| Literature DB >> 35531177 |
Ataur Rahman1,2, Nasrullah Khan1, Achim Bräuning2, Rafi Ullah1, Inayat Ur Rahman3.
Abstract
Quercus-dominated forests are among the most important broad-leaved evergreen forests of the Hindu Kush ranges and are currently prone to drastic anthropogenic and climatic changes. The aim of this study was to provide basic data for the development of a regional oak forest ecosystem framework for ecological restoration and management plan development to maintain local peoples' livelihoods. Hence, we analyzed distribution patterns and environmental factors that affect regional oak forests' species composition and diversity. Ward's Agglomerative clustering divided oak-dominated forest communities into three groups: i.e., Group I, dominated by Quercus baloot had an importance value index (IVI) of 89.87 ± 4.31, Group II, dominated by Quercus dilatata had an IVI of 32.16 ± 15.01, and Group III, dominated by Quercus oblongata had an IVI of 83.14 ± 4.67, respectively. The environmental factors which vary significantly within these communities were latitude, elevation, clay content and bulk density of the soil. Wilting point, saturation point, and electrical conductivity were also considered as ecosystem structural variables. Canonical correspondence analysis (CCA) indicated that community structure was affected by various environmental factors including precipitation, slope angle, elevation, clay content, and relative humidity.Entities:
Keywords: Canonical correspondence analysis; Elevation gradient; Forest composition; Oak species; Tree diversity
Year: 2022 PMID: 35531177 PMCID: PMC9073057 DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2022.01.013
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi J Biol Sci ISSN: 2213-7106 Impact factor: 4.052
Fig. 1Location of the Swat District in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan showing the sampling sites in black points.
Average values (Mean ± stand error) of the environmental variables, i.e., topographic, edaphic, and soil parameters in the three community types (vegetation groups) isolated by Ward’s agglomerative cluster analysis.
| Latitude | Lat | 35.0 ± 0.12 | 34.9694 ± 0.19 | 34.58 ± 0.050 | 5.57 | 0.009 |
| Longitude | Long | 72.28 ± 0.031 | 72.29 ± 0.023 | 72.25 ± 0.016 | 1.72 | 0.196 |
| Elevation (meters) | Elev | 2017.7 ± 205.2 | 2289.5 ± 240.2 | 1659.4 ± 64.4 | 4.87 | 0.015 |
| Slope (degree) | Slope | 41.8 ± 1.8 | 41.14 ± 2.55 | 38.66 ± 1.14 | 1.15 | 0.33 |
| Clay (%) | Clay | 16.37 ± 1.17 | 17.5 ± 2.2 | 12.11 ± 1.02 | 4.65 | 0.018 |
| Silt (%) | Silt | 24.44 ± 2.20 | 26 ± 3.6 | 29.03 ± 2.74 | 0.66 | 0.52 |
| Sand (%) | Sand | 59.18 ± 2.66 | 56.38 ± 3.42 | 58.85 ± 3.08 | 0.17 | 0.84 |
| pH | pH | 6.4 ± 0.12 | 6.6 ± 0.17 | 6.26 ± 0.13 | 1.25 | 0.30 |
| Organic matter (%) | Om | 2.2 ± 0.78 | 4.6 ± 0.76 | 2.61 ± 0.54 | 2.92 | 0.071 |
| CaCO3 (%) | Lime | 3.16 ± 0.52 | 4.06 ± 0.61 | 3.61 ± 0.38 | 0.66 | 0.52 |
| Nitrogen (%) | N | 0.12 ± 0.04 | 0.18 ± 0.03 | 0.16 ± 0.03 | 0.50 | 0.60 |
| Phosphorus (mg/kg) | P | 8.24 ± 0.63 | 7.44 ± 1.12 | 12.94 ± 4.46 | 0.61 | 0.54 |
| Potassium (mg/kg) | K | 146.25 ± 27.07 | 233.42 ± 37.52 | 186.33 ± 26.33 | 1.55 | 0.22 |
| Wilting point (kPa) | Wp | 0.114 ± 0.4 | 0.11 ± 0.09 | 0.09 ± 0.004 | 4.36 | 0.02 |
| Field capacity (kPa) | Fc | 0.22 ± 0.6 | 0.23 ± 0.09 | 0.21 ± 0.07 | 1.31 | 0.28 |
| Bulk density (g/cm3) | Bd | 1.4 ± 0.1 | 1.46 ± 0.02 | 1.52 ± 0.01 | 3.43 | 0.046 |
| Saturation (kPa) | Sat | 0.44 ± 0.5 | 0.44 ± 0.008 | 0.42 ± 0.06 | 3.41 | 0.047 |
| Electrical conductivity (mm/hr) | Cond | 12.41 ± 1.6 | 12.8 ± 0.03 | 23.46 ± 2.80 | 5.44 | 0.01 |
| Available water (%) | Aw | 0.10 ± 0.38 | 0.11 ± 0.005 | 0.11 ± 0.04 | 0.46 | 0.63 |
Fig. 3Distribution of different Oak-dominated forests (Groups) along the elevation gradient in Swat District, Hindukush Range Mountain of northern Pakistan.
Pearson’s correlations among different environmental variables associated with Quercus species from 30 different stands of Swat Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.
| Lat | Long | Ele | Slope | Clay | Silt | Sand | pH | OM | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lat | 1 | ||||||||
| Long | −0.175 | 1 | |||||||
| Ele | 0.727*** | 0.009 | 1 | ||||||
| Slope | 0.466** | −0.18 | 0.648*** | 1 | |||||
| Clay | 0.482** | −0.16 | 0.363* | 0.326 | 1 | ||||
| Silt | −0.298 | −0.11 | −0.155 | 0.171 | −0.116 | 1 | |||
| Sand | 0.043 | 0.181 | −0.032 | −0.318 | −0.378* | −0.87*** | 1 | ||
| pH | 0.406* | 0.083 | 0.372* | 0.162 | 0.373* | −0.392* | 0.183 | 1 | |
| OM | 0.088 | 0.188 | 0.04 | 0.099 | 0.059 | 0.347 | −0.352* | −0.021 | 1 |
| Li | 0.027 | 0.201 | −0.119 | −0.22 | −0.079 | −0.421* | 0.431* | 0.052 | 0.32 |
| N | −0.185 | 0.105 | −0.064 | 0.139 | −0.129 | 0.114 | −0.043 | −0.024 | 0.686*** |
| P | −0.199 | 0.022 | −0.081 | −0.155 | −0.133 | 0.493** | −0.395* | −0.362* | −0.085 |
| K | 0.144 | 0.256 | 0.116 | 0.06 | 0.034 | −0.176 | 0.147 | 0.372* | 0.45** |
| Wp | 0.485** | −0.16 | 0.36* | 0.313 | 0.997*** | −0.102 | −0.39* | 0.381* | 0.049 |
| Fp | 0.217 | −0.2 | 0.207 | 0.368* | 0.768*** | 0.541** | −0.87*** | 0.07 | 0.256 |
| Bd | −0.37* | 0.183 | −0.321 | −0.42* | −0.91*** | −0.267 | 0.694*** | −0.215 | −0.181 |
| Sat | 0.368* | −0.18 | 0.31* | 0.416* | 0.914*** | 0.269 | −0.69*** | 0.21 | 0.181 |
| Cond | −0.453 | 0.133 | −0.38* | −0.43* | −0.90*** | −0.076 | 0.509** | −0.3 | −0.08 |
| Aw | −0.25 | −0.13 | −0.114 | 0.2 | 0.003 | 0.991*** | −0.92*** | −0.354* | 0.346 |
| Lime | %N | P | K | Wp | Fc | Bd | Sat | Con | |
| Li | 1 | ||||||||
| N | 0.298 | 1 | |||||||
| P | −0.229 | −0.1*** | 1 | ||||||
| K | 0.393 | 0.489** | −0.317 | 1 | |||||
| Wp | −0.094 | −0.133 | −0.106 | 0.032 | 1 | ||||
| Fp | −0.348 | −0.043 | 0.23 | −0.094 | 0.78*** | 1 | |||
| Bd | 0.246 | 0.082 | −0.047 | 0.014 | −0.91*** | −0.94*** | 1 | ||
| Sat | −0.247 | −0.085 | 0.049 | −0.015 | 0.917*** | 0.941*** | −0.99*** | 1 | |
| Cond | 0.191 | 0.113 | 0.06 | −0.058 | −0.90*** | −0.80*** | 0.949*** | −0.95*** | 1 |
| Aw | −0.446** | 0.093 | 0.49** | −0.194 | 0.018 | 0.64*** | −0.374* | 0.376* | −0.172 |
Note: Lat: Latitude, Long: Longitude; Elev: Elevation; pH: pH (1:5) OM: % Org Matter; Li: % Lime; N: % Nitrogen; P:
Phosphorous (mg/kg); K: potassium (mg/kg). Confidence levels: *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001.
Results of canonical correspondence analysis of species-environmental variables operating on oak-dominated forests in Swat District, Pakistan.
| Total variance (“inertia”) in the species data: 3.8440 | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Axis 1 | Axis 2 | Axis 3 | |
| Eigenvalue | 0.756 | 0.446 | 0.277 |
| species variance %age | 19.7 | 11.6 | 7.2 |
| Cumulative % variance | 19.7 | 31.3 | 38.5 |
| Pearson Correlation | 0.88 | 0.72 | 0.64 |
| Kendall (Rank) Correlation | 0.52 | 0.60 | 0.40 |
Correlations and biplot scores for 15 factors operating on oak-dominated forest in Swat District, Pakistan.
| Correlations* | Biplot Scores | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S.No | Variables | Axis 1 | Axis 2 | Axis 3 | Axis 1 | Axis 2 | Axis 3 |
| 1 | Elevation | 0.88 | 0.043 | −0.241 | 0.344 | 0.022 | −0.108 |
| 2 | Slope | 0.51 | 0.057 | −0.614 | 0.219 | 0.028 | −0.275 |
| 3 | Clay | 0.569 | −0.29 | −0.065 | 0.245 | −0.144 | −0.029 |
| 4 | Silt | −0.068 | 0.374 | −0.224 | −0.029 | 0.186 | −0.1 |
| 5 | Sand | −0.215 | −0.206 | 0.24 | −0.092 | −0.103 | 0.108 |
| 6 | P.H(1:5) | 0.357 | −0.119 | 0.14 | 0.154 | −0.059 | 0.063 |
| 7 | Org Matt | 0.364 | 0.225 | 0.266 | 0.157 | 0.112 | 0.119 |
| 8 | Lime | 0.126 | 0.156 | 0.5 | 0.054 | 0.078 | 0.224 |
| 9 | N | 0.01 | 0.202 | 0.057 | 0.004 | 0.101 | 0.026 |
| 10 | P | −0.237 | 0.154 | −0.017 | −0.102 | 0.077 | −0.007 |
| 11 | K | 0.174 | 0.362 | 0.263 | 0.075 | 0.18 | 0.118 |
| 12 | Tpa | 0.157 | 0.302 | 0.005 | 0.067 | 0.15 | 0.002 |
| 13 | Tmi | 0.146 | −0.306 | −0.472 | 0.063 | −0.152 | −0.211 |
| 14 | Precip | −0.184 | 0.49 | −0.338 | −0.079 | 0.244 | −0.151 |
| 15 | RH | −0.529 | 0.049 | 0.203 | −0.227 | 0.024 | 0.091 |
Fig. 2Classification of 30 sample stands dominated by Quercus species into three groups (vegetation types) using Ward’s Agglomerative clustering procedure. Note: St. (Stand number); I (Group-I); II (Group-II); III (Group-III).
Importance value index of tree species classified after applying a Ward’s agglomerative clustering procedure (x represents absence of the species in particular group).
| Species Name | Species Code | Group I | Group II | Group III |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean ± SE | Mean ± SE | Mean ± SE | ||
| Quercus | Qo | X | x | |
| Qd | 1.37 ± 0.90 | 0.57 ± 0.57 | ||
| Qb | 7.16 ± 5.41 | x | ||
| Qs | 0.37 ± 0.37 | x | ||
| Pr | 3 ± 3 | |||
| Pw | X | 2.66 ± 1.97 | x | |
| Of | 2.25 ± 2.25 | |||
| DI | X | x | 3.07 ± 1.58 | |
| Dk | X | x | 0.21 ± 0.21 | |
| Ma | X | x | 1.78 ± 1.78 | |
| Cd | x | 1.21 ± 1.21 | ||
| Tf | X | 1 ± 1 | x | |
| Ap | X | 0.83 ± 0.83 | x | |
| Ps | X | 3.83 ± 2.80 | x | |
| Pg | 0.75 ± 0.75 | x | x | |
| Jr | 0.25 ± 0.25 | x | x | |
| Pj | X | 1.33 ± 1.33 | x | |
| Ai | X | 0.5 ± 0.5 | x |
Fig. 4Box plots of environmental variables that significantly affect the distribution of oak-dominated forest in the study region. Namely, these factors include latitude (a), elevation (b), clay content of the soil (c), wilting point (d), and electrical conductivity (e), respectively.
Fig. 5CCA-ordination plot for vegetation and environmental variables operating on oak-dominated communities in the studied area. For explanation of species codes, please refer to Table 1.