Sebastian Farr1, Julian Augustin2, Sebastian Röhrich3, Martina Felbermeier3, Lena Hirtler4. 1. Department of Pediatric Orthopaedics and Foot and Ankle Surgery, Orthopaedic Hospital Speising, Vienna, Austria. sebastian.farr@oss.at. 2. Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Schwestern Ried, Ried, Austria. 3. Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. 4. Center for Anatomy and Cell Biology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: This study investigated the anatomic feasibility of a new surgical therapy option for radial head arthrosis using an autologous vascularized bone graft of the second metatarsal and proximal fibula to recreate the proximal radiohumeral joint. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Upper and lower extremities of eleven body donors were evaluated using CT prior to anatomic dissection. Several distinct anatomic parameters were measured on the ipsi- and contralateral radial and fibular head and the second metatarsal base: bone diameter, articular surface diameter, head height, metaphyseal (neck) diameter, articular surface radius, total articular surface area, and angulation of the articular surfaces (facet). Each dissection phase was photographed in a standardized fashion and all measurements were repeated by direct caliper-measurements. RESULTS: When comparing the proximal radius and fibula to search for anatomic similarities, similar values were found in the maximum articular surface diameter and minimum and maximum measures of the neck diameter. Comparing the proximal radius and the second metatarsal, statistically similar values were found in the maximum neck diameter performing direct measurements and CT evaluation, the maximum head diameter in CT evaluation and the articular facet angulation. CONCLUSIONS: Neither the proximal fibula nor the base of the second metatarsal are ideal bone grafts for replacement of the head of the radius. The base of the second metatarsal might be a bit more suitable as a potential donor since the angulation of the proximal articular facet is similar to that of the radius. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, anatomic study.
INTRODUCTION: This study investigated the anatomic feasibility of a new surgical therapy option for radial head arthrosis using an autologous vascularized bone graft of the second metatarsal and proximal fibula to recreate the proximal radiohumeral joint. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Upper and lower extremities of eleven body donors were evaluated using CT prior to anatomic dissection. Several distinct anatomic parameters were measured on the ipsi- and contralateral radial and fibular head and the second metatarsal base: bone diameter, articular surface diameter, head height, metaphyseal (neck) diameter, articular surface radius, total articular surface area, and angulation of the articular surfaces (facet). Each dissection phase was photographed in a standardized fashion and all measurements were repeated by direct caliper-measurements. RESULTS: When comparing the proximal radius and fibula to search for anatomic similarities, similar values were found in the maximum articular surface diameter and minimum and maximum measures of the neck diameter. Comparing the proximal radius and the second metatarsal, statistically similar values were found in the maximum neck diameter performing direct measurements and CT evaluation, the maximum head diameter in CT evaluation and the articular facet angulation. CONCLUSIONS: Neither the proximal fibula nor the base of the second metatarsal are ideal bone grafts for replacement of the head of the radius. The base of the second metatarsal might be a bit more suitable as a potential donor since the angulation of the proximal articular facet is similar to that of the radius. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, anatomic study.
Authors: Helmut Wegmann; Simon Heider; Michael Novak; Matthias Sperl; Tanja Kraus; Georg Singer; Holger Till Journal: J Shoulder Elbow Surg Date: 2018-11-27 Impact factor: 3.019
Authors: Francesco Falciglia; Marco Giordano; Angelo G Aulisa; Antonio Di Lazzaro; Vincenzo Guzzanti Journal: J Pediatr Orthop Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 2.324