| Literature DB >> 35529452 |
Zhifeng Zhou1, Long Qian2, Jinping Xu3, Yumin Lu4, Fen Hou5, Jingyi Zhou5, Jinpei Luo5, Gangqiang Hou1, Wentao Jiang1, Hengguo Li5, Xia Liu1.
Abstract
Blindness studies are important models for the comprehension of human brain development and reorganization, after visual deprivation early in life. To investigate the global and local topologic alterations and to identify specific reorganized neural patterns in early-blind adolescents (EBAs), we applied diffusion tensor tractography and graph theory to establish and analyze the white matter connectivity networks in 21 EBAs and 22 age- and sex-matched normal-sighted controls (NSCs). The network profiles were compared between the groups using a linear regression model, and the associations between clinical variables and network profiles were analyzed. Graph theory analysis revealed "small-world" attributes in the structural connection networks of both EBA and NSC cohorts. The EBA cohort exhibited significant lower network density and global and local efficiency, as well as significantly elevated shortest path length, compared to the NSC group. The network efficiencies were markedly reduced in the EBA cohort, with the largest alterations in the default-mode, visual, and limbic areas. Moreover, decreased regional efficiency and increased nodal path length in some visual and default-mode areas were strongly associated with the period of blindness in EBA cohort, suggesting that the function of these areas would gradually weaken in the early-blind brains. Additionally, the differences in hub distribution between the two groups were mainly within the occipital and frontal areas, suggesting that neural reorganization occurred in these brain regions after early visual deprivation during adolescence. This study revealed that the EBA brain structural network undergoes both convergent and divergent topologic reorganizations to circumvent early visual deprivation. Our research will add to the growing knowledge of underlying neural mechanisms that govern brain reorganization and development, under conditions of early visual deprivation.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35529452 PMCID: PMC9072039 DOI: 10.1155/2022/8034757
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neural Plast ISSN: 1687-5443 Impact factor: 3.144
Clinical characteristics of blind participants.
| Subjects | Sex | Age (years) | Onset | Blind duration (months) | Causes of blindness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EBA01 | M | 14 | Age of 3rd month | 170 | ROP |
| EBA02 | M | 16 | Age of 2nd month | 194 | ROP |
| EBA03 | M | 11 | Age of 2nd month | 130 | ROP |
| EBA04 | F | 14 | Age of 1st month | 166 | ROP |
| EBA05 | M | 17 | At birth | 202 | Unknown |
| EBA06 | M | 15 | At birth | 180 | Unknown |
| EBA07 | F | 12 | Age of 3rd month | 144 | ROP |
| EBA08 | F | 16 | Age of 3rd month | 192 | ROP |
| EBA09 | M | 17 | At birth | 203 | CG |
| EBA10 | F | 17 | At birth | 205 | ROP |
| EBA11 | M | 15 | At birth | 180 | ROP |
| EBA12 | M | 18 | At birth | 213 | ROP |
| EBA13 | M | 16 | At birth | 192 | Unknown |
| EBA14 | M | 17 | At birth | 204 | Unknown |
| EBA15 | F | 15 | Age of 2nd month | 152 | ROP |
| EBA16 | F | 17 | Age of 1st month | 196 | ROP |
| EBA17 | M | 15 | Age of 4th month | 175 | ROP |
| EBA18 | M | 15 | At birth | 179 | Unknown |
| EBA19 | F | 11 | Age of 3rd month | 129 | ETE |
| EBA20 | M | 13 | At birth | 159 | Unknown |
| EBA21 | F | 14 | Age of 3rd month | 162 | ROP |
Abbreviations: ROP: retinopathy of prematurity; CG: congenital glaucoma; ETE: eyeball excision for tumor; EBA: early-blind adolescents; M: male; F: female.
Cortical and subcortical regions of interest defined in this study.
| Regions | Abbreviations | Regions | Abbreviations |
|---|---|---|---|
| Precentral gyrus | PreCG | Lingual gyrus | LING |
| Superior frontal gyrus, dorsolateral | SFGdor | Superior occipital gyrus | SOG |
| Superior frontal gyrus, orbital part | ORBsup | Middle occipital gyrus | MOG |
| Middle frontal gyrus | MFG | Inferior occipital gyrus | IOG |
| Middle frontal gyrus, orbital part | ORBmid | Fusiform gyrus | FG |
| Inferior frontal gyrus, opercular part | IFGoperc | Postcentral gyrus | PoCG |
| Inferior frontal gyrus, triangular part | IFGtriang | Superior parietal gyrus | SPG |
| Inferior frontal gyrus, orbital part | ORBinf | Angular gyri | IPL |
| Rolandic operculum | ROL | Supramarginal gyrus | SMG |
| Supplementary motor area | SMA | Angular gyrus | ANG |
| Olfactory cortex | OLF | Precuneus | PCUN |
| Superior frontal gyrus, medial | SFGmed | Paracentral lobule | PCL |
| Superior frontal gyrus, medial orbital | ORBsupmed | Caudate nucleus | CAU |
| Rectus gyrus | REC | Lenticular nucleus, putamen | PUT |
| Insula | INS | Lenticular nucleus, pallidum | PAL |
| Anterior cingulate and paracingulate gyri | ACG | Thalamus | THA |
| Median cingulate and paracingulate gyri | MCG | Heschl gyrus | HES |
| Posterior cingulate gyrus | PCG | Superior temporal gyrus | STG |
| Hippocampus | HIP | Temporal pole: Superior temporal gyrus | TPOsup |
| Parahippocampal gyrus | PHG | Middle temporal gyrus | MTG |
| Amygdala | AMYG | Temporal pole: Middle temporal gyrus | TPOmid |
| Calcarine fissure and surrounding cortex | CAL | Inferior temporal gyrus | ITG |
| Cuneus | CUN |
Demographics and clinical characteristics of all participants.
| Characteristics | EBA | NSC | Statistics |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (mean ± sd) (years) | 14.99 ± 1.97 | 14.60 ± 2.54 | 0.565 | 0.570 |
| Sex (M/F) | 13/8 | 11/11 | 0.617 | 0.432 |
| Blind duration (mean ± sd) (months) | 177.48 ± 24.68 | NA | NA | NA |
Note: Age was reported by participants or guardians at the time of MR imaging. Abbreviations: EBA: early-blind adolescents; NSC: normal-sighted controls; NA: not applicable.
Figure 1Group differences in global network metrics of WM structural networks (a) and the correlation between network Eloc and blind duration in the EBA cohort (b). (a) Bar charts and error bars represent the mean values and standard deviations, respectively (EBA: n = 21; NSC: n = 22). ∗p < 0.05 (Bonferroni corrected); ∗∗p < 0.001 (Bonferroni corrected). (b) Scatterplots show the significantly negative correlation between network Eloc and blind duration in the EBA cohort (n = 21). The fitted values indicate the residuals of original values of Eloc adjusted age and sex and corrected with mean value. Abbreviations: Eg: global efficiency; Eloc: local efficiency; Lp: shortest path length; Cp: clustering coefficient; λ: normalized path length; γ: normalized clustering coefficient; σ: small-world parameters; EBA: early-blind adolescents; NSC: normal-sighted controls.
Brain regions with significant nodal differences between groups.
| Systems | Regions | Abbreviations | Ne | NLp | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |||
| Default-mode | Left posterior cingulate gyrus | PCG.L | -5.10 | <0.001 | 4.71 | <0.001 |
| Right posterior cingulate gyrus | PCG.R | -4.04 | <0.001 | 3.81 | <0.001 | |
| Left precuneus | PCUN.L | -4.61 | <0.001 | 4.19 | <0.001 | |
| Right precuneus | PCUN.R | NA | NA | 3.76 | 0.001 | |
| Visual | Left calcarine | CAL.L | -6.24 | <0.001 | 4.81 | <0.001 |
| Right calcarine | CAL.R | -6.43 | <0.001 | 4.60 | <0.001 | |
| Left cuneus | CUN.L | -6.87 | <0.001 | 6.72 | <0.001 | |
| Right cuneus | CUN.R | -5.95 | <0.001 | 5.33 | <0.001 | |
| Left lingual | LING.L | -4.38 | <0.001 | 4.02 | <0.001 | |
| Right lingual | LING.R | -5.81 | <0.001 | 4.32 | <0.001 | |
| Left superior occipital gyrus | SOG.L | -5.26 | <0.001 | 5.67 | <0.001 | |
| Right superior occipital gyrus | SOG.R | -4.40 | <0.001 | 4.31 | <0.001 | |
| Left inferior occipital gyrus | IOG.L | -3.84 | <0.001 | NA | NA | |
| Right fusiform gyrus | FG.R | NA | NA | 4.45 | <0.001 | |
| Limbic | Left parahippocampal gyrus | PHG.L | -3.82 | <0.001 | 4.20 | <0.001 |
Note: The regions with significant group differences in nodal efficiency (Ne) and nodal shortest path (NLp) at p < 0.05 (Bonferroni-corrected) can be categorized into 3 functional systems. Abbreviations: EBA: early-blind adolescents; NSC: normal-sighted controls; NA: not applicable.
Figure 2Distribution of brain regions with significant intercohort differences in nodal efficiency (Ne) (a) and the correlation with blind duration in the EBA cohort (b). (a) Regions with decreased Ne are represented in different colors: purple for the default-mode system, green for the visual system, and blue for the limbic system. The node sizes indicate the significance of intercohort differences in Ne. (b) Scatterplots show the significantly negative correlation between Ne and blind duration in EBA cohort (n = 21). The fitted values indicate the residuals of original values of Ne adjusted age and sex and corrected with mean value. The abbreviations of nodes can be referred in Table 4.
Figure 3Distribution of brain regions with significantly intercohort differences in nodal shortest path length (NLp) (a) and the correlation with blind duration in EBA cohort (b). (a) Regions with longer NLp are represented in different colors: purple for the default-mode system, green for the visual system, and blue for the limbic system. The node sizes indicate the significance of intercohort difference in NLp. (b) Scatterplots show a significantly positive correlation between NLp and blind duration in EBA cohort (n = 21). The fitted values indicate the residuals of original values of NLp adjusted age and sex and corrected with mean value. The abbreviations of nodes can be referred in Table 4.
Figure 4Hub region distributions (top 13) in the WM structural network in EBA (a) and NSC (b) cohorts. The left panels indicate the 90 brain regions of AAL atlas sorted by mean nodal degree (Nd) in ascending order for each cohort. The right panels show hub distributions of each cohort. The hub nodes are shown in red, and node sizes indicate the significance of intercohort difference in Nd. The abbreviations of brain regions are presented in Table 2.