| Literature DB >> 35531154 |
Muhammad Saeed1, Tanveer Ahmad1, Mukhtar Alam1, Laila A Al-Shuraym2, Nazeer Ahmed1, Mohammed Ali Alshehri3, Hidayat Ullah1, Samy M Sayed4.
Abstract
In Pakistan and all over the world, the Peach Fruit Fly (PFF), Bactrocera zonata (Saunders.) and the Melon Fruit Fly (MFF), Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett.) are considered severe and polyphagous insect pests for various fruits and vegetables. The current study was conducted to check the Laboratory preference and performance of B. cucurbitae and B. zonata on selected Fruits Citrus (Citrus sinensis), Apple (Malus domestica), Banana (Musa acuminate), and vegetable, Sponge gourd (luffa aegyptiaca), Bitter gourd (Momordica charantia) Pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata) under laboratory conditions. The study showed that Sponge Gourd was the preferable host with the mean pupae resurgence of (242.33), followed by Bitter Gourd (78.333) among selected vegetables. At the same time, among fruits, a banana was the preferable host with mean pupae resurgence (204.33), followed by orange (158.33). The pumpkin and apple was the least preferable host for both B. cucurbitae and B. zonata, with mean pupae resurgence (35.667) and (79.000), respectively. Furthermore, the study showed that Banana was the preferable host for B. Zonata among intact and infested fruits, whereas B. cucurbitaee showed the most preference to Bitter gourd among intact and infested vegetables showing significantly different results among intact and infested fruits and vegetables. Maximum number of eggs, pupa, female flies, male flies, adult emergence from pupa (flies) and period of pupa of B. zonata and B. cucurbitae on banana and bitter gourd. While, other fruits and vegetables showed the minimum number of eggs, pupa, female flies, male flies, adult emergence from pupa (flies) and period of the pupa. The current study concluded there is a need to evaluate other host plants against these fruit fly species for effective control.Entities:
Keywords: Development; Emergence; Host preference; Melon fly; Peach fruit fly
Year: 2021 PMID: 35531154 PMCID: PMC9072918 DOI: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2021.12.001
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Saudi J Biol Sci ISSN: 2213-7106 Impact factor: 4.052
Pupal recovery, weight and Emergence of B. Zonata and B. Cucurbitae on six tested hosts.
| Mean ± SE | Mean ± SE | Mean ± SE | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Banana | 204.33 a ± 10.09 | 0.0507 ab ± 0.002 | 193.33 a ± 9.98 |
| Orange | 158.33 a ± 8.88 | 0.0973 a ± 0.003 | 140.00 b ± 5.55 |
| Apple | 79.000 a ± 6.76 | 0.0203 b ± 0.001 | 60.000 c ± 2.33 |
| Bitter gourd | 78.333 b ± 6.75 | 0.0417 b ± 0.003 | 67.000 b ± 2.55 |
| Sponge gourd | 242.33 a ± 10.00 | 0.1327 a ± 0.002 | 222.33 a ± 10.99 |
| Pumpkin | 35.667 b ± 2.33 | 0.0187 b ± 0.002 | 25.333 c ± 1.99 |
Fig. 1Preference of B. Zonata for fruit and vegetables hosts in the laboratory.
Fig. 2Preference of B. cucurbitae (%) for fruit and vegetables hosts in the laboratory.
Fig. 3Eggs laid by B. Zonata and B. Cucurbitae in fruits and vegetables hosts.
Fig. 4Numbers of pupae, male, and female flies of B. Zonata.
Fig. 5No of pupae, male, and female flies of B. Cucurbitae.
Fig. 6Survivorship of B. Zonata from pupae to adult.
Fig. 7Survivorship of B. Cucurbitae from pupae to adult.