Literature DB >> 35534768

Racial and Ethnic Disparities Among Women Undergoing a Trial of Labor After Cesarean Delivery: Performance of the VBAC Calculator with and without Patients' Race/Ethnicity.

Ayisha Buckley1, Stephanie Sestito2, Tonia Ogundipe2, Jacqueline Roig2, Henri Mitchell Rosenberg2, Natalie Cohen2, Kelly Wang2, Guillaume Stoffels2, Teresa Janevic2, Chelsea DeBolt2, Camila Cabrera2, Elizabeth Cochrane2, Jill Berkin2, Angela Bianco2, Luciana Vieira2.   

Abstract

The Maternal Fetal Medicine Units Network (MFMU) vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) calculator is a clinical tool designed to predict trial of labor after cesarean delivery (TOLAC) success. The calculator has come under scrutiny for its inclusion of race and ethnicity, which systematically predicts a lower likelihood of success for patients who identify as African American or Hispanic. We hypothesized that the calculator would predict VBAC more accurately without the use of race or ethnicity. A retrospective chart review including all patients undergoing TOLAC from 2016 to 2019 was conducted. A multivariate logistic regression was used to compare one model that utilizes the original variables in predicting VBAC (model 1) and another that uses the same variables except for race and ethnicity (model 2). In model 1, race and ethnicity were the only variables not associated with the probability of successful TOLAC (p = 0.065). The area under the curve (AUC) for models 1 and 2 were 0.77 and 0.78, respectively. There was not a statistically significant difference between the predictive abilities of the two models (p = 0.40). Rates of PPH (p = 0.001), abruption (p = 0.04), intra-amniotic infection (p < 0.0001), and other postpartum complications (p = 0.005) differed significantly by race and ethnicity. The use of race and ethnicity did not contribute to the accuracy of VBAC prediction. The use of race and ethnicity in this predictive model should be omitted to prevent inherent bias and discrimination. There were also significant racial and ethnic differences in overall postpartum complication rates.
© 2022. Society for Reproductive Investigation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Racial and ethnic disparities; Trial of labor after cesarean delivery; Vaginal birth after cesarean

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35534768     DOI: 10.1007/s43032-022-00959-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Reprod Sci        ISSN: 1933-7191            Impact factor:   2.924


  7 in total

1.  Births: Final Data for 2014.

Authors:  Brady E Hamilton; Joyce A Martin; Michelle J K Osterman; Sally C Curtin; T J Matthews
Journal:  Natl Vital Stat Rep       Date:  2015-12

2.  Predicting the chance of vaginal delivery after one cesarean section: validation and elaboration of a published prediction model.

Authors:  Marie C Fagerberg; Karel Maršál; Karin Källén
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2015-03-10       Impact factor: 2.435

3.  Challenging the Use of Race in the Vaginal Birth after Cesarean Section Calculator.

Authors:  Darshali A Vyas; David S Jones; Audra R Meadows; Khady Diouf; Nawal M Nour; Julianna Schantz-Dunn
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2019-05-06

4.  Validation of a prediction model for vaginal birth after caesarean.

Authors:  Nils Chaillet; Emmanuel Bujold; Eric Dubé; William A Grobman
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Can       Date:  2013-02

5.  Delivery after prior cesarean: maternal morbidity and mortality.

Authors:  Yvonne W Cheng; Karen B Eden; Nicole Marshall; Leonardo Pereira; Aaron B Caughey; Jeanne-Marie Guise
Journal:  Clin Perinatol       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.430

6.  Development of a nomogram for prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.

Authors:  William A Grobman; Yinglei Lai; Mark B Landon; Catherine Y Spong; Kenneth J Leveno; Dwight J Rouse; Michael W Varner; Atef H Moawad; Steve N Caritis; Margaret Harper; Ronald J Wapner; Yoram Sorokin; Menachem Miodovnik; Marshall Carpenter; Mary J O'Sullivan; Baha M Sibai; Oded Langer; John M Thorp; Susan M Ramin; Brian M Mercer
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Unified standard for fetal growth: the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Fetal Growth Studies.

Authors:  Katherine L Grantz; Jagteshwar Grewal; Sungduk Kim; William A Grobman; Roger B Newman; John Owen; Anthony Sciscione; Daniel Skupski; Edward K Chien; Deborah A Wing; Ronald J Wapner; Angela C Ranzini; Michael P Nageotte; Sabrina Craigo; Stefanie N Hinkle; Mary E D'Alton; Dian He; Fasil Tekola-Ayele; Mary L Hediger; Germaine M Buck Louis; Cuilin Zhang; Paul S Albert
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-12-11       Impact factor: 10.693

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.