| Literature DB >> 35529575 |
Zhounan Huangfu1,2, Lei Zhou3, Jing Zhao1,4, Sombat Kotchasit2, Wanmei Chen5.
Abstract
Along with the rapid development of big data, artificial intelligence, and information technology, the relationship quality (RQ) between short video applications and users is important for the sustainable development of short video applications. However, the existing studies have explored the mechanism of the role of RQ in a limited way. In order to respond to this critical issue, this study constructs a theoretical model based on attachment theory and combined with self-determination theory, with autonomy needs (AN), competence needs (CN), and relationship needs (RN) as influencing factors, emotional attachment (EA) as mediating variables and relationship quality as outcome variables, and the moderating role of attachment anxiety (AA) in which this study also analyzes the mechanism of short video applications users' psychological needs on relationship quality by combining the moderating role of AA. In this study, a sample of 512 university students using short video applications was used. The results of the data analysis indicated that EA was significantly influenced by psychological needs that played a positive role in relationship quality and mediated the relationship between psychological needs and relationship quality. The results of further analysis also revealed that attachment anxiety plays a moderating role in the relationship between emotional attachment and relationship quality. This study examines the intrinsic mechanism by which psychological needs affect relationship quality through emotional attachment, reveals the practical effects of short video applications users' sustained use behavior, and provides a reference for innovative management and business practices of short video applications.Entities:
Keywords: attachment anxiety; attachment theory; emotional attachment; psychological needs; relationship quality
Year: 2022 PMID: 35529575 PMCID: PMC9070564 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.858521
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
Figure 1Theoretical model.
Descriptive statistical analysis.
| Variables | Item | Frequency | % | Cumulative % |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Male | 217 | 42.38 | 42.38 |
| Female | 295 | 57.62 | 100 | |
| Age | 18–23 (inclusive) | 182 | 35.55 | 35.55 |
| 23–26 (inclusive) | 164 | 32.03 | 67.58 | |
| 27–30 (inclusive) | 146 | 28.52 | 96.10 | |
| 31 (inclusive) and above | 20 | 3.90 | 100 | |
| Marriage | Married | 20 | 3.91 | 3.91 |
| Unmarried | 492 | 96.09 | 100 | |
| Education level | College | 162 | 31.64 | 31.64 |
| Ordinary undergraduate schools | 170 | 33.20 | 64.84 | |
| First-class universities and disciplines of the world | 102 | 19.92 | 84.76 | |
| Key universities | 78 | 15.24 | 100 | |
| Time | Less than 1 year | 166 | 32.42 | 32.42 |
| 1 ~ 2 years (inclusive) | 296 | 57.81 | 90.23 | |
| Over 3 years | 50 | 9.77 | 100 |
The analysis of confirmatory factor analysis (CFA).
| Variables | Measurement items | Factor loading | CR | AVE |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AN | AN1 Tik Tok makes me feel a sense of freedom | 0.842 | 0.822 | 0.540 |
| AN2 Tik Tok is the social media I really want to use | 0.778 | |||
| AN3 Tik Tok allows me to be my most authentic self | 0.619 | |||
| AN4 I think Tik Tok is the social media I am really interested in | 0.680 | |||
| CN | CN1 Tik Tok makes me feel confident | 0.719 | 0.865 | 0.618 |
| CN2 Tik Tok makes me feel capable of doing what I want to do | 0.750 | |||
| CN3 Tik Tok makes me feel capable | 0.787 | |||
| CN4 Tik Tok makes me feel successful | 0.878 | |||
| RN | RN1 I think Tik Tok cares about my experience | 0.772 | 0.864 | 0.614 |
| RN2 I feel connected to Tik Tok | 0.827 | |||
| RN3 I think Tik Tok is important to me | 0.771 | |||
| RN4 I think Tik Tok makes me feel warm | 0.763 | |||
| RQ | RQ1 I had a delightful experience on Tik Tok | 0.649 | 0.853 | 0.539 |
| RQ2 Tik Tok meets my needs well | 0.790 | |||
| RQ3 Tik Tok provides a good service | 0.852 | |||
| RQ4 The information provided by Tik Tok is trustworthy | 0.650 | |||
| RQ5 Overall, I am satisfied with Tik Tok | 0.709 | |||
| EA | EA1 My feelings for Tik Tok are genuine | 0.672 | 0.836 | 0.565 |
| EA2 I am emotionally connected to Tik Tok | 0.818 | |||
| EA3 I am passionate about using Tik Tok | 0.857 | |||
| EA4 I am emotionally attached to Tik Tok | 0.635 | |||
| AA | AA1 I often worry that people close to me do not understand my needs | 0.701 | 0.915 | 0.731 |
| AA2 I have a lot of concerns about my various relationships | 0.905 | |||
| AA3 As a user, I worry about being abandoned by Tik Tok | 0.941 | |||
| AA4 As a user, I am worried that Tik Tok is not really looking out for me | 0.853 |
AN, autonomy needs; CN, competence needs; RN, relationship needs; EA, emotional attachment; RQ, relationship quality; and AA, attachment anxiety.
The analysis of discriminant validity.
| Parameter | Correlation coefficients | Bias-corrected 95% | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lower | Upper | ||
| AN<-->CN | 0.534 | 0.440 | 0.637 |
| AN<-->RN | 0.352 | 0.229 | 0.468 |
| AN<-->EA | 0.511 | 0.362 | 0.652 |
| AN<-->AA | 0.159 | 0.048 | 0.275 |
| AN<-->RQ | 0.478 | 0.361 | 0.584 |
| CN<-->RN | 0.493 | 0.343 | 0.607 |
| CN<-->EA | 0.520 | 0.396 | 0.626 |
| CN<-->AA | 0.097 | −0.020 | 0.225 |
| CN<-->RQ | 0.518 | 0.385 | 0.630 |
| RN<-->EA | 0.491 | 0.393 | 0.579 |
| RN<-->AA | 0.113 | 0.001 | 0.213 |
| RN<-->RQ | 0.411 | 0.298 | 0.507 |
| EA<-->AA | 0.087 | −0.015 | 0.196 |
| EA<-->RQ | 0.621 | 0.435 | 0.761 |
| RQ<-->AA | 0.010 | −0.100 | 0.119 |
AN, autonomy needs; CN, competence needs; RN, relationship needs; EA, emotional attachment; RQ, relationship quality; and AA, attachment anxiety.
Model fit criteria and the test results.
| Model fit | Criteria | Model fit of research model | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| The small the better | 225.282 | |
| DF | The large the better | 182 | |
| Normed Chi-square( | 1 < | 1.238 | Pass |
| RMSEA | <0.08 | 0.022 | Pass |
| SRMR | <0.08 | 0.069 | Pass |
| TLI (NNFI) | >0.9 | 0.991 | Pass |
| CFI | >0.9 | 0.992 | Pass |
| GFI | >0.9 | 0.962 | Pass |
| AGFI | >0.9 | 0.948 | Pass |
The analysis of regression coefficient.
| Path | Unstd | S.E. | Unstd./S.E. | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.253 | 0.046 | 5.456 | 0.303 | |
| 0.235 | 0.054 | 4.308 | 0.253 | |
| 0.248 | 0.047 | 5.317 | 0.278 | |
| 0.610 | 0.057 | 10.644 | 0.658 |
AN, autonomy needs; CN, competence needs; RN, relationship needs; EA, emotional attachment; and RQ, relationship quality.
The analysis of mediation effect.
| Effect | Point estimate | Product of coefficients | Bootstrap | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bias-corrected 95% | ||||||
| SE | z-value | Lower | Upper | |||
| Total effect: AN→RQ | 0.202 | 0.061 | 3.311 | 0.002 | 0.088 | 0.330 |
| Indirect effect: AN→EA→RQ | 0.095 | 0.045 | 2.111 | 0.003 | 0.028 | 0.198 |
| Direct effect: AN→RQ | 0.107 | 0.075 | 1. 427 | 0.106 | −0.023 | 0.330 |
| Total effect: CN→RQ | 0.251 | 0.077 | 3.260 | 0.005 | 0.076 | 0.386 |
| Indirect effect: CN→EA→RQ | 0.081 | 0.039 | 2.077 | 0.004 | 0.025 | 0.180 |
| Direct effect: CN→RQ | 0.169 | 0.076 | 2.224 | 0.045 | 0.003 | 0.307 |
| Total effect: RN→RQ | 0.144 | 0.057 | 2.893 | 0.005 | 0.040 | 0.268 |
| Indirect effect: RN→EA→RQ | 0.095 | 0.039 | 2.875 | 0.005 | 0.028 | 0.180 |
| Direct effect: RN→RQ | 0.049 | 0.064 | 3.186 | 0.366 | −0.061 | 0.200 |
AN, autonomy needs; CN, competence needs; RN, relationship needs; EA, emotional attachment; and RQ, relationship quality.
The analysis of moderating effect.
| Dependent variable (DV) | Independent variable (IV) | Path coefficient ( | S.E. | z-value |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RQ | EA | 0.514 | 0.058 | 8.816 | 0.000 |
| AA | −0.140 | 0.053 | −2.631 | 0.009 | |
| EA × AA | 0.023 | 0.009 | 2.468 | 0.014 |
RQ, relationship quality; EA, emotional attachment; and AA, attachment anxiety.
Figure 2Attachment anxiety (AA) moderating the relationship between emotional attachment (EA) and relationship quality (RQ).