Literature DB >> 35534235

Serum Pepsinogen as a Biomarker for Gastric Cancer in the United States: A Nested Case-Control Study Using the PLCO Cancer Screening Trial Data.

Haejin In1,2,3, Srawani Sarkar1,3, Jessica Ward4, Patricia Friedmann1,5, Michael Parides1,5,6, Julie Yang7, Meira Epplein8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Gastric cancer lacks specific symptoms, resulting in diagnosis at later stages and high mortality. Serum pepsinogen is a biomarker for atrophic gastritis, a gastric cancer precursor, and may be useful to detect persons at increased risk of gastric cancer.
METHODS: The Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial was conducted in the United States between 1993 and 2001. ELISA-based pepsinogen tests were conducted on prediagnostic serum samples of 105 PLCO participants who developed gastric cancer and 209 age, sex, and race-matched controls. Pepsinogen positive (PG+) was defined as pepsinogen I ≤ 70 μg/L and pepsinogen I/II ratio ≤3.0. Results of conditional logistic regression models, and sensitivity and specificity, of PG+ for gastric cancer are reported.
RESULTS: Gastric cancer cases were more likely to be PG+ (31.4% vs. 5.5%, P < 0.001) at baseline than controls. Compared to PG-, PG+ was associated with an 8.5-fold increased risk for gastric cancer [95% confidence interval (CI) = 3.8-19.4]. This risk remained significant after adjusting for Helicobacter pylori, family history of gastric cancer, education, smoking, and BMI (aOR, 10.6; 95% CI, 4.3-26.2). In subgroup analysis, PG+ individuals were 11-fold more like to develop non-cardia gastric cancer (OR, 11.1; 95% CI, 4.3-28.8); conversely, they were not significantly more likely to develop cardia gastric cancer (OR, 2.0; 95% CI = 0.3-14.2). PG+ status yielded low sensitivity but high specificity for both noncardia (44.3%; 93.6%) and cardia gastric cancer (5.7%; 97.2%).
CONCLUSIONS: Prediagnostic serum pepsinogen levels from a large, prospective cohort study were associated with risk of gastric cancer, particularly noncardia gastric cancer. IMPACT: PG status may identify individuals at higher risk of noncardia gastric cancer for targeted screening or interventions. See related commentary by Zhou and Huang, p. 1257. ©2022 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35534235      PMCID: PMC9268394          DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-21-1328

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev        ISSN: 1055-9965            Impact factor:   4.090


  69 in total

Review 1.  Phases of biomarker development for early detection of cancer.

Authors:  M S Pepe; R Etzioni; Z Feng; J D Potter; M L Thompson; M Thornquist; M Winget; Y Yasui
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2001-07-18       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Low serum levels of pepsinogen and gastrin 17 are predictive of extensive gastric atrophy with high-risk of early gastric cancer.

Authors:  Ryousuke Kikuchi; Yasuhiko Abe; Katsunori Iijima; Tomoyuki Koike; Nobuyuki Ara; Kaname Uno; Kiyotaka Asanuma; Naoki Asano; Akira Imatani; Tooru Shimosegawa
Journal:  Tohoku J Exp Med       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.848

3.  The serum pepsinogen test as a predictor of gastric cancer: the Hisayama study.

Authors:  Yoshinori Oishi; Yutaka Kiyohara; Michiaki Kubo; Keiichi Tanaka; Yumihiro Tanizaki; Toshiharu Ninomiya; Yasufumi Doi; Kentaro Shikata; Koji Yonemoto; Tomoko Shirota; Takayuki Matsumoto; Mitsuo Iida
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2006-01-27       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Global cancer statistics, 2012.

Authors:  Lindsey A Torre; Freddie Bray; Rebecca L Siegel; Jacques Ferlay; Joannie Lortet-Tieulent; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 5.  Pathogenesis of Helicobacter pylori infection.

Authors:  Johannes G Kusters; Arnoud H M van Vliet; Ernst J Kuipers
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 6.  Eradication of gastric cancer is now both possible and practical.

Authors:  Akiko Shiotani; Putao Cen; David Y Graham
Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 15.707

7.  Mortality reduction from gastric cancer by endoscopic and radiographic screening.

Authors:  Chisato Hamashima; Michiko Shabana; Katsuo Okada; Mikizo Okamoto; Yoneatsu Osaki
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 6.716

8.  The Serum Pepsinogen Test as a Predictor of Kazakh Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Wei Juan Cai; Liang Yin; Qiang Kang; Zu Chen Zeng; Shao Liang Wang; Jiang Cheng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  Significance of Serum Pepsinogens as a Biomarker for Gastric Cancer and Atrophic Gastritis Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ya-kai Huang; Jian-chun Yu; Wei-ming Kang; Zhi-qiang Ma; Xin Ye; Shu-bo Tian; Chao Yan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Sensitivity and specificity of mass screening for gastric cancer using the measurment of serum pepsinogens.

Authors:  Y Hattori; H Tashiro; T Kawamoto; Y Kodama
Journal:  Jpn J Cancer Res       Date:  1995-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.