Literature DB >> 3553397

Who should treat epistaxis?

D G John, A I Alison, D J Scott, A R McRae, M J Allen.   

Abstract

A prospective study was undertaken of 75 patients complaining of epistaxis who presented to an Accident and Emergency Department. The patients were placed into four groups according to their presenting features, and various forms of appropriate management applied. It was found that in the group that had ceased bleeding on presentation, whether or not a bleeding point was visible, there was no benefit obtained by treatment. If the nose was still bleeding on presentation, and the bleeding point was visible, successful management could be obtained by cauterising the bleeding point. This is a treatment that could be carried out by either the General Practitioner or the Accident Department. If the nose was actively bleeding, and the bleeding point could not be seen, then even initially successful treatment by the Accident Department was usually found to be ineffective within forty-eight hours. It is suggested that this group should be referred to an ENT unit on presentation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3553397     DOI: 10.1017/s0022215100101409

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laryngol Otol        ISSN: 0022-2151            Impact factor:   1.469


  3 in total

1.  Training model for nasal packing.

Authors:  P M Sugarman; D J Alderson
Journal:  J Accid Emerg Med       Date:  1995-12

2.  Efficacy of conservative treatment modalities used in epistaxis.

Authors:  Urvashi Razdan; R M Raizada; V N Chaturvedi
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2004-01

3.  Analysis of night-time and weekend otolaryngology service.

Authors:  D P McShane
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 1.568

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.