weight, kg | 0.89 [0.65–1.22] | 0.488 | 0.85 [0.48–1.52] | 0.589 | 0.72 [0.34–1.50] | 0.377 | ||
| Length, cm | 1.10 [0.98–1.23] | 0.099 | 0.94 [0.84–1.05] | 0.259 | 0.86 [0.70–1.04] | 0.126 | 0.95 [0.75–1.19] | 0.651 |
| LAZ | 1.24 [0.94–1.65] | 0.125 | 0.84 [0.64–1.10] | 0.200 | 0.62 [0.37–1.04] | 0.070 | 0.80 [0.45–1.41] | 0.438 |
| WAZ | 0.91 [0.68–1.21] | 0.528 | 0.84 [0.48–1.47] | 0.536 | 0.72 [0.38–1.36] | 0.311 | ||
| WLZ | 1.13 [0.65–1.94] | 0.666 | 0.77 [0.41–1.44] | 0.418 | ||||
| Stunting | 0.83 [0.48–1.42] | 0.494 | 1.31 [0.76–2.24] | 0.334 | 1.11 [0.35–3.53] | 0.864 | ||
| Underweight | 1.15 [0.65–2.02] | 0.633 | 1.58 [0.90–2.78] | 0.110 | 1.09 [0.40–2.94] | 0.871 | 1.18 [0.33–4.21] | 0.800 |
| Wasting | 2.17 [0.92–5.15] | 0.078 | 0.32 [0.04–2.57] | 0.286 | 0.66 [0.08–5.58] | 0.706 | ||
| Breastfeeding | 0.56 [0.12–2.67] | 0.467 | - | - | ||||
| Iron rich foodsa | 1.57 [0.81–3.07] | 0.182 | 1.23 [0.62–2.43] | 0.550 | 4.46 [0.53–37.10] | 0.167 | 1.23 [0.31–4.91] | 0.771 |
| MDDa | 0.56 [0.14–2.30] | 0.423 | 0.33 [0.07–1.71] | 0.188 | 1.92 [0.20–18.27] | 0.571 | 3.48 [0.53–22.77] | 0.193 |
| MMFa | 1.65 [0.87–3.14] | 0.122 | 1.62 [0.85–3.10] | 0.138 | 0.90 [0.23–3.51] | 0.879 | 1.15 [0.31–4.24] | 0.828 |
| Hemoglobin, g/L | 0.99 [0.96–1.01] | 0.358 | 0.96 [0.92–1.00] | 0.061 | ||||
| Anemia, % | 1.42 [0.84–2.42] | 0.193 | 2.25 [0.75–6.77] | 0.149 | 1.42 [0.45–4.44] | 0.551 | ||
| CRP, mg/L | 1.03 [0.87–1.23] | 0.694 | 1.16 [0.98–1.39] | 0.089 | 0.88 [0.64–1.23] | 0.455 | 1.03 [0.72–1.48] | 0.860 |
| CRP > 5 mg/L | 1.10 [0.53–2.25] | 0.802 | 0.87 [0.23–3.30] | 0.839 | 1.01 [0.21–5.00] | 0.986 | ||
| AGP, g/L | 0.95 [0.59–1.53] | 0.840 | 1.29 [0.80–2.10] | 0.301 | 1.27 [0.53–3.07] | 0.594 | 0.74 [0.28–1.97] | 0.550 |
| AGP > 1 g/L | 0.69 [0.37–1.29] | 0.242 | 1.02 [0.54–1.92] | 0.960 | 1.37 [0.48–3.94] | 0.559 | 0.23 [0.03–1.87] | 0.168 |
| RBP, µmol/L | 0.94 [0.36–2.46] | 0.893 | 0.64 [0.24–1.68] | 0.362 | 0.82 [0.15–4.60] | 0.819 | 0.09 [0.01–1.14] | 0.063 |
| Ferritin, µg/L | 0.97 [0.72–1.30] | 0.830 | 0.59 [0.34–1.04] | 0.068 | 0.88 [0.49–1.59] | 0.673 | ||
| pF < 12 µg/L | 1.14 [0.63–2.05] | 0.662 | 1.76 [0.96–3.24] | 0.069 | 2.34 [0.89–6.18] | 0.085 | 1.82 [0.61–5.44] | 0.285 |
| sTfR, mg/L | 0.70 [0.30–1.68] | 0.424 | 1.73 [0.35–8.48] | 0.502 | 1.57 [0.28–9.99] | 0.610 | ||
| sTfR > 8.3 mg/L | 0.90 [0.53–1.52] | 0.690 | 1.37 [0.49–3.78] | 0.547 | 0.95 [0.33–2.78] | 0.930 | ||
| Maternal | ||||||||
| Age | 0.99 [0.95–1.04] | 0.713 | 1.02 [0.97–1.06] | 0.437 | 1.02 [0.94–1.11] | 0.611 | 1.00 [0.92–1.11] | 0.853 |
| Education | 1.10 [0.63–1.94] | 0.732 | 0.45 [0.14–1.48] | 0.190 | 0.68 [0.20–2.25] | 0.525 | ||
| Marital status (couple) | 1.19 [0.34–4.17] | 0.783 | 3.62 [0.92–14.26] | 0.065 | 0.57 [0.06–5.16] | 0.618 | 0.78 [0.08–7.58] | 0.833 |
| BMI | 1.00 [0.90–1.10] | 0.938 | 0.98 [0.90–1.10] | 0.743 | 0.93 [0.78–1.12] | 0.451 | 1.00 [0.82–1.20] | 0.962 |
| Household | ||||||||
| SES index | 0.93 [0.82–1.05] | 0.253 | 0.80 [0.62–1.01] | 0.064 | 1.03 [0.79–1.33] | 0.836 | ||
| HFIAS | 1.00 [0.89–1.11] | 0.972 | 1.06 [0.87–1.28] | 0.573 | 0.89 [0.69–1.15] | 0.376 | ||
Models adjusted for age at baseline, sex and district.
MDD Minimum dietary diversity, MMF Minimum meal frequency, AGP α1-acid glycoprotein, BMI body mass index; CRP C-reactive protein; EGRac erythrocyte glutathione reductase activity coefficient, HFIAS household food insecurity access scale, LAZ length-for-age z score; MUAC mid-upper arm circumference, RBP Retinol-Binding Protein, SES socio-economic status, sTfR soluble transferrin receptor, WAZ weight-for-age z score, WLZ weight-for-length z score.
an = 188