Literature DB >> 35529415

Two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography in evaluating radiation-induced heart damage.

Tingcui Li1, Hongqing Zhuang2, Yuxia Wang2, Jun Li2, Dan Zhu3, Ming Cui3.   

Abstract

Objective: Radiation-induced heart damage (RIHD) in malignant tumor patients with thoracic radiotherapy has been well documented. However, there is no study on the cardiac toxicity of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) based on two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography (2D STE).
Methods: In a prospective cohort trial, 48 patients with malignant tumor (including patients with lung cancer, pulmonary metastases and other tumor) were assigned to receive thoracic SBRT. Circulating biomarkers, electrocardiogram (ECG), echocardiography, and 2D STE were performed prior to and within two months after thoracic radiotherapy. The primary outcome of the trial was a decrease in global longitudinal strain (GLS) ≥ 10%. The secondary outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Analysis were conducted using paired sample t-test, Wilcoxon signed rank test and Chi square test.
Results: The morbidity of RIHD is 44% within 2 months after SBRT in malignant tumor patients. Compared with pre-RT, a significant decrease in GLS was observed post-RT (-17.98 ​± ​3.54% vs. -16.92 ​± ​3.41%; P ​= ​0.008), without any significant change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (68.54 ​± ​6.06 vs. 69.63 ​± ​4.45; P ​= ​0.234), left ventricular mass (LVM) (P ​= ​0.342), ECG parameters, creatine kinase (P ​= ​0.074), cardiac troponin T (P ​= ​0.829) or N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (P ​= ​0.453) at during the post-RT period. There was no evidence that RIHD was correlated with age (P ​= ​1.000), mean heart dose (P ​= ​0.602), BED (P ​= ​0.234), EQD2/2 (P ​= ​0.615), V5 (P ​= ​0.506), V10 (P ​= ​0.578), V20 (P ​= ​0.670) and V30 (P ​= ​0.741). Subgroup analysis showed, there is still a significant decline of GLS (-18.30 ​± ​3.79% vs. -17.11 ​± ​3.58%; P ​= ​0.018) in patients without anthracycline treatment. And the decrease of GLS (-19.14 ​± ​2.42% vs. -16.85 ​± ​2.46%; P ​= ​0.004) was more significantly post-RT in anthracycline treatment group. MACE were found in one patient over a period of two months after SBRT. Conclusions: By using strain analysis subclinical cardiac dysfunction was found to be evident early after SBRT, despite unchanged conventional indices such as LVEF, ECG parameters or circulating biomarkers. And the decrease of GLS is still existed after the effect of anthracycline was removed. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, registration number: NCT04443400.
© 2022 The Authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiotoxicity; Global longitudinal strain; Radiation-induced heart damage; Radiotherapy; SBRT

Year:  2021        PMID: 35529415      PMCID: PMC9072173          DOI: 10.1016/j.apjon.2021.12.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs        ISSN: 2347-5625


Introduction

Radiotherapy is one of the most important treatment methods for malignant tumors. Although it plays an important role in the treatment of malignant tumors, radiotherapy can cause heart damage, which may partially offset the benefits of radiotherapy for cancer patients. Though it is generally accepted that radiotherapy can cause heart damage, the global understanding of radiation-induced heart damage (RIHD) is still in its early phases. At present, most studies on RIHD are based on retrospective studies of non-Chinese population. And they only focus on the long-term cardiac effects of radiotherapy, and pay little attention to the short-term cardiac damage after radiotherapy. Meanwhile, the long-term damage must be based on a series of structural and functional changes after radiotherapy. Long before the onset of clinically cardiac events, subclinical cardiac changes may occur during the RT, at the completion of the RT, or weeks, months, or first year after the RT, that can be detected as functional dysfunction. Early detection of RIHD may have important clinical significance for cancer patients, especially young cancer patients. Furthermore, it may be essential for the prediction and protection of late RIHD. Previous studies have shown that when the radiation reaches a specific dose, global longitudinal, circumferential, and radial strain as well as strain rate are substantially decreased, which can be detected by 2D STE before the decrease of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and the appearance of clinical symptoms., Therefore, we conducted a prospective cohort study to evaluate the early changes of cardiac structure and function based on circulating biomarkers, electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters, echocardiography, and two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography (2D STE) in malignant tumor patients treated by stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT).

Methods

Trial oversight

This study was an investigator initiated, monocenter, unblinded trial that was conducted at our hospital. The authors assume responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of the data and analysis as well as for the fidelity of the trial. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) was defined as unstable angina, new arrhythmia, acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, valvular heart disease, acute pericarditis, and cardiac death in this study.

Patients

Sixty-five consecutive patients with malignant tumor were prospectively screened, of whom 48 patients were recruited from April 2020 to June 2021 (Figure 1). Inclusion criteria were malignant tumor patients at the age of 18–85 who were treated by transthoracic radiotherapy. Prior radiotherapy, acute coronary syndrome, heart failure (NYHA III-IV), arrhythmia requiring intervention, echocardiographic images that could not be satisfactorily obtained, or significant valvular heart disease (defined as more than mild valvular regurgitation or stenosis) were exclusion criteria. Written informed consent was obtained from all recruited patients. Informed consent was signed by all study participants. Our study was in accordance with all the ethical requirements and followed the reporting guideline for case series.
Figure 1

Enrollment, screening, and follow-up. Details regarding inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria, SBRT, and follow-up strategies are provided in the text. ECG, electrocardiogram; SBRT, stereotactic body radiotherapy; 2D STE, two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography; RT, radiotherapy.

Enrollment, screening, and follow-up. Details regarding inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria, SBRT, and follow-up strategies are provided in the text. ECG, electrocardiogram; SBRT, stereotactic body radiotherapy; 2D STE, two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography; RT, radiotherapy.

Radiotherapy

All patients were treated with SBRT. Before radiotherapy, the chest computed tomography (CT) examination will be carried out to locate the target area. According to the location of CT, the treatment target area is gross tumor volume (GTV) and planned target volume (PTV) is appropriately expanded on the basis of the former target. The treatment plan was made by multiplan 4.6 planning system. After the plan had been made, it was verified first, and then the stereotactic radiotherapy robot was used. According to the treatment plan, the cardiac minimum dose, mean dose, maximum dose, V5, V10, V20 and V30 were registered for each case. To evaluate the effect of radiotherapy dose on heart more accurately, we converted all maximum and mean cardiac doses to the biologically effective doses (BED), assuming an α/β ratio of 3 for the heart, with conversion to an equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions (Eq. D2/2) using the linear quadratic model.7, 8, 9 The BED was calculated using the equation nd[1+d/(α/β)], the EQD2/2 was calculated from the dose–volume histograms as nd[(d+α/β)÷(2+α/β)], n is a number of fractions, d is dose per fraction, and α/β was 3 ​Gy.

Echocardiography and two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography

Echo–Doppler data were obtained using commercially available ultrasonography systems. LVEF was calculated by the modified Simpson or the modified Quinones method. LV mass index was calculated by the Devereux formula and indexed for body surface area. Offline two-dimensional speckle-tracking strain imaging (2D-STI) analysis was performed from stored transthoracic echocardiography images (DICOM) using TomTec (TomTec Imaging Systems GmbH, Unterschleissheim, Germany). Frame rates were at least 30 per second in all patients. In order to assess the LV longitudinal strain by means of 2D-STI, standard 2D gray-scale images of the LV were acquired from conventional, apical 2-, 3-, and 4-chamber views. Global longitudinal strain (GLS) was calculated as the peak strain value from the averaged strain curve generated from 16 segments. Subjects were excluded from the analysis if there were more than three segments judged as unsatisfactory.

Evaluation of cardiac structure and function

We evaluated the electrical activity of the heart by ECG, the cardiac structure (including pericardium, valve, atrioventricular diameter and wall thickness), systolic and diastolic function by echocardiography, the global longitudinal strain at baseline by two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography, and the presence of myocardial damage by cardiac damage markers [including creatine kinase (CK), CKMB, troponin T (cTnT), N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP)].

Follow-up and data analysis

Echocardiography, 2D STE, CK, CK-MB, cTnT, NT-proBNP, electrocardiogram (ECG), and hs-CRP were detected before and after radiotherapy. All the participants were followed within 2 months after their completion of thoracic radiotherapy (post-RT). Continuous variables are presented as mean and standard deviation or median and interquartile range as appropriate, whereas categorical variables are presented as frequency and percent. Paired sample t-test was used to compare continuous variables conforming to normal distribution, Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to compare continuous variables not conforming to normal distribution. Chi square test was used to evaluate the risk factors of RIHD. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS22.0 software. P-value < 0.05 will be considered significant.

Ethics considerations

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Peking University Third Hospital (IRB00006761-M2020074). The trial was conducted in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki (amended at the 64th World Medical Association General Assembly, Fortaleza, Brazil, October 2013).

Results

From April 7, 2020 to June 20, 2021, a total of 48 patients were enrolled at our hospital. The baseline patient demographics and cardiovascular risk factors are presented in Table 1. Among all the enrolled patients, 29 (60.4%) were lung cancer, 17 (35.4%) were pulmonary metastases, and 2 (4.2%) were patients with other malignant tumors receiving transthoracic radiotherapy (one was cardiac metastase and the other was thoracic vertebrae tumor). 20 patients had a history of chemotherapy, of which 13 patients had been treated with anthracyclines. Considering the prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors, 25.0% of the patients had hypertension, 16.7% with diabetes, 16.7% with dyslipidaemia, 12.5% with ischaemic heart disease, 29.2% with a history of smoking, and 4.2% with a family history of ischaemic heart disease of early onset.
Table 1

Characteristics of the patients at baseline.

Parametern (%)
Age, years, median (range)60.5 (18-82)
Male25 (52.1)
Blood pressure (mmHg, mean ± SD)
 Systolic blood pressure128.5 ​± ​12.9
 Diastolic blood pressure75.6 ​± ​10.0
Tumor classification
 Lung cancer29 (60.4)
 Pulmonary metastasis tumor17 (35.4)
 Non-lung tumor2 (4.2)
Tumor localization
 Upper lobe of left lung17 (35.4)
 Lower lobe of left lung7 (14.6)
 Upper lobe of right lung5 (10.4)
 Middle lobe of right lung2 (4.2)
 Lower lobe of right lung4 (8.3)
 Multiple lobes11 (22.9)
 Right atrium1 (2.1)
 7th thoracic vertebra1 (2.1)
Tumor stage
 I9 (18.6)
 II2 (4.2)
 III2 (4.2)
 IV35 (72.9)
Tumor size (mm3)8909.00 (159.00, 538,068.00)
Risk factors of cardiovascular disease
 Hypertension12 (25.0)
 Diabetes8 (16.7)
 Dyslipidaemia8 (16.7)
 IHD6 (12.5)
 Smoking14 (29.2)
 Family history of IHD2 (4.2)
Medication use
 Chemotherapy history20 (41.7)
 Anthracycline13 (27.1)
 Platinum9 (18.8)
 Cyclophosphamide5 (10.4)
 Paclitaxel6 (12.5)
 Beta-blockers2 (4.2)
 ACE-inhibitor/ARB8 (16.7)
 Statins6 (12.5)

IHD, ​ischaemic heart disease; ACE, ​angiotensin-converting enzyme; ARB, ​angiotensin receptor blocker.

Characteristics of the patients at baseline. IHD, ​ischaemic heart disease; ACE, ​angiotensin-converting enzyme; ARB, ​angiotensin receptor blocker. All patients received SBRT. The median prescribed dose was 40 Gy (range, 24–50 Gy) in a median of 3 fractions (range, 1–7). The average minimum, mean and maximum heart doses were 77.08 cGy (1.69–322.18 cGy), 593.24 cGy (37.95–1457.90 cGy), and 2725.35 cGy (111.47–6121.08 cGy) respectively. Converted to EQD2/2, the median cardiac maximum EQD2/2 was 108.00 Gy2/2 (range, 40.00–198.00 Gy2/2). 32 patients (66.7%) had a maximum EQD2/2 ​> ​100 Gy, and 15 (31.3%) had a maximum EQD2/2 ​> ​150 Gy. The median values of V5, V10, V20 and V30 were 50.55% (range, 0–99.1%), 17.35% (range, 0–75.4%), 0.5% (range, 0–25.1%) and 0 (range, 0–19.7%). 21 patients (44%) had a cardiac maximum dose > 30 Gy. Eight patients (17%) had a mean cardiac dose >10 Gy. The median cardiac BED was 180.00 Gy (range, 67.00–330.00 Gy) (Table 2).
Table 2

Radiotherapy data.

ParameterMedianRange
Prescription dose (Gy)4024-50
Fractionation31–7
PTV (mm3)32,104.003931.00–37,0520.00
GTV (mm3)8909.00159.00–538,068.00
Minimum heart dose (cGy)59.451.69–322.18
MHD (cGy)646.1337.95–1457.90
Maximum heart dose (cGy)2275.50111.47–6121.08
V5 (%)50.550–99.1
V10 (%)17.350–75.4
V20 (%)0.500–25.1
V30 (%)00–19.7
BED (Gy)180.0067.00–330.00
EQD2/2 (Gy)108.0040.00–198.00

PTV, planned target volume; GTV, ​gross tumor volume; MHD, ​mean heart dose; V5,V10,V20,V30, ​percentage of volume receiving > 5, > 10, > 20, and > 30 ​Gy, respectively; BED, ​biologically effective doses; EQD2/2, ​equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions.

Radiotherapy data. PTV, planned target volume; GTV, ​gross tumor volume; MHD, ​mean heart dose; V5,V10,V20,V30, ​percentage of volume receiving > 5, > 10, > 20, and > 30 ​Gy, respectively; BED, ​biologically effective doses; EQD2/2, ​equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions. Follow-up data for all outcomes were available through February 20, 2021. No patients were missing from the follow-up to the primary outcome. During the follow-up period after radiotherapy, GLS of 44% (21/48) patients decreased ≥10% from baseline. And a significant decline in GLS from baseline was observed post-RT (−17.98 ​± ​3.54% vs. −16.92 ​± ​3.41%; P ​= ​0.008). Among them, GLS of 32 patients decreased from baseline, two patient's GLS remained unchanged, and 14 patients' GLS improved compared with the pre-RT GLS. And, there was no significant difference in the parameters of circulating serum biomarkers (excluded CKMB), heart rate, left ventricular end systolic volume, left ventricular end diastolic volume, LVEF, Peak E, Peak A, E/A ratio, e’, E/e’ and LAP after SBRT (Table 3). In this study, acute pericarditis and acute heart failure occurred in one patient one month after SBRT. GLS decreased from -20.3% at baseline to -14.3% after two months of SBRT. A 29.6% drop of GLS appeared in this patient.
Table 3

Parameters of circulating biomarkers, echocardiography, and 2D STE.

Mean ​± ​SD (baseline)Mean ​± ​SD (post RT)P
Circulating biomarkers
 CK88.74 ​± ​60.3975.00 ​± ​39.590.074
 CK-MB10.24 ​± ​8.078.00 ​± ​3.940.029
 cTnT0.012 ​± ​0.0090.011 ​± ​0.0080.829
 NT-proBNP153.87 ​± ​272.57192.95 ​± ​387.000.453
 Hs-CRP14.046 ​± ​23.8738.211 ​± ​17.1730.107
 ECG
 Heart rate76.49 ​± ​17.9981.19 ​± ​15.940.085
 P-R intervals149.12 ​± ​35.37154.34 ​± ​17.950.323
 QRS wave87.12 ​± ​10.5387.94 ​± ​19.560.249
 QTC384.96 ​± ​75.13412.61 ​± ​29.770.756
Parameters of ECHO and 2D STE
 LVESV46.17 ​± ​4.1545.63 ​± ​3.860.348
 LVEDV28.23 ​± ​3.2327.59 ​± ​2.720.166
 LVEF68.54 ​± ​6.0669.63 ​± ​4.450.234
 LVM113.03 ​± ​29.38108.80 ​± ​26.320.342
 Peak E0.71 ​± ​0.180.71 ​± ​0.170.834
 Peak A0.78 ​± ​0.180.80 ​± ​0.230.480
 E/A ratio0.96 ​± ​0.320.97 ​± ​0.410.815
 e’11.16 ​± ​2.9210.82 ​± ​3.080.353
 E/e’6.31 ​± ​2.146.09 ​± ​1.540.519
 LAP9.23 ​± ​2.739.00 ​± ​1.910.610
 GLS−17.98 ​± ​3.54−16.92 ​± ​3.410.008

CK, ​creatine kinase; CK-MB, ​creatine kinase isoenzyme; cTnT, ​cardiac troponin T; NT-proBNP, ​N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide; hs-CRP, ​hypersensitive C-reactive protein; LVEF, ​left ventricular ejection fraction; LVM, ​left ventricular mass; GLS, ​global longitudinal strain; 2D STE, two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography.

Parameters of circulating biomarkers, echocardiography, and 2D STE. CK, ​creatine kinase; CK-MB, ​creatine kinase isoenzyme; cTnT, ​cardiac troponin T; NT-proBNP, ​N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide; hs-CRP, ​hypersensitive C-reactive protein; LVEF, ​left ventricular ejection fraction; LVM, ​left ventricular mass; GLS, ​global longitudinal strain; 2D STE, two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography. Subgroup analysis showed that, there is still a significant decline in GLS from baseline was observed after SBRT (−18.30% ​± ​3.79% vs. −17.11% ​± ​3.58%; P ​= ​0.018) in patients without anthracycline treatment. And in anthracycline treatment group, the decrease of GLS (−19.14% ​± ​2.42% vs. −16.85% ​± ​2.46%; P ​= ​0.004) was more significantly post-RT. In this trial, we found that RIHD is not correlated with age (P ​= ​0.575), BED (P ​= ​0.575), EQD2/2 (P ​= ​0.537), and anthracycline therapy history (P ​= ​0.390) (Table 4).
Table 4

Relationship between RIHD and dose, age and beta-blockers.

RIHD, n (%)Non-RIHDn (%)P
Age, years0.575
 < 507 (50.0)7 (50.0)
 ≥ 5014 (41.2)20 (58.8)
BED (Gy)0.575
 < 1507 (50.0)7 (50.0)
 > 15014 (41.2)20 (58.8)
EQD2/2 (Gy)0.537
 < 1008 (50.0)8 (50.0)
 > 10013 (40.6)19 (59.4)
Anthracyclines0.390
 Yes7 (53.8)6 (46.2)
 No14 (40.0)21(60.0)

RIHD, radiation-induced heart damage; BED, biologically effective doses; EQD2/2, equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions.

Relationship between RIHD and dose, age and beta-blockers. RIHD, radiation-induced heart damage; BED, biologically effective doses; EQD2/2, equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions. The GLS of a 72-year old female who had lung cancer was −14.27% before SBRT. Then she received SBRT of which the prescribed dose was 45 Gy in 3 fractions. The average cardiac minimum dose, mean dose, maximum dose, BED, and EQD2/2 were 0.27 Gy, 2.21 Gy, 9.20 ​Gy, 270 Gy, and 162 Gy, respectively. Her GLS dropped 30.2% to −10.61% after the SBRT (Figure 2).
Figure 2

Strains analysis and SBRT data. A: Representation of regional myocardial damage in a lung cancer patient with 4-chamber, 2-chamber, and 3-chamber longitudinal strain curves and segmental (bull's eye) model of GLS pre-RT; B: Representation of SBRT plan; C: Representation of regional myocardial damage in the same patient with 4-chamber, 2-chamber, and 3-chamber longitudinal strain curves and segmental (bull's eye) model of GLS post-RT. RT, radiotherapy; SBRT, stereotactic body radiotherapy; GLS, global longitudinal strain.

Strains analysis and SBRT data. A: Representation of regional myocardial damage in a lung cancer patient with 4-chamber, 2-chamber, and 3-chamber longitudinal strain curves and segmental (bull's eye) model of GLS pre-RT; B: Representation of SBRT plan; C: Representation of regional myocardial damage in the same patient with 4-chamber, 2-chamber, and 3-chamber longitudinal strain curves and segmental (bull's eye) model of GLS post-RT. RT, radiotherapy; SBRT, stereotactic body radiotherapy; GLS, global longitudinal strain.

Discussion

In this single-center study of malignant tumor patients treated by radiotherapy, we used echocardiography, 2D STE, circulating biomarkers and ECG to evaluate early subclinical heart changes induced by radiation. And we have demonstrated two important findings with respect to two-month cardiotoxicity following SBRT in malignant tumor patients. Firstly, nearly half of the patients had RIHD within two months after SBRT. Secondly, GLS decreased significantly after SBRT, however, no significant changes were found in circulating serum biomarkers (excluded CKMB), ECG, LVEF, LVM, peak E, peak A, E/A ratio, e’, E/e’, and LAP compared with their pre-RT levels. Subgroup analysis showed that the change still existed after the effect of anthracycline was removed. We reported that RIHD appeared in about half of the patients within two months after SBRT for the first time. In accordance with the existing studies, we found the changes of GLS appeared earlier than that of LVEF, CK, cTnT, NT-proBNP, and ECG parameters. GLS is a reliable tool of early detection for radiation-induced heart damage. Myocardial strain analysis uses the principle of reflection and scattering when the sound beam meets the myocardial tissue interface. By continuously tracking the movement track of the acoustic spots in the myocardium, we can quantitatively analyze the myocardial movement displacement, velocity, strain, strain rate, and heart rotation angle. It has no angle dependence, and can accurately reflect the myocardial movement. It is an effective method to evaluate regional myocardial function., A 10% decrease of GLS can be used for the early detection of the subclinical heart damage. Radiation can cause RIHD in many ways, such as oxidative stress, mitochondrial damage, microvascular endothelial damage and atherosclerosis, leading to myocardial ischemia and energy metabolism disorders. Radiation can lead to mitochondrial dysfunction and affect the activity of mitochondrial electron transport chain complex, resulting in excessive production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and cardiomyocyte apoptosis. Excessive production of ROS and other free radicals can mediate the epigenetic changes of fibroblasts through targeting DNA methylation, histone methylation and acetylation, thus inducing fibroblasts to differentiate into myofibroblasts. Studies have shown that after radiation exposure, the levels of inflammatory factors and pro-fibrotic factors [such as interleukin (IL)-1, IL-6, IL-8, platelet-derived growth factor, insulin-like growth factor and transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β), etc.] are increased to promote the formation of ROS and then lead to inflammatory reaction, in which TGF-β1 plays an important role in radiation-induced cardiac fibrosis.16, 17, 18 Radiation can cause the swelling and apoptosis of vascular endothelial cells, induce the secretion of inflammatory chemokines, and lead to the degradation of endothelial basement membrane. In animal experiments, the microvessel density of mouse heart tissue decreased significantly after irradiation. It is suggested that radiation can cause vascular endothelial cell damage and myocardial fibrosis, eventually leading to the change of cardiac structure and cardiac dysfunction. In addition, radiation can also lead to the dysfunction of calcium regulation in endoplasmic reticulum, affecting cardiac systolic and diastolic function. Studies have shown that the level of atherosclerosis in the anterior descending branch of patients with left breast cancer after radiotherapy is significantly higher than that of other blood vessels, suggesting that radiation can promote the occurrence of atherosclerosis, which may be related to microvascular endothelial damage caused by radiation. Myocardial damage and/or fibrosis induced by radiation may be the mechanism of GLS decrease. A prospective study, included 81 chemotherapy-naïve early-stage breast cancer patients, demonstrated the decline of GLS after radiation in the three-year follow-up examination. This short-term decrease in GLS is perhaps related to long-term RIHD. We found that there was statistical difference in CKMB levels before and after SBRT. CKMB level before SBRT was higher than that after SBRT. In some patients, CKMB was higher than the normal range, while cTnT was within the normal range. Therefore, we did not consider that the increase of CKMB was caused by myocardial damage. This may be related to the detection methods. For the determination of CKMB, the immunoinhibition method is utilized most commonly. However, the estimated CKMB activity may be influenced by the presence of creatine kinase isoenzymes in some conditions like cancer. This abnormality could be explained by the unexpected appearance of CK-BB (brain type) or macro-CK, the complex composed of CKBB and immunoglobulin (type 1) or another creatine kinase isoenzymes derived from mitochondria (type 2). Earlier case reports had described that false increase of CKMB, even higher than whole creatine kinase, was observed in the sera of patients with neoplasms but not myocardial infarction., LVEF and circulating serum biomarkers may not change before the serious damage of cardiac structure. In the stage of subclinical heart damage, left ventricular structure will not change significantly, and serious myocardial cells damage may not occur. Studies have shown that troponin T is rarely abnormal in the early stage of most radiation-induced heart diseases. Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) is mainly synthesized and secreted by ventricular muscle cells. Its secretion is affected by ventricular wall tension. Nellessen et al. found elevated levels of BNP after radiotherapy, but the outcomes were not characterized as clinically significant. However, D'Errico et al. clearly demonstrated increased levels of NT-proBNP in left-sided breast cancer patients within 5–22 months after radiotherapy. Palumbo I et al. reported that BNP increased significantly (P ​< ​0.001), particularly within 1–6 months after radiotherapy. It slightly decreased after 12 months. However, we did not find the change of NT-proBNP after radiation in this study. This may be affected by the type of tumor, the method of treatment, the dose received by the ventricle and other factors. Therefore, more large-scale studies are needed to evaluate the value of NT-proBNP in the early detection of radiation-induced heart damage. In this study, we did not find the correlation between RIHD and age, radiation dose, and chemotherapy history before SBRT, which is different from previous research results.31, 32, 33, 34 The small sample size, the location of radiotherapy, the left ventricular dose, the types of cancer, and the race may affect our conclusion in this study. More large-scale studies are needed to further clarify the possible risk factors of RIHD. In the stage of subclinical cardiac damage, LVEF and serum markers may not change. This further highlights the advantages of GLS as an early detection index of radiation-induced heart damage. As far as we know, this is the first prospective study from China to research the early stage of RIHD. In this study, the follow-up time frame after radiotherapy was controlled within two months, which reduced the impact of other unknown factors on the results effectively. All the patients were treated with SBRT in this study. Compared with traditional radiotherapy, SBRT has the advantages of high effective rate and less damage to non-tumor tissues. However, there is no report on cardiac damage after SBRT. Furthermore, this study explored the changes of short-term myocardial strain after radiotherapy, and go a step further in clarifying the cardiotoxicity of radiotherapy in the early stage.

Limitations

There are some limitations to this study. First, the sample size was small, which might represent a beta error. Second, as the follow-up time frame in this study was limited to two months, subclinical and clinical cardiac changes may not occur during this period in some participants. A more larger study over a longer follow up time period would be required to validate our current observations and to determine its impact on long-term adverse outcomes.

Conclusions

This study found that by using strain analysis subclinical cardiac dysfunction was found to be evident early after SBRT, despite unchanged conventional indices such as LVEF, ECG parameters, or circulating biomarkers. And the decrease of GLS is still existed after the effect of anthracycline was removed.
  33 in total

Review 1.  The simultaneous boost technique: the concept of relative normalized total dose.

Authors:  J V Lebesque; R B Keus
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 6.280

2.  Persistent reduction in global longitudinal strain in the longer term after radiation therapy in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Siddharth J Trivedi; Preeti Choudhary; Queenie Lo; Hari Prakash Sritharan; Arvind Iyer; Vikneswary Batumalai; Geoff P Delaney; Liza Thomas
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 6.280

3.  Risk of cardiac death after adjuvant radiotherapy for breast cancer.

Authors:  Sharon H Giordano; Yong-Fang Kuo; Jean L Freeman; Thomas A Buchholz; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; James S Goodwin
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2005-03-16       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Mortality from myocardial infarction after adjuvant radiotherapy for breast cancer in the surveillance, epidemiology, and end-results cancer registries.

Authors:  L F Paszat; W J Mackillop; P A Groome; C Boyd; K Schulze; E Holowaty
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Atorvastatin Ameliorates Radiation-Induced Cardiac Fibrosis in Rats.

Authors:  KunYi Zhang; XuYu He; Yingling Zhou; Lijuan Gao; Zhengyu Qi; Jiyan Chen; Xiuren Gao
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 2.841

Review 6.  Canadian Cardiovascular Society Guidelines for Evaluation and Management of Cardiovascular Complications of Cancer Therapy.

Authors:  Sean A Virani; Susan Dent; Christine Brezden-Masley; Brian Clarke; Margot K Davis; Davinder S Jassal; Christopher Johnson; Julie Lemieux; Ian Paterson; Igal A Sebag; Christine Simmons; Jeffrey Sulpher; Kishore Thain; Paaldinesh Thavendiranathan; Jason R Wentzell; Nola Wurtele; Marc André Côté; Nowell M Fine; Haissam Haddad; Bradley D Hayley; Sean Hopkins; Anil A Joy; Daniel Rayson; Ellamae Stadnick; Lynn Straatman
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 5.223

Review 7.  Targeting of cellular redox metabolism for mitigation of radiation injury.

Authors:  Bagher Farhood; Milad Ashrafizadeh; Ehsan Khodamoradi; Mojtaba Hoseini-Ghahfarokhi; Shima Afrashi; Ahmed Eleojo Musa; Masoud Najafi
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 5.037

8.  Effects of radiation on the expression of adhesion molecules and cytokines in a static model of human dermal microvascular endothelial cells.

Authors:  F Haubner; E Ohmann; F Pohl; L Prantl; J Strutz; H G Gassner
Journal:  Clin Hemorheol Microcirc       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.375

9.  Troponin T-release associates with cardiac radiation doses during adjuvant left-sided breast cancer radiotherapy.

Authors:  Tanja Skyttä; Suvi Tuohinen; Eeva Boman; Vesa Virtanen; Pekka Raatikainen; Pirkko-Liisa Kellokumpu-Lehtinen
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 3.481

10.  The relationship between radiation doses to coronary arteries and location of coronary stenosis requiring intervention in breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Anna-Karin Wennstig; Hans Garmo; Ulf Isacsson; Giovanna Gagliardi; Niina Rintelä; Bo Lagerqvist; Lars Holmberg; Carl Blomqvist; Malin Sund; Greger Nilsson
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 3.481

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.