| Literature DB >> 35529804 |
Chuchu Li1, Stanislav N Gorb1, Hamed Rajabi2.
Abstract
Cuticle is one of the most abundant, but least studied, biological composites. As a result, it has contributed very little to the field of biomimetics. An important step to overcome this problem is to study cuticle biomechanics by means of accurate mechanical measurements. However, due to many reasons, mechanical testing on fresh cuticle specimens is not always possible. Hence, researchers often use stored specimens to measure properties of arthropod cuticle. Our knowledge about the influence of different treatment methods on cuticle properties is currently very limited. In this study, we investigated the effect of freezing, desiccation, and rehydration on the elastic modulus of the hind tibial cuticle of locusts obtained by nanoindentation. We found that all the mentioned treatments significantly influence cuticle properties. This is in contrast to previous reports suggesting that freezing did not significantly influence the elastic modulus of native cuticle specimens tested in bending. In the light of our data, we suggest that changes of the elastic modulus of cuticle are not solely due to changes of the water content. Our results provide a platform for more accurate measurements of cuticle properties.Entities:
Keywords: biomimetics; cuticle; locust; material properties; mechanical testing; nanoindentation; water content
Year: 2022 PMID: 35529804 PMCID: PMC9039525 DOI: 10.3762/bjnano.13.33
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Beilstein J Nanotechnol ISSN: 2190-4286 Impact factor: 3.272
Figure 1Specimens. (a) The middle part of the hind tibia was cut from the desert locust. Indents were performed on the transverse section of the specimen. (b) Tibial specimens were glued on the sample holder and surrounded by wet cotton. The wet cotton was covered by a layer of parafilm to minimize desiccation. (c) SEM image of an indent measured for a dry tibia. (d) Elastic modulus as a function of the indentation depth obtained from the CSM technique.
Figure 2Elastic modulus and water content of specimens in different treatment groups. (a) The elastic moduli of fresh (n = 5), frozen (n = 5), desiccated (n = 5), and rehydrated (n = 5) hind tibiae are 4.8 ± 0.2, 7.3 ± 0.2, 9.4 ± 0.5, and 6.2 ± 0.2 GPa, respectively. Significant differences were determined via Holm–Sidak one-way ANOVA. Different capital letters indicate significant differences (P < 0.001). (b) Elastic modulus of fresh tibiae as a function of the recorded time. Different samples are presented in different colors. Each data point represents the elastic modulus obtained from a distinct indentation site. (c) Water contents of fresh (n = 15), frozen (n = 15), desiccated (n = 15), and rehydrated (n = 15) hind tibiae. Significant differences were determined via Kruskal–Wallis one-way ANOVA on ranks. Different capital letters indicate significant differences (P < 0.05). (d) Water contents of fresh (n = 3) and frozen tibiae (n = 3) as function of the time.
Figure 3Elastic modulus of (a) frozen, (b) desiccated and (c) rehydrated tibiae against recorded time. Different colors represent different samples.