| Literature DB >> 35531342 |
Li-Fang Yeo1,2, Soo Ching Lee3, Uma Devi Palanisamy1,2, Bak Khalid1, Qasim Ayub2,4, Shu Yong Lim4, Yvonne Al Lim3, Maude Elvira Phipps1,2.
Abstract
The Orang Asli (OA) of Malaysia have been relatively understudied where little is known about their oral and gut microbiomes. As human health is closely intertwined with the human microbiome, this study first assessed the cardiometabolic health in four OA communities ranging from urban, rural to semi-nomadic hunter-gatherers. The urban Temuan suffered from poorer cardiometabolic health while rural OA communities were undergoing epidemiological transition. The oral microbiota of the OA were characterised by sequencing the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene. The OA oral microbiota were unexpectedly homogenous, with comparably low alpha diversity across all four communities. The rural Jehai and Temiar PP oral microbiota were enriched for uncharacterised bacteria, exhibiting potential for discoveries. This finding also highlights the importance of including under-represented populations in large cohort studies. The Temuan oral microbiota were also elevated in opportunistic pathogens such as Corynebacterium, Prevotella, and Mogibacterium, suggesting possible oral dysbiosis in these urban settlers. The semi-nomadic Jehai gut microbiota had the highest alpha diversity, while urban Temuan exhibited the lowest. Rural OA gut microbiota were distinct from urban-like microbiota and were elevated in bacteria genera such as Prevotella 2, Prevotella 9, Lachnospiraceae ND3007, and Solobacterium. Urban Temuan microbiota were enriched in Odoribacter, Blautia, Parabacetroides, Bacteroides and Ruminococcacecae UCG-013. This study brings to light the current health trend of these indigenous people who have minimal access to healthcare and lays the groundwork for future, in-depth studies in these populations.Entities:
Keywords: cardiometabolic health; gut microbiota; indigenous health; oral microbiota; orang asli
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35531342 PMCID: PMC9074829 DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2022.812345
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol ISSN: 2235-2988 Impact factor: 6.073
Anthropometrics and cardiometabolic health measures of OA.
| Category | Asian Criteria | Total (%, n = 214) | Male (%, n = 80) | Female (%, n = 134) | Jehai (Semi-Nomadic, n = 83) (%) | Temiar (Sub-Urban, n = 97) (%) | Temuan (Urban, n = 34) (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Underweight | <18.5 | 11.21 | 16.25 | 8.21 | 15.66 | 8.25 | 8.82 |
| Normal | 18.5-22.9 | 32.71 | 35.00 | 31.34 | 42.17 | 28.87 | 20.59 | |
| Overweight | 23-29.9 | 25.70 | 26.25 | 25.37 | 16.87 | 42.27 | 0.00 | |
| Obese | ≥30 | 30.37 | 22.50 | 35.07 | 25.30 | 20.62 | 70.59 | |
|
| Healthy | <90cm (M), <80cm (F) | 41.98 | 64.56 | 28.57 | 30.86 | 49.48 | 47.06 |
| Risk | >90cm (M), | 58.02 | 35.44 | 71.43 | 69.14 | 50.52 | 52.94 | |
| >80cm (F) | ||||||||
|
| Normal | 4.0-5.6 | 64.37 | 53.73 | 71.03 | 87.80 | 43.24 | |
| Pre-diabetes | 5.7-6.4 | 28.74 | 40.30 | 21.50 | 7.32 | 50.00 | ||
| Diabetes | ≥6.5 | 6.90 | 5.97 | 7.48 | 4.88 | 6.76 | ||
|
| Healthy | 74.60 | 71.88 | 84.97 | 71.60 | 78.13 | ||
| Insulin-resistant | 0.9-1.7 | 25.40 | 28.13 | 15.03 | 28.40 | 21.88 | ||
|
| Low | <90/60 mmHg | 1.40 | 0.00 | 2.22 | 0.00 | 3.06 | 0.00 |
| Normal | <120/80 mmHg | 35.98 | 27.85 | 40.74 | 42.17 | 31.63 | 33.33 | |
| Pre-hypertension | <130/80 mmHg | 41.12 | 41.77 | 40.74 | 39.76 | 44.90 | 33.33 | |
| Stage 1 | <140/90 mmHg | 14.49 | 21.52 | 10.37 | 9.64 | 15.31 | 24.24 | |
| Stage 2 | <180/90 mmHg | 6.07 | 7.59 | 5.19 | 7.23 | 4.08 | 9.09 | |
| Stage 3 | >180/120 mmHg | 0.93 | 1.27 | 0.74 | 1.20 | 1.02 | 0.00 | |
|
| Healthy | <5.0(M), | 73.45 | 75.00 | 72.48 | 61.73 | 83.33 | |
| <4.5 (F) | ||||||||
| Risk | >5.0 (M), | 26.55 | 25.00 | 27.52 | 38.27 | 16.67 | ||
| >4.5 (F) | ||||||||
|
| Healthy | <3.5 (M), | 75.14 | 78.13 | 82.66 | 64.20 | 84.38 | |
| <3.0 (F) | ||||||||
| Risk | >3.5 (M), | 24.86 | 21.88 | 17.34 | 35.80 | 15.63 | ||
| >3.0 (F) | ||||||||
|
| Non-smoker | 58.17 | 23.08 | 79.23 | 76.92 | 40.63 | 64.71 | |
| Former | 9.62 | 16.67 | 5.38 | 2.56 | 13.54 | 14.71 | ||
| Smoker | 32.21 | 60.26 | 15.38 | 20.51 | 45.83 | 20.59 | ||
|
| 5-year risk ± 95% CI | 4.35 ± 0.88 | 5.94 ± 1.69 | 3.37 ± 0.93 | 4.06 ± 1.17 | 4.59 ± 1.30 | ||
|
| Yes | 44.63 | 36.76 | 49.54 | 33.33 | 54.17 | ||
| No | 55.37 | 63.24 | 50.46 | 66.67 | 45.83 |
Figure 1(A) Alpha diversity of OA oral microbiota unexpectedly low and homogenous (* p-value < 0.05). (B) Supervised CAP ordination plot shows distinct clusters with rural Jehai and Temiar PP microbiota grouping away from urban-like Temuan and Temiar GM.
Figure 2(A) Semi-nomadic Jehai had the highest alpha diversity, while urban Temuan had the lowest (*** p-value < 0.001). (B) OA gut microbiota formed four distinct clusters with some overlaps.
Summary of bacteria genera of differentially abundant bacteria genera which appeared significant in ALDEX2 analysis and appeared in the negative controls.
| Saliva | Genus | Sample ID | Sample Type | Body Site | Abundance (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OTU_ID | |||||
| 1363 |
| Saliva-neg | PCR | NA | 0.1582 |
| 1967 |
| Saliva-neg | Kit | Oral | 0.0333 |
| 1624 |
| Saliva-neg | Kit | Oral | 0.8975 |
| 565 |
| Saliva-neg | Kit | Oral | 1.4640 |
| 1137 |
| Saliva-neg | Kit | Oral | 0.0562 |
| 1655 |
| Saliva-neg | Kit | Oral | 1.4120 |
| 1662 |
| LF-Negative | Kit | Oral | 1.0638 |
| 342 | uncultured Porphyromonadaceae bacterium | Saliva-neg | Kit | Oral | 0.4596 |
| 2145 |
| Saliva-neg | Kit | Oral | 1.6717 |
|
| |||||
| 295 |
| Stool-neg | PCR | NA | 2.0000 |
| 1913 |
| Stool-neg | Kit | Gut | 6.4384 |
| 2206 |
| Stool-neg | Kit | Gut | 1.0461 |
| 199 | Lachnospiraceae ND3007 group | Stool-neg | Kit | Gut | 0.0670 |
| 993 |
| Stool-neg | Kit | Gut | 0.0593 |
| 350 | uncultured Porphyromonadaceae bacterium | Stool-neg | Kit | Gut | 0.0848 |